1
Journal of Surgical Oncology 2003;82:131 COMMENTARY Hepatic metastases of solid malignancies remain difficult to cure. For some malignancies, particularly colorectal cancer, the liver is the only obvious site of metastases and therefore, liver-directed therapies are a logical therapeutic option. Indeed, clinical trials have suggested that intrahepatic arterial chemotherapy admi- nistered after resection of hepatic metastases of colon cancer improves clinical outcome [1]. To obtain pre- liminary evidence of safety and efficacy, new strategies will require testing in animal models. Therefore, animal models that mimic metastatic solid malignancies clini- cally would be a major boost to the development of novel strategies. In our opinion, to be useful for testing strategies before human clinical trials, a model must satisfy several requirements: (1) the pattern of disease spread should mimic the human disease, (2) the genetic abnormalities underlying the progression of the tumor should be similar, (3) the pharmakokinetics, pharma- codynamics, or other factors important to the distribution of the therapeutic agent must be similar in the model and human disease, and (4) the innate response of the tumor bearing host to the tumor must be similar in the model and human disease. Many models fail to satisfy these requirements. For example, the most common approach is to inject the tumor subcutaneously. While this may be appropriate as a model of a skin cancer, it does not mimic the pattern of disease for a colon cancer. Other approaches, such as injection into the organ from which the tumor is derived, do not always completely recapitu- late the spread of the tumor. For example, a tumor cell line injected into the pancreas may cause only peritoneal metastases, and not liver metastases. Finally, some models use murine tumors, whereas an ideal model would use human tumors. Stapfer and colleagues [2] claim to have developed such a model, which was optimized for estab- lishment of hepatic metastases of a human pancreatic cancer xenograft. In their study, Stapfer and colleagues [2] adapted a method of delivering tumor cells into the portal vein, consistent with the spread of human pancreatic cancer. Multiple nodules developed over time with typical histologic features. They then used this model to test the ability to deliver a matrix-targeted retroviral vector intraportally. They observed 1–3% transduction effi- ciency in vivo. Advantages of this model are the numerous nodules that develop in the liver over time and the production of abundant stromal collagen that allows better efficacy of the matrix-targeting vectors. Also, by using nude mice, any effects of an immune response against nonself antigens is eliminated. Disadvantages are the fact that peritoneal disease apparently does not occur, unlike human pancreatic cancer. A model in which both of these occurred would be even more desirable. Also, since the blood supply to hepatic tumors is typically derived from the hepatic artery, a technique for delivering intra- hepatic arterial therapy, as opposed to intraportal therapy, might also be more relevant. The establishment of models of hepatic metastases is clearly important for the development of treatments for conditions that typically involve liver metastases. Given the possible hepatic toxicity of these approaches, the establishment of safety in animal models is of para- mount importance. As mentioned above, the demonstra- tion of clinical efficacy for intrahepatic arterial delivery of chemotherapy to treat hepatic metastases of colon cancer has increased the excitement in liver directed therapies. Other investigators [3] and our group [4] have demonstrated the efficacy of intrahepatic delivery of new agents to treat hepatic tumors. It is hoped that the development of models that predict efficacy in the human will increase the ease of translating these observations into clinical trials. Michael Morse, MD Bryan Clary, MD H. Kim Lyerly, MD Departments of Medicine and Surgery Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina REFERENCES 1. Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, et al.: Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;341:2039–2048. 2. Stapfer M, Hu J, Wei D, et al.: Establishment of a nude mouse model of hepatic metastasis for evaluation of targeted retroviral gene delivery. J Surg Oncol 2003;82:121–130. 3. Zager JS, Delman KA, Malhotra S, et al.: Combination vascular delivery of herpes simplex oncolytic viruses and amplicon mediated cytokine gene transfer is effective therapy for experi- mental liver cancer. Mol Med 2001;7:561–568. 4. Selzner M, Bielawska A, Morse MA, et al.: Induction of apoptotic cell death and prevention of tumor growth by ceramide analogues in metastatic human colon cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:1233–1240. DOI 10.1002/jso.10169 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). ß 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Commentary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Commentary

Journal of Surgical Oncology 2003;82:131

COMMENTARY

Hepatic metastases of solid malignancies remaindifficult to cure. For some malignancies, particularlycolorectal cancer, the liver is the only obvious site ofmetastases and therefore, liver-directed therapies are alogical therapeutic option. Indeed, clinical trials havesuggested that intrahepatic arterial chemotherapy admi-nistered after resection of hepatic metastases of coloncancer improves clinical outcome [1]. To obtain pre-liminary evidence of safety and efficacy, new strategieswill require testing in animal models. Therefore, animalmodels that mimic metastatic solid malignancies clini-cally would be a major boost to the development ofnovel strategies. In our opinion, to be useful for testingstrategies before human clinical trials, a model mustsatisfy several requirements: (1) the pattern of diseasespread should mimic the human disease, (2) the geneticabnormalities underlying the progression of the tumorshould be similar, (3) the pharmakokinetics, pharma-codynamics, or other factors important to the distributionof the therapeutic agent must be similar in the model andhuman disease, and (4) the innate response of the tumorbearing host to the tumor must be similar in the modeland human disease. Many models fail to satisfy theserequirements. For example, the most common approachis to inject the tumor subcutaneously. While this maybe appropriate as a model of a skin cancer, it does notmimic the pattern of disease for a colon cancer. Otherapproaches, such as injection into the organ from whichthe tumor is derived, do not always completely recapitu-late the spread of the tumor. For example, a tumor cellline injected into the pancreas may cause only peritonealmetastases, and not livermetastases. Finally, somemodelsuse murine tumors, whereas an ideal model would usehuman tumors. Stapfer and colleagues [2] claim to havedeveloped such a model, which was optimized for estab-lishment of hepatic metastases of a human pancreaticcancer xenograft.In their study, Stapfer and colleagues [2] adapted a

method of delivering tumor cells into the portal vein,consistent with the spread of human pancreatic cancer.Multiple nodules developed over time with typicalhistologic features. They then used this model to testthe ability to deliver a matrix-targeted retroviral vectorintraportally. They observed 1–3% transduction effi-ciency in vivo.Advantages of this model are the numerous nodules

that develop in the liver over time and the production ofabundant stromal collagen that allows better efficacy of

the matrix-targeting vectors. Also, by using nude mice,any effects of an immune response against nonselfantigens is eliminated. Disadvantages are the fact thatperitoneal disease apparently does not occur, unlikehuman pancreatic cancer. A model in which both of theseoccurred would be even more desirable. Also, sincethe blood supply to hepatic tumors is typically derivedfrom the hepatic artery, a technique for delivering intra-hepatic arterial therapy, as opposed to intraportal therapy,might also be more relevant.

The establishment of models of hepatic metastases isclearly important for the development of treatments forconditions that typically involve liver metastases. Giventhe possible hepatic toxicity of these approaches, theestablishment of safety in animal models is of para-mount importance. As mentioned above, the demonstra-tion of clinical efficacy for intrahepatic arterial deliveryof chemotherapy to treat hepatic metastases of coloncancer has increased the excitement in liver directedtherapies. Other investigators [3] and our group [4] havedemonstrated the efficacy of intrahepatic delivery of newagents to treat hepatic tumors. It is hoped that thedevelopment of models that predict efficacy in the humanwill increase the ease of translating these observationsinto clinical trials.

Michael Morse, MD

Bryan Clary, MD

H. Kim Lyerly, MD

Departments of Medicine and SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurham, North Carolina

REFERENCES

1. Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, et al.: Hepatic arterial infusion ofchemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectalcancer. N Engl J Med 1999;341:2039–2048.

2. Stapfer M, Hu J, Wei D, et al.: Establishment of a nude mousemodel of hepatic metastasis for evaluation of targeted retroviralgene delivery. J Surg Oncol 2003;82:121–130.

3. Zager JS, Delman KA, Malhotra S, et al.: Combination vasculardelivery of herpes simplex oncolytic viruses and ampliconmediated cytokine gene transfer is effective therapy for experi-mental liver cancer. Mol Med 2001;7:561–568.

4. Selzner M, Bielawska A, Morse MA, et al.: Induction of apoptoticcell death and prevention of tumor growth by ceramide analogues inmetastatic human colon cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:1233–1240.

DOI 10.1002/jso.10169

Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).

� 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.