Upload
eustace-griffith
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Commonwealth IT Consolidation Working Group Discussion DocumentExecutive Office for Administration and Finance: Secretariat-Level Application Consolidation
ANF Application Consolidation Work Group
Date 09/30/2009
- 2 -- 2 -DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Agenda
ANF Application Consolidation Work Group Report
1 Secretariat Application Consolidation Candidates
• Application Work Group
• EOANF Agency Application Inventory
• Findings and Recommendations
2 High-priority Program Issues and Risks
3 Immediate Action Items
- 3 -- 3 -DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Application Consolidation Work Group
Cross-Agency team formed to review feasibility of ANF agency application consolidation
Team members:Advisors– Marcie Desmond, SCIO– Alan Nawoj, Deloitte Consulting– Brian Hickey (HRD)Working Members– Nancy Burke, Project Lead (OSD)– Craig DiGiorgi (DCP)– Chuck Meredith (HRD)– Neil Montague (ANF)– Vincent Piccinni (DOR)– Valerie Valliant (ANF)
Project goals and objectives:– Gather and review ANF Agency Application Inventory information– Review Phase 1 Secretariat IT Consolidation Plan for list of suggested secretariat-level application candidates– Develop criteria to gauge feasibility of agency applications as secretariat-level applications– Review application inventory and recommend Secretariat-level application candidates– Identify common software across agencies that could generate savings through license aggregation or sharing– Establish a Center of Excellence and define the Governance model
Short-term Goals by September 30, 2009– Assemble an inventory listing of ANF agency applications– Review inventory for potential Secretariat-level consolidation– Finalize criteria and produce a listing of potential consolidation candidates
IT Consolidation WIKI will be used for transparency on team activities as data security levels allow
- 4 -- 4 -DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Work Group Activities
Reviewed and leveraged the application inventory collected by the Data Center Consolidation Work group (DCCWG)
Created a combined listing of all ANF agency applications reported
Assessed remaining applications on 2 levels – (1) business application and (2) underlying application platform
– Removed agency-only applications with neither a business nor underlying application benefit for consolidation
Grouped application candidates into functional business categories:– Administration and Finance– Training and Outreach (includes Marketing)– Supply Chain– IT Development and Support– Other
Confirmed ANF Application Consolidation Criteria:
– Redundant functional duplication across Secretariats and associated maintenance costs
– Ability to leverage scales of economy across the Secretariat
– Application age
– Business value of sharing information
– Augmentation of information security
- 5 -- 5 -DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Application Work Group Findings
Agencies within the Executive Office for Administration and Finance (ANF) reported 153 applications
Number of agency applications identified by work group as potential candidates for Secretariat Consolidation : 87
Number of agency applications by business function:
– Functional category 1 ( Administration and Finance ) : 38
– Functional category 2 ( Training and Outreach (includes Marketing) ) : 9
– Functional category 3 ( Supply Chain ) : 3
– Functional category 4 ( IT Development and Support ) : 23
– Functional category 5 (other) : 14
Application Work Group identified 30 application types as potential candidates for Secretariat-level consolidation
These categories have the most potential for cost savings or added efficiency through consolidation
Team conclusions:
More in depth analysis of application candidates is needed
Opportunity for cost savings on COTS software requires review of license terms and opportunity data
– May be able to leverage data already collected by procurement efficiencies team
- 6 -- 6 -DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
High-Priority Program Issues and Risks
Type (dependency, issue, or risk)
Title Priority Details Action Needed Owner
Dependency Secretariat-Level
Staffing
Success of consolidating recommended applications depends on the secretariat having appropriate staffing levels for development, maintenance and support
•Define center of excellence (COE) and Governance Model•Define roles and responsibilities•Develop staffing plan with ANF SCIO
Application Work group and SCIO
Dependency Staff Skill Sets
Agency skill-sets for consolidated staff need to be representative of the various underlying application architectures.
•Review underlying application architectures•Perform gap analysis between current staff skill sets and skill sets needed•Develop and Implement knowledge transfer, training and mentoring Talent Management and HR / Labor Administration Committee.
Application Work group and Talent Management and HR / Labor Administration
Risk Dual Agency IT
Responsibility of staff
Agency development and application support staff are responsible for other IT core functions, not related to application development.
•Assess roles, responsibilities and skill sets of agency IT staff•Review timeline for desktop, LAN, HelpDesk and Data center Consolidation•Determine optimum placement of staff based
Application Work group Talent Management and HR / Labor Administration,HelpDesk, Desktop and LAN and DCCWG Teams
- 7 -- 7 -DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Immediate Action Items
Action Item Owner Priority Due Date
Define Center of Excellence SCIO and Application Work
Group
1 October 31, 2009
Define Roles and Responsibilities of COE and Agency IT staff
SCIO and Application Work
Group
2 November 15, 2009
Identify skill sets required Application Work Group
3 November 30, 2009
Assess current skill level of agency staff and skill set gaps Application Work group and Talent Management and
HR / Labor Administration
4 December 31, 2009
Review data collected by the Procurement Efficiencies Team on agency Microsoft licenses
Application Work Group
5December 31,
2009