52
Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options Presented to the Hydrogen Technical Advisory Committee Washington, DC NREL Offices November 15, 2012 by C. E. (Sandy) Thomas, Ph.D., Clean Energy Consultant former-President H 2 Gen Innovations, Inc. (ret.) Alexandria, Virginia www.CleanCarOptions.com

Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Comparison of Electrical Energy

Storage Options

Presented to the Hydrogen Technical Advisory Committee

Washington, DC NREL Offices November 15, 2012

by C. E. (Sandy) Thomas, Ph.D.,

Clean Energy Consultant former-President H2Gen Innovations, Inc. (ret.)

Alexandria, Virginia

www.CleanCarOptions.com

Page 2: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Intermittent Renewable Electricity Sources Require

Storage at times due to • Limited Electric transmission capability • Insufficient electrical loads • To reduce the environmental impact of

burning fossil fuels (Mainly natural gas) to firm intermittent renewable sources

2

Page 3: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Electrical Energy Storage Options include

• Pumped Hydro (not considered here) • Batteries • Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) • Hydrogen storage

3

Page 4: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Hydrogen Storage System

4

-

electricity to the grid-

H2

-

H2 ElectricityGENERATOR to the customer

NG CT

STORAGE SystemFuel Cell

Wind or PVELECTROLYZER

COMPRESSORH2 &

FUELINGHydrogenEXTERNAL

Page 5: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

NREL Underground H2 Storage Costs

5

Source :Darlene Steward, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Page 6: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Above Ground H2 Storage Costs

6 H2 Storage Tank Costs.XLS; I85 10/12 /2

$-

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

ASME (2,220 - 8,500 psi)

Composite (3,600 psi)

Propane (266 psi)

DOT (2160 psi)

Used Propane (266 psi)

Kg of Hydrogen Storage

Storage Tank Cost($/kg of useable hydrogen)

Note: composite tank costs/kg reflect multiple tanks, not larger tanks

2 tanks

3 tanks

Page 7: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Low High Low High Low HighAdv PbA 950 1590 425 475 90% 85%Zn /Br 1450 1750 290 350 60% 60%Fe/Cr 1800 1900 360 380 75% 75%Zn/Air 1440 1700 290 340 75% 75%NaS 3100 3300 520 550 75% 75%CAES-Above 800 900 200 240 90% 90%CAES-below 640 730 1 2 90% 90%Li-Ion 1085 1550 900 1700 92% 87%

$/kW $/kWh Efficiency

Battery Cost Data for 50- to 100- MW storage systems*

7

From EPRI: D. Rastler, “Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options” a white paper primer on applications, costs & benefits, Electric Power Research Institute, 1020676 (2010); Li-Ion data are for energy storage for Utility T&D support applications (EPRI estimates for Li-ion for megawatt-scale for ISO fast response and renewables integration are even higher at $4,340/kWh to $6,200/kWh.)

EPRI paper shows that Zn/Air may be

the lowest cost option in the long-run

Although Zn/Air is in the R&D stage and is

not commercially available

Page 8: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Hydrogen/FC System cost & Efficiency assumptions

8

Near- term medium-term Long-termElectrolyzer HHV efficiency* 79.3% 81.7% 87.7%Electrolyzer Capex** $1500 /kW $1000 /kW $380 /kWCompressor efficiency 92% 92% 92%Compressor Capex ($/kg/day) 232 232 232FC HHV efficiency 39.7% 44.8% 49.0%FC capex*** $1000 /kW $750 /kW $500 /kWH2 (above ground) tank capex $807 /kg $760 /kg $700 /kgH2 Dispenser Capex 75,000$ 60,259$ 50,216$ * Norsk Hydro 50.7 kWh/kg = 77.7% HHV eff.; Giner/ProtonOnsite: 88.9%

** NREL Independent Panel Review; (BK-6A1-46676; Sept 2009)

***DOE Targets: $750/kW (2008); $650/kW (2012); $550/kW(2015); $450/kW (2020)HTAC ERWG simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12 -25MW).XLS, WS Assumptions D15;10/12/

Page 9: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

O&M and Replacement cost Assumptions

9

Replacement Interval

Fraction Replaced

Annual O&M

(Years) (% of Capex)

Electrolyzer 7 25% 2.18%Compressor 10 100% 2.50%Storage System 0.02%Fuel Cell System 15 30% 2.00%Dispenser System 0.90%

HTAC simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12--25MW).XLS, WS 'O&M' D-13;11/11

Replacement Costs

Page 10: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Cost of Stored Electricity for one day’s storage

(below-ground hydrogen storage)

10 Wind energy purchased at 5.4 cents/kWh; Natural Gas at $7/MBTU (needed for CAES systems)

ctricity; one-day storage

HTAC simple model EPRI(Rev10-9-12-25MW).XLS, WS 'DashBoard' AM-315;11/11

61.9 43.1

31.5 33.6

20.9 39.2

34.2 32.4

27.4 47.9

56.2

37.0 22.1

45.7 39.7

33.9 31.0

50.3

0 20 40 60 80

H2 Storage -Near-TermH2 Storage- Medium-Term

H2 Storage- Long-TermCAES-AboveCAES-Below

Adv PbAZn /BrFe/Cr

Zn/AirNaS

Li-ion

High

Low

Electricity cost from storage (cents/kWh)

Below-ground storage

Zn/air is representative of a projected lowest cost

Battery storage system

Page 11: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

11

Cost of Stored Electricity for one day’s storage (Above-ground hydrogen storage)

Natural Gas at $7/MBTU (needed for CAES systems)

Page 12: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Wind Spectral Data (Peaks at one day; four days & one year)

12

Source: Green Rhino Energy http://www.greenrhinoenergy.com/renewable/wind/wind_characteristics.php

Page 13: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Seasonal Wind Energy production in Lake Benton, Minnesota- (104 MW)

13 Source: Y. H. Wan, “Long-term Wind Power Variability”, Report # NREL/TP-5500-53637, January 2012

Winter average energy is 1.64 times average Summer Energy

Page 14: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

14

Seasonal Wind Energy production in Blue Canyon, Oklahoma- (75 MW)

Winter average energy is 2 times average Summer Energy

Source: Y. H. Wan, “Long-term Wind Power Variability”, Report # NREL/TP-5500-53637, January 2012

Page 15: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

15

Seasonal Wind Energy production in Storm Lake, Iowa- (113 MW)

Winter average energy is 2.4 times average Summer Energy

Source: Y. H. Wan, “Long-term Wind Power Variability”, Report # NREL/TP-5500-53637, January 2012

Page 16: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Industrial Natural Gas Prices

16 Story Economics.XLS; Tab 'AEO 2012 Fuel costs'; - 40 10/5 /2012

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041

Natural Gas Industrial Prices($/MBTU)

AEO-2012 Ind. NG price projections

Historical NG Industrial prices

Monthly NG Prices

Annual Prices &

AEO projections

Page 17: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

CAES cost depends on Natural Gas cost

17

HTAC simple model EPRI (REV 7-5-12-Energy only).XLS, WS 'DashBoard' AH-410;11/11

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 20 40 60

Storage Time (Days)

Cost of stored electricity(cents/kWh)

Zn /Air-Low

CAES-$7/MBTU NG

CAES-$5/MBTU NG

H2-Near-Term

H2-Medium-TermH2-Long-Term

CAES-$4/MBTU NG

CAES-$3/MBTU NG

Page 18: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Acknowledgments • HTAC Enabling Renewables

Subcommittee members*: • Frank Novachek, Chairman-Xcel Energy • Darlene Steward-NREL • Charlie Freese-GM • Daryl Wilson-Hydrogenics • Rob Friedland- Proton Onsite • Robert Shaw – Arête • Todd Ramsden-NREL • George Sverdrup- NREL (ret.) • Fred Joseck- DOE EERE

18

• Hal Koyama – Idatech • Levi Thompson -U. of Michigan • Jason Marcinkoski- DOE EERE • Peter Bond – Brookhaven Nat’l

Lab • Maurice Kaya – Hawaii Renewable

Energy Development Venture

*While subcommittee members contributed to much of the information is this presentation, they have not endorsed the conclusions presented here, which are the sole responsibility of the author.

Disclaimer: EPRI has neither reviewed nor endorsed the conclusions of this presentation.

Page 19: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Storage Volume Required

19

Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie Freese (GM) : “GM Powertrain Strategy- Electrification of the Vehicle” Hydrogen conference, April 1, 2009

Page 20: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

20 Used with permission

Page 21: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

21 Used with permission

Page 22: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

22 Used with permission

Page 23: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

23 Used with permission

Page 24: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Storage Potential

• Storage Energy Potential from: • Pumped hydro – 8,000 MWh • CAES- 4,000 MWh • Hydrogen – 600,000 MWh

24

H2 = 75X

H2 = 150X

Page 25: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Future Advanced SOFC Systems

25

Page 26: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Capex projections

• FC capex projections: – $1,000/kW near-term – $750/kW mid-term – $500/kW long-term

26

Page 27: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Future SOFC Systems

• SA* Estimate: $700/kW • HTAC subcommittee: $500/kW • SECA** Goal: $400/kW • ERCN*** Estimate: $150/kW

27

*SA = Strategic Analysis (Brian James et al. formerly from DTI); **SECA = Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance; ***ERCN = Energy Research Center of the Netherlands

Page 28: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Long-Term SOFC Production Cost Estimate*

28

R. Rivera-Tinoco, K. Schoots & B.C.C. van der Zwaan, Learning Curves for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (Energy Research Center of the Netherlands.), Figure 4; available at: http://www.energy.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/Learning%20Curves%20for%20Solid%20Oxide%20Fuel%20Cells.pdf *(cost based on SOFC data from HC Starck, Topsoe & Versa)

Page 29: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Cost to Price Markup

• Labor – 20% of cost – 25% G&A – 40% OH – 15% profit

• Material – 80% of cost – 20% G&A – 15% Profit

29

Labor Markup: 0.2 x 1.25 x1.4 x1.15 =1.1

Material Markup: 0.8 x 1.2 x1.15 =0.4

Total markup = 1.1 +0.4 =1.5 SOFC Price: $100/kW x 1.5 = $150/kW

Page 30: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Long-Term Electrolyzer Price

• Construction Cost: $213/kW* • Electrolyzer Price: $213 x 1.5 =

$320/kW

30

*Genovese, K. Harg, M. Paster, & J. Turner, Current (2009) State-of-the-Art Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Water Electrolysis, NREL/BK-6A1-46676, September 2009

Long-Term Hydrogen Assumptions Base Case SOFC-Low SOFC-HighFC Capex $500 /kW $150 /kW $700 /kWFC HHV Efficiency 49.0% 55.0% 55.0%Electrolyzer HHV Efficiency 87.7% 87.7% 87.7%Electrolyzer Capex $380 /kW $320 /kW $320 /kW

HTAC simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12 -25MW).XLS, WS Assumptions D47;11/11

Page 31: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Additional Revenue to Storage system operator

(CHHP) • Hydrogen Fuel (1530 kg/day* sold at a same

price per mile as gasoline at $3.81/gallon untaxed with 50/50 split of HEVs and ICVs)

• Displacement of natural gas heating @ $6.30/MBTU using SOFC waste heat (30% heat recovery)

[Total efficiency = 30% + 55% = 85%]

31

* Assumes 13,000 miles/yr; 68.3 miles/kg; 300 cars/day; & 8 days average time between fill-ups.

Page 32: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Long-Term Stored Electricity Prices to Yield 10% ROI

(for one day’s storage time)

32

HTAC simple modelEPRI (Rev 10-9-12-25 MW).XLS, WS H2 Value T-46;11/11

25.0

21.1

16.2

12.4

22.8

18.9

14.1

10.2

21.7

17.8

13.0

9.1

19.0

15.1

10.2

6.4

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

No Extra Revenue NG heating revenueonly

H2 Revenue only H2 & NG revenue

SA Estimate = $700/kW

Long-Term H2=$500/kW

SECA Goal=$400/kW

ERCN=$150/kW

Stored Electricity Costs for Long-Term Hydrogen Cases (cents/kWh)-ONE DAY'S STORAGE

SA = Strategic Analysis (Brian James et al. formerly from DTI); SECA = Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance; ERCN = Energy Research Center of the Netherlands

Page 33: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Long-Term Stored Electricity Prices to Yield 10% ROI

(for six month’s storage time)

33 HTAC simple modelEPRI (Rev 10-9-12-25 MW).XLS, WS H2 Value AA-46;11/11

27.1

23.2

18.2

14.3

24.9

21.0

16.0

12.2

23.8

20.0

14.9

11.1

21.1

17.2

12.2

8.4

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

No Extra Revenue NG heatingrevenue only

H2 Revenue only H2 & NG revenue

SA Estimate = $700/kW

Long-Term H2=$500/kW

SECA Goal=$400/kW

ERCN=$150/kW

Stored Electricity Costs for Long-Term Hydrogen Cases (cents/kWh)-SIX MONTH'S STORAGE

SA = Strategic Analysis (Brian James et al. formerly from DTI); SECA = Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance; ERCN = Energy Research Center of the Netherlands

Page 34: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Electricity Costs for SIX MONTH’S (SEASONAL) STORAGE

(without the $150/kW option)

34

Page 35: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Summary of stored Electricity Prices for one day’s storage

35 SOFC systems include H2 Revenue and NG Heating credits; Low cost estimates only for battery & CAES systems

HTAC simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12-25MW).XLS, WS 'Dashboard' AW-323;3/19/2

61.9 c/kWh43.1 c/kWh

31.5 c/kWh12.4 c/kWh

10.189346779.1 c/kWh

33.6 c/kWh20.9 c/kWh

39.7 c/kWh34.8 c/kWh

33.0 c/kWh27.9 c/kWh

48.7 c/kWh

0 20 40 60 80

H2 Storage -Near-TermH2 Storage- Medium-Term

H2 Storage- Long-TermH2 -Long-Term (SA=$700/kW)+ H2 Rev

H2 Storage-Long-Term + H2 RevH2 - Long-term(SECA= $400/kW)+H2Rev

CAES-AboveCAES-Below

Adv PbAZn /BrFe/Cr

Zn/AirNaS

One Day Storage

Stored Electricity Price (cents/kWh)

Page 36: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

HTAC simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12-25MW).XLS, WS 'Dashboard' BC-323;3/19/2

63.0 c/kWh44.1 c/kWh32.5 c/kWh

11.0 c/kWh10.1893467713.2 c/kWh

847.5 c/kWh185.2 c/kWh

803.2 c/kWh796.1 c/kWh

642.5 c/kWh

0 200 400 600 800 1000

H2 Storage -Near-TermH2 Storage- Medium-Term

H2 Storage- Long-TermH2 -Long-Term (SA=$700/kW)+…

H2 Storage-Long-Term + H2 RevH2 - Long-term(SECA=…

CAES-AboveCAES-Below

Adv PbAZn /BrFe/Cr

Zn/AirNaS

Two Months Storage

Stored Electricity Price

36

Summary of stored Electricity Prices for Two Month’s underground storage

SOFC systems include H2 Revenue and NG Heating credits

Even Near-term hydrogen storage

is 3 times less expensive than

underground CAES

Page 37: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

37

Summary of stored Electricity Prices for Six Month’s (Seasonal) underground storage

SOFC systems include H2 Revenue and NG Heating credits

Page 38: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Conclusions

• Energy Storage may be needed to enable significant renewable electricity market penetration

• Storage will be required to avoid the negative environmental impact* of natural gas (or Coal) “firming” of intermittent renewables

38

*Even natural gas turbines used to “firm” intermittent renewables may increase greenhouse gas emissions and local air pollution compared to running those turbines 100% of the time without any renewables.

Page 39: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Conclusions (cont.) • Hydrogen Storage is economic for one-

day storage at 9.1 to 12.4 cents/kWh. • For two month’s storage, even near-term

hydrogen storage is 3 times less expensive than the next lowest option: CAES

• For Seasonal (6-months) storage, hydrogen is the only viable option at 11.1 to 14.3 cents/kWh – [no other option is less than $1/kWh]

39

Page 40: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

40

Thank You • Contact Information:

C.E. (Sandy) Thomas, former-President (ret.) H2Gen Innovations, Inc. Alexandria, Virginia 22304 703-507/8149 [email protected] – Simulation details at: – http://www.cleancaroptions.com

Page 41: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Back-Up Slides

41

Page 42: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Financial Assumptions

• Storage system owner purchases wind energy at 5.4 cents/kWh (with 10% free to represent stranded wind)

• Owner charges enough for peak electricity to make a 10% real, after-tax ROI.

42

Page 43: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Other Financial Assumptions

43

Inflation rate 1.9%Marginal income tax rate 38.9%Real, after-tax Rate of return required 10%Depreciation schedule Declining balanceAnnual capital recovery factor 11.79%Taxes & Insurance 2%

HTAC simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12--25MW).XLS, WS 'Dashboard (Flow Diagram) D-95;11/11

Page 44: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Wind + NG turbine worse than 100% NG turbine? • Wind + NG turbine balancing plant

increases: – GHGs – NOx & – SOx – (Due to part-power operation of NG

turbine)

44

See, for example, Willem Post, “Wind energy does little to reduce GHG emissions,” available at http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/64492/wind-energy-reduces-co2-emissions-few-percent

Page 45: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Simple-cycle NG Turbine efficiency

45

Page 46: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

New Motivation to curb greenhouse gases

46

Page 47: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

ARCTIC ICE Extent

47

Previous Low Ice extent: 2007

Page 48: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

New Lowest Arctic Ice Exent; Sept 16, 2012:

48

Page 49: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Graph of Arctic Ice Extent

49 Source: National snow & ice data center; http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

21-year average:

1979-2000

2005

2007

2012

Page 50: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Global Coal Consumption Rising Fast

50

Page 51: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Average hourly wind power at Trent Mesa, Texas -150 MW peak

51

Page 52: Comparison of Electrical Energy Storage Options · 2012-11-29 · Energy Storage Volume: German Case Study: Storage Volume required for: Pumped hydro CAES Hydrogen Source: Charlie

Longer-Term (Below-Ground) Storage

52

HTAC simple model EPRI (Rev 10-9-12 - 25MW.XLS, WS 'DashBoard' AK-355;11/11

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 5 10 15 20

Li-Ion-LowZn / air -HiZn / Air-LowH2 near-termCAES-Hi-$7/MBTUCAES-Low-$7/MBTUH2 Med-termH2 long-term

Storage Time (Days)

Cost of stored electricity (cents/kWh)

Natural Gas = $7/MBTU