Comparision of Physiological Variables

11SHODH, SAMIKSHA AUR MULYANKAN

International Indexed & Refereed Journal, February, 2013, ISSN 0974-2832 (Print), E-ISSN- 2320-5474, RNI RAJBIL, 2009/29954. VOL- V * ISSUE- 49

IntroductionThe history of human being witness to the

fact that as man was busy in this day to day routinework in absence of modern means of life. They do havethe problems faced by the today's man. The develop-ment in the field of technology has provided numerouscomforts to the modern men compared to their ancientone. Sports are not exception to it. Science applied tosports has enabled modern youth to develop physicalcapacities beyond anything earlier imagined.One of the important, remarkable, beautiful, valuableand priceless thing that god has created particularly onthe earth is human life. Therefore it is necessary toprotect and maintain human life in order to achievehigher goals and objectives and also live a happy andmeaningful life. To develop health and fitness and tolengthen life, the scientists and researches have de-voted their lives to invention of medicine that protectlife from various diseases and health related equip-ments that measure that physical, physiological andpsychological parameters of individual will to discovernew things in these fields are highly remarkable andadmirable in the history of men and civilization.Objective of the study

The purpose of study was to Comparison ofselected physiological variables between Basketballand Volleyball male players.Material and Method

Sixty (60) male students were studying inS.G.B.A.U. Amravati University, were selected as sub-jects for the present study.From the sixty subjects thirty subjects were college /

Research Paper -Physical Education

February ,2013

Comparison of Selected Physiological VariablesBetween Basketball and Volleyball Male Players

* Dr. Sanjay V. Deshmukh* Director of Physical Education, Takshashila Mahavidyalya Amravati.

The purpose of the present study was to compare the selected Physiological variables between Basketball and VolleyballMale Players of S.G.B.A.U. Amravati University, for the purpose of the study 60 male university/college level players (30Basketball Players and 30 Volleyball Players) were randomly selected, as the subjects for the present study. The subject'sage ranged from 18 to 25 years. The variables for study were-Blood Pressure(Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic BloodPressure), Vital Capacity, Resting Heart Rate, Breath Holding Capacity (Positive Breath Holding Capacity and NegativeBreath Holding Capacity), and Body Fat Percentage.To Comparison of selected physiological variables Basketball and Volleyball male players mean difference method (t ratio)'t' test was used. The level of significance was set at 0.05 levels.Results showed significant difference in Fat percentage and insignificant differences were found in Systolic Blood Pressure,Diastolic Blood Pressure, vital capacity, Resting Heart Rate, Positive Breath Holding Capacity, Negative Breath HoldingCapacity, and Negative Breath hold capacity.

A B S T R A C T

Key words- Vital Capacity, Resting Heart Rate, Breath Holding Capacity, Breath Holding Capacity, and Body Fat Percentageuniversity level Basketball players, and remaining thirtysubjects were college / university level Volleyball play-ers.VariablesFollowing Physiological variable were selecteda) Blood Pressure- Systolic Blood Pressure- Diastolic Blood Pressureb)Vital Capacityc) Resting Heart Rate.d)Breath Holding Capacity.- Positive Breath Holding Capacity.- Negative Breath Holding Capacity.e) Body Fat Percentage.Statistical Analysis To Comparison of selected physiological variablesbetween Basketball and Volleyball male players meandifference method 't' test was used. The level of signifi-cance was set at 0.05 levels.Results and Discussion

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Mean

Sy.B.P. Dy.B.P. C.V. R.H.R. P.B.H.C N.B.H.C. % Fat

Basketball Players

Volleyball Players

Fig. 1: Graphical Representation of Physiological Vari-

12


ables between Basketball and Volleyball playersSee Table 1 The above table-1 reveals that no significant differ-ence was found in Systolic blood pressure betweenBasketball players and Volleyball players, as the cal-culated value of 't'=-.950 was less than the tabulatedt.05 (58) = 2.021. See Table 2 The above table-2 reveals that no significant differ-ence was found in Diastolic Pressure between Basket-ball players and Volleyball players, as the calculatedvalue of 't'= -.596 was less than the tabulated t.05 (58)= 2.021. See Table 3 The above table-3 reveals that no significant differ-ence was found in Vital Capacity between Basketballplayers and Volleyball players, as the calculated valueof 't'= .849 was less than the tabulated t.05 (58) = 2.021.See Table 4

The above table-4 reveals that no significant differ-ence was found in resting heart rate between Basket-ball players and Volleyball players, as the calculatedvalue of 't'= -.701 was less than the tabulated t.05 (58)= 2.021.See Table 5 The above table-5 reveals that no significant differ-ence was found in Positive Breath Holding betweenBasketball players and Volleyball players, as the cal-culated value of 't'= .338 was less than the tabulated t.05(58) = 2.021.See Table 6

The above table-6 reveals that no signifi-cant difference was found in Negative breath holdingbetween Basketball players and Volleyball players, asthe calculated value of 't'= .335 was less than thetabulated t.05 (58) = 2.021.

Table-1 Mean comparison of Systolic blood pressure between Basketball and Volleyball playersBasketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 119.9333 120.5000 -.950SD 2.47656 1.77626 Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.021

Table-2 Mean Comparison of Diastolic blood Pressure between Basketball and Volleyball Players Basketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 80.4333 80.8667 -.596SD 2.59553 2.68756Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.021

Table-3 Mean comparison of Vital Capacity between Basketball and Volleyball players Basketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 1.5300 1.2200 .849 SD 1.98827 .21877Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.021

Table-4 Mean comparison of resting heart rate between Basketball and Volleyball players Basketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 73.6333 73.6333 -.701SD 2.43088 2.18905Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.021

Table-5 Mean comparison of Positive Breath Holding Capacity between Basketball and Volleyball players Basketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 20.8667 20.4667 .338SD 5.58158 4.02349Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.021

Table-6 Mean comparison of Negative Breath Holding between Basketball and Volleyball playersBasketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 11.1667 11.0333 .335SD 1.48750 1.42595

Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.02

13SHODH, SAMIKSHA AUR MULYANKAN


The above table-7 reveals that significant differencewas found in Fat Percentage Basketball players andVolleyball players, as the calculated value of 't'=-4.938was greater than the tabulated t.05 (58) = 2.021.Conclusion

On the basis of results and with in the limita-tion of study, the following conclusions are drawn:-1. Systolic Blood Pressure, Diastolic Blood Pressure,

Table-7 Mean comparison of Fat Percentage between Basketball and Volleyball playersBasketball players Volleyball players "t" ratio

Mean 15.7990 17.1500 -4.938SD .90406 1.08397Significant t 0.05 (58) = 2.02

1 Auxter David and Pyfer Jeasn, Principles and Methods of Adapted Physical Education and Recreation Sixth Ed. (St. Louis:Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing, 1989),191-192.

2 Blackman I.S., "Mental Retardation", The International Encyclopedia of Education, 1985 Ed.3 Bosewell Betty Born, "Adopted Dance for mentally Retarded Children: An Experimental study", Dissertation abstracts

international, 43:9 (March - 1983) 2925.A.4 Bucher A.Charles, Foundation of Physical Education (St. Louis: C.V.Mosby Company, 1997),5 Cavanaugh R.John, "A Study to Determine the Effect of a physical Education Programme on Educable Retarded and Minimal

Brain challenged children", Completed Research in Health, Physical Education and Recreation Vol. 11 (1969).6 Nieman and Facsm "Fitness and Sports Medicine: A Health related Approach" 3rd edition)

vital capacity, Resting Heart Rate, Positive BreathHolding Capacity, Negative Breath Holding Capacity,and Negative Breath hold capacity have shown insig-nificant relationship between Basketball players andVolleyball players.2. The Fat percentage has shown significant relation-ship between Basketball players and Volleyballplayers.

R E F E R E N C E

Documents

Comparision of Physiological Variables