Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Common Shoulder Injuries in the Throwing
Athlete: Amateur to Professional
Steven B. Cohen, MD Associate Professor: Dept Orthopedic Surgery
Thomas Jefferson University / Rothman Institute Asst Team Physician – Philadelphia Phillies Asst Team Physician – Philadelphia Flyers
AsstTeam Physician – St. Joseph’s University Philadelphia, PA
EATA Conference – Jan 10, 2015
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Disclosure
Consultant: ConMed Linvatec
Consultant / Royalties: Zimmer
Research Funding: Arthrex, Inc
Research Funding: MLB
Royalties – SLACK, Inc
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Phases of Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
¤
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
EMG Activity With Throwing
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
External Rotation Set
Point
IR velocity in elite pitcher =
7000˚ /second
Increased ER
Increased IR velocity
“the slot”
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Historical
Kennedy, Hawkins, Krusoff 1978
AJSM 6:309-22
Poor results with CA ligament division in swimmers
Tibone, Jobe, Kerlan et al 1985
CORR 188:134-40
Open SAD in throwers
50% failure rate
22% return to pre-injury level
Impingement?
True subacromial (outlet) impingement is not the problem
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Historical
Andrews, Carson, McLoed - 1985
AJSM 13:337-340
High level throwing athletes
Rotator cuff tears
Superior labral injuries
Suggested that attrition was secondary to repetitive tension overload on rotator cuff and biceps tendon
Cuff Tear?
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Historical
Jobe et. al. Orthop. Rev. 18;963-975:1989
Repetitive throwing
Laxity of anterior capsule
Humeral head migrates anteriorly
Rotator cuff / labral pathology
Laxity?
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Historical
Walsh et. al. JSES 1:238-45:1992
“internal impingement”
rotator cuff impinged by posterior / superior glenoid rim in extremes of abduction and external rotation
Jobe Arthroscopy 1995 and CORR 1996
Internal Impingement?
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Physiologic, but increases with anterior micro-instability
Internal Impingement
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Internal Impingement
Meister K et al; Aspects of Sports
Med. Aug 2004 p 412-415
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Common Conditions
Labrum Superior / SLAP most common Anterior / posterior
Rotator cuff Tendonitis Partial-thickness tear Full-thickness tear
Biceps tendon Tendonitis Subluxation / tear
Scapular Dyskinesia
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
SLAP Tears?
1990
Snyder et. al.
Arthroscopy 6:274-279
Historical
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Functional Importance
Biceps anchor stabilizes
humeral head (Anterior +
Superior)
Ext. rotation = labral strain
SLAP = strain I.G.H.
Itoi et al JBJS ’93; Rodosky et al, AMJS ’94;
Grauer et al Arthro ‘92
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Dysfunction
Long Head of Biceps Humeral head depressor
2˚ restraint to GH translation in Abd. & ER
Increased EMG activity in pitchers with instability
Decreases biceps stabilizing ability
Increases stresses on IGHL
Increased laxity
S
L
A
P
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Peel-Back Phenomenon
Burkhart and Morgan
AJSM 1998
Acquired tight posterior capsule
Peel back of biceps/labral anchor
Posterior/superior GH instability
& anteroinferior pseudolaxity
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Peel-Back Phenomenon
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Tight Posteroinferior
Capsule
- Deceleration
- distraction force
750 N (80% body wt.)
- Repetitive
microtrauma to
posteroinferior
capsule leading to
contracture
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
GIRD
Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit
Def: loss in degrees of glenohumeral
internal rotation of the throwing shoulder
compared to non-throwing shoulder
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
GIRD
124 baseball pitchers
40 pro, 43 college,
41 HS
Type II SLAP
(arthroscopic)
Avg. GIRD 53˚ (25-80˚)
19 asymptomatic
professional
GIRD 13˚ preseason
and 16˚ postseason
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Catching
Pain
Anterior Tenderness
Looseness
Complaints
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
SLAP Tests
Examine for GIRD
Compression - rotation
Anterior Slide Test
Hawkins / Neer
Apprehension / Relocation
O’Brien Sign (Active compression)
Mayo Shear Test No one test is perfect
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Diagnosis of SLAP Tears
MRI arthrogram is gold standard (specificity & sensitivity > 90%)
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Treatment
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Nonoperative
Rest
Sleeper stretches
Cuff strengthening
Scapular strengthening & scapular stabilizing
Core / Kinetic Chain
Sleeper Stretch 2Roll-Over
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
1. Acceptable GIRD is <20˚ or 10% of total
rotation in the non-throwing shoulder
2. Prophylactic posteroinferior capsular stretching
program minimizes GIRD and can prevent 2˚
problem
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Non-op treatment is successful
Edwards et al (Columbia). Nonoperative treatment of SLAP tears: Improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. AJSM July 2010. 39 patients documented SLAP with non-op tx
Non-op tx = NSAIDs, PT (scap stabilization + post caps stretching)
20 (51%) failures of non-op tx
F/U = 3.1 yrs
VAS (4.5 2.1), ASES (58.5 84.7), Euro Qual life, SST (8.3 11.0)
All returned to sports
71% return to preparticipation levels
66% of overhead athletes returned to same or higher level
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
• If non surgical treatment
fails, then:
• Reduce and fix labrum
• Evaluate posterior
capsular contracture
• Evaluate anterior laxity –
but do not tigthen
Operative Treatment
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Arthroscopic SLAP
Repair
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Arthroscopic SLAP Repair
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Arthroscopic SLAP Repair
DO NOT OVER CONSTRAIN THE BICEPS
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Release of Tight Capsule
For patients who have failed IR stretching
with persistent GIRD
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
What is the right way to fix it?
Controversies
Number of anchors
Location of anchors
Single or double loaded
Simple or mattress stitch
Knotless vs. knot tying
Approach
Tenodesis???????
Concomitant pathology – what to do with cuff?
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Early Results of SLAP Repair
Morgan and Burkhart Arthroscopy 1998
53 baseball players, 44 pitchers
Types 2b and 2c SLAP tears
87% return to pre-injury level
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Results of SLAP Repair
Kim et al. Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. JBJS 2002. 34 patients
94% good to excellent results
91% to pre-injury level
22% return to same level of sporting activity
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Results of SLAP Repair
Outcome of Type II SLAP Repairs in Elite Overhead Athletes: Effect of Concomitant Partial Thickness Cuff Tear
Neri, ElAttache, Yocum et al, AJSM 2011
13 of 23 returned to pain free pre-injury level
Good / excellent results
ASES score – 96%
KJOC score – 52%
Inability to return to full participation linked to cuff tear
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Results of SLAP Repair
Cohen SB, Sheridan S, Ciccotti MG. Return to Sports for Professional Baseball Players after Surgery of the Shoulder or Elbow. Sports Health 2010. 22 professional baseball players
underwent labral repair Specific analysis of return to level
(MLB, AAA, AA, A) 7 of 22 (35%) returned to same or
higher level 5 return to lower level; 10 retired from
pro baseball
Surgeries done both in and out of organization
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Results of SLAP Repair
Neuman B; Boisvert CB; Reiter B; Lawson K; Ciccotti MG; Cohen SB. Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions in Overhead Athletes: Assessment of Return to Pre-Injury Playing Level and Satisfaction. AJSM 2011
35 overhead athletes
F/U = 3.6 years
Avg age = 28.6 yrs
24 baseball / softball
ASES & KJOC evaluation
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Results of SLAP Repair
Neuman B; Boisvert CB; Reiter B; Lawson K; Ciccotti
MG; Cohen SB. Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions in Overhead Athletes: Assessment of Return to Pre-Injury Playing Level and Satisfaction. AJSM 2011
Athletes’ perception - they returned to 84.1% of their pre-injury level of function - mean time to return to play = 12.5 months
“Other” overhead athletes’ perception of return to their pre-injury level was significantly greater than baseball/softball players (94% vs. 79.6%)
Drop from the ASES to KJOC score for the baseball/softball players (89 & 72.1)
Patients reported an overall satisfaction rate of 94.3%
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Systematic Review
Return to Play after Type II SLAP Lesion Repairs in Athletes
Sayde, Cohen, Ciccotti et al, CORR 2012
506 patients with type II SLAP repair
Minimum 2 year follow-up
83% good / excellent subjective results
73% overall return to athletics
63% OH athletes return to prior level
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Rotator Cuff
Due to repetitive microtrauma / internal
impingement
Partial thickness tears are extremely
common
Full thickness tears are rare with improved
treatment of labral pathology, scapular
dyskinesia, and improved mechanics
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Rotator Cuff
Symptoms
Pain
Fatigue
Catching
Stiffness
Weakness
Instability?
Poor performance / loss of
velocity
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Rotator Cuff
Examination
Inspection – evaluate atrophy and scapula position
Tenderness – anterolateral
ROM – usually normal except dec IR
Strength – may demonstrate weakness
Stability – relative anterior instability / internal
impingement
Tests
Impingement signs
O’Brien’s sign
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Rotator Cuff
X-rays of limited utility
MRI very helpful However, almost all elite level throwers and most
collegiate and high school pitchers will have abnormal imaging
MRI Arthrogram = most accurate study
Treatment Active rest
Cessation of throwing
Cuff / scapular strengthening
IR Stretching
+ / - subacromial injection
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Rotator Cuff Repair
Arthroscopic evaluation of tear
Subacromial decompression only for outlet
impingement
Cuff Debridment < 50% tear
Repair > 50% tear
PASTA repair
Complete and standard repair
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Debridement of PT Tears in Athletes
Andrews JR et al. CORR 2008
67 professional pitchers with partial thickness tears
76% RTP professionally
55% RTP at same or higher level
74% of tears < 25% of thickness
Only 8.2% > 50% of thickness
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Surgical Repair
In situ transtendon repair outperforms tear completion and repair for partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon tears
Gonzalez-Lomas et al (Columbia). JSES 2008 2 repair techniques >50% tears in cadavers Cyclic loading showed less gapping with in situ
repair and higher ultimate failure strength
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Surgical Repair
Repair of partial-thickness cuff tears: a biomechanical analysis of footprint contact pressure and strength in an ovine model
Peters & Murrell. Arthroscopy 2010
3 repair techniques 1) transtendon, 2) completion
& single row repair, 3) completion & double row repair
Ultimate load to failure greatest in trans-tendon repair by 3x
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Surgical Repair
Itoi & Tabata. CORR 1992
Review of 36 pts with completion & open repair
82% good / excellent results
Kamath, Yamaguchi et al. JBJS 2009
42 shoulders > 50% tear with completion & arthroscopic repair
88% intact by U/S @ 11 months post-op
93% satisfaction
ASES scores 46.1 82.1
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Surgical Repair
Ide et al. AJSM 2005
Transtendinous repair in 17 pts
Improved post-op scores
2 of 6 overhead athletes return to same level
Mazoue & Andrews. AJSM 2006
8% of pitchers (1 of 12) able to return to same professional baseball level after mini-open repair of full thickness tears at 67 month follow-up
3 of 4 position players returned (1 of 2 dom arm)
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Biceps Tendon
Symptoms Similar to cuff – generally more
anterior and distal
Examination Tenderness in bicipital groove
Tendon instability – passive abd with IR / ER + pop
+ Speeds / Yerguson’s tests
Failed SLAP repair???
Biceps is a pain generator
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Biceps Tendon
Biceps function in Throwing
Low level activity in throwing
No EMG activity if elbow fixed during shoulder motion
Yamaguchi K, et al, CORR 1997;(336):122-9
Levy AS, et al, JSES 2001; 10(3):250-5
Jobe FW, et al, AJSM 1984; 12(3):218-20
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Biceps Tendon
Imaging
Routine x-rays including outlet view
MRI / Arthrogram
Evaluate quality of tendon on axial and coronal views
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Biceps Tendon
Treatment
Nonoperative
Active rest
Stretching
Cuff / scapular strengthening
NSAIDs
Return to throwing program / sport
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Biceps Tendon
Treatment Operative
Debridement – of partial tear
Tenodesis*** - for overhead athletes Repair in subacromial space, in groove,
or subpectoral
Tenotomy Usually reserved for lower demand
Not likely used for young OH throwers
Very limited literature on biceps treatment in throwers
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Role of Superior Labrum Following Tenodesis
Role of Superior Labrum following Tenodesis in GH Stability
Strauss, Bush-Joseph, Cole, Romeo et al, JSES 2014
Biceps tenodesis did not impact GH translation
Posterior SLAP repair restores baseline translation
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Analysis of Pitching Motion after Tenodesis
Upper Extremity Motion in the Overhead Pitch: Evaluation of Tenodesis & Repair of SLAP Tears
Chalmer, Cole, Romeo et al. AJSM in press 2014
12 patients: 7 control, 6 SLAP, 5 tenodesis
Both BT & SLAP repair restore neuromuscular activation patients
BT more normal restoration than SLAP repair
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
SICK Scapula
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Scapular Dyskinesia
Kinetic Chain – Kibler Shoulder does not function in isolation
Alterations in any of the other links of can affect the shoulder, and alterations in the shoulder can affect other links in the kinetic chain
Optimum restoration of shoulder function requires activation of all kinetic chain segments
Ultimate velocity of the distal segment is highly dependent on the velocity of the proximal segments
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Scapular Dyskinesia
Kinetic Chain – Kibler Proximal segments accelerate the entire
chain and sequentially transfer force and energy to the next distal segment
Proximal segments are responsible for the majority of force and kinetic energy that is generated
Lower extremity force production is more highly correlated with ball velocity than is upper extremity force production
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Scapular Dyskinesia
Kinetic Chain – Kibler
Re-establishment of the muscle activation patterns for optimal kinetic chain function can be achieved through rehabilitation protocols, which target all aspects of the kinetic chain
Preventative or prospective exercises to minimize future loading stresses should be included at the end of rehabilitation as part of the return to function
Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University
Conclusion
Throwing injuries are common
Labrum > Rotator Cuff > Biceps
Prevention of injuries
Avoid IR deficit
Improve scapula function
Proper mechanics
Core strengthening
THANK YOU. 2008 AOSSM
Traveling Fellowship