1
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR MULTI-GENRE NETWORKS Introduction: Armor alloys and variations of the Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC), including pretreatment, primer, and top-coat, are continuously evaluated at ARL in order to ensure conformance with military specifications. The ASTM B117 Neutral Salt Fog, GMW14872 Cyclic Corrosion and outdoor exposure are the three test being compared in this research. Objective: The objective in this research was to compare outdoor exposure and accelerated corrosion, to see if machine learning / AI could assist in identifying any correlation between the test methods. Figure 1: Outdoor exposure of armor alloys at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Figure 2: GMW 14872 Cyclic Corrosion test Figure 3: ASTM B117 Neutral Salt Fog test Figure 4: Average scribe ratings for three pretreatments across the three corrosion test methods Table 1 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Chromated Wash Primer B117 Time (hours) Cyclic Time (cycles) Outdoor Time (months) 8 336 8.4 15 10 6 6.9 672 7.3 30 5.1 12 6.6 1008 6.9 45 3.2 18 6.5 1344 5.9 60 2.4 24 6.5 1680 Exposure Ended 1.3 30 Exposure Ended 1.6 36 Exposure Ended Table 1: Shows the comparison between the three test while using chromated wash primer pretreatment on mill finished steel with primer (MIL-DTL-53030) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039) Table 2 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Chrome Free Conversion Coating B117 Time (hours) Cyclic Time (cycles) Outdoor Time (months) 8.4 336 9 15 10 6 7 672 6.8 30 8.6 12 6 1008 6.8 45 7 18 5.6 1344 6 60 6.4 24 5.6 1680 Exposure Ended 5.8 30 Exposure Ended 5.8 36 4.8 42 Exposure Ended Table 3 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Zinc Rich Primer B117 Time (hours) Cyclic Time (cycles) Outdoor Time (months) 8.4 336 9.3 15 9.1 6 7.1 672 8.6 30 9.1 12 5.3 1008 8 45 9.1 18 Exposure Ended 7.7 60 9 24 7.3 75 9 30 6.9 90 9 36 6.6 105 9 42 6.4 120 9 48 Exposure Ended Exposure Ended Table 2: Shows the comparison between the three test while using chrome free conversion coating pretreatment on mill finished steel with primer (MIL-DTL-53030) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039) Table 3: Shows the comparison between the three test while using zinc rich primer pretreatment on mill finished steel with primer (MIL-DTL-53022) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039) References: All data provided by Army Research Laboratory Conclusion : Rating decrease with exposure time Given significant amount of data, analysis technique is inadequate to find a direct correlation between the three tests Machine learning/ AI is well suited to find any correlations Comparing Test Results Obtained in Accelerated Corrosion and Real-World Exposure By: Kenneth Watts Coatings and Corrosion Team 0 10 20 30 40 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 ASTM D1654 Ratings Hours B117 GMW14872 Outdoor Months

Comparing Test Results Obtained in Accelerated Corrosion ... · three test being compared in this research. Objective: The objective in this research was to compare outdoor exposure

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparing Test Results Obtained in Accelerated Corrosion ... · three test being compared in this research. Objective: The objective in this research was to compare outdoor exposure

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR MULTI-GENRE NETWORKS

Introduction: Armor alloys and variations of the Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC), including pretreatment, primer, and top-coat, are continuously evaluated at ARL in order to ensure conformance with military specifications. The ASTM B117 Neutral Salt Fog, GMW14872 Cyclic Corrosion and outdoor exposure are the three test being compared in this research.

Objective: The objective in this research was to compare outdoor exposure and accelerated corrosion, to see if machine learning / AI could assist in identifying any correlation between the test methods.

Figure 1: Outdoor exposure of armor alloys at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station

Figure 2: GMW 14872 Cyclic Corrosion test

Figure 3: ASTM B117 Neutral Salt Fog test

Figure 4: Average scribe ratings for three pretreatments across the three corrosion test methods

Table 1 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Chromated Wash Primer

B117Time

(hours) Cyclic Time

(cycles) OutdoorTime

(months)8 336 8.4 15 10 6

6.9 672 7.3 30 5.1 126.6 1008 6.9 45 3.2 186.5 1344 5.9 60 2.4 246.5 1680 Exposure Ended 1.3 30

Exposure Ended 1.6 36Exposure Ended

Table 1: Shows the comparison between the three test while using chromated wash primer pretreatment on mill finished steel with primer (MIL-DTL-53030) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039)

Table 2 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Chrome Free Conversion Coating

B117Time

(hours) Cyclic Time

(cycles) OutdoorTime

(months)8.4 336 9 15 10 67 672 6.8 30 8.6 126 1008 6.8 45 7 18

5.6 1344 6 60 6.4 245.6 1680 Exposure Ended 5.8 30

Exposure Ended 5.8 364.8 42Exposure Ended

Table 3 Scribe Rating Pretreatment: Zinc Rich Primer

B117Time

(hours) Cyclic Time

(cycles) OutdoorTime

(months)8.4 336 9.3 15 9.1 67.1 672 8.6 30 9.1 125.3 1008 8 45 9.1 18

Exposure Ended 7.7 60 9 247.3 75 9 306.9 90 9 366.6 105 9 426.4 120 9 48

Exposure Ended Exposure Ended

Table 2: Shows the comparison between the three test while using chrome free conversion coating pretreatment on mill finished steel

with primer (MIL-DTL-53030) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039)

Table 3: Shows the comparison between the three test while using zinc rich primer pretreatment on mill finished steel with

primer (MIL-DTL-53022) and topcoat (MIL-DTL-53039)

References: All data provided by Army Research Laboratory

Conclusion:• Rating decrease with exposure time • Given significant amount of data, analysis technique is

inadequate to find a direct correlation between the three tests • Machine learning/ AI is well suited to find any correlations

Comparing Test Results Obtained in Accelerated Corrosion and Real-World Exposure

By: Kenneth WattsCoatings and Corrosion Team

0 10 20 30 40

012345678910

0123456789

10

0 500 1000 1500 2000

ASTM

D16

54 R

atin

gs

Hours

B117 GMW14872 Outdoor

Months