35
Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display

Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display

Page 2: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Process of data capture

• All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to produce a radiographic image

• Each system analog (film/screen) versus digital (CR and DDR) records photon intensity and displays the data.– Differences in photon density become

radiographic contrast

Page 3: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Radiographic Contrast

• Radiographic contrast is dependent on subject contrast and technical factors– Subject contrast is basically fixed for each patient.

Within certain body/organ systems we can alter subject contrast by introducing contrast media.

• Some technical factors include;– kVp– Grid ratio– Screen speed– Processor temperature

• Altering technical factors can improve or degrade radiographic contrast.

Page 4: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Film• Films produce an analog image

that allows edges to gradually blend into one another. This is how we see images normally. Conversely, digital images are broken up into pixels (tiny squares). Because the image consists of pixels there is an inherent loss of spatial resolution when compared to analog film.

– 2.5 – 5 lp/mm versus 10 lp/mm

Page 5: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Computed Radiography

• Photostimulable plate (PSP)– Barium-fluorohalide doped with europium

• When the PSP is struck by a photon electrons are released in the crystal lattice and stored in F centers within the lattice

• In the CR reader, a helium-neon laser (red light) stimulates the crystals of the PSP. Once stimulated the crystals emit blue-violet light.

Page 6: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to
Page 7: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

• The amount of light emitted is proportional to the amount of radiation absorbed by the PSP.

• The emitted light is read by a photomultiplier tube within the CR reader producing an electronic signal. The electronic signal is then fed through an analog-to-digital converter (ADC usually 12 bit) producing a digital signal.

• Essentially, the PSP is a OSL radiation monitor

Page 8: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

ADC

• While converting the analog signal to a digital the ADC also breaks the pieces or squares that represent pixels in the final image.

Page 9: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Digital Radiography (DR)

• Direct DR– X-ray photons are absorbed by the DR plate.

The active ingredient is usually amorphous selenium. The a-Se is ionized by the photons and the released electrons are stored in the TFT (thin film transistor) array. The TFT consists of multitude of individual elements that represent the pixels of the final image

Page 10: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Direct TFT

Page 11: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

• Indirect DR– Similar to direct DR but x-ray photons are

converted to light photons (cesium iodide) and then pass through a photo-multiplier tube coupled with amorphous silicon.

• Cesium iodide crystals resemble needles in appearance resulting in very little light spread and high spatial resolution.

Page 12: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Indirect DR w/CCD

Page 13: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Indirect DR w/CMOS

Page 14: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Indirect DR

Deterioration of image quality due to light diffusion

Page 15: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to
Page 16: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Device Active Ingredient Grayscale/

dynamic range

Processor

Film/

Screen

Phosphorescent screens and silver halide film emulsion

1000 Wet or dry chemical action

CR Barium fluorobromide doped with europium

14 bit

16000

Helium-neon red laser stimulates the PSP to emit light

Direct DR Amorphous selenium 14 to 16 bit 16000 - 65000 shades of gray

Indirect DR Cesium iodide scintillator coupled with amorphous silicon

14 to 16 bit 16000 - 65000 shades of gray

Page 17: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Film/screen

• Optical density ranges from 0 to 3– This represents a range of 3 orders of

magnitude or 1000.– View boxes can only display 30 shades of

gray

• Film/screen grayscale is 1000

Page 18: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

CR

• Four orders of magnitude are possible– 10000 shades of gray

• CT and MR– 12 bit or 4096

• CR and DR– 14 bit or 16384

• Digital Mammography– 16 bit or 65536 shades of gray

Page 19: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Contrast Resolution

• Principal descriptor– Grayscale– Dynamic range

Page 20: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Window level

• Window and leveling of the digital image allows us to see the entire grayscale of the digital image. Even though the eye is limited to 30 shades of gray by manipulating the window width and level we can determine where the 30 shades occur.

• We determine the center point of the 30 shades, level, and the width is how many grays will be displayed.

Page 21: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Window Width and Level

Page 22: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Processing the Image

• Image pre-processing– Find the pertinent image (histogram)– Scale data to appropriate range

• Contrast enhancement– Anatomy specific gray scale manipulation

• Spatial frequency enhancement

Page 23: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Raw Image

• Inherent subject contrast displayed

• Contrast inverted• PSL signal amplitude

log amplified

Page 24: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to
Page 25: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to
Page 26: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Scaled and inverted:Unprocessed image

Preprocessed raw image

Page 27: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Contrast Enhancement

• Optimize image contrast via non-linear transformation curves

• Unprocessed images have linear ‘subject contrast’ – Gradiation processing – Fuji– Tone scaling – Kodak– MUSICA - Agfa

Page 28: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Contrast Enhancement

Page 29: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Contrast enhancedScaled and inverted:Unprocessed image

Page 30: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to
Page 31: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to
Page 32: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

• CsI crystals

Page 33: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Spatial Resolution and Monitor Performance

• In the analog environment, spatial resolution is a affected by SID, OID, RSV, FFS, and type of film to name a few.

• In the digital domain, the viewing monitor also affects spatial resolution as well as contrast resolution or dynamic range.

Page 34: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Monitor Factors Affecting Image Quality

• Monitor brightness– The brighter the monitor the better the image

quality

• Color v/ B & W– For CR and DR color monitors do not offer

enough dynamic range

• Matrix size– Most PC monitors are 1024 x 1280 or 1200 x

1600. These will allow you to view CT and MR at resolution.

Page 35: Comparison of Film v. Digital Image Display. Process of data capture All image recording systems rely on differential absorption within the patient to

Diagnostic Monitors

• Matrix size– 2048 x 2560 at minimum

• Black and white not color

• Brightness– 600 cd/m2 v 300 cd/m2