Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR MULTI-GENRE NETWORKS
Introduction: Armor alloys and variations of the Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC), including pretreatment, primer, and top-coat, are continuously evaluated at ARL in order to ensure conformance with military specifications. The ASTM B117 Neutral Salt Fog, GMW14872 Cyclic Corrosion and outdoor exposure are the three test being compared in this research.
Objective: The objective in this research was to compare outdoor exposure and accelerated corrosion, to see if machine learning / AI could assist in identifying any correlation between the test methods.
Figure 1: Outdoor exposure of armor alloys at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
Figure 2: GMW 14872 Cyclic Corrosion test
Figure 3: ASTM B117 Neutral Salt Fog test
Figure 4: Average scribe ratings for three pretreatments across the three corrosion test methods
Table 1 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Chromated Wash Primer
B117Time
(hours) Cyclic Time
(cycles) OutdoorTime
(months)8 336 8.4 15 10 6
6.9 672 7.3 30 5.1 126.6 1008 6.9 45 3.2 186.5 1344 5.9 60 2.4 246.5 1680 Exposure Ended 1.3 30
Exposure Ended 1.6 36Exposure Ended
Table 1: Shows the comparison between the three test while using chromated wash primer pretreatment on mill finished steel with primer (MIL-DTL-53030) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039)
Table 2 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Chrome Free Conversion Coating
B117Time
(hours) Cyclic Time
(cycles) OutdoorTime
(months)8.4 336 9 15 10 67 672 6.8 30 8.6 126 1008 6.8 45 7 18
5.6 1344 6 60 6.4 245.6 1680 Exposure Ended 5.8 30
Exposure Ended 5.8 364.8 42Exposure Ended
Table 3 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Zinc Rich Primer
B117Time
(hours) Cyclic Time
(cycles) OutdoorTime
(months)8.4 336 9.3 15 9.1 67.1 672 8.6 30 9.1 125.3 1008 8 45 9.1 18
Exposure Ended 7.7 60 9 247.3 75 9 306.9 90 9 366.6 105 9 426.4 120 9 48
Exposure Ended Exposure Ended
Table 2: Shows the comparison between the three test while using chrome free conversion coating pretreatment on mill finished steel
with primer (MIL-DTL-53030) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039)
Table 3: Shows the comparison between the three test while using zinc rich primer pretreatment on mill finished steel with
primer (MIL-DTL-53022) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039)
References: All data provided by Army Research Laboratory
Conclusion:• Rating decrease with exposure time • Given significant amount of data, analysis technique is
inadequate to find a direct correlation between the three tests • Machine learning/ AI is well suited to find any correlations
Comparing Test Results Obtained in Accelerated Corrosion and Real-World Exposure
By: Kenneth WattsCoatings and Corrosion Team
0 10 20 30 40
012345678910
0123456789
10
0 500 1000 1500 2000
ASTM
D16
54 R
atin
gs
Hours
B117 GMW14872 Outdoor
Months