Committee Reports from Board Liaisons; September Board ... · August 19 – Pecha Kucha event at HAA September 9 – Bambu 2 – happy hour September 10,11, 18 – R&D building work

Committee Reports from Board Liaisons; September Board Meeting, Sept. 27, 2011 YAF Committee Report 9-20-2011

1. Continued with 2nd

Friday Happy Hours at various spots. Welcomed new participants who just heard about our group.

2. Various members worked on Interisland Terminal’s new R&D space (Auahi Street) during the past two weekends as part of our community service efforts. John Whitaker is the project leader.

3. Began organization for the next Pecha Kucha event (October 21) at the HAA. Sam Haagenson,

Miriam Gee, Shawn Moseley John Whitaker and Mayumi Hara are the project leaders.

4. Discussed ways to get involved with the Parkour Park group. Andrew Lynch is the project leader. Membership Currently, we have 24 members who show up at various events, not all at once. 2011 Events August 12 – Kochi – happy hour August 19 – Pecha Kucha event at HAA September 9 – Bambu 2 – happy hour September 10,11, 18 – R&D building work October 7 – TBD – happy hour October 21 – Pecha Kucha event at HAA November 11 – TBD – happy hour December 9 – TBD – happy hour Mayumi Hara AIA [email protected] P 808.955.1151 _________ Regional and Urban Design Committee Update: Scott Wilson, AIA The Regional and Urban Design Committee met Friday (Sept. 16) to review Position Statements of AIA Honolulu regarding the amendments which have been proposed for the Waikiki Special District. Per the Agenda sent out last week, the August 24 Draft Position Statement document was used as the beginning point of the discussion. Each Position Statement was reviewed, revised where it was felt appropriate and voted on. The attached Draft Position Statements, approved by those at the meeting, are enclosed for your information and review. Draft Position Statements have been forwarded to Amy and Spencer to take up at the next EXCOM meeting in October/followed by discussion at October Board meeting Pending Honolulu Hale: Bill 52, which contains the amendments (some of which the RUDC opposes) has gone through First Reading at the City Council and we want to have AIA testimony ready when the time comes for public hearings on the bill. I don't know enough about the City Council process to know how long the gap is between First Reading and first public hearing.

mailto:[email protected]

summarysect ion

sect ion 1 .0 page 1

Janine shinoki Clifford

a ia , a ic p, a s id

1.0 Statement & Achievements

janine shinoki clifford has advanced the profession of architecture through extraordinary leadership in the realm of inquiry-based design for over 20 years. Her hall-mark work is deeply rooted in the belief that when design and research are combined with 21st-century innovative and often-experimental technology, this synthesis can yield in undreamed and soul-satisfying results.

clifford’s pioneering spirit is best exemplified by her success as Harvard’s first experimental, remote, real-time distant learning doctoral design candidate. With the success of that venture, she later became a remote, real-time urban design professor at Harvard. Her work continues to explore the impact in which the internet may have on our built environment and on the way we practice—What happens to our environs when where we choose to live and work are no longer locality-linked?

clifford believes that effective designers envision the body to space relationship at any scale. This heart-felt belief has lead her to meld throughout her career, architecture and architectural interiors with planning principals. Her most noted award-winning work entails communities that consider the region, the neighborhood, the structure and the interiors—a life beyond that which the artifact was originally designed. consequently, clifford is a licensed architect in several states and in New South Wales, Australia. She is also a certified planner and certified interior designer. Her research-based work and thoughts on the future of housing won her a co-fellowship with the Harvard Kennedy school of government and Harvard Design school’s internationally prestigious Joint center for Housing studies think tank where she authored the white paper—The Computer as a Household Appliance in the Subsidized Housing Arena.

What happens if we combine creative research and experimentation? For clifford, this combination often becomes a laboratory for both private and public-sector projects. she is able to reconcile design excellence with the reality of limited resources; Her fascination with the way we live has led her to design one of the first low-income housing tax credit conversions in the

UrbanisT arc HiTec T / Le ader / innovaTor / pioneer /

sc HoL ar / designer / edUc aTor / c iT izen arc HiTec T /

FoUnder and princ ipaL / MenTor

state of Hawaii and to develop innovative land planning techniques for new housing communities in a place where land is preciously finite. Her design influence has extended internationally—from affordable housing in Honolulu and american samoa to luxury housing in denaru, Fiji and bogotá, colombia.

janine shinoki clifford’s work has been recognized by the Honolulu chapter aia institute, the national as-sociation, the american society of interior Designers, and Building industry association. she has also been recognized by the Hawaii state senate and House of Representatives for her historic preservation work in the community.

Her work has also appeared in several publications, including the Harvard gazette, Venture Magazine, cadence Magazine, nikken architecture and Dialogue (a gensler publication). she is co-editor of the award-winning research-based book, Pōhaku: the Art and architecture of stonework in Hawai‘i. she has published several white papers and booklets on the Internet’s influ-ence on the way we live at Harvard and at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.

janine shinoki clifford’s sense of civic duty—or the notion of the citizen architect—is ingrained. she is keenly aware that we can only lead by example. Her influence in this arena is international. she is a founding member of the institute for international Urban Development. The institute supports urban issues in countries of conflict and Third World Countries. Regionally, she is a founding member of the Hawaii architectural Foundation (HaF) whose mission is to support community awareness of architecture.

Founder and principal of the Honolulu-based firm, clifford planning & architecture LLc, janine shinoki clifford is a dedicated mentor to architecture students and young professionals, and particularly women through the firm’s perpetual paid intern program.

Her inquisitive nature has always led her to ask the very question—What can be?

Accomplished urbanist architect, Janine shinoki Clifford cultivates innovation in a global economy through a synthesis of scholarly

researCh, cutting-edge teChnology implementation and design. Her knowledge sharing, professional leadership and digital-

optimization-based collaboration elevates higher education, benefits practice and community.

Recently, Gensler capitalized on clifford’s remote collaboration capac-

ity and BIM modeling capabilities. Gensler’s partnership with clifford and a consortium of 21 other regional profes-

sional small businesses won the design and construction administration of one

of the larger ARRA funded western region projects. This project converts

more than 860,000 SF of fully occu-pied courthouse and federal offices into a high-performance, energy efficient,

LEED work place of the future under the GSA’s first impressions, design

excellence program.–

see exhibit 1

SECTION 1 – SUMMARY

Dwight K. Mitsunaga, AIA

DWI GHT K. MI TS UNA G A, AI A (PR A CTI CE) 30 0 35 45 3 Dwight K. Mitsunaga, AIA’s expertise in innovative project delivery methods has provided guidance and education for design professionals, interns and clients in the initiation of proven alternatives for successful project execution. Dwight has been involved with alternative project deliveries throughout his entire architectural career. His first-hand research and applications have provided exponential impact within this area of practice. Since assuming his role as a principal architect in 1979, he has enabled numerous design professionals, interns and clients associated with his projects to pass on their knowledge of varying project delivery methods. His extensive education and professional development within the building industry has allowed him to provide mentorship and assistance to numerous others. In 1998 Dwight created a new market through his utilization of electronically dedicated project delivery sites to capitalize on the differences associated with time and distance. He successfully marketed to West Coast firms that, his firm’s remote location in Hawaii with its time differential, would allow for an increase in their productivity and profit. He introduced this concept to KMB Design Group of Olympia, Washington and RAW International of Los Angeles. His perception and efforts were successful, as evidenced by those firms and others currently promoting their ability to service clients 24/7 through distance resource applications. He currently retains additional project support from sources in Shanghai, China. Dwight has successfully developed a design-build model that allows the architect, in the lead role, to provide consistent services from design to construction execution. Consistent project involvement; continuous reviews of scoping, documentation, innovative product development; and immediate problem resolution allow for an efficient and successful project delivery. The Small Business Administration (SBA) has certified his architectural company as a licensed design-build entity. He has resolved the issues of insurance, bonding, and conflicts pertaining to design-build roles and responsibilities. His project delivery model allows interns and architects to expand their skills and involvement in the building industry. His ability to effectively feature combined architectural and construction management skills increases the value of architectural interns as a beneficial project management resource pool for contractors. Dwight Mitsunaga’s extensive experience allows him to recommend appropriate delivery methods with authority. Isolated locale factors, especially within the Pacific Basin, create the need for project delivery innovation since project costs often inflate beyond affordability. He has also been very instrumental in apprising national consultants of the differing conditions and situations in Hawaii and the Pacific Basin. In crucial meetings, he has provided them insight as to the impact of high land, construction, living and transport costs relative to local design decisions. His information to a sustainability design consultant from South Carolina and Nevada resulted in major decision changes for a new elementary school project. His contributions to a State’s specialist from Arizona resulted in the successful introduction of a performance-based contractor selection process. Dwight also provided much needed information and clarification for the State’s prison consultant from Connecticut resulting in major program and planning changes. His willingness to share the wealth of his knowledge with other design professionals has resulted in successful executions of their commitments to the State and community.

NOMINEENOMINEENOMINEENOMINEE

SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY

SUMMARY OF SUMMARY OF SUMMARY OF SUMMARY OF ACHIEVEMENTSACHIEVEMENTSACHIEVEMENTSACHIEVEMENTS

PAT R I C K T. O N I S H I , A I A 1SECTION 1: SUMMARY OF ACHIEVEMENTS

SECTION 1: SUMMARY OF ACHIEVEMENTS

CHAPTER

REGION

NATIONAL

A LEGACY OF LEADERSHIP AND SERVICE TO THE INSTITUTE

From the national to the local level, Patrick T. Onishi has crafted a legacy of service to the public and the institute. As a “Citizen Architect,” he is a respected leader and advocate for issues of design and public policy.

Over four decades of practice, Patrick Onishi has established himself as a leader and mentor within the architecture community. Pat’s commitment to the profession and the values of public service have elevated the standards to which his colleagues strive. This dedication has culminated in rising numbers of “citizen architects,” improved pub-lic policy, beautified cities, and inspired students.

Pat has served many roles at AIA National including Director, member of the Advocacy Committee and leader of the Institute’s Civic Engagement/Citizen Architect initia-tive among others. In these positions, Pat has led by his belief “that success comes through mentoring the success of others.” He believes that the AIA and the communi-ties it serves find success in similar ways: through the collaboration of people working together to accomplish what individuals cannot do alone.

Pat’s work with the AIA Northwest Pacific Region continues his quest towards making sustained positive change within the profession. Serving as regional director for three years, he has worked to promote leadership and enhance communication between the geographically widespread components of the region. Here he also served as chair of the Leadership Development Committee and the Northwest Pacific Region Leadership Institute.

Locally, Pat has become a fixture of the architecture community. Within Hawaii, he has helped shape the profession through his leadership in policy, education, professional design work, and the AIA. As Planning Director for the City and County of Honolulu, he promoted the value of neighborhoods and neighborhood identity through policy change and community planning. Here he directed the community-based revisionprograms for the City’s eight Sustainable Community Plans. He also streamlined the permitting process, therefore encouraging innovative design proposals that could improve the city. Teaching at the University of Hawaii’s School of Architecture since 1983, Pat has mentored students in the values of the Citizen Architect, guiding them through the process of advocacy and community engagement.

From AIA 150 Champ to AIA Honolulu President, Pat has inspired and encouraged the architectural community to lead by example and with integrity. As VP/President Elect, Pat led the strategic planning process that created the foundation for sustained future growth, improved public outreach, and greater Continuing Education opportunities.

Pat’s commitment to design excellence is founded in the belief that it must be driven as a collective value of community members, government, and design professionals. He believes that architects play a key role in engaging community members in mat-ters of design by promoting understanding and collaboration. In order to enjoy a high quality of life and quality of place, architects must look beyond just a single iconic proj-ect; Pat focuses instead on how architecture can enrich the fabric of the community.

The career of Patrick Onishi exemplifies the values of a true Citizen Architect. He has inspired countless architects to practice in the spirit of community and collaboration. Under his guidance and leadership at all levels of the AIA, the Citizen Architect move-ment and its values have continued to gain momentum throughout the profession.

Citizen Architect Exchange 2009 San Francisco Convention

AIA Honolulu

119 Merchant Street, Suite 402

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-4452 Phone: 808.545.4242 Fax: 808.545.4243 Website: www.aiahonolulu.org

September 26, 2011 Prof. Michael D. Kroelinger’ARCC President Herbinger Institute for Design and the Arts P.O. Box 872102 Tempe, Arizona 85287-2102 Dear Professor Kroelinger,

This is a letter of support to have the 2014 Architectural Research Centers

Consortium (AARC) International Conference in Hawaii in the Spring of 2014

sponsored by the School of Architecture, University of Hawaii. The focus on

Interdisciplinary Connections is a particularly appropriate topic for our State

and AIA chapter; the future of architecture needs focused discussion, and we

applaud the desire to discuss the alternatives together as colleagues. The

architect is a creative problem solver, and it is an exciting idea to understand

that the future holds collaboration across many disciplines for our profession.

The architectural community looks forward to participating in this important

endeavor.

Sincerely yours,

Spencer Leineweber FAIA

AIA Honolulu President 2011

Draft AIA Position Statement on Bill 52 (To Amend Chapter 21 of the Land Use Ordinance, relating to the Waikiki Special District)

Drafted and Approved by RUDC (9/16/11) Rev. Sept. 16, 2011

Background: The six proposed amendments to the WSD were first described in a Background Report dated May 23, 2011 written by John Whalen for the Waikiki Improvement Association. The Background Report was reviewed and approved by the Honolulu Planning Commission in July. The amendments were then written up as Bill 52 which passed First Reading at the City Council on Sept. 16. The amendments are numbered here as they were originally presented in the Background Report. Bill 52 (25 pages) contains all those sections of Chapter 21 which would be affected by the amendments. The pages noted after the amendment title refer to the relevant pages within Bill 52. The RUDC is asking for Board approval of the Proposed AIA Position Statement for each amendment. A Background/Explanation and Discussion paragraph is included for each amendment to explain the process by which the RUDC arrived at the position statements. Amendment 1: Merge the Resort Commercial Precinct with the Resort Mixed Use Precinct. (Bill 52, pages 3-4, 15-22) Proposed AIA Position Statement: Amendment Approved Background/ Explanation: The idea of a commercial-only resort precinct, in which no visitor accommodations or hotels are allowed, was used to contain what was perceived as overly rapid expansion of hotels in Waikiki in the mid-1970’s. Since that time, Waikiki has reached its planned hotel room capacity and hotel expansion is not a concern. The commercial-only precinct is no longer needed. RUDC Discussion: To distinguish between hotel and commercial use in a Resort district is meaningless for planning since tourism nearly always combines these two uses today. The Resort Mixed Use Precinct simply recognizes the nature of modern tourism and the type of resort development that has been most successful in Waikiki. The amendment is justified. Amendment 2: Allow greater flexibility for building height. (Bill 52, page 15) Proposed AIA Position Statement: Amendment not approved. Background/Explanation: This amendment proposes to allow additional height for any new building in Waikiki (up to the district maximum of 350’) on a case-by–case basis if the increased height does not adversely impact two specific views: 1) the view of Diamond Head from Punchbowl lookout, and 2) the mauka-makai view from the Kalakaua Avenue frontage of Fort DeRussy. New buildings built under this amendment would still be governed by existing zoning regulations (FAR, setbacks, uses) but the height could increase (up to 350’) if the developer could show (through view analysis) that a taller building would not impact the two views mentioned above. RUDC Discussion: Approval of this amendment would potentially allow any new building in Waikiki to exceed the existing building height limit so long as the additional height is not visible from Punchbowl lookout or the Kalakaua Avenue frontage of Fort DeRussy. Given that Punchbowl lookout is approximately 400 feet in elevation and approximately 3 miles from the center of Waikiki, a building at the current height limit of 350 feet at the ewa end of Waikiki would screen (and thereby allow) a building of nearly the same height located behind it (when viewed from Punchbowl) anywhere within the length of Waikiki. The current building height limit in Waikiki is 350 feet at the Ewa end tapering to 220 feet at the Diamond Head end.

Although the view from Punchbowl is cited in the WSD as a reason for establishing building heights in Waikiki, the RUDC feels that the tapering of building heights in Waikiki has other significant public benefits, such as preserving mauka views from public viewing areas in Waikiki (7 streets are specifically cited in the WSD) and preserving views of Waikiki and Kapiolani Park from other areas (public and/or private) within central Honolulu.. The RUDC is concerned that allowing 350’ tall buildings in precincts with current height limits of 220 or 280 feet would result in an increased perception of crowding in the precincts. The RUDC believes that the tapering of building heights from Kapiolani Park to the Ewa end of Waikiki is also desirable in that it more closely resembles natural land forms than an abrupt transition from Kapiolani Park to buildings 300 to 350 feet in height. The RUDC feels this amendment is overly broad, would create numerous unforeseen “loopholes” for increased building height and would result in significant negative public impacts. Amendment 3: Provide Incentives for Improving Properties in the Apartment Precinct. (Bill 52, pages 1-2, 7-14, 21-22) Proposed AIA Position Statement: Amendment Approved Background/ Explanation: Many of the development standards for Apartment –zoned lots in Waikiki were created to encourage consolidation of smaller lots into larger developments. This strategy has not been effective in Waikiki because small lot owners have tended to hold on to their properties. Many of these properties have deteriorated over time and current development standards are so restrictive that landowners have no incentive to rebuild. This amendment would add a “Planned Development-Apartment” (PD-A) zoning category which would allow adjustment of certain development standards (FAR, minimum open space) for lots less than 20,000 sf. For lots less than 10,000 sf and buildings less than 40 feet in height, side and rear yard setbacks would be reduced from 10 feet to 5 feet, with one additional foot of setback for every 4 feet of building height above 20 feet. A building 40 feet in height would still require a 10 foot side and rear yard setback. RUDC Discussion: This amendment would ensure a variety of housing types in Waikiki in the future and create incentives for the rebuilding of small, low-rise apartment buildings without consolidation. The proposed side and rear yard setbacks for 2-story (20 feet or less) apartment buildings would be similar to those in residential-zoned neighborhoods, which is a reasonable revision for a high-density neighborhood. Amendment 4: Expand the Apartment Mixed Use Subprecinct (Bill 52, pages 18-19, 23-24) Proposed AIA Position Statement: Amendment portion adding Hobron Lane (mauka frontage) and Ala Moana Boulevard (mauka frontage) to the sub-precinct is approved. Amendment portion adding Seaside Avenue and Kanekapolei Street (both frontages) between Kuhio Avenue and Ala Wai Boulevard is not approved. Background/Explanation: The Apartment Mixed Use (AMX) Sub-precinct was created in 1994 primarily to recognize existing non-conforming commercial uses along the mauka side of Kuhio Ave and Ala Moana Boulevard. The amendment proposes to add 4 areas to the AMX sub-precinct: Hobron Lane in the area of Eaton Square, Seaside Avenue and Kanekapolei Street (both frontages) from Kuhio Avenue to Ala Wai Boulevard, and Ala Moana Boulevard (mauka frontage) from near Hobron Lane (existing AMX boundary) to the Ala Wai Canal. Commercial activities allowed in a standard Apartment Precinct are very limited and in some parts of the city (particularly Waikiki) this hampers the ability of businesses to serve neighborhood residents. The

AMX Sub-Precinct has been a useful tool in allowing a wider range of businesses along the mauka frontages of Kuhio and Ala Moana Boulevard. RUDC Discussion: Including mauka frontage on Hobron Lane (Eaton Square) and mauka frontage on Ala Moana Boulevard between Hobron Lane and the Ala Wai Canal to the AMX sub-precinct is justified because it would legitimize desirable existing commercial use (Eaton Square) and extend/reinforce an existing commercial strip (Ala Moana Boulevard). The RUDC has concerns, however, with including frontages on Seaside Avenue and Kanekapolei Street between Kuhio Avenue and Ala Wai Boulevard in the sub-precinct. The RUDC feels that the existing commercial spine along Kuhio Avenue is so close (1 block) to nearly all apartment buildings in Waikiki that creating additional commercial zones mauka of Kuhio Avenue for the convenience of a few nearby residents is not justified in light of the overall negative impact on Waikiki. Extending commercial activity mauka to Ala Wai Boulevard is contrary to zoning and uses in Waikiki that progress from Resort along the ocean edge to Commercial in the center to Residential at the mauka edge. The RUDC is concerned that the extension of the AMX precinct on Seaside and Kanekapolei will result in a commercial presence on Ala Wai Boulevard that will be disruptive to the current feel of the street which has no commercial activity at present. The poplar pedestrian route along the Ala Wai Canal is enjoyed by many because of its natural vistas and residential atmosphere. The RUDC feels that the commercial-free zone along Ala Wai Canal is unique in Waikiki and worth preserving. Amendment 5: Eliminate Off-Street Parking Requirements for Small Commercial Properties (Bill 52, page 15) Proposed AIA Position Statement: Amendment approved Background/Explanation: This amendment would exempt retail and eating establishments in ground floor and basement spaces from off-street parking requirements when they are located on lots less than 10,000 sf in size. RUDC Discussion: Given that businesses in Waikiki rely mainly on walk-in customers and the desire to enhance the pedestrian experience (by minimizing curb cuts and parking along the street), this amendment is justified. Amendment 6: Make Minor Adjustment for Vending Carts and Outdoor Dining in Front Yards (Bill 52, pages 5-7) Proposed AIA Position Statement: Amendment portion allowing more vending carts and an increase in allowable outdoor dining area is approved. Amendment portion allowing a decorative railing to be used instead of a planter or hedge to define the perimeter of outdoor dining area is not approved. Background/Explanation: This amendment would allow more vending carts (one cart per 100’ of street frontage of a zoning lot vs. the current one cart per zoning lot) in the setback areas of resort-zoned properties. It would also allow outdoor dining areas to be defined by a “decorative railing” rather than a (currently required) hedge or planter, and allow a greater percentage (100% vs. the current 40%) of the front yard to be used for outdoor dining (as an accessory to a permitted eating establishment).

RUDC Discussion: Allowing more vending carts (limited by ordinance to selling only food or fresh flowers) is justified since it would enliven the sidewalk environment and enhance the visitor/pedestrian experience. Allowing more outdoor dining area in Waikiki is also justified in that it is a use compatible with tourism as well as appropriate for the Hawaiian climate. The RUDC supports the expansion of outdoor dining areas provided the lots affected still meet the current front yard landscaping requirements of the WSD, so that there will not be a net loss of landscaping with this portion of the amendment. The RUDC is concerned, however, with the portion of the amendment allowing a decorative railing to be used instead of a planter or hedge (currently required) along the perimeter of an outdoor dining area. The RUDC feels that plantings and natural foliage in Waikiki help offset the man-made environment and contribute to the charm of the district and therefore should be retained. The RUDC feels that with adoption of this portion of the amendment, owners of eating establishments would opt to replace planters and hedges with a less bulky railing in order to maximize outdoor dining area, resulting in a loss of greenery and negative impact on pubic space in the district.

AIA Honolulu



AIA HONOLULU

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AIA Honolulu Red Room

Meeting Minutes Aug. 23, 2011

Attending: Spencer Leineweber, FAIA, Pip White, AIA, Terry McFarland, AIA, Scott Wilson, AIA, Mayumi Hara, AIA, Katie Mac Neil, AIA, Tonia Moy, AIA, Amy Blagriff, Hon AIA Honolulu (EVP), Kris Palagi, Assoc.AIA, Sandi Quildon, AIA, Kelly Irvine, AIA, Zon Sullenberger, AIA

Absent: Phil Camp, AIA, Eric Nelson, AIA, Reid Mizue, AIA

I. Meeting called to order 4:34 pm

II. Secretary’s Report

- July 26, 2011 Minutes approved (handout provided).

- No new business items proposed

III. Treasurer’s Report

- July financials presented (handout provided)

IV. Priority Issues

A) Lease Task Force: Spencer reported on meeting she convened of PAPAIA (Past Area Presidents, AIA) to network and discuss lease status; lease renewal, relocation options, and recent downstairs vacancy option. Written notes of meeting to be shared with Lease Task Force (LTF). Spatial “use” plan being created. LTF to coordinate with Matt Bittick to explore other options to consider before making final decision on downstairs space.

B) Board approved AIA Honolulu Nominating Committee: Spencer Leineweber,

Pat Onishi, Mayumi Hara, Stephen Nash, Larry Heim, Honorary affiliate member, Amy Blagriff EVP (as ex-officio).

C) Candidates for AIA Northwest and Pacific Region Medal of Honor: discussed purpose of designation with 2 possible candidates including Pat Onishi, and Dan Chun. Consensus for AIA Honolulu to recommend Pat Onishi for consideration this year. Amy reported State Council will be offering support to Dan Chun for his state-wide advocacy efforts.

D) Committee Events. Spencer made request for board members to coordinate with their respective chair/leads for planning/budgeting future events. She reiterated committee charge for each group to plan one event to attract larger membership before end of 2011.

AIA Honolulu



E) Green Schools Event: Event status update provided; members encouraged to attend/promote event to AIA. F) CACE Annual Meeting/AIA National - Overview of topics presented (Amy B.)

- AIA CEU requirements: Should AIA adjust/increase CEU requirements

to align with NCARB’s 12 HSW CEU requirements? Discussion ensued with general comments indicating board uncertain of value with doing this.

- Additional commenting on Emeritus status and concept of virtual global chapter to provide services to unassigned AIA Members

- Contract documents: AIA to roll-out new platform for delivering documents via the web in Winter 2012.

G) AIA State Council Directory: Amy reported that State Council has chosen to

partner with Hawaii Business Buyer’s Guide to publish AIA Firm listing this year (instead on stand-alone Hawaii directory as in past years). Broader coverage planned with this new Hawaii Business partnership.

H) AIA National Policy Review (handout provided). Brief discussion with

Board encouraged to submit comments online. I ) Leadership Program: VP, Pip White presented overview (handout provided). Reported on good progress being made indicating program is comprised of total of 3 sessions designed to help educate participants (Licensed AIA members)on various aspects of establishing/organizing an architectural practice. Proposed program location - YWCA.

Committee reports: A) Re-organized AIA Honolulu Public Policies – Part 1 only (handout provided).

Overview presented by Scott Wilson with request for Board review/approval. Discussion ensued, motion made and seconded to approve. B) Draft of Re-organized AIA Honolulu Public Policies – Part 2 only (handout

provided). Consensus to request further input and comments at the individual committee level. RUDC to be notified of public policies up for review and will be asked to provide their input prior to full board discussion. Other committees should also be encouraged to consider future policy amendments appropriate to their interest areas

C) Transit- Honolulu’s elevated rail – Scott Wilson noted StarAdvertiser article front page, using AIA Simulations (presented). Reported on new Kapolei Simulation provided as public education, and funded with support from Hawaii Architectural Foundation. D) Codes- Amy reported Codes Committee chaired by Rick Myers currently reviewing Honolulu 2006 International Building Code and 2006 Residential Code Amendments under review for pending adoption by Honolulu City and County. Committee will send recommendations in coming months for board consideration and vote.

E) YAF- Mayumi provided brief overview of recent Pecha Kucha event which

AIA Honolulu



was successful and encouraged participation. AIA’s YAF noted to be lead organizers for Pecha Kucha this year.

F) Big Island | Codes Update: Zon S. provided overview indicating that Hawaii county was adopting 2006 IBC with amendments, and then backed off with adopting due to community concern. Upcoming Hawaii Council meeting scheduled for Tues., Sept 6

th to discuss draft 3. It was noted that 2006 IBC

might go into effect regardless of whether there is support – due to requirements that all counties adopt or amend State Building codes within 3 years of adoption. Deadline for counties to adopt or amend 2006 IBC is Oct 2011.

G) Discussion of City plans to require PDF drawings as part of application process

(August Pacific Business news article). Amy to check with AIA National if other chapters have encountered issues or advantages in permit processing with electronic submissions requirements.

Announcements Special Thanks to Reid Mizue for reviving “Canstruction” Foodbank Drive- 7 teams committed/participating to date … way to go Reid !

Motion to adjourn. Meeting adjourned 6:00 pm. Respectfully submitted 8/23/2011: Amy Blagriff, Honorary AIA Honolulu, Executive Vice President Sandi Quildon, AIA, Secretary

AIA Honolulu Board of Directors Meeting: September 27, 2011 Secretary’s Report

Consent Agenda Items

1. MOTION: CHAPTER SUPPORT OF FELLOWS NOMINATIONS for 3 applicants from Hawaii who have requested our support: Janine Clifford, AIA; Dwight Mitsunaga, AIA; Patrick Onishi, AIA (applicant summary pages included in minutes of meeting)

2. MOTION: VOTE TO APPROVE TOM YOUNG, AIA, of GROUP 70 INTERNATIONAL AS AIA CHAIR OF ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SYMPOSIUM, to replace Lloyd Arakaki, AIA, of AHL Design, Inc.

3. MOTION: TO APPROVE USE OF AIA LOGO In FLYER TO CO-PROMOTE event for Hawaii Society of Business Professionals, October 20, 2011 , entitled “Kick-starting Hawaii’s Economy.” AIA Members receive member rate ($34). (Draft flyer attached)

4. MOTION: TO APPROVE AIA SUPPORT FOR 2014 Architectural Research Centers Consortium to hold their International Conference in Hawaii in Spring 2014, as sponsored by the University of Hawaii. (draft letter attached; Spencer Leineweber signature pending approval).

DATE Thursday, October 20, 2011

TIME 11:30 Sign In, Networking 12:00 Lunch and Program 1:30 Adjourn

PLACE Hawai‘i Prince Hotel, Waikiki Mauna Kea Ballroom

COST Registration (by October 17) $34 for Members of HSBP, AIA, HBR, HBM, HVCA & Ent. Hon. $40 for Guests (see offer below*) & Non-Members $350 for Tables of 10

Late Registration (after Oct. 17) $10.00 additional

All Reservations Must Be Honored

NAME COMPANY TELEPHONE E-MAIL

REGISTRATION FORM Thursday, October 20, 2011 • Hawai‘i Prince Hotel, 11:30 AM - No Host Parking $4.00 • Valet Parking $7.00

(Overflow Parking at the Ilikai Marina) WARNING! Cars parked at expired meters are towed immediately! Call Roberta Cullen at (808) 537-2356 • Sorry, No Telephone Registration. Registration Forms Available at www.HSBP.biz

Mahalo to our Sponsor

*For a limited time only, HSBP members may bring a potential member to a lunch at the member rate! Call your friends, colleagues, clients, fellow workers and vendors and invite them to the luncheon and they can attend at the member rate. This is a one time offer for each guest; they may not attend again at the special rate. (That is unless they join HSBP!)

Number of HSBP Members & HSBP Guests at Special HSBP rate, Number of: HBR Members ______, HBM Members ______, HVCA Members ______, AIA Members ______, Ent. Hon. Members ______, Number of Guests/Non-Members _______

All Credit Card Payments MUST be made Online. Registration must be made in advance by web, email or mail. Enclosed is my check for $ __________ payable to HSBP.

Mail Check and Registration Form to HSBP • PMB 202, 350 Ward Ave. Ste 106, Honolulu, HI 96814-4004 Please Prepare __________ Vegetarian Lunches (Must Be Requested in Advance).

THANKS ALSO TO OUR RECENT SPONSORS

Bank of Hawaii • Chaminade University The Mediation Center of the Pacific, Inc.

The Gas Company Starwood Hotels & Resorts Waikiki

Foodland • The Audio Visual Company

The Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT) is Hawaii's resource center for economic and statistical data, business development opportunities, energy and conservation information, and foreign trade advantages.

Richard C. Lim was appointed Director of DBEDT by Governor Neil Abercrombie earlier this year to lead the state’s efforts to diversify the economy, expand existing businesses, and attract new economic activity. Mr. Lim will share his strategies to take advantage of new markets and unique opportunities in three key areas: Energy, Broadband and Public Land Trust.

Prior to joining DBEDT, Mr. Lim served as managing director and co-founder of Sennet Capital, LLC. He is also former president of City Bank Hawaii and was instrumental in leading the bank in focusing on small business and emerging growth industries. He has also served as president of International Holding Capital Corporation, the holding company for International Savings.

Mr. Lim is the former publisher and co-founder of TIGR Report (Targeted Industries Growth Report), a monthly report in Hawaii Business Magazine of both the potential and roadblocks of Hawaii’s emerging growth industries.

Mr. Lim served on more than a dozen boards and agencies before he joined DBEDT. He currently serves on the Chaminade Board of Governors. He is a graduate of Santa Clara University and holds an MBA from Chaminade University.

HSBP together with its partners: Hawaii Venture Capital Association, AIA Honolulu,

Hawaii Business Magazine, Honolulu Board of Realtors and Enterprise Honolulu proudly present

KICKSTARTING HAWAII’S ECONOMY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

A B D F H J L N P Q Z AA AB AC

Total

Yearly

Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Variance (over) Budget

Income

4000 Dues

4001 Professional members 63,610.68$ 11,383.44$ 16,390.00$ 10,713.57$ 996.68$ 1,723.43$ 996.68$ 915.53$ 500.00$ 106,730.01$ 106,068.00$ 662.01$ 150,568.00$

4010 Associate members 6,707.03$ 1,050.00$ 336.00$ 1,207.50$ 241.50$ 84.00$ 273.00$ 126.00$ 150.00$ 10,025.03$ 9,927.00$ 98.03$ 14,677.00$

4020 Allied members 14,355.00$ 7,260.00$ 300.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ 350.00$ 750.00$ 300.00$ 300.00$ 24,315.00$ 24,015.00$ 300.00$ 30,415.00$

4098 Other dues 106.00$ -$ -$ -$ 106.00$ 106.00$ -$ 306.00$

4099 Less regional dues (4,383.00)$ (4,383.00)$ (4,383.00)$ -$ (4,383.00)$

Total 4000 Dues 84,778.71$ 19,693.44$ 12,643.00$ 11,921.07$ 2,238.18$ 2,157.43$ 2,019.68$ 1,341.53$ 950.00$ 136,793.04$ 135,733.00$ 1,060.04$ 191,583.00$

5000 AIA/CSI /Expo

5015 AIA/CSI Expo net distributions 50,000.00$ -$ -$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$

Total 5000 AIA/CSI /Expo 50,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$

5050 HSC contract

5051 HSC contract income 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.00$ 17,507.84$ 17,504.00$ 3.84$ 26,256.00$

Total 5050 HSC contract 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.48$ 2,188.00$ 17,507.84$ 17,504.00$ 3.84$ 26,256.00$

5100 Architecture month -$

5101 Design awards income 400.00$ 16,100.00$ 400.00$ 500.00$ 12,650.00$ 225.00$ 1,350.00$ -$ 31,625.00$ 31,500.00$ 125.00$ 31,500.00$

5105 Sponsorship income 200.00$ 350.00$ 550.00$ 550.00$ -$ 550.00$

5119 Other income (walking tours) -$ -$ -$ -$

5120 Design awards expenses (1,054.29)$ (112.61)$ (123.65)$ (384.21)$ (17,835.83)$ 760.45$ (1,100.00)$ (18,750.14)$ (20,769.00)$ 2,018.86$ (20,769.00)$

5125 Film night expenses (125.00)$ (125.00)$ -$ (250.00)$ (250.00)$ -$ (250.00)$

5149 Other expenses (145.20)$ -$ (145.20)$ (145.20)$ -$ (145.20)$

Total 5100 Architecture month -$ (654.29)$ 15,862.39$ 331.15$ (9.21)$ (4,835.83)$ 985.45$ 1,350.00$ (1,100.00)$ 13,029.66$ 10,885.80$ 2,143.86$ 10,885.80$

515- Committees

5200 Associates committee

5201 Income -$ -$ -$ -$

5220 Expenses -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5200 Associates committee -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5250 Committee pool

5251 Income -$ -$ -$ -$

5270 Expenses (56.50)$ (56.50)$ (56.50)$ -$ (56.50)$

Total 5250 Committee pool -$ -$ (56.50)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (56.50)$ (56.50)$ -$ (56.50)$

Total 515- Committees -$ -$ (56.50)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (56.50)$ (56.50)$ -$ (56.50)$

550- Meetings and Awards

5500 Speaker meetings

5501 Speaker meetings - income -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,500.00$

5502 Speaker meetings_sponsorships -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500.00$

5505 Speaker meetings - expenses -$ -$ -$ -$ (9,000.00)$

Total 5500 Speaker meetings -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5510 Regular film nights

5511 Regular film nights - income -$ -$ -$ -$

5515 Regular film nights - expenses -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5510 Regular film nights -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5520 Installation Party

5521 Installation Party - income 6,905.00$ 130.00$ -$ 7,035.00$ 7,035.00$ -$ 7,035.00$

5522 Installation Party_sponsorships 1,550.00$ 1,500.00$ -$ 3,050.00$ 3,050.00$ -$ 3,050.00$

5525 Installation Party - expenses (9,805.40)$ -$ (9,805.40)$ (9,805.40)$ -$ (9,805.40)$

Total 5520 Installation Party (1,350.40)$ 1,500.00$ 130.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 279.60$ 279.60$ -$ 279.60$

5530 Student design awards

5531 Student design awards - sponsor income -$ -$ -$ -$

5535 Student design awards - expenses -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5530 Student design awards -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5540 Non-annual events

5541 NavFac_was Pac-Div - income 150.00$ -$ 150.00$ 150.00$ -$ 150.00$

AIA Honolulu

August 2011 Executive Committee Detail Financial ReportAugust 2011 Executive Committee Detail Financial Report

Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 Apr 2011 May 2011 Jun 2011 Jul 2011 Aug 2011 YTD Total

1

2

3

4

5

6


Total

Yearly


AIA Honolulu



62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

5545 NavFac_was Pac-Div - expenses -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5551 Army Corps - income 2,990.00$ 19,850.00$ 5,720.00$ (2.00)$ -$ 28,558.00$ 28,558.00$ -$ 28,558.00$

5555 Army Corps - expenses (500.00)$ (5,000.00)$ (8,666.88)$ -$ (14,166.88)$ (14,166.88)$ -$ (14,166.88)$

Total 5540 Non-annual events (350.00)$ (5,000.00)$ 2,990.00$ 19,850.00$ (2,946.88)$ (2.00)$ -$ -$ -$ 14,541.12$ 14,541.12$ -$ 14,541.12$

5580 CANstruction

5581 CANstruction Team Entries 75.00$ 150.00$ 150.00$ 75.00$ -$ 450.00$ 450.00$ -$ 450.00$

5582 Sponsorship_Canstruction 500.00$ 600.00$ -$ 1,100.00$ -$ 1,100.00$ -$

5585 Canstruction Event Expenses (74.26)$ (250.00)$ -$ (324.26)$ (324.00)$ (0.26)$ (474.00)$

5586 Canstruction Food Payment -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5580 CANstruction -$ -$ 0.74$ 150.00$ (100.00)$ 75.00$ 500.00$ 600.00$ -$ 1,225.74$ 126.00$ 1,099.74$ (24.00)$

5590 Other meetings and awards

5591 Other Mtgs&Awrds - income -$ 430.00$ 360.00$ 130.00$ 280.00$ 1,750.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,950.00$ 3,950.00$ (1,000.00)$ 7,950.00$

5592 Other Mtgs&Awrds_Sponsorships 1,575.00$ 690.00$ 500.00$ -$ 2,765.00$ 2,265.00$ 500.00$ 2,265.00$

5595 Other Mtgs&Awrds - expenses (2,930.27)$ (7.25)$ -$ (2,937.52)$ (2,937.00)$ (0.52)$ (7,437.00)$

Total 5590 Other meetings and awards -$ -$ 2,005.00$ (1,880.27)$ -$ 122.75$ 280.00$ 2,250.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,777.48$ 3,278.00$ (500.52)$ 2,778.00$

Total 550- Meetings and Awards (1,700.40)$ (3,500.00)$ 5,125.74$ 18,119.73$ (3,046.88)$ 195.75$ 780.00$ 2,850.00$ 3,000.00$ 18,823.94$ 18,224.72$ 599.22$ 17,574.72$

5600 AIA Contract Documents

5601 Income 730.32$ 361.51$ 512.75$ 462.35$ 725.60$ 535.48$ 876.02$ 499.60$ 600.00$ 4,703.63$ 4,370.00$ 333.63$ 6,720.00$

5620 Cost of paper documents (687.57)$ (867.05)$ (214.61)$ -$ (415.24)$ (146.84)$ (181.45)$ (71.86)$ (200.00)$ (2,584.62)$ (2,682.00)$ 97.38$ (3,582.00)$

Total 5600 AIA Contract Documents 42.75$ (505.54)$ 298.14$ 462.35$ 310.36$ 388.64$ 694.57$ 427.74$ 400.00$ 2,119.01$ 1,688.00$ 431.01$ 3,138.00$

5710 Golf tournament -$

5711 Entry fee - income -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5712 Sponsorship - income -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5713 Expenses -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5710 Golf tournament -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5700 Fundraising -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5750 AIA NWPR Conference

5751 Conference revenue -$ -$ -$ -$

5752 Conference expenses -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 5750 AIA NWPR Conference -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5800 Scholarship program

5801 Scholarship Program Income 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$

5815 Scholarship Program Expenses (37.85)$ (3,000.00)$ -$ (3,037.85)$ (3,037.85)$ -$ (3,037.85)$

Total 5800 Scholarship Program -$ -$ -$ (37.85)$ 1,000.00$ (3,000.00)$ -$ -$ -$ (2,037.85)$ (2,037.85)$ -$ (2,037.85)$

5900 Other income

5901 Memo Advertising -$ -$ -$ -$

5910 Weekly/Web advertising 225.00$ 150.00$ 75.00$ 450.00$ 75.00$ 900.00$ 525.00$ 375.00$ 825.00$

5915 Regular walking tours - income 160.00$ 330.00$ 215.00$ 265.00$ 160.00$ 165.00$ 265.00$ 79.75$ 50.00$ 1,639.75$ 1,425.00$ 214.75$ 1,825.00$

5916 Walking tours - expense -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5920 Interest earned 1.88$ 1.70$ 1.88$ 1.82$ 1.88$ 1.82$ 1.88$ 1.88$ 2.00$ 14.74$ 16.00$ (1.26)$ 24.00$

5930 Royalty income 1,434.46$ 3,937.76$ 5,164.28$ 2,270.34$ 4,708.80$ -$ 17,515.64$ 12,815.00$ 4,700.64$ 22,115.00$

5990 Miscellaneous sponsors nontax -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5998 Miscellaneous income - taxable 50.00$ -$ 50.00$ 50.00$ -$ 50.00$

5999 Miscellaneous income - nontaxable 200.00$ 0.30$ 88.00$ 150.00$ 40.00$ 40.00$ 478.30$ 518.00$ (39.70)$ 678.00$

Total 5900 Other income 586.88$ 1,966.46$ 4,229.64$ 354.82$ 5,476.16$ 2,477.16$ 266.88$ 5,240.43$ 167.00$ 20,598.43$ 15,349.00$ 5,249.43$ 25,517.00$

Total Income 135,896.42$ 19,188.55$ 40,290.89$ 33,339.75$ 8,157.09$ (428.37)$ 6,935.06$ 13,398.18$ 5,605.00$ 256,777.57$ 247,290.17$ 9,487.40$ 322,860.17$

Expenses

600- Operating Expenses

6000 Personnel

6001 Salaries and wages 11,845.26$ 11,457.38$ 12,225.26$ 11,785.26$ 11,969.38$ 12,089.37$ 11,713.38$ 12,225.26$ 11,950.00$ 95,310.55$ 95,270.00$ 40.55$ 143,070.00$

6010 Payroll taxes 1,042.42$ 924.15$ 960.81$ 1,335.00$ 915.67$ 924.84$ 1,293.08$ 935.24$ 900.00$ 8,331.21$ 7,903.00$ 428.21$ 11,503.00$

6012 Payroll insurance 207.22$ 183.78$ 185.84$ -$ 576.84$ 577.00$ (0.16)$ 763.00$

1

2

3

4

5

6


Total

Yearly


AIA Honolulu



115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

6020 Medical insurance 395.28$ 395.28$ 395.28$ 395.28$ 395.28$ 395.28$ 414.18$ 414.18$ 414.00$ 3,200.04$ 3,198.00$ 2.04$ 4,854.00$

6030 Other employee benefits 362.54$ 362.54$ 527.54$ 362.54$ 362.54$ 527.54$ 362.54$ 362.54$ 363.00$ 3,230.32$ 3,234.00$ (3.68)$ 5,016.00$

6040 Staff education & seminar -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6041 Staff travel 1,384.42$ 1,204.37$ 1,500.00$ 2,588.79$ 3,678.00$ (1,089.21)$ 3,678.00$

6045 Temporary help -$ -$ -$ -$

6049 Allocated from CACE President Fund -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 6000 Personnel 13,852.72$ 13,139.35$ 14,108.89$ 14,061.86$ 13,642.87$ 15,321.45$ 13,969.02$ 15,141.59$ 15,127.00$ 113,237.75$ 113,860.00$ (622.25)$ 168,884.00$

6100 Occupancy

6101 Rent & CAM 5,396.63$ 5,396.63$ 6,737.54$ 5,396.63$ 5,396.63$ 5,396.63$ 5,289.70$ 5,289.70$ 5,397.00$ 44,300.09$ 44,410.00$ (109.91)$ 65,998.00$

6110 Telephone 230.21$ 229.69$ 233.68$ 236.32$ 232.00$ 231.01$ 235.60$ 226.12$ 232.00$ 1,854.63$ 1,857.00$ (2.37)$ 2,785.00$

6120 Repair & maintenance - office -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 6100 Occupancy 5,626.84$ 5,626.32$ 6,971.22$ 5,632.95$ 5,628.63$ 5,627.64$ 5,525.30$ 5,515.82$ 5,629.00$ 46,154.72$ 46,267.00$ (112.28)$ 68,783.00$

6200 Member services and benefits

6201 Travel - officers 250.00$ 1,888.83$ (50.00)$ 1,992.97$ 2,000.00$ 4,081.80$ 6,082.00$ (2,000.20)$ 6,332.00$

6205 Membership services 58.43$ -$ 58.43$ -$ 58.43$ 750.00$

6210 AIA board meeting - expenses -$ 18.00$ 75.00$ 18.00$ 93.00$ (75.00)$ 243.00$

6215 Marketing and public relations 2,092.33$ 2,092.33$ 2,092.33$ 4,092.33$ 2,092.33$ 2,092.33$ 2,092.33$ 3,217.33$ 3,500.00$ 19,863.64$ 20,144.00$ (280.36)$ 32,328.00$

6220 Dues & subscriptions 295.00$ -$ 295.00$ 295.00$ -$ 395.00$

6230 Memo expenses -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000.00$

6915 Advertising -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 6200 Member services and benefits 2,342.33$ 4,276.16$ 2,042.33$ 4,092.33$ 4,085.30$ 2,110.33$ 2,092.33$ 3,275.76$ 5,575.00$ 24,316.87$ 26,614.00$ (2,297.13)$ 41,048.00$

6900 Management and general

6901 Accounting 852.21$ 1,340.75$ 1,126.56$ 811.45$ 906.45$ 811.45$ 811.45$ 836.44$ 811.00$ 7,496.76$ 7,470.00$ 26.76$ 14,153.00$

6905 Legal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6918 Promotional 24.87$ 116.38$ (53.73)$ 134.58$ 110.21$ 18.49$ 220.00$ 350.80$ 552.00$ (201.20)$ 1,112.00$

6920 Equipment rental 508.24$ 420.13$ 591.78$ 420.59$ 586.29$ 589.46$ 486.33$ 496.35$ 450.00$ 4,099.17$ 3,865.00$ 234.17$ 6,015.00$

6921 Repairs and maintenance - equipment 199.03$ 126.63$ 65.98$ -$ 391.64$ 326.00$ 65.64$ 626.00$

6930 Postage_permit and first class -$ 99.03$ 15.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ -$ -$ 314.03$ 365.00$ (50.97)$ 715.00$

6935 Bank charges & fees 290.41$ 563.28$ 340.58$ 599.43$ 571.90$ 206.04$ 443.45$ 369.02$ 300.00$ 3,384.11$ 3,071.00$ 313.11$ 4,521.00$

6940 Office supplies and expenses 86.85$ 97.65$ 134.97$ 52.48$ 177.94$ 146.94$ 81.59$ 100.00$ 778.42$ 693.00$ 85.42$ 1,193.00$

6945 Internet and other computer expenses -$ 43.00$ 150.00$ 530.61$ 135.00$ 188.90$ -$ 1,047.51$ 859.00$ 188.51$ 1,499.00$

6955 Insurance - D&O 1,567.00$ -$ 1,567.00$ 1,567.00$ -$ 1,567.00$

6960 Insurance - other liability 3,441.00$ 93.00$ -$ 3,534.00$ 3,534.00$ -$ 3,534.00$

6970 General excise tax 1,682.64$ 948.42$ -$ 2,631.06$ 2,631.06$ -$ 2,631.06$

6975 Depreciation expense -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6999 Miscellaneous expenses -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total 6900 Management and general 3,445.22$ 6,022.19$ 3,956.19$ 1,924.47$ 2,861.76$ 2,281.10$ 3,046.80$ 2,056.77$ 1,881.00$ 25,594.50$ 24,933.06$ 661.44$ 37,566.06$

Total 600- Operating Expenses 25,267.11$ 29,064.02$ 27,078.63$ 25,711.61$ 26,218.56$ 25,340.52$ 24,633.45$ 25,989.94$ 28,212.00$ 209,303.84$ 211,674.06$ (2,370.22)$ 316,281.06$

Total Expenses 25,267.11$ 29,064.02$ 27,078.63$ 25,711.61$ 26,218.56$ 25,340.52$ 24,633.45$ 25,989.94$ 28,212.00$ 209,303.84$ 211,674.06$ (2,370.22)$ 316,281.06$

Net Income 110,629.31$ (9,875.47)$ 13,212.26$ 7,628.14$ (18,061.47)$ (25,768.89)$ (17,698.39)$ (12,591.76)$ (22,607.00)$ 47,473.73$ 35,616.11$ 11,857.62$ 6,579.11$

2011 Bankoh checking balance:

Beginning of month 207,283.84$ 314,600.18$ 305,331.33$ 318,434.84$ 326,309.64$ 308,312.00$ 281,784.24$ 263,988.91$

End of month 314,600.18$ 305,331.33$ 318,434.84$ 326,309.64$ 308,312.00$ 281,784.24$ 263,988.91$ 251,577.04$

2011 Investment account balance 221,502.48$ 221,504.18$ 221,506.06$ 221,507.88$ 221,509.76$ 221,511.58$ 221,513.46$ 221,515.34$

2011 Total (checking and investment accounts) 536,102.66$ 526,835.51$ 539,940.90$ 547,817.52$ 529,821.76$ 503,295.82$ 485,502.37$ 473,092.38$

2010 Totals checking/investments (for comparison) 404,770.69$ 487,213.55$ 495,155.60$ 516,700.04$ 513,314.93$ 504,459.37$ 496,988.49$ 459,005.61$

August Financials: Summary Report

Only items which have changed will be reported.

OVERALL: See line 1555 (Z/AA) Net Income. August YTD = positive; showing $9500 over YTD total

budget. Note that paper gains mostly relate to cash flow timing. We have not actually exceeded budget

-- we have expenses pending for some programs. But we are on target (positive) YTD -- which is good!

INCOME: Line 7

Dues (4000). Line #14 Total dues.

Shows slightly ahead of budget; note we did better in YTD 2010

($141,000 YTD August 2010 vs. $137,000 YTD August 2011).

October 1 begins 15 for 12 campaign to attract new members. Invoices for renewing members for 2012

will be mailed in October. We hope to encourage members to renew ASAP. They can potentially use

renewal as a marketing/professional expense on their taxes for this year end.

Architecture Month (5100):

Line #22/ 5101. Late payment in August for design awards added $1300 to overall net gain for this

category. Total event net = $13,000!

Canstruction (Line 71/5580):

Line# 68/Z Sponsorships collected ($1100 YTD). This money IS NOT profit and will be used to fund KIDS

CORNER CANS.

Other Meetings and Awards (includes Green Schools and Misc Events):

Line 73/5591= $1750 income listed . Green schools is not yet reconciled. Should not be viewed as net

income,as there are expenses in Sept. We do anticipate slight positive for overall event.

Line 74/5592 = $500 misc sponsorship. Bays Deaver for Pecha Kucha. Net = ZERO as this money is paid

out in Sept to purchase food for event.

Other Income (5900)

Line #103- P: Royalty Income (5930). See August. Contract Documents revenue share of $4708

received. Income was budgeted for September; posted in August.

Total Income (Line 107/Z)

YTD Total Income shows net positive over budget. As noted above, this positive is mostly the result of

cash flow issues. We are on budget (positive) -- but no unexpected gains.

EXPENSES: (LINEs 109- 154= no significant changes to report

Line 154. Total expenses on target. See 154/Z/AA YTD

NET INCOME:

YTD we are showing better than budgeted, but this should not be considered a windfall:-).

As noted earlier, any additional gains over budget are due to cash flow timeline; we have

expenses pending. We are on budget, overall, which is great. We appreciate board support

in reinforcing value of membership and early renewal. Thanks for serving as ambassadors

for AIA and please take time at the expo to thank members and welcome potential members!

Prepared by: Amy Blagriff, Honorary AIA Honolulu, EVP , 9/28/2011

AIA+2030 Survey DRAFT

Purpose of Survey: • To determine the whether we should undertake a 2030 training program for AIA Honolulu members.

• How much interest does the chapter have for this kind of training? • If so, is AIA+2030 training the right program?

Description of Program: AIA+2030 is a program designed to provide region specific design and engineering skills to reduce energy consumption and to reduce the carbon footprint of buildings in our region. Our chapter would be responsible for putting together an AIA+2030 program for our region and based upon the template developed by the Seattle chapter. The program consists of 10 sessions of 4 hours each. A brief outline of the 10 sessions follows.

1. The 2030 Challenge: Setting and achieving energy goals with integrated design.

2. Getting to 50: The Power of Targets + Load Reduction. 3. Accentuate the Positive: Climate responsive design. 4. Skins: The importance of the thermal envelope. 5. Passively Aggressive: Employing passive systems for load reduction. 6. Illuminating Savings: Daylighting and integrated lighting strategies. 7. Right-Sizing: Equipment and controls for super-efficient building systems. 8. Site Power: Renewable energy opportunities. 9. The Hand-Off & Staying in Shape: Operations, maintenance + education. 10. Putting It All Together: Achieving 2030 goals on the project and at the office.

Several other chapters have developed AIA+2030 programs for their areas and results have mixed but generally been good. To be clear, the chapters with mixed results were due to poor attendance not a poor quality of program. The program focuses on the reduction of power consumption. There are many other environmental considerations that are not part of the current program. The program would be open to all AIA members, engineers, city officials, contractors and etc. There will be learning units and a fee for the training. Survey Questions for AIA members:

1. DEMOGRAPHICS? AIA or Assoc AIA; How many years in practice? Large or small firm?

2. Is it important for the AIA to take leadership in the community for reduction of building energy consumption? (Give rating scale from most to least important + comments section); What other areas do you believe AIA should position take a lead role (in our community).

3. Would training for the AIA+2030 program be a benefit to the profession? (Give rating scale from most to least important); What other programs do you believe would be of benefit to the profession (comments)

4. Would you find this kind of training beneficial to your career? (Give rating scale from most to least important) What other training would benefit your career?

5. Please take a moment to prioritize the type of training that would be most beneficial to you and your firm: a. Leadership training- How to grow your career. b. Business (or Project) management c. Marketing and getting work. d. Designing to reduce energy consumption. e. Designing to reduce other environmental impacts f. Community advocacy