COMMUNITY DATA SNAPSHOT AURORA, MUNICIPALITY …Community Data Snapshot: Aurora EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 2014-2018 Aurora Kane County CMAP Region Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

COMMUNITY DATA SNAPSHOTAURORA, MUNICIPALITYJUNE 2020 RELEASE

About The Community Data Snapshot 1

About The Community Data SnapshotThe Community Data Snapshots are a series of county, municipal, and Chicago Community Area data profiles thatprimarily feature data from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. As noted in eachprofile, the data comes from multiple sources in addition to the ACS, which include U.S. Census Bureau, IllinoisEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA), Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES), Illinois Department ofRevenue (IDR), and the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP).

User NotesMargin of error

ACS is a sample-based data product. Exercise caution when using data from low-population municipalities, as themargins of error are often large compared to the estimate. For more details please refer to the ACS Sample Size andData Quality Methodology.

Regional values

Regional values are estimated by aggregating 2014-2018 ACS county level data of the seven counties that make upthe CMAP region. These counties are Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will.

Median values

The Census Bureau encourages users to aggregate small levels of geographies into larger areas and recalculatemedian values for those aggregated areas. Median values are recalculated using grouped frequency distributions foraggregated areas such as the CMAP region.

Values for municipalities that extend outside the CMAP region

Values derived from CMAP analyses are restricted to geographies that fall within the CMAP regional boundaries.General Land Use, Equalized Assesed Value, Park Access, Water Supply, and ON TO 2050 Indicator table values onlyrepresent portions of the the municipality that fall within the CMAP region.

Municipalities located in more than one county

Data is provided for the county containing the largest geographic portion of municipality.

Employment values

The Private Sector Employment table features data from the IDES Where Workers Work report. This report includesprivate sector employment totals for six counties within the seven-county CMAP region, excluding Kendall County.

2

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/sample-size-and-data-quality/

POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDThe population and household tables include general demographic, social, and economic characteristics summarizedfor Aurora.

GENERAL POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS, 2014-2018

Aurora Kane County CMAP Region

Total Population 200,660 530,839 8,511,032Total Households 63,204 178,050 3,107,682Average Household Size 3.2 3.0 2.7% Population Change, 2000-10 38.4 27.5 3.5% Population Change, 2010-18 1.4 3.0 0.9% Population Change, 2000-18 40.3 31.4 4.5

Source: 2000 and 2010 Census, 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.

RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2014-2018


Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

White non-Hispanic 72,798 36.3 304,340 57.3 4,367,579 51.3Hispanic or Latino 86,063 42.9 168,385 31.7 1,944,675 22.8Black non-Hispanic 21,314 10.6 27,979 5.3 1,419,547 16.7Asian non-Hispanic 16,304 8.1 21,011 4.0 603,513 7.1All other categories 4,181 2.1 9,124 1.7 175,718 2.1

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Total population.

AGE COHORTS, 2014-2018



19 and Under 63,927 31.9 153,625 28.9 2,191,110 25.720 to 34 40,601 20.2 97,896 18.4 1,807,984 21.235 to 49 47,427 23.6 110,338 20.8 1,713,974 20.150 to 64 31,469 15.7 101,962 19.2 1,641,420 19.365 to 74 10,914 5.4 40,562 7.6 669,758 7.975 to 84 4,508 2.2 18,715 3.5 337,105 4.085 and Older 1,814 0.9 7,741 1.5 149,681 1.8Median Age* 33.4 37.0 37.2

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Total population.

3

Community Data Snapshot: Aurora

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 2014-2018



Less than High School Graduate 26,928 22.1 54,761 15.9 684,093 11.9High School Graduate or Equivalency 26,656 21.8 77,366 22.5 1,319,895 22.9Some College, No Degree 22,065 18.1 71,653 20.9 1,110,944 19.3Associate's Degree 8,641 7.1 25,881 7.5 400,050 7.0Bachelor's Degree 23,873 19.6 72,952 21.2 1,352,126 23.5Graduate or Professional Degree 13,924 11.4 40,897 11.9 888,642 15.4

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 25 years and older.

NATIVITY, 2014-2018


Count Percent Percent Percent

Native 136,154 73.3 81.2 79.7Foreign Born 49,517 26.7 18.8 20.3


LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH, 2014-2018



English Only 101,673 54.8 340,579 68.6 5,489,328 68.7Language other than English 83,998 45.2 155,640 31.4 2,495,708 31.3Speak English less than "very well" 32,654 17.6 62,458 12.6 960,908 12.0


LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME, 2014-2018



English 101,673 54.8 340,579 68.6 5,489,328 68.7Spanish 66,840 36.0 128,156 25.8 1,466,849 18.4Slavic Languages 1,379 0.7 4,088 0.8 275,150 3.4Chinese 1,283 0.7 881 0.2 90,366 1.1Tagalog 1,520 0.8 4,085 0.8 74,092 0.9Arabic 641 0.3 1,528 0.3 61,835 0.8Korean 409 0.2 524 0.1 36,409 0.5Other Asian Languages 4,379 2.4 4,554 0.9 104,636 1.3Other Indo-European Languages 6,706 3.6 10,605 2.1 331,350 4.1Other / Unspecified Languages 841 0.5 1,219 0.2 55,021 0.7


4


HOUSEHOLD SIZE, 2014-2018



1 Person Household 12,655 20.0 37,993 21.3 894,230 28.82 People Household 16,440 26.0 54,661 30.7 952,267 30.63 People Household 10,897 17.2 29,075 16.3 486,146 15.64 or More People Household 23,212 36.7 56,321 31.6 775,039 24.9

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Occupied housing units.

HOUSEHOLD TYPE, 2014-2018



Family 46,741 74.0 74.1 65.1Single Parent with Child 7,365 11.7 8.9 8.3

Non-Family 16,463 26.0 25.9 34.9


HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2014-2018



Less than $25,000 8,911 14.1 23,310 13.1 551,715 17.8$25,000 to $49,999 13,261 21.0 33,060 18.6 585,464 18.8$50,000 to $74,999 11,673 18.5 30,459 17.1 504,014 16.2$75,000 to $99,999 8,250 13.1 23,738 13.3 390,392 12.6$100,000 to $149,999 11,657 18.4 33,541 18.8 516,533 16.6$150,000 and Over 9,452 15.0 33,942 19.1 559,564 18.0Median Income $69,730 $76,912 $70,444


5


HOUSING AND TENURE, 2014-2018



Occupied Housing Units 63,204 94.5 178,050 95.3 3,107,682 91.4Owner-Occupied* 40,299 60.2 130,827 70.1 1,984,033 58.4Renter-Occupied* 22,905 34.2 47,223 25.3 1,123,649 33.0

Vacant Housing Units 3,712 5.5 8,709 4.7 292,513 8.6

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: *Occupied housing units; Housing units.

HOUSING COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2014-2018*



Less than $20,000 5,715 9.2 8.8 12.0Less than 20 percent 113 0.2 0.2 0.320 to 29 percent 395 0.6 0.6 0.830 percent or more 5,207 8.4 8.0 10.8

$20,000 to $49,999 15,599 25.1 22.0 23.3Less than 20 percent 1,837 3.0 2.6 2.620 to 29 percent 3,075 4.9 4.7 5.130 percent or more 10,687 17.2 14.7 15.6

$50,000 to $74,999 11,640 18.7 17.3 16.5Less than 20 percent 3,103 5.0 5.4 5.320 to 29 percent 4,970 8.0 6.4 5.830 percent or more 3,567 5.7 5.6 5.4

$75,000 or More 29,288 47.1 51.9 48.2Less than 20 percent 20,089 32.3 33.8 31.920 to 29 percent 7,668 12.3 14.2 12.330 percent or more 1,531 2.5 3.9 4.0

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Excludes households with zero or negative income and no cash rent.

Universe: Occupied housing units.

HOUSING & TRANSPORTATION (H+T) COSTS, PERCENT OF INCOME PER HOUSEHOLD, 2012-2016*

Median-Income Household** Moderate-Income Household***

Housing Costs 29 36Transportation Costs 21 23H + T Costs 50 58

Source: Location Affordability Index, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, and U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development.*The purpose of the H+T Index is to isolate the effect of location on housing and transportation costs, grouped by common demographic characteristicsthat form four distinct household types. The values above represent the percent of household income that an average household within each of thesetypes in the region would spend on housing and transportation if they lived in this county. The standard threshold of affordability is equal to 30 percentfor housing costs and 45 percent for housing and transportation costs combined. For more information, visit hudexchange.**Median-Income Household assumes a household income equal to the area median, with regional average household size, and the regional averagecommuters per household.***Moderate-Income Household assumes a household income of 80% of the area median with regional average household size, and the regional averagecommuters per household.

6

https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/location-affordability-index/


HOUSING CHARACTERISTICSThe housing characteristics tables include housing unit estimates by housing type, size, and age summarized forAurora.

HOUSING TYPE, 2014-2018*



Single Family, Detached 40,268 60.2 130,385 69.8 1,707,038 50.2Single Family, Attached 9,979 14.9 21,019 11.3 252,166 7.42 Units 3,309 4.9 7,383 4.0 238,040 7.03 or 4 Units 2,976 4.4 7,020 3.8 269,766 7.95 or more Units 10,285 15.4 19,798 10.6 906,352 26.7

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Excludes mobile, boat, RV, van, etc.

Universe: Housing units.

HOUSING SIZE, 2014-2018



0 to 1 Bedrooms 7,040 10.5 14,923 8.0 544,680 16.02 Bedrooms 19,350 28.9 45,839 24.5 967,257 28.43 Bedrooms 24,521 36.6 65,797 35.2 1,132,665 33.34 Bedrooms 13,297 19.9 49,735 26.6 593,229 17.45+ Bedrooms 2,708 4.0 10,465 5.6 162,364 4.8Median Number of Rooms* 5.7 6.3 6.0

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Includes all rooms.


HOUSING AGE, 2014-2018



Built 2000 or Later 13,708 20.5 45,074 24.1 448,760 13.2Built 1970 to 1999 28,564 42.7 73,539 39.4 1,151,670 33.9Built 1940 to 1969 12,414 18.6 38,992 20.9 1,049,052 30.9Built Before 1940 12,230 18.3 29,154 15.6 750,713 22.1Median Year Built 1982 1981 1968

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Housing units.

7


TRANSPORTATIONThe transportation tables include vehicle availability by household, mode of travel to work, and annual vehicle milestraveled for Aurora.

VEHICLES AVAILABLE PER HOUSEHOLD, 2014-2018



No Vehicle Available 2,597 4.1 7,813 4.4 394,626 12.71 Vehicle Available 18,574 29.4 47,412 26.6 1,104,851 35.62 Vehicles Available 27,862 44.1 78,044 43.8 1,103,712 35.53 or More Vehicles Available 14,171 22.4 44,781 25.2 504,493 16.2


MODE OF TRAVEL TO WORK, 2014-2018

Aurora Kane County 6-County Region*


Work at Home** 4,430 N/A 14,120 N/A 214,903 N/ADrive Alone 76,125 80.9 207,341 84.3 2,856,015 72.4Carpool 11,492 12.2 24,987 10.2 323,107 8.2Transit 4,076 4.3 6,651 2.7 551,089 14.0Walk or Bike 1,446 1.5 4,042 1.6 163,932 4.2Other 1,001 1.1 3,055 1.2 51,124 1.3TOTAL COMMUTERS 94,140 100.0 246,076 100.0 3,945,267 100.0Mean Commute Time (minutes) 29.0 28.9 31.8

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.* Commuter estimates not available for Kendall County.** Not included in "total commuters."

Universe: Workers 16 years and older.

ANNUAL VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PER HOUSEHOLD, 2014-2018


Average Vehicle Miles Traveled 21,168 22,219 17,165

Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning analysis of U.S. Census Bureau, HERE, and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (2017) data.

8


EMPLOYMENTThe employment tables include general workforce characteristics for Aurora.

EMPLOYMENT STATUS, 2014-2018



In Labor Force 107,299 72.0 281,764 69.0 4,547,626 67.2Employed†* 100,997 94.1 266,113 94.4 4,231,812 93.1Unemployed* 6,257 5.8 15,524 5.5 304,075 6.7

Not In Labor Force 41,829 28.0 126,860 31.0 2,215,759 32.8

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.Does not include employed population in the Armed Forces.†

Universe: *In Labor Force; Population 16 years and older.

PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT, 2019*

Aurora Kane County 6-County Region**


Private Employment 59,611 N/A 178,561 N/A 3,598,232 N/AJob Change (2002-10) -3,331 -6.0 -8,674 -5.3 -225,309 -6.7Job Change (2010-19) 7,848 15.2 22,896 14.7 465,181 14.8Job Change (2002-19) 4,517 8.2 14,222 8.7 239,872 7.1Private Sector Jobs per Household 0.94 1.00 1.16

Source: Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES).*Figures exclude employees not covered by unemployment insurance.**Kendall County is not included in IDES data.

EMPLOYMENT OF AURORA RESIDENTS, 2017*

By Industry Sector Count Percent

Manufacturing 9,600 12.1Retail Trade 9,364 11.8Health Care 8,974 11.3Administration 7,424 9.4Professional 6,634 8.4

By Employment Location

Aurora 14,246 18.0Chicago 9,266 11.7Naperville 6,800 8.6Batavia 2,167 2.7Downers Grove 1,504 1.9

EMPLOYMENT IN AURORA, 2017*

By Industry Sector Count Percent

Health Care 9,983 15.8Administration 8,542 13.5Manufacturing 6,618 10.5Retail Trade 6,596 10.5Education 6,591 10.4

By Residence Location

Aurora 14,246 22.6Chicago 4,049 6.4Naperville 2,879 4.6Oswego 1,836 2.9Joliet 1,704 2.7

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Longitudinal-Employer Household Dynamics Program (2017).*Excludes locations outside of the CMAP region.

9


LAND USEThe land use tables include general land use composition, park access, and Walk Score for Aurora. The general landuse and park access table estimates were derived from the CMAP Parcel-Based Land Use Inventory.

GENERAL LAND USE, 2013

Acres Percent

Single-Family Residential 9,745.6 33.3Multi-Family Residential 559.2 1.9Commercial 1,682.7 5.7Industrial 2,097.2 7.2Institutional 2,031.4 6.9Mixed Use 13.3 0.0Transportation and Other 6,198.6 21.2Agricultural 1,962.9 6.7Open Space 3,568.5 12.2Vacant 1,435.6 4.9TOTAL 29,295.0 100.0

Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Parcel-Based Land Use Inventory 2013.

PARK ACCESS, 2013


Accessible Park Acreage per 1,000 Residents* 7.5 9.3 5.6

Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning calculations of 2013 Land Use Inventory.*Neighborhood parks (under 35 acres) are considered accessible by residents living within 0.5 miles; community parks (35 or more acres) are consideredaccessible by residents living within 1 mile.

WALK SCORE, 2018

Walk Score* 40.00

*Walk Score is a number between 0 and 100 that measures the average walkability of a municipality. For more information visit walkscore.com (2018).

10

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/land-use/inventory

https://www.walkscore.com


REVENUEThe revenue tables include Aurora revenues based on sales and current land use.

GENERAL MERCHANDISE RETAIL SALES, 2019


General Merchandise $ 1,932,065,291 $ 5,977,282,979 $ 105,768,000,000Total Retail Sales $ 2,347,727,571 $ 7,472,301,950 $ 133,428,000,000Total Sales per Capita* $ 11,700 $ 14,076 $ 15,677

Source: Illinois Department of Revenue, 2019.*Per capita calculations based on population from 2014-2018 ACS 5-year estimates.

EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE, 2018

Residential $ 2,852,649,827Commercial $ 660,214,403Industrial $ 411,775,377Railroad $ 2,196,226Farm $ 1,314,182Mineral $ 150TOTAL $ 3,928,150,165

Sources: Illinois Department of Revenue 2018, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning calculations of 2013 Land UseInventory, 2014-2018 ACS 5-year estimates.

11

Community Data Snapshot Time Series: Aurora

CHANGE OVER TIMEThe time series tables include comparisons of current 2014-2018 ACS estimates to historic year estimates from the2000 Census and 2006-2010 ACS.

RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2000-2018

2000 2010 2018

Percent Percent Percent

White non-Hispanic 52.1 41.1 36.3Hispanic or Latino 32.6 40.8 42.9Black non-Hispanic 10.8 10.2 10.6Asian non-Hispanic 3.0 6.3 8.1All other categories 1.6 1.6 2.1

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American CommunitySurvey five-year estimates.

Universe: Total population.

NATIVITY, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Native 72.8 73.3Foreign Born 27.2 26.7

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.

Universe: Population 5 years and older.

AGE COHORTS, 2000-2018

2000 2010 2018


19 and Under 34.5 34.5 31.920 to 34 26.8 23.3 20.235 to 49 22.3 23.0 23.650 to 64 10.1 12.7 15.765 and Older 6.3 6.5 8.6Median Age* 29.3 30.6 33.4

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American CommunitySurvey five-year estimates.

Universe: Total population.

12


EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 2000-2018

2000 2010 2018


Less than High School Graduate 24.4 22.0 22.1High School Graduate or Equivalency 21.9 23.0 21.8Some College, No Degree 17.8 17.7 18.1Associate's Degree 6.0 6.2 7.1Bachelor's Degree 20.6 19.8 19.6Graduate or Professional Degree 9.3 11.2 11.4

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 25 years and older.

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

English Only 57.3 54.8Language other than English 42.7 45.2Speak English less than "very well" 21.6 17.6

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 5 years and older.

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

English 57.3 54.8Spanish 34.9 36.0Slavic Languages 0.9 0.7Chinese 0.5 0.7Tagalog 0.5 0.8Arabic 0.2 0.3Korean 0.2 0.2Other Asian Languages 1.6 2.4Other Indo-European Languages 3.7 3.6Other / Unspecified Languages 0.2 0.5

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 5 years and older.

13


HOUSEHOLD SIZE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

1 Person Household 21.7 20.02 People Household 25.5 26.03 People Household 17.2 17.24 or More People Household 35.5 36.7

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Occupied housing units.

HOUSEHOLD TYPE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Family 73.0 74.0Single Parent with Child 11.6 11.7

Non-Family 27.0 26.0


HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2010-2018

2010 2018

(2018 Dollars) (2018 Dollars)

Median Income $ 69,888 $ 69,730


14


HOUSING AND TENURE, 2010-2018

2000 2010 2018


Occupied Housing Units 95.3 93.8 94.5Owner-Occupied* 66.8 66.7 60.2Renter-Occupied* 28.5 27.1 34.2

Vacant Housing Units 4.7 6.2 5.5

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.

Universe: *Occupied housing units; Housing units.

HOUSING COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Less than $20,000 10.3 9.2Less than 20 percent 0.4 0.220 to 29 percent 0.8 0.630 percent or more 9.2 8.4

$20,000 to $49,999 29.1 25.1Less than 20 percent 3.2 3.020 to 29 percent 5.1 4.930 percent or more 20.8 17.2

$50,000 to $74,999 19.4 18.7Less than 20 percent 4.0 5.020 to 29 percent 6.7 8.030 percent or more 8.7 5.7

$75,000 or More 39.5 47.1Less than 20 percent 19.9 32.320 to 29 percent 14.1 12.330 percent or more 5.5 2.5


15


HOUSING TYPE, 2010-2018*

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Single Family, Detached 59.9 60.2Single Family, Attached 13.8 14.92 Units 5.3 4.93 or 4 Units 4.3 4.45 or more Units 16.5 15.4

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.*Excludes mobile, boat, RV, van, etc.


HOUSING SIZE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

0 to 1 Bedrooms 11.0 10.52 Bedrooms 27.9 28.93 Bedrooms 37.4 36.64 Bedrooms 20.7 19.95+ Bedrooms 3.0 4.0Median Number of Rooms* 5.7 5.7

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Includes all rooms.


HOUSING AGE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Built 2000 or Later 19.5 20.5Built 1970 to 1999 40.0 42.7Built 1940 to 1969 21.6 18.6Built Before 1940 18.9 18.3Median Year Built 1979 1982

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.


16


VEHICLES AVAILABLE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

No Vehicle Available 5.9 4.11 Vehicle Available 31.1 29.42 Vehicles Available 44.3 44.13 or More Vehicles Available 18.7 22.4


MODE OF TRAVEL TO WORK, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Work at Home* N/A N/ADrive Alone 80.3 80.9Carpool 11.0 12.2Transit 5.0 4.3Walk or Bike 1.5 1.5Other 2.2 1.1TOTAL COMMUTERS 86,922.0 94,140.0Mean Commute Time (minutes) 29.1 29.0

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.* Not included in "total commuters."

Universe: Workers 16 years and over.

EMPLOYMENT STATUS, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

In Labor Force 74.8 72.0Employed†* 91.5 94.1Unemployed* 8.4 5.8

Not In Labor Force 25.2 28.0

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.Does not include employed population in the Armed Forces.†

Universe: *In Labor Force; Population 16 years and older.

17

Community Data Snapshot Water Supply: Aurora

WATER SUPPLYCMAP supports an integrated approach to water resource management, and encourages communities to incorporatewater supply and demand considerations into land use, transportation, and infrastructure investment decisions.Assessing demand, price, and loss trends of a community can inform decisions that strengthen regional water supplymanagement, maintain drinking water infrastructure, and manage demand. Click here to learn more about howcommunities can coordinate and conserve our shared water supply resources.

WATER SOURCE AND DEMAND TRENDS OF AURORA*

Primary Water Source: Fox River**

2003 MGD*** 2013 MGD Percent

Total Water Withdrawals**** 18.00 18.20 0.70Residential Sector 14.00 14.30 1.60Non-Residential Sector 4.00 3.90 -2.60

Source: Analysis of Illinois Water Inventory Program water withdrawal data (2002-2013).* Only available for municipalities with community water suppliers providing service to the majority of the community. ** The primary water source of a community is based on the source of the majority of withdrawals from all wells and intakes within the community,including community water suppliers and industrial and commercial businesses. The majority of withdrawals is calculated as an average from yearly data,given year to year fluctuations. *** Millions of gallons per day. **** Total includes all community water suppliers and industrial and commercial wells/intakes within a municipality; private residential wells are notincluded. Residential sector includes withdrawals identified as residential by community water suppliers. Non-residential sector includes withdrawalsidentified as non-residential by the community water suppliers and withdrawals from industrial and commercial wells/intakes.

DAILY RESIDENTIAL WATER DEMAND PER CAPITA

Aurora CMAP Region

2003 2013 Percent Change 2003 2013 Percent Change

Residential* (GPCD**) 85.4 71.3 -18.0 104.2 87.5 -17.4

Source: Analysis of Illinois Water Inventory Program water withdrawal data 2003-2013.* Residential sector includes withdrawals identified as residential by community water suppliers. The prevalence of private residential wells or communitywater suppliers that provide water outside of the municipal boundary could lead to artificially lower or higher GPCD values respectively. ** Gallons of water per capita per day (estimated unit use). Population values used in sector totals come from the U.S. Census.

18

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050/environment/water-supply#water-planning

Community Data Snapshot Water Supply: Aurora

WATER AND WASTEWATER PRICE TRENDS*

Real price per 1,000 gallons, in 2018dollars 2008 2018

PercentChange Annual Percent Change

Drinking Water $ 4.47 $ 6.88 42.5 4.4Sewer $ 1.14 $ 6.24 138.4 18.6Combined** (if applicable) N/A N/A N/A N/A

Source: Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Water Rates Data for Northeastern Illinois, IISG19-RCE-RLA-031.* Only available for communities with water utilities and that responded to data requests. Percent changes and 2008 prices were adjusted for inflationusing the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic's Consumer Price Index for the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin region.** Some utilities combine drinking water and sewer prices, rather than separating them out as two distinct rates.

WATER LOSS*

Reporting utility: Not a Lake Michigan permittee

2017

Nonrevenue Water (Millions of Gallons per Day)** N/AAnnual Cost of Nonrevenue Water ($) N/APercent of Nonrevenue Water to Water Supplied*** N/A

Source: Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Lake Michigan Allocation Program.* Data is only regionally available for Lake Michigan permittees; water losses from other communities and industrial and commercial businesses are notreported to the state. ** Nonrevenue water is the difference between net annual pumpage (water supplied) and billed, authorized consumption. Non-revenue water includeswater that is lost from the system due to underregistration of meters, systematic data handling errors, leakage anywhere within the distribution system,unauthorized consumption, or unbilled authorized consumption.*** The threshold for permit compliance is less than 12 percent of water supplied in Water Year 2015, decreasing to no more than 10 percent by Water Year2019 and all years thereafter. Permittees that exceed the threshold are required to submit a water system improvement plan.

19

Community Data Snapshot ON TO 2050 Indicators: Aurora

ON TO 2050 INDICATORS

ON TO 2050 is the region's long-range comprehensive plan, adopted by CMAP in 2018. The plan includes a set ofindicators for quantifying its goals and measuring implementation progress. While many of these indicators can onlybe measured at a regional level, several can also be tracked at a local level. These have been laid out in the tablebelow, with comparisons to the region's current measure as well as the targets that the plan is aiming to reach by2050. Visit cmap.illinois.gov/2050/indicators to learn more.

Aurora CMAP Region

(Current) (Current) (Target) Source

Plan Chapter Indicator

COMMUNITY

Population located in highlywalkable areas

4.6% 41.5% 45.2% CMAP, 2015

Jobs located in highly walkableareas

0.7% 38.2% 45.2% CMAP, 2015

PROSPERITY

Population aged 25+ with anassociate's degree or higher

38.0% 45.9% 64.9% 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year

Workforce participation rateamong population aged 20-64

82.4% 80.6% 83.4% 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year

ENVIRONMENT

Population with park access of 4+acres per 1,000 residents

64.0% 41.5% 65.0% CMAP, 2013

Population with park access of 10+acres per 1,000 residents

26.1% 16.0% 40.0% CMAP, 2013

Impervious acres per household0.18 0.18 0.15 USGS National

Land CoverDataset, 2016

Daily residential water demand percapita (gallons)

71.3 87.5 65.2 Illinois WaterInventory Program,

2013

GOVERNANCE

State revenue disbursement percapita

$278.50 $286.21* N/A CMAP, 2018

Is per capita disbursement at least80% of regional median?

Yes Yes for 74% ofmunicipalities

Yes for 100% ofmunicipalities

CMAP, 2018

MOBILITY

Population with at leastmoderately high transit availability

36.6% 53.2% 65.0% CMAP, 2017

Jobs with at least moderately hightransit availability

31.2% 55.2% 58.0% CMAP, 2017

Percent of trips to work via non-SOV modes

21.8% 30.1% 37.3% 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year

*Median value of region's 284 municpalities.

20

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050/indicators


For More Information Last updated July 2020

To improve the Community Data Snapshots in the future, CMAP wants to hear from you. Please take a quick surveyto describe how you use this data and what you'd like to see in next year's snapshots.

Please direct inquiries to [email protected]. To access other Community Data Snapshots for municipalities andcounties in the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s seven-county northeastern Illinois region, visithttp://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/community-snapshots.

21

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/339KXSH

mailto:%[email protected]

http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/community-snapshots

Documents

COMMUNITY DATA SNAPSHOT AURORA, MUNICIPALITY …Community Data Snapshot: Aurora EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 2014-2018 Aurora Kane County CMAP Region Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent