Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Community Ecology IB 453 FALL ‘10
www.life.illinois.edu/ib/453
IB 453 Community Ecology
Lecture (MW) • Community concepts and examples from the primary
literature
$62 on Sinauer.com $32 as ebook
Book covers material similar to Morin’s textbook “Community Ecology”
Primer of Ecology
Nick Gotelli
Sinauer Publisher
Good for Competition and Predation Models, Island Biogeography
Primer of Ecology with R
Henry Stevens
Springer
Covers much of the material in Gotelli with more mathematical background and with R code
Fridays: Discussion in here 12-1 or 1-2 pm
- Discussion of primary literature: Classic papers in Community Ecology Recent reviews of issues in Ecology
Discussion starts Wednesday 5th of September
November 30 – December 10: Term paper presentations
Projects conceived and presented singly or in student pairs
Term Papers written independently
Jim Dalling Dept. Plant Biology
149 Morrill Hall
dallingj at life.illinois.edu
Ph: 244 8914
Email for appointments
Study of patterns in diversity, abundance and composition of species in communities and the processes that underlie them (Vellend 2010).
Early beliefs that forces of predation and interspecific - competition provide a “balance of nature” (paradigm that persisted up to ~1940s)
Community Ecology
Origins of Community Ecology
Stephen Forbes (1844-1930) First Chief of the Illinois Natural History Survey
Concerned with more than just surveying species distributions and occurrences. Concerned with the relationship between organisms and the environment - an ecological survey
Qu: How is ‘harmony’ maintained?
Major contributions to aquatic ecosystem science as well as community ecology
Stephen Forbes Major contribution was paper “The Lake as a Microcosm” (presented to the Peoria Scientific Association in 1887)
Strongly influenced by Darwin, Lamarck, Spencer: considered that natural selection was a harmonious force that led to community equilibrium - reflecting a common interest between a species and its enemies
Recognized that species were bound together (in a food web) through competitive and predatory relations
Community as species association
• Cowles (1899) - Indiana Dunes Succession – Geologist - idea of chronosequence (space for
time) – Succession towards Climax community (never
attained?) – Like Forbes, species associations/linkages
important – 42 references cited: only 4 in english!
• Gleason (1926). ‘Individualistic view’ Species associations are unpredictable. Limited opportunities for co-evolution.
“Every species of plant is a law unto itself, the distribution of which in space depends upon its individual peculiarities of migration and environmental requirements…it grows in company of any other species of similar environmental requirements, irrespective of their normal associational affiliations. Plant associations depend solely on the coincidence of environmental selection and migration over an area of considerable extent”
Gleason H. A. (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant Association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53:7-26
Defining communities • Descriptive: groups of populations that occur in
the same area • Statistically defined communities - still the
“European school” • Contrast with ecosystems. Organisms may have
discrete distributions but fluxes in energy and resources do not…
• Functional: populations that interact with each other
In the meantime, in Animal Ecology…
Development of ideas of ecological niche (Elton and Grinnell) - first defined as a habitat - then in reference to position in a food web - allowed functional classifications of species
Grinnell (1917) - niches + competitive exclusion… “no two species regularly established in a single fauna have precisely the same niche relationships”
Community processes
Physiological constraints Biogeographical events
Habitat selection Dispersal ability
Competition
SPECIESCOMPOSITION OF THE
LOCAL COMMUNITY
Predation Mutualisms
REGIONALSPECIES
POOL
Evolutionary processes
Community ecology is a mess? 100 theories proposed for how species coexist in communities
The rules (of species interaction) are contingent in so many ways… as to make the search for patterns unworkable (Lawton 1999).
Each twist added to theoretical models seems to matter, making an overarching treatment of the subject difficult (Vellend 2010)
Solution: Start not from pattern to process, but from exploring limits to process?
Contemporary synthesis of community ecology
Vellend (2010) Quat. Rev. Biol 85:183-206