6
Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially larger Promotes access Preservation of originals Doubles the collection Credibility

Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects

Similar Advantages:•Asset management – information more direct •Unique digital objects •Audience potentially larger •Promotes access •Preservation of originals •Doubles the collection •Credibility

Page 2: Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

Public & Academic Digitization Projects:

Collaboration Conquers

South Carolina Digital Library Initiativehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuZ1nGoJhvE

• Do you think that every state should have a state-wide digital initiative?

•How do library managers decide on the distribution of funds to ensure the participation in such initiative?

Page 3: Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization

Projects

Similar Challenges: • Lack of infrastructure and well-trained staff• Disorganized and inadequate facilities • Lack of sufficient plan to earmark funds

allotted to the libraries are insufficient• Lapses in the management of funds• Information technology is lacking far behind

Page 4: Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

Contrast Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects

• Source of funding

(Larger academic libraries and Google, Sun Microsystems)

• Approval process of projects

(Larger libraries more involved even include planning funding/grants)

• Types of projects

(Bigger libraries=bigger projects)

• Target audience

(Local vs. global)

Page 5: Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

Library of the Future: Stanford University

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMus6tZifGY 

• If you were a potential funder to continue this project, would this video convince you to support it? Why /Why Not?

• As a library manager, would you consider spending the funding to create a video of this caliber to promote your libraries’ digitization project?

Page 6: Compare Public vs. Academic Digitization Projects Similar Advantages: Asset management – information more direct Unique digital objects Audience potentially

ResourcesAstle, P.J., & Muir, A. (2002). Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 34, 67-79.

Boock, M. (2008). Organizing for digitization at Oregon State University: A case study and comparison with ARL Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, (34)5, 445–451.

Center of Southwest Studies. (2008). Digitization standards. Retrieved October 25, 2008 from http://swcenter.fortlewis.edu/tools/Digitiz.htm

Kahl, C.M., & Williams, S.C. (2006). Accessing digital libraries: A study of ARL members’ digital projects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, (32) 4, 364–369.