34
STATE OF HUNGER TULSA COUNTY Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Counci October 201

Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

STATE OF HUNGER TULSA COUNTY

Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service CouncilOctober 2011

Page 2: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

TULSA COUNTY

Demographic Trends Economics Health Indicators

Dem

og

rap

hic

s

Page 3: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

Page 4: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

Population change--migration to suburban areas of Tulsa and Oklahoma City MSA with an overall decrease in new births

Age--aging population Race and ethnicity--more culturally

diverse Living arrangements--transitional for

family living arrangement

Dem

og

rap

hic

s

Page 5: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Dem

og

rap

hic

sRace Comparison for Total Population and Children under 5

Oklahoma and Tulsa County, 2010

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

59.3%

8.2%11.0%

1.6%

19.8%54.9%

12.6%

7.3%

2.5%

22.8%

72.2%

7.4%

8.6%

1.7%

10.1%

69.2%

10.7%

6.0%

2.3%

11.7%

White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races

Oklahoma Tulsa County

Under 5

Total Population

N = 591,982

N = 48,035N = 266,547

N = 3,642,361

Hispanic16.8%

Hispanic20.6%

Hispanic8.9%

Hispanic11.0%

Page 6: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.

6.3

6.6

6.8

7.4

7.7

7.7

8.5

16.6

17.1

18.2

18.9

18.4

19.8

25.9

9.2

9.7

10.1

10

10.1

13.5

10.7

47.8

50.5

52.5

51.9

52.2

49.1

46.2

17.5

14.1

10.6

10.4

10.4

9

8.1

2030

2020

2010

2000

1990

1980

1970

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of population

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+

1.9

1.4

1.2

.9

.6

Pro

ject

ions 2.5

2.1

Demographics

Page 7: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18Tulsa County, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2005-07 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005-07.

Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005-07 est.

1970 82% 1% 11% 4%

1980 74% 2% 16% 6%

1990 71% 3% 18% 5%

2000 65% 5% 21% 7%

2005-07 est. 61% 6% 25% 8%

Children living with 1 or both parents

Demographics

Page 8: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

ECONOMICS AND EMPLOYMENT

Page 9: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Children

Tulsa County, 2005-09

Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-09 American Community Survey.

Total population Under 18 Under 6 6-170%

25%

50%

75%

Percentage of population

Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%

Below 100% 19.8% 22.2% 26.8% 19.6%

Below 185% 41.6% 42.1% 47.9% 38.7%

Below 200% 45.4% 45.4% 51.1% 42.1%

EC

ON

OM

ICS

& E

MP

LO

YM

EN

T

Page 10: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2010*

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2009 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 74, No. 14, January 23, 2009, p. 4200; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-08 American Community Survey.

$73,324

$52,870

$36,832

$10,309$15,312

$18,310

$33,874

$21,551

WelfareWage

MinimumWage

PovertyWage

185% PovertyWage

Median FamilyIncome

(2006-08 ACS)

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000Annual Wage

Self-Sufficiency Wage = $39,978 ($18.93/hr)

Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income

($4.88/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($8.67/hr) ($16.04/hr)

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. The 2009 poverty guidelines are being used until at least March 1, 2010. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC.

Married-couple families w/ children <18($34.72/hr)

All families w/ children <18

Male-headed families w/ children <18

Female-headed families w/ children <18

($17.44/hr)

($25.03/hr)

($10.20/hr)

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t

Page 11: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

Tulsa County, 2011

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2011; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2010-11; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, August 2011.

129,750

73,002

4,152

9,972

4,231

87,852

2,533

31,732

4,946

21.5%

44.9%

47.1%

22.3%

9.5%

14.6%

1.6%

52.8%

8.2%

Soonercare Total (185%/100%) (8/11)

Soonercare <19 (185%) (8/11)

WIC Infants (185%) (8/11)

WIC age 1-5 (185%) (8/11)

Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%) 6/11)

SNAP Total (130%) (6/11)

TANF <18 (50%) (6/11)

Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)(SY 2010-11)

Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)(SY 2010-11)

050,000100,000150,000

Number of Participants

0% 20% 40% 60%

Percent of Population

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t

Page 12: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderTulsa County, 2006-08 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-08.

15.1%

33%

22.8%

6.7%

15.1%

5.1%

1.4%

0.8%

Less than high school

High school graduate

Some college

Associate degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional school degree

Doctorate degree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Percent of persons 25+

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t

Page 13: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

HEALTH INDICATORS

Page 14: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

WHAT IS OKLAHOMA’S RISK FOR HUNGER?

8th in the nation per capita of people hungry 13% of population food insecure compared to 11.3%

nationally 1 in 5 children and 1 in 3 elderly are food insecure 32 of 77 counties are food deserts with at least 25

percent of the population living ten miles or more from a supermarket or supercenter

9 of those counties are "severe food deserts," meaning that the entire population has limited access to such food outlets. These counties are Cimarron, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Hughes and Jefferson Counties.

Oklahoma loses an estimated $1.4 billion each year from hunger through illness, increased illness and decreased academic achievement alone. (Oklahoma Food Bank Network, (2010). Retrieved http://www.hungerinoklahoma.org/facts.html)

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 15: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY PYRAMID

Early Death

Disease, Disability and

Social Problems

Adoption of Health-risk Behaviors

Social, Emotional and Cognitive Impairment

Disrupted Neurodevelopment

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Conception

Death

Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

Page 16: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse An alcohol or drug

abuser An incarcerated

household member

Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill

Mother being treated violently

One or no parents Emotional or

physical neglectSource: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH:

Page 17: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

…LEAD TO HEALTH-RISK BEHAVIORS…

Smoking Overeating Physical inactivity Heavy alcohol use Drug use Promiscuity

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 18: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

…WHICH CAUSE DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN ADULTHOOD

Heart disease Cancer Chronic lung and

liver disease Stroke Diabetes Sexually transmitted

diseases

Nicotine addiction Alcoholism Drug addiction Obesity Depression Suicide Injuries Unintentional

pregnancy

Source: Felitti, Vincent J., “The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences to Adult Health: Turning gold into lead;” CDC Media Relations, May 14, 1998, “Adult Health Problems Linked to Traumatic Childhood Experiences.”

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 19: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and Oklahoma, 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.

12.1%

43.9%

8%

23.2%

7%

1.8%

31.5%

17.6%

12.2%

13.7%

42.3%

5.4%

21.4%

6.9%

1.4%

34.8%

20.5%

11%

Teen mother(age 15-19)

Unmarried mother

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of Births

Tulsa Co.

Oklahoma

Tulsa County births: 9,530 Oklahoma births: 54,753

Page 20: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2007

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

75

12 13

1821

16 16

24

31

2325

18

38

2023

3134

29

4245

47 48

3835

27

51

40

32

39

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 21: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT

In Tulsa County in FY 2009, there were 3,933 reports of child abuse and/or neglect accepted for investigation or assessment. 6,583 children were involved in these reports (duplicated count).

1,248 children were confirmed victims of child abuse and/or neglect. 89 were abused, 992 were neglected, 167 were victims of both abuse and neglect.

Eight of every 1,000 children in Tulsa County are victims of abuse and/or neglect. In Oklahoma, the rate is 10 of every 1,000 children.

Oklahoma ranks #35 in the nation in the rate of children who are victims of abuse and/or neglect.

Parents make up 73.7% of all perpetrators, followed by “no relation” at 6.9%, step-parents at 5.9%, and grandparents at 3.5%.

Substance abuse is a major contributing factor to child neglect.

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 22: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, FY 2009

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

Under 11,492 (17.3%)

1-21,480 (17.2%)

3-62,351 (27.3%)

7-111,883 (21.9%)

12 & older1,399 (16.3%)

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 23: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program

By School District, Tulsa County, 2010-2011 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2009-2010.

52.8%

78.2%

64.5%

50.1%

51.4%

50.7%

51.6%

40.1%

43.1%

31.5%

31%

29.9%

24.7%

26.3%

20.5%

8.2%

8.3%

7%

17.2%

13.6%

12.1%

9.7%

12.3%

8.6%

12%

7.4%

7.4%

7.4%

5.4%

4.2%

Tulsa County Total

Tulsa

Sperry

Keystone

Sand Springs

Liberty

Union

Glenpool

Skiatook

Collinsville

Broken Arrow

Berryhill

Owasso

Jenks

Bixby

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Students Eligible

Free

Reduced

Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $24,089 for a family of three.

Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $34,281 for a family of three.

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 24: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

47.8%

22%

9.9%

22.2%

26.5%

17.5%

30.6%

40.5%

18.7%

7.1%

18.4%

28.6%

12.3%

25.8%

43.1%

15.9%

5.5%

19.1%

23.2%

13.3%

26.8%

39%

17.2%

4.8%

16.8%

22.6%

11%

23.1%

44.7%

19.7%

4.4%

22.3%

20%

10.5%

29.1%

Alcohol

Marijuana

Methamphetamine

Offered/sold/givenillegal drugs at school

Smoked cigarettesduring past month

Drove after drinkingalcohol in past month

Rode with drinkingdriver in past month

0% 20%40%60%80%100%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2007 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007

Used once or more during past 30 days...

Ever used...

Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 25: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

50%

5.8%

64.3%

17.7%

7%

14.2%

49.3%

6.5%

61.7%

16.4%

7.9%

15.9%

38.2%

50.9%

5.8%

59.6%

16.7%

5.9%

15.2%

49.6%

51.1%

4.7%

56.7%

22.7%

7%

16.4%

47.4%

47.8%

7.1%

61.5%

16%

6.9%

15.8%

34.7%

Ever hadsexual intercourse

Had sex before age 13

Used condom last time

Used birth controlpills last time

Attempted suicidein past year

Overweight(according to BMI)

Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2007 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007

Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.

na

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 26: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Health StatusOklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2009

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Pe

rce

nt a

du

lt s r

ep

ort

ing

f air

or

po

or

he

alt h

0

10

20

30

40

50

Sta

te ra

nk

Oklahoma Rank US

Oklahoma 13.1% 14% 13.4% 12.6% 17.4% 15.3% 19.6% 17.7% 17.8% 19.7% 18.7% 20.2% 19.2% 18.7%

Rank 26 32 28 25 42 34 45 41 41 44 42 46 43 42

US 12.9% 12.9% 12.8% 12.6% 13% 13.9% 14% 14.7% 14.7% 14.9% 14.8% 14.7% 14.9% 14.4%

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 27: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prevalence of ObesityOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2009

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Pe

rce

nt o

f po

pu

l ati o

n e

stim

at e

d t o

be

ob

ese

0

10

20

30

40

50

Sta

te ra

nk

Oklahoma Rank US

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 28: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prevalence of SmokingOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2009

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Pe

rce

nt o

f po

pu

l ati o

n o

ver

18

t ha

t sm

oke

re

gu

lar l

y

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Sta

te ra

nk

Oklahoma Rank US

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 29: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2007-2008

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation.

1,714,100 (48.5%)

156,600 (4.4%)

505,000 (14.3%)

590,500 (16.7%)

564,700 (16.0%)

456,300 (47.0%)

38,900 (4.0%)

337,000 (34.7%)

38,600 (4.0%)101,000 (10.4%)

1,255,500 (60.6%)

114,800 (5.5%)

146,300 (7.1%)

96,800 (4.7%)

457,500 (22.1%)

2,300 (0.5%)2,900 (0.6%)21,700 (4.4%)

455,100 (93.2%)

6,200 (1.3%)

Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare/Other Public Uninsured

Total Population Under Age 19

Age 19-64 Age 65 & over

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Page 30: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2010 (part 1)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

#48

#10

#46

#23

#40

#44

#28

#31

#24

Personal Behaviors

Prevalence of smoking

Prevalence of Binge Drinking

Prevalence of obesity

Community & Environment

High school graduation

Violent crime

Occupational fatalities

Infectious disease

Children in poverty

Air pollution

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1990 2010

Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

Page 31: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2010 (part 2)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

#35

#14

#18

#47

#49

#46

#45

Public & Health Policies

Lack of health insurance

Public health funding (per capita)

Immunization coverage

Clinical Care

Early prenatal care

Primary Care Physicians

Preventable Hospitalizations

All Determinants

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1990 2010

Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

Page 32: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2010According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

#48

#46

#21

#44

#48

#40

#46

#46

Poor mental health days

Poor physical health days

Geographic disparity

Infant mortality

Cardiovascular deaths

Cancer deaths

Premature death

All Health Outcomes

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1990 2010

Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst

Oklahoma’s overall health ranking for 2010 is # 46

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

Page 33: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

…IN SUMMARY

Page 34: Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa Prepared by the Community Service Council October 2011

STATE OF HUNGER TULSA COUNTY

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater TulsaOctober 2011

…is available on our website:www.csctulsa.org