COMMODITY ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY, PRODUCT RANGE AND CONSUMER PREFERENCES OF THE FROZEN VEGETABLES Masters Degree Work on the topic: Barilchenko Alona Slide 1 Fig. 1. Structure of sales of deep-frozen vegetable products Slide 2 Characteristics of the sample Weight, g400 Nutritional value (100 g), g Protein-1 Carbohydrate-4.5 Protein 1,3 Carbohydrate 4,5 Protein 1,3 Carbohydrate 1,4 Protein 1 Carbohydrate 3,5 Protein 1,3 Carbohydrate 4,5 Protein 1,3 Carbohydrate 1,5 Energy value (100 grams), calories Date of manufacture Conditions Storage, C At a temperature no higher than -18 Designation normative document (for domestic production) GOST TU TU TU TU TU Name and address of the manufacturer Frozen Group, Dn-sky region, v.Ybileynoye, Teplichna St., 23 Milfruit Warszawa ul. Nowogrodzka 50 lok. 515 Krasa, Kherson Region, Kahovsky region, v. Razdolne, Shumenska St., 1 Etnofood Kiev, Sagaydak St., 114, of. 310, Frozen Factory 3 Sweet garden Katarzynw Bedw Jarzny Meyer Sp. z o.o ul. eromskiego Kouchw Terms of Use Refreezing is not allowed Table 1 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION OF FROZEN PEPPER Samples Methods of quality evaluationIndexes Organoleptical consistence color scent taste Physico-chemical Mass concentration of mineral impurities Mass concentration of impurities of vegetable origin product temperature impurities Table 2 QUALITY INDICATORS OF FROZEN PEPPER Slide 3 Slide 4 Indexes Sample 123456 Barcode Name of the manufacturer Manufacturers Address Trademark Normative document information Validity Table 3 MARKING CONFORMITY RESULTS Slide 5 sample Trademark Weight is stated on the package, kg Weight, kg 1Frozen Group0,40,40,4 2Darus0,40,40,40,4 3Milfruit0,40,40,40,4 4Etnofood0,40,40,39 5Sweet Garden0,40,40,36 6Jarzny Meyer0,40,40,40,4 Table 4 DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OF SELECTED SAMPLES Slide 6 sample Trademark Mass concentration of mineral impurities,% Mass concentration of impurities of vegetable origin,% Product temperature, C Foreign matter,% For standardActuallyFor standardActually For standard Actually For standard Actually 1 Frozen Group Not more 0,03 0,01 Not more 0,5 0,2 -18 1 18 N ot allowed 2 Darus 0,010,318 3 Milfruit 0,030,218 4 Etnofood 0,020,218 5 Sweet Garden 0,010,217 6 Jarzyny MeyerJarzyny Meyer 0,020,318 Table 5 THE RESULTS OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH OF FROZEN PEPPER Slide 7 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Expert Expert Expert Expert Expert Grade point average 22,219,624,622,823,422,2 Table 6 SENSORY RESEARCH ANALYSIS Slide 8 Fig. 2. Assortment structure of frozen products Slide 9 IndexesResults Range completeness0,75 Width range0,8 Table 7 Results for indicators of completeness and with of product range Slide 10 Fig. 3. Distribution of respondents by gender Slide 11 Fig. 4. Age of respondents Slide 12 Fig. 5. Family status of respondents Slide 13 Fig. 6 Income per family member Slide 14 Fig. 7. Product analysis by weight Slide 15 Fig. 8. The dynamics of consumer interest Slide 16 Fig. 9. Manufacturing preferences Slide 17 Fig. 10. The willingness of respondents to pay more for frozen vegetables free from pesticides Fig. 11 The advantage of frozen vegetables Slide 17