16
Comparing KOF & Kearney LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. To identify the strengths and weaknesses of the KOF and Kearney index 2. To evaluate which is the best index for showing Globalization

Comparing KOF & Kearney

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Comparing KOF & Kearney. LEARNING OBJECTIVES To identify the strengths and weaknesses of the KOF and Kearney index To evaluate which is the best index for showing Globalization. A. T. Kearney Index. Broken into 4 categories Economic Integration Personal Contact Technological Connectivity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparing KOF & Kearney

Comparing KOF & Kearney

LEARNING OBJECTIVES1. To identify the strengths and weaknesses of the KOF and Kearney

index

2. To evaluate which is the best index for showing Globalization

Page 2: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T. Kearney Index

• Broken into 4 categories

–Economic Integration–Personal Contact–Technological Connectivity–Political Engagement

Page 3: Comparing KOF & Kearney
Page 4: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A.T. Kearney - Economic

• Trade & Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

Page 5: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T. Kearney - Personal

• Telephone traffic

• Travel

• Remittances and Personal Transfers

Page 6: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T. Kearney - Technological

• Internet Users

• Internet Hosts

• Secures Servers

Page 7: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T. Kearney – Political

• International Organizations• U.N Peacekeeping• Treaties• Government Transfers

Page 8: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T Kearney – How is it calculated?

• The lowest value is given a 0, the highest is given a 1 and then relative values are given to the ones in between.

• FDI, Internet and Telephone Traffic is weighted double

• All scores are then summarized

Page 9: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T Kearney Advantages

• It covers 96% of worlds GDP

• It covers 84% of worlds Population

• Allows for comparison between countries

• Allows for comparison over time

Page 10: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T Kearney - Disadvantages

• Only 64 Countries are included in the index

• Weightings – who decides?

• How do you measure cultural trends?

Page 11: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T Kearney Criticisms

• Smaller countries tend to take the top places in the index due to higher proportion/importance of FDI – therefore suggesting an over importance of the size of the country.

Page 12: Comparing KOF & Kearney

A. T Kearney - Response

• Not statistically significant

Page 13: Comparing KOF & Kearney

Points of Note with KOF Index

• The KOF Index of 2009 shows that globalization is still on the rise, driven by increased economic and political globalization, while social globalization stagnates.

• According to the KOF Index of Globalization 2009, Belgium is the world's most globalised country, although it is not on the top of any of the three dimensions

Page 14: Comparing KOF & Kearney

Advantages of KOF

• The index allows comparing degree and changes in globalization over a large number of countries and more than 30 years.

• The KOF Index of Globalization 2009 is available for 158 countries over the period 1970–2006,

• It is calculated on the basis of 24 variables.

Page 15: Comparing KOF & Kearney

Advantages of KOF Index

• employing the weighted individual data series instead of using the aggregated lower-level globalization indices data can enter the higher levels of the index even if the value of a sub-index is not reported due to missing data

Page 16: Comparing KOF & Kearney

Disadvantages of KOF

• the results were sometimes driven by extreme outlying observations and missing values.

• cultural globalization mostly refers to the domination of U.S. cultural products. Arguably, the United States is the trend-setter in much of the global socio-cultural realm