7
Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 [email protected] http://research.microsoft.com/~jamesrh http://research.microsoft.com/~jamesrh

Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Commodity Data Center Design

James Hamilton2007-10-08

[email protected]://research.microsoft.com/~jamesrhhttp://research.microsoft.com/~jamesrh

Page 2: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Containerized Products

1/21/2007

Nortel Steel EnclosureContainerized telecom equipment

Sun Project Black Box242 systems in 20’

Rackable Systems Concentro1,152 Systems in 40’ (9,600 cores/3.5 PB)

Rackable Systems Container Cooling Model

CaterpillarPortable Power

2

DatatainerZoneBox

Google WillPowerWill Whitted Petabox Internet Archive

Brewster Kahle

Page 3: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Cooling, Feedback, & Air Handling Gains

1/21/2007

• Tighter control of air-flow increased delta-T and overall system efficiency

• Expect increased use of special enclosures, variable speed fans, and warm machine rooms

• CRACs closer to servers for tighter temp control feedback loop

• Container takes one step further with very little air in motion, variable speed fans, & tight feedback between CRAC and load

3

Intel

Intel

Verari

Page 4: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Shipping Container as Data Center Module• Data Center Module

– Contains network gear, compute, storage, & cooling– Just plug in power, network, & chilled water

• Increased cooling efficiency– Variable water & air flow– Better air flow management (higher delta-T)– 80% air handling power reductions (Rackable Systems)

• Bring your own data center shell– Just central networking, power, cooling, security & admin center– Can be stacked 3 to 5 high– Less regulatory issues (e.g. no building permit)– Avoids (for now) building floor space taxes

• Political/Social issues– USA PATRIOT act concerns & regional restrictions

• Move resources closer to customer (CDN mini-centers)• Single customs clearance on import• Single FCC compliance certification• Distributed, incremental fast built mini-centers

1/21/2007 4

Page 5: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Manufacturing & H/W Admin. Savings• Factory racking, stacking & packing much more efficient

– Robotics and/or inexpensive labor• Avoid layers of packaging

– Systems->packing box->pallet->container– Materials cost and wastage and labor at customer site

• Data Center power & cooling expensive consulting contracts– Data centers are still custom crafted rather than prefab units– Move skill set to module manufacturer who designs power & cooling once– Installation design to meet module power, network, & cooling specs

• More space efficient– Power densities in excess of 1250 W/sq ft– Rooftop or parking lot installation acceptable (with security)– Stack 3 to 5 high

• Service-Free– H/W admin contracts can exceed 25% of systems cost– Sufficient redundancy that it just degrades over time

• At end of service, return for remanufacture & recycling– 20% to 50% of systems outages caused by Admin error (A. Brown & D. Patterson)

1/21/2007 5

Page 6: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Systems & Power Density• Estimating datacenter power density difficult (15+ year horizon)

– Power is 40% of DC costs• Power + Mechanical: 55% of cost

– Shell is roughly 15% of DC cost– Cheaper to waste floor than power

• Typically 100 to 200 W/sq ft• Rarely as high as 350 to 600 W/sq ft

– Modular DC eliminates impossible shell to power trade-off• Add modules until power is absorbed

• 480VAC to container– High efficiency DC distribution within– High voltage to rack can save >5% over 208VAC

• Over 20% of entire DC costs is in power redundancy– Batteries able to supply up to 12 min at some facilities– N+2 generation at over $2M each

• Instead, use more smaller, cheaper data centers• Eliminate redundant power & bulk of shell costs• Resource equalization1/21/2007 6

Page 7: Commodity Data Center Design James Hamilton 2007-10-08 JamesRH@microsoft.comjamesrh

Where do you Want to Compute Today?

10/08/2007Slides posted soon to: http://research.microsoft.com/~JamesRH

7