Upload
truongdieu
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
RONDERBOSCH, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
COMPARISON OF AN INVERTER DRIVEN
INDUCTION MOTOR FOR A PV WATER PUMP
WITH A DC MOTOR DRIVEN SYSTEM
PREPARED FOR:
Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Cape Town
PREPARED BY:
Sihaam Saban (SBNSIH001)
Fourth Year Student
Department Electrical Engineering
University of Cape Town
22 October 2007
Thesis prepared in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of
Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Electrical Engineering at the University of
Cape Town
DECLARATION
I declare that this thesis is my own unaided work. I affirm that all information gathered from
various sources in this document has been referenced accordingly where necessary.
This thesis is prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of
Science (Bsc) in Electrical Engineering at the University of Cape Town.
________________ _____________________
S.Saban Date
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks to:
My creator, for granting and blessing me with the ability to further my knowledge in all
aspects of life.
My family, specially my parents as well as siblings for their helpful support throughout.
Dr. Ben Sebitosi, my supervisor, for his invaluable support, encouragement and
guidance throughout my thesis project.
Mr. Chris Wozniak and Mr. Phillip, the lab supervisors, for their assistance and their
patience in helping me throughout my thesis research.
Prof. G McLaren for his exceptional advice on my thesis project.
Lastly, to all my friends and colleagues, especially, Heskin, Richard, Emma, Wesley,
and many more for their help, encouragement and moral support.
Thanks a lot.
Allah’s Name I begin, the Beneficent, the Merciful
II
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Dr Ben Sebitosi, a senior member of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the
University of Cape Town, proposed this thesis topic. This project involves the comparison of
an inverter driven induction motor for a PV water pump system to a DC motor driven system.
Specific instructions given were:
• To investigate the comparison between a DC motor driven system for solar water
pumping and an Inverter Induction Motor driven system.
• To investigate how to optimize the performance of these systems in order to maximize
water delivery, whereby,
• The most efficient system should be able to pump water despite variations in the
irradiance level.
• Comment on findings made.
• Make suitable Recommendation and Conclusions based on findings.
III
ABSTRACT
With the growing shortage of water in the metropolis, it is of major concern that our most
valuable asset become available for all South Africans, specifically those located in remote
areas.
According to our Provincial Government, water consumption and demand for water in the
Western Cape region is growing annually at a rate of 3-4% for households and 1.5-2% for
agriculture [1]. Many people living in remote areas do not have access to the national electric
grid and therefore water pumping in theses areas are often difficult.
This thesis aims to address the issue of using renewable energy to provide these remote areas
with clean drinking water and electricity. The best possible water pumping system is thus
studied and the method of selecting the best motor system for photovoltaic water pumping is
being analysed, such that it is able to maximize the amount of water delivery during low levels
of solar irradiation.
The purpose of this investigation is to revise the performance of both the AC and DC motor
water pumping system and to observe each system response under various weather conditions.
Each system consists of a positive displacement pump, solar panels and a 3-phase inverter used
with the induction motor to convert DC voltage from the panel to AC voltage.
The Induction motor has been expected to perform significantly better than the DC motor. The
power rating of the Induction motor is 0.37kW. To run a high rated motor of 0.37kW, at least 5
panels are needed. Due to cost and time ordering panels, a variable frequency drive that is
connected to the mains was used for testing purposes. This drive allowed the author to
distinguish the performance characteristics of the Induction motor-pump setup.
The big disparity in the sizes of the DC and Induction motor caused major challenges when
comparing the relative system performances, even though the pumps were identical. Because
the only matched system was the pumps, comparisons on the performance of the pumps were
made.
IV
From various tests conducted, for the DC motor, we observed that the motor stalls at 4.5V;
1.02A. This means that at low levels of solar irradiation the DC motor pumping system
becomes inefficient. The minimum flow rate for the DC system was 0.25 litres/min at a power
rating of 4.59W and pump speed ≈ 40 rpm. For the AC system the minimum flow rate was
0.001 litres/min at a power rating of 1W and pump speed of 0.5 rpm.
From these results it was observed that the Induction motor system therefore operates at lower
speeds and input power, compared to the DC motor system. Lower speeds and input power
means that the induction motor operates better at low levels of insolation, hence maximizes the
amount of water delivery during cloud cover.
A conclusive result was thus made on the implementation of the Induction motor-pump
system. The Induction motor-pump system offered significant advantages over the DC motor
system. Even though the ratings for the DC and AC motor differed considerably, the pumps of
each system helped the author determine various performance characteristics based on each
system. The various tests conducted allowed the author to conclude and make
recommendations based on further improvements and possible solutions to a better working
system.
Because, the smallest available AC motor was 10 times the size of the DC motor, the author
would therefore recommend that future test be done using motors of comparable sizes.
V
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………...……………………………….….....I
TERMS OF REFERENCE…………..…………………………………………......II
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………….……..III
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………….……………………....…..V
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS……………………….………………...………....VIII
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………..X
NOMENCLATURE…………………….…………………………………...……..XI
1 INTRODUCTION……………………………..…………………………….1
1.1 Background…………….…………………………………………..….1
1.2 Overview of solar photovoltaic water pumping systems……….….….3
1.3 Thesis Objectives………………………………….……………….….3
1.4 Thesis Limitations……………………………………………………..3
1.5 Thesis Outline………………………………..………………………...4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………5
2.1 Solar Water Pumping……………………………..…………………...5
2.2 Problems associated with Solar Water Pumping……………….…......9
2.3 Techniques used to maximize the performance of a Solar
Water Pumping system………………………………………..………10
2.4 Efficiency of the DC Motor system…………………………..……….11
2.5 Efficiency of the AC Motor system.……………...……….……......…12
3 MODELLING THE PV SOURCE………………………………………….15
4 MODELLING THE POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMP……………..16
VI
5 DC MOTOR SYSTEM EXPERIMENTATION AND DATA
ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………………..18
5.1 Basic operation of a DC Motor……………………...……………….18
5.2 Circuit parameters and characteristics of a DC motor…………….…..19
5.3 DC motor system description…………………………………..……...20
5.4 Motor performance analysis……………………………………….…..21
5.4.1 Test conducted without compensating for internal
impedance……………………………………………………22
5.4.2 Test conducted compensating for internal impedance.………22
6 AC MOTOR SYSTEM EXPERIMENTATION AND DATA
ANALYSIS………………………………………………………………....26
6.1 Basic Operation of an Induction Motor…………………………......26
6.2 Circuit parameters and characteristics of an induction motor…….…26
6.3 AC motor system description………………………………………..30
6.4 Motor performance analysis…………………………………………32
6.4.1 Resistive Load test at varying frequency and varying
voltage……………………………………………………….32
6.4.2 Induction motor test at varying frequency and varying
voltage.....................................................................................34
6.4.3 Test Simulations and Results………………………………..36
6.4.4 Factors affecting system performance during testing……….43
6.4.5 Possible improvements and solutions…………………….....44
7 DESIGN OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR DC/AC INVERTER…..45
7.1 Basic operation of DC-AC inverter…………………………………45
7.2 Inverter design………………………………………………………45
7.3 MOSFET driver circuit……………………………………………...46
7.4 Interfacing with Motor Controller…………………………………..47
8 CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………….……….…….49
VII
9 RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………….…….51
10 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………..52
11 APPENDICES………………………………………………………………55
VIII
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1 - Yearly sum of global irradiation in South Africa
Figure 2 - DC Motor Driven System
Figure 3 - AC Motor Driven System
Figure 4 - Typical Layout of Photovoltaic Water Pumping System
Figure 5 - Levels of insolation in a day
Figure 6 - PV water pumping system using an inverter induction motor system
Figure 7 - Measured results for ‘inverter-motor-pump set’ comparing efficiency in function
of flow rate with the frequency as a parameter
Figure 8 - I-V characteristics of the motor-pump assembly and a PV array with six panels
Figure 9 - Pump flow rate vs. electrical motor power input
Figure 10 - PV module equivalent circuit
Figure 11 - Positive Displacement diaphragm pump
Figure 12 - Positive Displacement Characteristic Curve
Figure 13 - DC Motor
Figure 14 - Permanent Magnet DC Motor
Figure 15 - Torque-speed characteristics of a permanent magnet DC motor, where Vt4 is the
rated voltage
Figure 16 - Lab simulation of DC pumping system
Figure 17 - Graph of input power required (W) vs. Pressure Head (Pa)
Figure 18 - Cross-section of an Induction Motor
Figure 19 - IEEE Equivalent Circuit for an Induction Motor
Figure 20 - Thevenin equivalent circuit
Figure 21 - Typical torque-speed characteristic of an Induction motor
Figure 22 - Lab simulation of AC pumping system
Figure 23 - Shaft of pump aligned with shaft of induction motor and connected using a heat
shrink tubing
Figure 24 - Y– Connected load
Figure 25 - Illustration of Lab simulation of resistive load
Figure 26 - Relationship between varying voltages (V) with varying frequency (Hz) for
resistive load
IX
Figure 27 - Induction Motor characteristics and capabilities
Figure 28 - Photograph of (a) induction motor water pumping system and (b) variable
frequency drive
Figure 29 - Voltage (V) vs. Frequency (Hz) for Induction Motor
Figure 30 - Illustration of Two Wattmeter Method
Figure 31 - Illustration of white strip used on pump shaft to measure speed
Figure 32 - Pump Power (W) vs. Flow Rate (litres/sec) at full load
Figure 33 - Comparison between Pump Power (W) vs. Speed (rpm) for AC and DC system
Figure 34 - DC-AC inverter connected to a 3-phase AC motor
Figure 35 - Waveform generated by inverter of a PWM variable frequency drive compared
with that of a true AC sine wave
Figure 36 - MOSFET Driver Circuit
Figure 37 - Start/Stop Switch from motor controller
Figure 38 - Photograph of Motor Controller Circuit
Figure 39 - Square wave switching scheme from one inverter leg
X
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Electrical Parameters of solar module SM55
Table 2 - DC Motor Voltage and Current readings
Table 3 - Relationship between varying voltage and varying frequency for resistive load
Table 4 - Induction Motor test showing values of varying voltage with varying frequency
Table 5 - Induction Motor test showing real Power measured as the frequency is adjusted
Table 6 - Induction motor test showing real power losses (at no load) and speed at which
pump shaft rotates
XI
NOMENCLATURE
Ia armature current (A)
Iph photo-current (A)
Is diode saturation current (A)
Ra armature resistance (Ω)
Rs series resistance (Ω)
Rp parallel (or shunt) resistance (Ω)
R1 stator resistance (Ω)
R2’ rotor resistance referred to stator (Ω)
X’2 rotor reactance referred to stator (Ω)
Xm magnetizing reactance (Ω)
Vth thevenin equivalent voltage (V)
Vm motor voltage (V)
A thermal voltage of one solar cell (V)
ε electromotive force (V)
τ motor torque (N.m)
Tmech mechanical torque (N.m)
ω motor shaft angular velocity (rads/s)
φ permanent magnet flux (Wb)
κ constant flux coefficient
ns synchronous speed (rpm)
s slip
f supply frequency (Hz)
efficiency
1
1 INTRODUCTION
Following the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development, it has been a
key issue for South Africa to focus on the needs of people for many generations to
come. The vast shortage and provision of clean drinking water has created a serious
concern in meeting the social and health needs of the population.
1.1 Background
Issues have been raised to make sustainable use of renewable resources for the supply
of freshwater and generation of electricity. This will allow us to minimize the wastage
of scarce mineral resources as well as reduce the amount of global pollution.
As a Capetonian, I have come to realize, traveling through South Africa, that many
areas and suburbs particularly low quality areas outside Cape Town, do not have access
to clean drinking water. Many children particularly areas in the Cape flats such as
Khayelitsha, Langa and other informal settlements die because of impurities in water.
Remote areas outside Cape Town are often not connected to the electrical grid as they
are situated many miles away from power stations. This has initiated my interest in
using renewable resources such as wind and solar energy to provide pasteurized water
and generate and supply electricity in these remote areas, to help improve the standard
of living of our poor communities.
Developments in using renewable energy for alternative energy distribution came to the
fore, because of the worldwide energy crises. Wind and solar energy seemed the
obvious sources of renewable energy, for the inhabitants of South Africa, as they are
resources that are most readily available in many remote areas in South Africa.
If any technology is considered for a remote application, it should be redesigned
according to the socio-economic structure of that particular area [2]. Taking into
account the socio-economic structure, a wind farm would not be feasible in an area
2
where wind is not always available, but water is. The most viable option would be to
use solar energy for pumping clean drinking water and generating electricity.
The advantage of renewable resources is that they are replenished every day. Using
renewable energy resources reduces the amount of environmental pollution and harmful
waste through its utilization.
Owing to the amount of global irradiation in South Africa, as shown in figure 1, using
the sun as a renewable source to allow us to generate electricity or pump
uncontaminated water would be most practical.
Figure 1: Yearly sum of global irradiation in South Africa [3]
Using photovoltaic as a power source for pumping water, more attention has been paid
to design and optimize the utilization of PV systems to achieve the most reliable and
economical operation of solar energy [4]. On a clear day the sun’s radiation on the earth
can be 300 watts per square meter depending on the location [5].
3
The technology of using Photovoltaic (PV) is to convert radiant energy from the sun to
direct current (DC) electricity [5]. These pumping systems are often located in remote
areas where there is a high demand for clean drinking water and power demand is
moderately small.
1.2 Overview of solar photovoltaic water pumping systems
The current photovoltaic water pumping system uses a DC motor to drive the water
pump. Various studies have shown that the DC motor system, although cost-efficient
and easy to use, has not been reliable. The motor uses mechanized commutators and
brushes, which need regular maintenance and are also prone to failure [6]. It has also
been noted that during low levels of irradiation, the motor stops pumping. The DC
motor is thus not reliable, as it requires a high threshold to keep the motor running in
order to pump water.
1.3 Thesis Objectives
The author is therefore undertaking this study to investigate a low-cost and more robust
system, by comparing whether an AC motor system is more efficient in maximizing
water delivery for the water pump system as compared to using a DC motor system.
Analyzing this matter, it will allow the author to help uplift the community in Cape
Town and other remote areas to use the PV water pump system (PVWPS).
1.4 Thesis Limitations
Tests for comparison between the actual DC and AC motor could not be conducted due
to the vast size difference between both motors. The only tests that could be conducted
were the comparison between the performance of the pumps of each system, since the
same pump is used for both the AC and DC system. Actual real time tests using panels
could not be conducted due to limited time available and shortage in the amount of
panels required driving the induction motor.
4
1.5 Thesis Outline
Chapter 1 introduces solar water pumping and briefly introduces PV pumping systems
that has already been used. Also gives a brief description on thesis limitations and
objectives.
Chapter 2 discusses in more detail solar water pumping (SWP), problems associated
SWP, efficiency of DC and AC motor systems and techniques used to maximize the
performance of a SWP system.
Chapter 3 models the photovoltaic source.
Chapter 4 models how the positive displacement pump operates.
Chapter 5 outlines how the DC motor system works as well as deals with experiments
and results, which was conducted in the UCT machines lab.
Chapter 6 outlines how the AC motor system works as well as deals with experiments
and results, which was conducted in the UCT machines lab.
Chapter 7 covers the general operation and use of the DC/AC inverter for the AC motor
driven system.
Chapter 8 and 9 consists of conclusions that were based on the findings and
recommendations for future improvements made.
The thesis concludes with a set of References and Appendices containing all additional
information.
5
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
This review discusses recent literature and focuses on the following issues:
• Optimising the performance of the system to maximise water delivery.
• Comparing the efficiency of the DC motor against the Induction motor.
• Selecting the most suitable motor so that the photovoltaic array or solar panel is
utilized in a way that it maximises the amount of water during low irradiance
levels.
2.1 Solar Water Pumping
The technology of solar PV water pumping has been advancing steadily in recent years,
for the efforts to overcome the problem of developing countries not having access to
safe drinking water [5, 7].
The sun has provided us with radiant energy, which is used to pump water in places
where there is a scarcity of freshwater. This has brought about the concept of solar
water pumping in remote areas. These areas are also often not connected to the national
electric grid, thus the use of solar water pumping has become economically
advantageous where the typical head lies between 1m and 100m [5].
According to Kenna and Gillet [7], there are two methods by which solar energy can be
converted to mechanical energy required for pumping. These methods are:
• Direct conversion of solar radiation to electricity using PV cells and then
conversion of electrical energy to mechanical energy using a motor/pump
system or
• The conversion of solar energy to heat, which can then be used to drive a heat
engine [7].
6
The main components that make up the photovoltaic pumping system are:
• The PV array which converts solar energy to DC electricity
• The motor and pump subsystem comprising the components which convert the
electrical output of the PV array into hydraulic power, and
• The storage and distribution system that delivers the water to its point of use
[7].
The volume of pumped water is dependant on five major factors [5]:
• The amount of solar irradiation, which is the measure of the suns available
energy.
• The photovoltaic array area.
• The conversion efficiency of the photovoltaic array.
• The ambient temperature.
• The pump motor for the hydraulic system characteristics.
Two different systems configurations are currently been studied:
• System 1: PV array is directly coupled to a DC motor and a pump.
• System 2: PV array coupled to an inverter which is then coupled to a 3 phase
AC motor and a pump
The directly couple systems, where the PV array is directly coupled to a DC motor-
pump system, is shown in figure 2 [5].
Figure 2: DC Motor Driven System
PV Array
DC Motor
Pump
Tank
7
The PV array coupled to an inverter, which is then coupled to a 3-phase AC motor, and a
pump system is shown in figure 3:
Figure 3: AC Motor Driven System
When using an AC motor, the solar photovoltaic array needs to be connected to an
inverter that is then connected to the AC motor. The inverter converts the DC voltage
coming from the solar panel into AC voltage, which drives the induction motor.
These systems have revolutionised, where many people in remote areas with no access
to clean water, could now have access to clean drinking water. The ability of providing
pasteurised water has freed labourers, mainly women and children from the time
consuming task of carrying water from distant springs [8].
With the availability of groundwater and sunlight, solar photovoltaic powered water
pumping are more cost effective in remote areas and for small applications. Figure 4
below shows the complete set-up of the photovoltaic pumping system.
PV Array
Inverter AC Motor
Pump
Tank
8
Figure 4: Typical Layout of Photovoltaic Water Pumping System
For many years the old conventional pumps used were the DC motor water pump,
which is directly attached to a solar panel as discussed before. Today several types of
motors can be used, such as AC, DC, permanent magnet, brushed, brushless,
synchronous and asynchronous, variable reluctance, and many more [9]. In South
Africa the DC motor system, is most commonly used.
As technology progressed, many different solar pumps also became available for
various applications. They are specifically the solar submersibles, floating water pumps
and the solar surface pumps.
Submersible pumps draw water from shallow wells, springs, ponds, rivers or tanks and
floating pumps draws water from reservoirs with height ability [9]. There are also
different pumps according to their pumping principle:
• Centrifugal pump- where liquid is sucked by the centrifugal force created by the
impeller and the casing directs the liquid to the outlet as impeller rotates. The
liquid leaves with a higher velocity and pressure than it had when it entered [9].
• Positive Displacement Pump – causes a liquid to move by trapping a fixed
amount of fluid and then forcing (displacing) that trapped volume into the
discharge pipe.
9
These pumps are often connected or built into the motor.
2.2 Problems associated with Solar Water Pumping
One of the main problems associated with solar water pumping is the level of insolation
received on a day that fluctuates because of weather conditions. Figure 5 [10] below
shows the levels on insolation in a day when it is clear, cloudy and overcast,
respectively.
Figure 5: Levels of insolation in a day [10]
On an overcast day the maximum amount of insolation received during noon can be as
low as 60% when compared to a clear day.
Because of the high threshold required by the traditional DC PM driven pump system,
the motor stops with cloud cover or pollution and does not pump water.
According to Fiaschi, Graniglia and Manfrida [11] the power and head characteristics
of a centrifugal pump are not well matched to solar PV water supply systems. When the
solar irradiance levels are low, the pump is unable to provide the head necessary for
10
extracting water. When irradiation is high, some of the solar power is wasted, if costly
energy storage devices such as batteries are added [11].
Eskander and Zaki [12] investigated a system in which an induction motor was
controlled to operate at maximum efficiency. The operating characteristic of the array
was then controlled to match the voltage and current required by the motor. This
system was reported to be more efficient in providing a large quantity of water being
pumped at low levels of insolation [12].
2.3 Techniques used to maximize the performance of a Solar Water pumping
system
Various techniques have been studied to improve the performance of a solar water
pumping system. One of the main aspects of a good design for a photovoltaic driven
water supply system is the choice of pump, the flow rate of water and the daily
radiation peak power.
According to Fiaschi, Graniglia and Manfrida [11], the importance of maximising the
use of the available solar power is by “following” the daily radiation curve, so as to
cover the maximum possible time extension, thus allowing the pump to work in the
early morning and late afternoon hours by varying the number of active stages (in a
modular pump) and rotational speed [11].
It has also been discovered that using an AC motor pump combined with a variable-
speed DC-AC inverter is optimised by working at low speeds and full on during hours
of daylight as well as during hours of low irradiation.
11
According to Fiaschi, Graniglia and Manfrida [11], the reason for this discovery is the
consequence of the characteristic head-flow rate curves of centrifugal pumps and by the
similitude laws at variable shaft speed. This has lead them to conclude that coupling a
centrifugal pump with variable rotational speed, resulted in a more effective use of
daily solar available power curve [11].
According to Munir, Al-Karaghouli and Al-Douri [13], the inverter has a voltage and
frequency regulation of the output voltage that supplies the water pump [13]. (See
figure 6 below) As the insolation levels increase, the inverter frequency and voltage
increases proportionately to maintain the supply of water during cloud cover or
pollution.
Figure 6: PV water pumping system using an inverter induction motor system [13]
2.4 Efficiency of the DC Motor system
Much research has been done to conclude whether either AC or DC motors should be
integrated to design the most viable photovoltaic water pumping system.
In the DC motor system, the PV array generates sufficient electrical power from solar
irradiation to operate the DC motor [14]. The solar irradiation then converts the
electrical energy into mechanical energy to drive the pump [14]. The mechanical
energy is in turn converted into hydraulic energy in order to draw water up a well [14].
12
DC motors are simple to use and very efficient. They are expensive maintenance wise,
but relatively cheaper and easier to control than an AC motor [15].
A solar energy system should seek to provide an optimal combination of efficient
performance, low initial and running costs, robustness and durability [16]. DC motors,
even though attractive, they are not suitable for high-power applications. According to
Firatoglu and Yesilata [14], the use of a brushless DC motor is found to be more
suitable for photovoltaic pumping systems. The brushless DC motor has a rotating
permanent magnet and stationary armature winding instead of the conventional brush-
commutator assembly [14]. Because of electronic commutation, the brushless
permanent magnet DC motor has a high efficiency [14]. However, due to electronic
commutation this increases the running cost and decreases reliability.
2.5 Efficiency of the AC Motor system
On the other hand, AC motor systems are convenient because household electrical
appliances such as lights, televisions and power tools can run off it. It is simply easy to
plug in an AC pump to provide a domestic water supply [17].
The AC motor can however be expensive, as it requires an inverter, which lowers the
overall system efficiency rate [17]. Though, when a better output performance is
required during low levels of irradiation, the AC motor exceeds its performance
capabilities compared to the DC motor. The DC motor stops completely during cloud
cover or environmental pollution.
Given the continuously changing solar irradiance levels, the most practical solution is
choosing a motor that is highly efficient in providing the maximum amount of water
during solar water pumping, specifically during times when solar irradiance is low.
13
Davies [18] states that most effective motor and pump combination should be designed
for rural areas, which have little technical support and may not be easily accessible. He
noticed significant benefits in using the AC motor system, in terms of cost and
reliability. The efficiency of the AC motor system for a 300W (peak power output of
the solar panel) system was found to be 67%, which is not much less than the efficiency
of the DC motor system. The cost of the induction motor is significantly less than that
of the DC motor, as it is more reliable [18].
A solar powered induction motor-driven water pump system was installed in a desert
well in Jordan to provide pasteurised water to Bedouins living in the well area [19].
From Laboratory results, as shown in the figure 7 below, Daud and Mahmoud [19]
have shown that increasing the frequency caused the flow rate to increase significantly,
which is proportional to the input power.
Figure 7: Measured results for ‘inverter-motor-pump set’ comparing efficiency in
function of flow rate with the frequency as a parameter [19].
Suehrcke, Appelbaum and Reshef [20] performed various experimental tests on the
performance characteristics of motors and pumps. The motor-pump assembly was then
mathematically modelled and thus confirmed that the photovoltaic array yields the
relationship between solar radiation and pump flow rate [20].
14
The I-V characteristics in figure 8 [20] obtained during the experiments of the motor-
pump assembly were compared to the relationship between the flow rate and the motor
electrical input power in figure 9 [20].
Figure 8: I-V characteristics of the motor-pump assembly and a PV array with
six panels [20]
Figure 9: Pump flow rate vs. electrical motor power input [20]
They concluded that the conversion efficiency between the electrical power supplied to
the motor and the solar radiation is approximately constant and the motor input power
can be scaled to represent the solar radiation [20].
15
3 MODELLING THE PV SOURCE
The mathematical model of determining the series resistance of the solar module varies
as the ambient temperature and irradiation level changes.
The photovoltaic module used, is a Siemens SM-55 PV panel. It consists of 36 series
connected monocrystalline silicon solar cells. The equivalent circuit of one PV cell
consists of a diode, a current source, a series resistor and a shunt (or parallel) resistor.
Figure 10 [21] below is an equivalent circuit of the photovoltaic cell.
Figure 10: PV module equivalent circuit [21]
The relationship between the current (I) and the voltage (V) are derived as follows:
exp 1s sph s
p
V IR V IRI I I
A R + + = − − −
(1)
The current source generates the photo-current Iph (A), which is generated from the
amount of solar irradiation received. The diode represents a p-n junction of a solar cell
[21]. The amount of leakage current is determined by the parallel resistance Rp ( Ω ) and
the voltage loss is expressed by a series resistance Rs ( Ω ). Is (A) is the diode saturation
current and A represents the thermal voltage (V). The parallel resistance Rp ( Ω ) is
independent of intensity and can therefore be neglected. This however only applies in
the case of a crystalline silicon cell. In this case the equation can thus be reduced to:
exp 1sph s
V IRI I I
A + = − −
(2)
16
4 MODELLING THE POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMP
The pump used in the photovoltaic water pumping system is a Flojet Quad II
diaphragm positive displacement pump. Both the DC and AC pumping system
incorporates the positive displacement pump.
The DC Motor (“Quad II Diaphragm 4406 Series Automatic Water System Pump With
Internal Bypass Valve”) was obtained from Flojet SA. This motor includes the positive
displacement pump attached to it. The Induction motor, however, was not sold or
readily available with a pump attached. Because of this, an extra DC motor was
purchased. The pump of the extra DC motor was then removed and placed onto the
induction motor.
As shown in the figure 11 [22] below, the pump will function when a diaphragm is
forced into reciprocating motion by mechanical linkage, compressed air, or fluid from a
pulsating, external source. The pump construction eliminates any contact between the
liquid being pumped and the source of energy. This eliminates the possibility of
leakage. Figure 11 [22] below is an indication of how the diaphragm pump operates.
Figure 11 – Positive Displacement diaphragm pump [22]
17
The positive displacement pump delivers a definite volume of liquid for each cycle of
pump operation. The only factor that affects the flow rate in an ideal positive
displacement pump is the speed at which it operates [22]. Figure 12 [22] below shows
the characteristic curve of the positive displacement pump.
Figure 12 – Positive Displacement Characteristic Curve [22]
The dashed line in the graph above shows the actual positive displacement pump
performance. This line reflects that as the discharge pressure of the pump increases,
some amount of liquid will leak from the discharge of the pump back to the pump
suction, reducing the effective flow rate of the pump. The rate at which the liquid leaks
from the pump discharge to its suction is called slippage [22].
18
5 DC MOTOR SYSTEM EXPERIMENTATION AND DATA
ANALYSIS
5.1 Basic Operation of a DC Motor
In a DC motor, the field winding is placed on the stator and the armature winding on
the rotor. A DC current is passed through the field winding to produce flux in the
machine. Voltage in the armature winding is alternating. A mechanical commutator and
a brush assembly function as a rectifier or inverter, making the armature terminal
voltage unidirectional. Figure 13 [23] below shows a DC motor and indicates how the
direction armature movement is attained [23].
Figure 13: DC Motor [23]
DC motors are used almost everywhere, as they are cheaper to produce, small in size
and powerful. There are various types of motors classified according to their excitation
field [4]: separately excite (permanent magnet), series and shunt motors. The
convenience of using a DC motor is, it does not require any converters [4], because the
solar panel supplies DC power.
19
5.2 Circuit parameters and characteristics of a DC motor
A permanent magnet DC motor (PMDCM) was used in the application of the solar PV
water pumping system. Figure 14 [4] below is a circuit diagram indicating the
permanent magnet DC motor, with, armature current (Ia), armature resistance (Ra) and
the motor voltage (Vm).
Figure 14: Permanent Magnet DC Motor [4]
The motor voltage Vm (V) is determined by the equation,
aam RIV += ε (3)
where Ia (A) is the motor armature current and Ra ( Ω ) is the motor armature resistance.
The electromotive force (ε ) is given by,
mε κφω= (4)
where φ (Wb) is the permanent magnetic flux, ω (rads/s) is the motor shaft angular
velocity and κ is the constant flux coefficient.
DC motors produce high torque at low speeds. The motor torque τ (Nm) is given by,
aIτ κφ= (5)
The speed of the motor can be calculated by substituting equation 3.2.2 into equation 3.2.1, hence, the speed of the motor is given by:
m a a
m
V I Rωκφ−= (6)
20
The speed-torque characteristics of the DC motor
Figure 15: Torque-speed characteristics of a permanent magnet DC motor, where Vt4 is the rated voltage [24]
Pressure Head can be expressed as, P
Hgρ
= (7)
5.3 DC motor system description The operating point of a DC photovoltaic pumping system depends on the current-
voltage (I-V) characteristics of both the motor –pump assembly and the PV array [14].
Tests were conducted in order to obtain the necessary I-V characteristic curve. The
system below was set up in the laboratory. The solar panel was replaced with a power
supply for an indoor performance test.
21
Equipment used during testing was:
• Power supply
• Water/Flow Metre (see Appendix D for manufacturer specifications)
• Pressure Gauge
• Quad II Diaphragm 4406 Series Automatic Water System Pump With Internal
Bypass Valve DC Motor (see Appendix B for manufacturer specifications)
• Positive Displacement pump
• Water tank
The closed loop circuit configuration was set up as shown in the figure 16 below:
Figure 16: Lab simulation of DC pumping system
5.4 Motor performance analysis
For a good load regulation, the internal impedance of any power supply is very low,
close to zero. The solar panel, however, has a high internal resistance (called series
resistance) present and their output power varies significantly with environmental
factors.
The DC motor system was then first tested without compensating for internal
impedance, and then tested compensating for internal impedance.
22
5.4.1 Test conducted without compensating for internal impedance
The Motor was run from rated voltage (i.e. 12V DC) and adjusted to lower
voltages, to observe at which voltage the motor stops running or stops pumping
water. A low voltage in this case would indicate a low level of solar irradiation;
where as rated voltage indicates a high level of solar irradiation.
The tests have shown that the motor keeps running at low voltages and the
motor stops pumping water at 0.08V at 0.6A. Reason being, as discussed
before, the power supply has zero internal impedance, and thus compensation
for internal impedance that is present in a solar panel has not been taken into
consideration.
5.4.2 Test conducted compensating for internal impedance
A test was then conducted compensating for internal impedance. The series
resistance was then calculated using values from the solar module SM55
datasheet.
Table 1 – Electrical Parameters of solar module SM55 (See Appendix for full
data sheet)
23
The short circuit current, as shown above in table 1, is ISC = 3.45A. The series
resistance was calculated as:
ds
sc
VR
I= , Where Vd is the voltage drop across the diode. Assuming the voltage
drop across each diode is 0.6V. Therefore, ds
sc
VR
I= =
0.60.17
3.45= Ω (series
resistance for one cell)
The total series resistance through 18 cells or half of the panel, i.e. 18 cells is
0.17 * 18 = 3.06
The power rating for the series resistance is thus, P = I2 R, where I is the rated
current of the motor (which is 2 Amps).
Hence, P = I2 R = (2)2(3.06) = 12.24 W
To get the best power-rating resistor, close to what was calculated, a 1 , 10W
and a 2.2 , 10W resistor was connected in series. Due to tolerance in resistors,
the total impedance across the two resistors was 3.6 , 20W.
The system was then tested and the motor was run from rated voltage, 12V, and
then adjusted to lower voltages to observe at which voltage the motor stops
running or stops pumping water.
From the test, we observed that the motor stalls at 4.5V, 1.02A. The table of
the recorded corresponding voltage and current readings are shown in table 2
below.
24
Table 2: DC Motor Voltage and Current readings (Valve Completely Open)
This shows and proves that at low levels or irradiation or cloud cover the DC
motor stops. Therefore during early hours in the morning and late afternoon
hours, as well as overcast days when irradiation levels are low, the DC system
will not be operational.
Figure 17 below represents the input power required by the pump as a function
of the pressure head. The pressure head is due to mechanical forces acting on
the fluid and is the vertical lift in height at which a pump can no longer exert
enough pressure to move the water. The head was simulated with a valve and
measured with a pressure gauge.
This does not exactly simulate a pumping system, as the head is dependant on
the pressure, which in turn varies with the pump speed. Therefore, in order to
simulate a particular head at different speeds, the valve needed continual
adjustment where the voltage was kept constant [18].
Voltage (V) Current (A) Flow Rate
(l/min) Input Power to
Pump (W) 12 1.71 5.5 20.52 11 1.6 4.5 17.6 10 1.47 4 14.7 9 1.32 3.5 11.88 8 1.22 3 9.76 7 1.08 2.8 7.56 6 0.95 2 5.7 5 0.92 1 4.6
4.5 1.02 0.25 4.59
DC Motor Stalls at 4.5V, 1.02A with minimum flow rate of 0.25 litres/min
25
Figure 17: Graph of input power required (W) vs. Pressure Head (Pa)
From the figure we can observe that as the input power required by the pump
increases, the amount of pressure head increases proportionately. (See
Appendix for full experimental results)
Input Power Required (W) vs Pressure Head (Pa)
0
10
20
30
40
0 50000 100000 150000 200000
Pressure Head (Pa)
Pow
er (W
) 12V10V8V6V4V
26
6 AC MOTOR SYSTEM EXPERIMENTATION AND DATA
ANALYSIS
6.1 Basic Operation of an Induction Motor
The induction motor is the most robust machine and the most broadly used machine in
industry. It consists of a stator and a rotor, which is mounted on bearings and separated
from the stator by an air gap. The stator and rotor winding both carry alternating
currents. The alternating current (AC) is supplied to the stator winding directly and to
the rotor winding by induction [25].
Figure 18 [23] below shows a cross-section of an induction machine.
Figure 18: Cross-section of an Induction Motor [23]
6.2 Circuit parameters and characteristics of an induction motor
The stator windings are connected to a three-phase AC voltage supply, which produces
an induced voltage in the rotor windings producing a rotor current. The rotor will rotate
in the direction of the stator-rotating magnetic field in the air gap [25].
27
The synchronous speed ns at which the stators rotating field rotate is greater than the
steady state speed n. The synchronous speed ns is given by,
120s
fn
p= or
4syn
fp
πω = (7)
where f is the supply frequency and p is the number of poles [19]. The difference
between the rotor speed n or ω and the synchronous speed ns or synω of the rotating
field is called the slip s and is given by [25],
syn s
s
n ns
n
ω ωω
− −= = (8)
The frequency induced in the rotor can be expressed as,
2f sf= (9)
where 2f is the frequency of voltage and current in the rotor, f is the supply frequency
connected to the stator and s is the slip.
For a three-phase machine the power input to the stator is,
1 1 13 cosinP V I θ= (10)
and the power loss in the stator is, 2
1 1 13P I R= (11)
The efficiency of the induction motor is,
out
in
PP
η = (12)
The efficiency is dependant on the slip and therefore if all losses are neglected except
those in the resistance of the rotor circuit, then the ideal efficiency becomes,
1outideal
in
Ps
Pη = = −
(13)
The ideal efficiency represents the ratio of the power output to the air gap power. This
indicates that for maximum efficiency the induction motor should operate at
28
synchronous speed. This is the reason why the slip is low for normal operation of the
induction motor.
The IEEE per phase equivalent circuit of a three-phase induction motor is shown in
figure 19 below.
Figure 19: IEEE Equivalent Circuit for an Induction Motor
For simplicity, V1, R1, X1 and Xm can be replaced by the thevenin equivalent circuit
values Vth, Rth, and Xth as shown in figure 20 below.
Figure 20: Thevenin equivalent circuit
Where, ( )
1 122 2
1 1
mth
m
XV V
R X X
= + +
(14)
The thevenin impedance is ( )( )
1 1
1 1
mth th th
m
jX R jXZ R jX
R j X X
+= = +
+ + (15)
29
where,
( )2
122
1 1
mth
m
R XR
R X X=
+ + (16)
and ( )
( )
21 1 1
221 1
m mth
m
X R X X XX
R X X
+ + =+ +
(17)
If, ( )221 1 mR X X+ then,
2
11
mth
m
XR R
X X +
and since 1 mX X therefore, 1thX X . The typical torque-speed characteristic of an induction motor is shown in the graph below.
Figure 21: Typical torque-speed characteristic of an Induction motor [26] From the equivalent circuits we can thus determine the performance characteristics of
the induction motor. The mechanical torque Tmech per phase of the induction motor can
be obtained as a function of the slip.
30
2 '2
'2 ' 22
2
1
( ) ( )
thmech
synth th
V RT
R sR X Xs
ω=
+ + + (18)
For the total mechanical torque of the three-phase induction machine, equation (18)
should be multiplied by 3.
6.3 AC motor system description
The starting of the induction motor must be started from rest and both the motor and the
load must be accelerated up to full speed. The closed loop circuit configuration for the
AC motor system is shown in figure 22.
Figure 22: Lab simulation of AC pumping system
31
Equipment used during testing was:
• Power Supply
• Water/Flow Metre
• Pressure Gauge
• 0.37kW, 6-pole cast-iron three-phase induction squirrel cage electric motor
• Positive Displacement pump
• 3-phase DC-AC Inverter
• Water tank
The author’s objective was to obtain the lowest power rated induction motor. A local
company, Alstom SA, provided the author a 0.37kW, 6-pole cast-iron three-phase
induction squirrel cage electric motor at a reasonably cost efficient price. The lowest
power rated motor, a 0.25kW motor was unavailable at the time.
The Induction motor, however, was not sold or readily available with a pump attached.
Because of this, an extra DC motor was purchased. The pump of the extra DC motor
was then removed and placed onto the induction motor. This had an additional
advantage of having identical pumps for each of the systems being compared. The
pump was connected to the induction motor as shown in the figure 23 below:
Figure 23: Shaft of pump aligned with shaft of induction motor
and connected using a heat shrink tubing
Heat shrink tubing
32
6.4 Motor performance analysis
An indoor performance test was conducted on the AC driven water-pumping
system. For testing purposes a variable frequency drive (VFD) was used in
place of the solar panel and 3-phase DC-AC inverter. This VFD was first
connected to a resistive load to enable the author to see the corresponding I-V
characteristics. The same test was then conducted with the Induction motor
system. Calculations, comparisons and conclusions were then made based on
the results obtained.
6.4.1 Resistive Load test at varying frequency and varying voltage
The resistive load was connected as a Y-connected load as shown in figure 24.
A digital ammeter and voltmeter was connected up as shown in the figure 24, to
measure the necessary readings required.
Figure 24: Y– connected load
Neutral
V
A
33
Figure 25: Illustration of Lab simulation of resistive load
The frequency was then varied between 0 – 50Hz and the corresponding voltage,
current readings were recorded. Table 3 shows the voltage, current and power readings
with varying frequency.
Table 3: Relationship between varying voltage and varying frequency for resistive load
VLN (V) I (A) f (Hz) P (W) 3*Power (W) 10 0.5 2 5 15 25 0.7 5 17.5 52.5 50 1 10 50 150 70 1.3 15 91 273
100 1.5 20 150 450 120 1.75 25 210 630 145 1.92 30 278.4 835.2 170 2.1 35 357 1071 190 2.25 40 427.5 1282.5 210 2.4 45 504 1512 230 2.55 50 586.5 1759.5
Voltmeter and Ammeter
Resistive Load
Variable Frequency
Drive
34
A graph was then plotted to show the relationship between varying voltages with
varying frequency for the resistive load.
Figure 26: Relationship between varying voltages (V) with varying frequency
(Hz) for resistive load
From the graph we can see that as the frequency increases, the voltage increases
linearly. This allowed the author to obtain the required voltage/frequency (V/f) ratio.
6.4.2 Induction motor test at varying frequency and varying voltage [27]
Figure 27 (a) below shows the family of torque-speed curves at variable voltage and
frequency and (b) shows the stator voltage (Vs), the magnetising current (Im) and the
rotor current (Ir) which is referred to the stator. The magnetising current combined with
the rotor current gives the stator current. At no load the magnetising current is equal to
the stator current.
The constant torque region in (a) consists of many linear sections. The peak amplitude
of the torque curve in the constant power and high-speed region reduces exponentially.
35
The maximum operating torque (Tem) reduces along the constant power hyperbola (Tem
* r = constant value) in the constant power region. In the high speed region the
maximum permissible torque reduces exponentially.
Figure 27: Induction Motor characteristics and capabilities [24]
A frequency beyond the rated frequency (f3) would require a higher voltage than rated
voltage or allowing the motor to draw current in excess of its rated current. These
conditions are not desirable and would ultimately lead to breakdown. Motor ratings are
usually exceeded by overloading the motor.
The stator voltage is non-zero at zero rotor speed (b). The voltage drop across the
resistance in the stator windings becomes larger relative to the applied voltage as the
voltage across the motor terminal is reduced. The boost voltage therefore compensates
for this voltage drop.
36
Any motor speed can be generated at a particular torque, which is determined by the
load as shown in figure 27, provided that the motor drive is able to apply the exact
voltage and frequency. If the load on the motor output causes the motor to operate near
or at the rated torque, which is in excess of the frequency range, concern has to be
taken not to overload the motor. This normally occurs in the region beyond the rated
frequency.
In PV water pumping applications the motors are usually oversized to allow for
efficiency improvements by the motor designer. Therefore, there is no danger in
overloading the motor since the motor is consistently operated in the partial load region
of about 60% of the rated torque or less.
6.4.3 Test Simulations and Results
The induction motor is rated at 400V, star-connected. The star connected load means
that the start-up current is minimized. Varying the frequency applied to the motor
controls the speed. Application of this speed control method also required the VFD.
If the voltage drop across R1 and X1 (Figure 9) is small compared to the terminal
voltage V1, then the motor flux is directly proportional to the voltage/frequency ratio
[25],
p V/f
The terminal voltage is thus varied in proportion to the frequency. This type of control
is known as constant volts per hertz [25].
The induction motor system was then set-up as shown in the figure below and tested to
see the variation in voltage with change in frequency.
37
(a) (b)
Figure 28: Photograph of (a) induction motor water pumping system and (b)
variable frequency drive
Table 4 below shows values of voltage as the frequency varied. Input power to the
pump was calculated as well as the flow rate in litres/second.
VLN
(V) Current
(A) f (Hz) Flow Rate (litres/min)
Flow Rate (litres/sec) Pin (W) = 3VI
2.887 0.1 0.65 0.001 0.00002 0.866 9.238 0.3 1 0.075 0.00125 8.314
13.279 0.4 1.5 0.175 0.00292 15.935 16.166 0.5 2 0.25 0.00417 24.249 20.207 0.55 2.5 0.35 0.00583 33.342 25.981 0.58 3 0.4 0.00667 45.207 28.868 0.6 3.5 0.45 0.00750 51.962 31.754 0.62 4 0.5 0.00833 59.063 34.641 0.65 4.5 0.57 0.00950 67.550 37.528 0.7 5 0.65 0.01083 78.808
Table 4: Induction Motor test showing values of varying voltage with varying frequency
Minimum Flow Rate of Induction Motor at 2.887VLN, 0.1A and 0.001 litres/min
38
Figure 29 below shows the relationship between varying voltages (V) with varying
frequency (Hz). As discussed before, varying the frequency f can control the speed of
the motor or the synchronous speed, keeping the flux in the air gap constant and
varying Vs in a linear proportion to f. It is clearly seen from figure 29 below that there is
a linear relationship between voltage and frequency.
Figure 29: Voltage (V) vs. Frequency (Hz) for Induction Motor
The amount of power consumed by the pump was then compared against the flow rate
and the frequency. The calculated input power illustrated in table 4 makes up the real
and reactive power. Therefore, a re-test was done measuring the real power using the
two-wattmeter method (by using two analog meters) as show in figure 30 below.
39
Figure 30: Illustration of Two Wattmeter Method
The table below shows the measured power obtained from the two wattmeters. Each
wattmeter had a scaling factor of 10. The total power for the load at each frequency is
P1 + P2.
Table 5: Induction Motor test showing real Power measured as the frequency is
adjusted
Frequency (Hz)
Power 1 (x10) (W)
Power 2 (x10)(W)
Flow Rate (litres/min)
Flow Rate (litres/sec)
Total Pin (W)
0.65 0.1 0 0.001 0.00002 1 1 0.3 0 0.075 0.00125 3 2 1 0 0.25 0.00417 10 5 3 0 0.55 0.00917 30
10 6 0 1.5 0.02500 60 15 9 1 2.5 0.04167 100 20 11 2 3 0.05000 130 25 13 3 4 0.06667 160 30 16 5 5 0.08333 210 35 18 6 5.5 0.09167 240 40 20 7 6 0.10000 270 45 22 9 7 0.11667 310 50 24 10 8 0.13333 340
40
The pump was then disconnected in order to measure the losses in the pump and the
corresponding speed was measured by placing a white strip across the shaft of the
pump (shown in figure 31) to measure the speed using a tachometer.
Figure 31: Illustration of white strip used on pump shaft to measure speed
The losses were then calculated as shown in the table below. An interesting observation
was then made. The losses in the pump turned out to be equivalent to the power
calculated when the pump was connected to the motor.
This means that the pump is almost hundred efficient and does not consume many
losses. Possible cause of this result may be that the power rating of the Induction motor
does not match the power rating of the pump. The positive displacement pump has
much lower power rating to that of the induction motor.
White strip used to determine speed using a tachometer
41
Table 6: Induction motor test showing real power losses (at no load) and speed at
which pump shaft rotates
Because the losses turned out to be similar when the pump was connected, different
characteristic figures were obtained for each set of data. This set of results is thus
equivalent to a no load test. The total pump power was obtained as a function of the
flow rate and speed at full load and the total power losses was obtained as a function of
the speed of rotation of pump at no load.
Figure 32: Pump Power (W) vs. Flow Rate (litres/sec) at full load
Frequency (Hz)
Power 1 (x10)(W)
Power 2 (x10)(W)
Power Loss (W) Speed (rpm)
0.65 0.1 0 1 0.5 1 0.3 0 3 10.1 2 1 0 10 44.1 5 3 0 30 129.8
10 6 0 60 221.2 15 9 1 100 294.8 20 11 2 130 400.5 25 13 3 160 500.9 30 15 5 200 597 35 17 6 230 693.4 40 19 8 270 799.7 45 21 9 300 895 50 23 11 340 995.5
Pump Power (W) vs. Flow Rate (litres/sec)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0.00000 0.05000 0.10000 0.15000
Flow Rate (litres/sec)
Pum
p P
ower
(W)
AC (Full Load)DC (Full Load)
42
From figure 32 above the author can deduce that the AC system requires less power to
pump water as compared to the DC system at minimum flow rate.
Since both motors made use of the same pump, technically they would operate at the
same synchronous speed. The pump power was then obtained as a function of the speed
as shown in figure 33 below.
Figure 33: Comparison between Pump Power (W) vs. Speed (rpm) for AC and DC
system
The corresponding speed matching to the minimum flow rate was obtained for each
system. The minimum flow rate for the DC system was 0.25 litres/min at a power
rating of 4.59W and synchronous speed ≈ 40 rpm. For the AC system the minimum
flow rate was 0.001 litres/min at a power rating of 1W and synchronous speed 0.5 rpm.
From this analogy the author deduced that the Induction motor system operates at lower
speeds and input power, compared to the DC motor system. Lower speeds and input
power means that the induction motor operates better at low levels of insolation, hence
maximizes the amount of water delivery during cloud cover.
Pump Power (W) vs. Speed (rpm)
050
100150200250300350400
0 500 1000 1500
Speed (rpm)
Pum
p P
ower
(W)
AC
DC
43
6.4.4 Factors affecting system performance during testing
An induction motor essentially operates at the frequency of the supply connected to it.
The rated frequency of the induction motor is 50Hz. In order for the motor to turn, the
frequency should be varied as the speed of the motor varies. This means that, as you
reduce the voltage of the motor the frequency needs to be reduced in order to retain the
same flux density. If the voltage is reduced and the frequency does not change, the flux
density will increase and the iron will saturate.
The inverter that was built should have had a constant voltage/flux ratio from the rated
frequency down to a low frequency. Thus at low frequencies, with a constant
voltage/flux ratio, the flux will reduce due to the ratio between the reactive component
and the resistive component of the stator. From the equivalent circuit of the induction
motor we want the current flowing through the magnetizing coil to be constant at all
frequencies, as this will allow us to maintain a constant flux.
When the AC motor system was set-up in the laboratory, the motor refused to operate,
as it should. An input DC voltage of 12V was supplied across the DC bus of the
inverter, using a power supply. Technically speaking, the output voltage from the
inverter should have been 230V AC per phase. However, the output voltage coming out
was 11V AC. The output voltage waveform from the inverter was a rectified signal,
only producing the positive half cycle. This is because the DC bus runs from 0V to
+12V, not supplying a negative supply rail for the inverter output.
The motor controller used to design the inverter did not allow the frequency to vary
with varying voltage. Due to this, with an input DC voltage of 12V DC, and an
induction motor rated at 400V AC, it was unable to rotate. The frequency of the
induction motor was fixed at 50 Hz. The DC bus voltage needed to be increased to
match the ratings of the Induction motor in order to operate as it should.
44
6.4.5 Possible improvements and solutions
Because the induction motor is a pseudo synchronous machine, it behaves as a speed
source. As discussed before, the running speed is set by the frequency applied to it and
is independent of the load torque provided the motor is not overloaded [26].
Due to time constraints, here are possible solutions to how the author would have gone
about solving the problem:
1. Increasing the voltage across the DC bus to match the system requirements
of running a high power rated induction motor of 400V AC.
- Problem with this is that many solar panels will be required to
increase the voltage at the DC bus to 400V.
- This affects cost and ordering of the panels would take long.
- This solution also does not allow automatic variation of frequency as
the voltage changes.
2. Adding a transformer to step the voltage up to the required voltage and use a
voltage inverter that converts the input voltage from the panel to produce a
negative voltage.
- Problem is, still does not allow automatic variation of frequency as
the voltage changes.
3. A possible working system will contain and take into account the following
procedures:
- To run a 0.37kW motor, at least 5-7 panels should be used, where
the system capacity should be extended to operate up to the full
rating of the motor.
- A variable voltage/frequency inverter, that automatically allows the
frequency to change as the input voltage changes.
- An equivalent size DC motor should be used such that the complete
AC and DC motor system-pump configuration is matched.
45
7 DC–AC INVERTER
7.1 Basic operation of DC-AC inverter
Inverters play an important role between a DC power and the AC power, which is
usually needed by standard household electrical systems. The inverter used in the
photovoltaic water pumping system is thus used to convert the DC voltage from the
solar array panel into AC voltage to drive an induction motor.
7.2 Inverter Design
Low impedance MOSFETs were used in the design of the inverter, rated at
60V (drain-source), R (drain-source) 0.008Ω. The inverter uses three sets of high speed
switching MOSFETS to create DC pulses that emulate all three phases of the sine
wave. An advantage of Mosfets, it has extremely low power consumption.
The three-phase inverter circuit consists of three legs, one for each phase as shown in
the figure below. The large filter cap across the DC bus is connected in parallel and acts
as an energy reservoir. This helps prevent fluctuations on the bus from disturbing motor
waveforms, i.e. the capacitor filters the AC ripple voltage before it enter the inverter
section. Fluctuations are often caused by voltage surges on the AC mains or high
frequency ripple resulting from rectification of the AC line.
Figure 34: DC-AC inverter connected to a 3-phase AC motor
Large Filter Cap
46
The MOSFET’s are driven by a pulse width modulated (PWM) signal. The PWM is
used to control the output voltage (or speed) and frequency with varying input voltage
Vdc. The expected output waveform generated by the inverter is shown in figure 35[28]:
Figure 35: Waveform generated by inverter of a PWM variable frequency drive
compared with that of a true AC sine wave [28]
7.3 MOSFET driver circuit
A high-speed power MOSFET and IGBT driver circuit was constructed with use of the
IR2113 IC, which has independent high and low side referenced output channels. See
Appendices for full circuit diagram with component values.
Figure 36: MOSFET Driver Circuit
15 V
6 PWM Inputs from Motor Controller
5V
6 PWM Outputs to 3-Phase Inverter
IR 2113 IC (Low and High Driver chip)
47
7.4 Interfacing with Motor Controller
A monolithic motor controller chip (MC3PHAC) was used for a low-cost, variable
speed, three-phase AC motor control system. The MC3PHAC is commonly used for
various applications such as pumps and fans.
This device consists of 6 outputs PMW’S which have been modulated with variable
voltage to control the three-phase AC motor. It also includes a start/stop motion motor
control feature. The start/stop pin is constantly high and when the start pin on the
device is set low, the motor starts up. This prevents accidental motor startup in the
event of the MC3PHAC being powered up, where the switch was left in the start
position. In order to accommodate for this feature, a switch was made (as shown in the
diagram below) for easy startup and stop.
Figure 37– Start/Stop Switch from motor controller
START/STOP SWITCH
48
Figure 38: Photograph of Motor Controller Circuit (See Appendices for full circuit
diagram)
Each switch on one inverter leg was monitored for one half cycle. The output voltage
waveform is shown in figure 39 below.
Figure 39: Square wave switching scheme from one inverter leg
Monolithic Motor Controller
IC
6 PWM Inputs to MOSFET driver
circuit
Start/Stop Switch
5V Regulator
49
8 CONCLUSIONS
Based on various tests conducted on the performance of both the AC and DC system,
the following conclusions can be drawn regarding both the DC motor and the induction
motor and inverter.
Due to the vast difference in the size of the DC motor compared to the Induction motor,
the motors of each system never formed a matched system; therefore the pump
performance of each system was compared as both systems used the positive
displacement pump.
The performance results obtained were:
For the DC motor, we observed that the motor stalls at 4.5V, 1.02A.
This means that at low levels of solar irradiation the DC motor pumping system
becomes inefficient.
The minimum flow rate for the DC system was 0.25 litres/min at a power rating
of 4.59W and synchronous speed ≈ 40 rpm.
The AC system the minimum flow rate was 0.001 litres/min at a power rating of
1W and synchronous speed 0.5 rpm.
The Induction motor system therefore operates at lower speeds and input power,
compared to the DC motor system at minimum flow rate.
Lower speeds and input power means that the induction motor operates better at
low levels of insolation, hence maximizes the amount of water delivery during
cloud cover.
Problems encountered during experiments:
Because the motors were difficult to compare since the AC Induction motor was
a much higher rated motor (or oversized) than the DC motor, each motor had a
different set of losses.
50
Power losses should have been measured at shaft of motor; however the DC
shaft was inaccessible. Power losses in the DC motor were thus assumed
negligible.
5-7 solar panels were required to drive an Induction motor rated at 0.37kW. Due
to time constraints and cost of panel’s, real life testing of the AC motor system
was not possible.
The hardware built, i.e. the 3-phase inverter, never allowed a varying frequency
with varying voltage for the AC system. The reason being, the motor controller
used operated at a fixed frequency of 50Hz.
Because of the big discrepancy between the two motors, a conclusive result could not
be made. However, a conclusive result was made based on tests conducted according to
the pump performance.
From theses tests the author concluded that the Induction motor-pump system is the
best-suited system for solar water pumping because:
The induction motor is maintenance free and relatively cheap.
Accommodates for wider speed control range.
Has the ability to pump water at low power levels, hence, at low levels of
irradiation the induction motor performs exceptionally well, and,
Subsequently, maximizes the amount of water delivery.
51
9 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings and conclusions of this thesis, the following recommendations
are made:
The complete motor-pump configuration should be matched (i.e. Use a higher
rated DC motor to match the AC motor.) between the two systems such that
suitable comparisons can be made between both systems.
The power rating of the induction motor should match the power rating of the
pump being used.
If, however, a lower rated induction motor cannot be found an equivalent rated
pump should be bought to match the ratings of the motor.
Use a sun tracker with the Induction motor system for a better optimal
performance of maximizing water delivery.
Generally for larger photovoltaic water pumping systems, the AC motor system
is a more viable option, because of the size of the motor available and cost. DC
motors systems are best suited for low power applications.
52
10 REFERENCES
1. Opening Speech by Western Cape Premier, Marthinus Van Schalkwyk, addressing
the Western Cape Water Summit,“South African Government Information”,
www.info.gov.za [online], Stellenbosch, 19 May 2003
2. K. Meah, S. Ula, S. Barret, “Solar photovoltaic water pumping-opportunities and
challenges”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2007), doi:
10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.020
3. Huld T., Šúri M., Dunlop E., Albuisson M, Wald L (2005). Integration of
HelioClim-1 database into PVGIS to estimate solar electricity potential in Africa.
Proceedings from 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and
Exhibition, 6-10 June 2005, Barcelona, Spain, http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/.
4. A.A. Ghoneim, “Design optimization of photovoltaic powered water pumping
systems”. Energy Conversion and Management 47 (2006) 1449-1463
5. A. Betka, “Perspective for the sake of photovoltaic pumping development in the
south”. Thesis- University of Batna
6. B. Singh, C.L. Putta Swamy, B.P.Singh, “Analysis and development of a low-cost
permanent magnet brushless DC motor drive for PV-array fed water pumping
system”. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 51 (1998) 55-67
7. Jeff Kenna and Bill Gillet, “Solar Water Pumping”. A Handbook, Intermediate
Technology Publications, 1984 and 1985. (Pages 1, 13)
8. Sunelco, The Sun Electric Company. Solar Water Pumping
http://www.sunelco.com/swp.aspx
9. K. Meah, S. Fletcher, S. Ula, “Solar photovoltaic water pumping for remote
locations”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2006), doi:
10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.008
10. Michael G. Thomas, “Water Pumping: The Solar Alternative”, Photovoltaic
Systems Design Assistance Centre, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque,
NM 87185-0753
11. D. Fiaschi, R. Graniglia, G. Manfrida, “Improving the effectiveness of solar
pumping systems by using modular centrifugal pumps with variable rotational
speed”. Solar Energy 79 (2005) 234-244
53
12. Mona N Eskander and Aziza M. Zaki, “A Maximum Efficiency- Photovoltaic-
Induction Motor Pump System”. Pergamon PII: S0960-1481 (96) 00004-3
13. A. Munir, Ali A. Al-Karaghouli, Ala A.J. Al-Douri, “A PV pumping station for
drinking water in a remote residential complex”. Desalination 209 (2007) 58-63
14. Z. A. Firatoglu, B. Yesilata, “New approaches on the optimisation of directly
couple PV pumping systems”. Solar Energy 77 (2004) 81-93
15. Practical Action, “Solar (PV) Water-Pumping”. http://practicalaction.org
16. I. Odeh, Y.G. Yohanis and B. Norton, “Influence of pumping head, insolation and
PV array size on PV water pumping system performance”. Solar Energy doi:
10.1016/j.solener.2005.07.009
17. M.D.J. Wainwright, “The Potential For Photovoltaic Water Delivery Systems in
South Africa”, Technical Report for Master of Business Administration Degree,
December 1981, (Pages 108-130)
18. J.L. Davies, “The Design and Optimization of a System using an Induction Motor
driven pump, powered by solar panels”, 30 April 1992 (Pages 14,)
19. A.K. Daud, M.M. Mahmoud, “Solar powered induction motor-driven water pump
operating on a desert well, simulation and field tests”. Renewable Energy 30 (2005)
701-714
20. H. Suehrcke, J. Appelbaum, B. Reshef, “Modelling permanent magnet DC
Motor/Centrifugal pump assembly in a photovoltaic energy system”, Pergamon PII:
S0038-092X (96) 00117-X
21. E. Karatepe, M. Boztepe, M. Colak, “Neural network based cell model”. Energy
Conservation and Management 47 (2006) 1159-1178
22. PDHengineer.com – course No M-2003, “Centrifugal and Positive Displacement
Pump Fundamentals
23. Molecular Expressions, Electricity and Magnetism,
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/electromag/electricity/generators/index.html
24. Mohan, Undeland and Robbins, “Power Electronics”, Media Enhanced Third
Edition, 2003, (Pages 399-432)
25. P.C SEN, “Principles of Electric Machines and Power Electronics”, second edition,
1997, (Pages 197,227-228)
54
26. L M Photonics Ltd, “Induction Motor Control Theory”, [ONLINE]
www.lmphotonics.com/m_control
27. A. Scholle, “Evaluation of two prototype three phase photovoltaic water pumping
systems”, MSc Thesis, May 1994
28. Joe Evans, Ph.D, “Variable Frequency 101”, June 2003
55
APPENDICES
Appendix A SM55 Solar Panel Specification Sheet Appendix B Flojet DC Motor Pump System Specification Sheet Appendix C Alstom Squirrel Cage AC Induction Motor Specification Sheet Appendix D Flow Meter Specification Sheet Appendix E The DC Motor Pumping Current and Voltage Test Results Appendix F Circuit diagram for Low and High MOSFET Driver Appendix G Circuit Diagram for Monolithic Intelligent Motor Controller (MC3PHAC) Appendix H Full diagram of DC – AC Inverter
56
Appendix A
SM55 Solar Panel Specification Sheet
57
Appendix B
Flojet DC Motor Pump System Specification Sheet
58
Appendix C Alstom Squirrel Cage AC Induction Motor Specification
Sheet
59
Appendix D
Flow Meter Specification Sheet
60
Appendix E
The DC Motor Pumping Current and Voltage Test Results
61
DC SYSTEM USING 3.6 OHM, 20 WATT RESISTOR
12V
Current Pressure (bar) Pressure (Pa) Input Power (W) 1.71 0.2 20000 20.52 1.82 0.4 40000 21.84 2.05 0.6 60000 24.6 2.27 0.8 80000 27.24 2.48 1 100000 29.76 2.67 1.2 120000 32.04 2.84 1.4 140000 34.08 2.92 1.6 160000 35.04
10V
Current Pressure (bar) Pressure (Pa) Input Power (W) 1.48 0.2 20000 14.8 1.6 0.4 40000 16 1.8 0.6 60000 18 2.05 0.8 80000 20.5 2.3 1 100000 23 2.45 1.2 120000 24.5 2.47 1.4 140000 24.7
8V
Current Pressure (bar) Pressure (Pa) Input Power (W) 1.23 0.2 20000 9.84 1.35 0.4 40000 10.8 1.58 0.6 60000 12.64 1.8 0.8 80000 14.4 1.84 1 100000 14.72 1.92 1.2 120000 15.36
6V
Current Pressure (bar) Pressure (Pa) Input Power (W) 1.05 0.2 20000 6.3 1.15 0.4 40000 6.9 1.31 0.6 60000 7.86 1.41 0.8 80000 8.46 1.42 1 100000 8.52
4V
Current Pressure (bar) Pressure (Pa) Input Power (W) 0.96 0.2 20000 3.84 0.96 0.4 40000 3.84
62
Appendix F
Circuit diagram for Low and High MOSFET Driver
63
Circuit diagram for Low and High MOSFET Driver
64
Appendix G
Circuit Diagram for Monolithic Intelligent Motor Controller (MC3PHAC)
65
Circuit Diagram for Monolithic Intelligent Motor Controller (MC3PHAC)
66
Appendix H
Full diagram of DC – AC Inverter
67
DC – AC Inverter
Side View of 3-phase Inverter with Filter Cap across DC Bus