5
2017-03-15 1 Promoting more effective communication partner training in speech-language pathology practice Riva Sorin-Peters, PhD, Reg CASLPO, SLP©, CCC-SLP [email protected] Marie-Christine Hallé, MPO, PhD, [email protected] Learning Objectives 1. To be aware of the current gap between best practice and SLPs’ routine practice with regards to communication partner training (CPT). 2. To learn how existing theories and theoretical frameworks in adult education and knowledge translation can support professional practice change. 2. To learn how theory was applied to a training program for speech-language pathologists to improve their practice of CPT. 3. To identify the barriers and facilitators influencing your use of CPT and the strategies that can help you overcome barriers and enhance facilitators. 1. Introduction Communication Partner Training (CPT) “CPT is intervention aimed at people other than the individual with aphasia with the intent of improving communication with the person with aphasia(Simmons- Mackie, Raymer, Armstrong, Holland, & Cherney, 2010) Why is it important? Evidence: Simmons-Mackie, 2010 Simmons-Mackie, 2016 1. Introduction Current SLP Practice: SLPs rarely and only under specific conditions train SOs to communicate better with the PWA (Halle, Le Dorze, Mingant, 2014) SLPs perceive work with significant others and CPT as a challenging bonus to therapy, rather than as a feasible necessity (Halle, Le Dorze, Mingant, 2014). 1. Introduction Barriers & Challenges: SLPs perceive their role with significant others as one of offering information about aphasia and obtaining information about the PWA for the purpose of treatment. SLPs perceive CPT as being linked to only the chronic phase of aphasia and as less compatible with hope for language recovery. SLPs perceive CPT skills as more challenging, including addressing more difficult family emotions and issues. 2. Knowledge Translation What is it? A dynamic and iterative process What is its primary purpose? Address the gap between what is known from the research and what is done in clinical practice with the intention to: Improve health outcomes Provide more effective health services Strengthen health care system How does it occur? In which context? Within a complex system of interactions among stakeholders (researchers, practitioners, consumers, policy makers) (Graham et al., 2006)

Communication Partner Training (CPT) - MemberClicks · 2. The Knowledge to Action Framework A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Communication Partner Training (CPT) - MemberClicks · 2. The Knowledge to Action Framework A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two

2017-03-15

1

Promoting more effective

communication partner training in

speech-language pathology practice

Riva Sorin-Peters, PhD, Reg CASLPO, SLP©, CCC-SLP

[email protected]

Marie-Christine Hallé, MPO, PhD,

[email protected]

Learning Objectives

1. To be aware of the current gap between best practice and SLPs’

routine practice with regards to communication partner training

(CPT).

2. To learn how existing theories and theoretical frameworks in

adult education and knowledge translation can support

professional practice change.

2. To learn how theory was applied to a training program for

speech-language pathologists to improve their practice of CPT.

3. To identify the barriers and facilitators influencing your use of

CPT and the strategies that can help you overcome barriers and

enhance facilitators.

1. Introduction

• Communication Partner Training (CPT)

– “CPT is intervention aimed at people other than the individual with aphasia with the intent of improving communication with the person with aphasia” (Simmons-

Mackie, Raymer, Armstrong, Holland, & Cherney, 2010)

• Why is it important?

• Evidence:

– Simmons-Mackie, 2010

– Simmons-Mackie, 2016

1. Introduction

• Current SLP Practice:

– SLPs rarely and only under specific conditions train

SOs to communicate better with the PWA (Halle, Le Dorze,

Mingant, 2014)

– SLPs perceive work with significant others and CPT as

a challenging bonus to therapy, rather than as a

feasible necessity (Halle, Le Dorze, Mingant, 2014).

1. Introduction

• Barriers & Challenges:

– SLPs perceive their role with significant others as one of offering information about aphasia and obtaining information about the PWA for the purpose of treatment.

– SLPs perceive CPT as being linked to only the chronic phase of aphasia and as less compatible with hope for language recovery.

– SLPs perceive CPT skills as more challenging, including addressing more difficult family emotions and issues.

2. Knowledge Translation

What is it? • A dynamic and iterative process

What is its primary purpose? • Address the gap between what is known from the research and

what is done in clinical practice with the intention to: – Improve health outcomes

– Provide more effective health services

– Strengthen health care system

How does it occur? In which context? • Within a complex system of interactions among stakeholders

(researchers, practitioners, consumers, policy makers) (Graham et al., 2006)

Page 2: Communication Partner Training (CPT) - MemberClicks · 2. The Knowledge to Action Framework A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two

2017-03-15

2

2. The Knowledge to Action Framework

A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two concepts: 1. Knowledge creation 2. Action cycle

2. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)

• Specifically developed to study the implementation of evidence-

based practice.

• Consists of a list of 14 domains that can act as barriers and facilitators

to behaviour change.

1. Knowledge 8. Intention

2. Skills 9. Goals

3. Social/professional role and identity

10. Memory, attention and decision process

4. Beliefs about capabilities 11. Environmental context and resources

5. Optimism 12. Social influences

6. Beliefs about consequences 13. Emotion

7. Reinforcement 14. Behavioural regulation

Cane, O’Connor, and Michie, 2012

– Learning is a process that occurs within the

learner and is activated by the learner

• “Inside-out” learning

• A consequence of experience

2. Adult Education Principles

–Learning involves a restructuring of previous knowledge, experience and learning

– Involves the whole person and the multiple factors in the system

–A cyclical process of change

–Lifelong learning

2. Principles of Adult Education

2. The Kolb’s Experiential Learning

Model

Experience et

ressenti

Imagination et

lecture

Observation et

réflexion

Application

Concrete Experience

Reflective Observation

Active

Experimentation

Abstract Conceptualisation

3. Application of theory to practice:

Pilot project

• Subjects:

Sex Age # years of practice

Year of SCA training

Previous training in CPT

SLP1 F 35 10 2014 no

SLP2 F 36 8 2011 Discussed in master’s pgm

SLP3 F 50 15 2010 no

SLP4 F 55 30 > 10 yrs ‘It Takes Two to Tango’

Page 3: Communication Partner Training (CPT) - MemberClicks · 2. The Knowledge to Action Framework A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two

2017-03-15

3

3. Application of theory to practice:

Pilot project

• Intervention: – Pre-workshop assignment

– 2-day workshop

• Included all 4 components of Kolb’s cycle

• Included role play activities and the opportunity to practice skills learned with selected couples.

• Included measurement of CPT.

– Follow-up assignment

– Follow-up conference call with workshop participants

Concrete Experience

Reflection Active

Experimentation

Abstract Conceptualisation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Familiar with adult learning principles

Know strategies to apply adult lng

principles to CPT

Comfortable training family members of

PWA

Effective in training family members of

PWA

Sco

re

Knowledge

Results Pre- and post- knowledge about adult learning

Pre

Post

3. Results

Change in Practice of CPT

4/4 applied the new knowledge and strategies to

their practice of CPT

3. Follow up Results

• Reported results of applying the adult learning

techniques:

– “more positive results training client and his wife”

– “more positive results training client and his friend”

– “partners were way more invested than before”

– “worked beautifully”,

– “seemed like a different couple when they came

back”

– “they are now mentors for other couples”

3. Implications

Commonalities between knowledge translation and adult learning theory:

• They involve change

• They begin with the recognition of a problem

• They are iterative, dynamic and long-term processes

• They involve individual factors and organizational factors that may act as barriers and facilitators

• They require one to reflect on experience, integrate concepts and apply learning to practice.

These components should be taken into account when

planning to support professional practice changes

among SLPs, for instance towards a more systematic

use of CPT

4. Points for Discussion

• What is your current experience

implementing CPT?

• What works well?

What are your challenges?

Page 4: Communication Partner Training (CPT) - MemberClicks · 2. The Knowledge to Action Framework A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two

2017-03-15

4

4. Points for Discussion

• How could you overcome these

challenges?

• What’s ONE thing you could do

differently in your practice of CPT?

Conclusion

• Common core components in adult learning theory

and knowledge translation theory.

• The Kolb’s experiential learning model can help us

promote change in clinical practice to provide more

evidence based interventions in CPT.

• Our learning process is similar to the change

process we aim to facilitate in our clients.

Questions References

• Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation science, 7(1), 37.

• Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?. Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 26(1), 13-24.

• Hallé, M. C., Le Dorze, G., & Mingant, A. (2014). Speech–language therapists’ process of including significant others in aphasia rehabilitation. International journal of language & communication disorders, 49(6), 748-760.

References

• Kolb, D. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

• Simmons-Mackie (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

References

• Simmons-Mackie, N. , Raymer, A. & Cherney, L. (2016). Communication partner training in aphasia: an updated systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(12), 2202-2221.

• Sorin-Peters, R. (2003). Viewing couples living with aphasia as adult learners: Implications for promoting quality of life. Aphasiology, 17, 405-416.

• Sorin-Peters, R. (2004). The evaluation of a learner-centred training programme for spouses of adults with aphasia using qualitative case study methodology. Aphasiology, 18, 951-975.

Page 5: Communication Partner Training (CPT) - MemberClicks · 2. The Knowledge to Action Framework A model illustrating the process of translating research into practice and involving two

2017-03-15

5

References

• Sorin-Peters, R. & Patterson, R. (2010). The implementation of a learner-centred conversation training programme for spouses of adults with aphasia in a community setting. Aphasiology, 28(6), 731-749.

• Turner & Whitworth (2006). Conversational partner training programmes in aphasia: a review of key themes and participant roles. Aphasiology, 20(6), 483-510.