33
Commack Coalition of Caring Building Bridges to Address Substance Use and Abuse in the Commack Community

Commack Coalition of Caring

  • Upload
    mabli

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Commack Coalition of Caring. Building Bridges to Address Substance Use and Abuse in the Commack Community. History of the CCC. 1996 Ad Hoc Drug Advisory Committee Chaired by Russell Stewart Helped to guide programs and district policy related to substance use and abuse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Commack Coalition of Caring

Commack Coalition of

Caring

Building Bridges to Address Substance Use and Abuse in

theCommack

Community

Page 2: Commack Coalition of Caring

History of the CCC

• 1996 Ad Hoc Drug Advisory Committee– Chaired by Russell Stewart– Helped to guide programs and district

policy related to substance use and abuse

• 2002 Commack Coalition of Caring– Chaired by John Kelly since 2004

Page 3: Commack Coalition of Caring

Major Accomplishments

• Safe Homes Program –Debbie Virga

• Parent Resource Center & Parent Workshops –Nan Lancy

• Drug and Alcohol Awareness Events

• Parent Academy

• Teacher Awareness and Education

Page 4: Commack Coalition of Caring

Current Activities

• Collaboration with the Suffolk Coalition to Prevent Alcohol and Drug Dependency

• SAMHSA Grant to strengthen community coalition

• Community Forums• “Community Connectors” to facilitate

relationships in community • Collaboration with Health and Physical

Education Department to promote ASHA standards for social and emotional competency

Page 5: Commack Coalition of Caring

SAMHSA Grant

• Two year grant received by the Suffolk Coalition to “mentor” the CCC to strengthen community bridges– $75,000/year

• Potential for District to receive additional grant funding for up to 10 years– $125,000/year

Page 6: Commack Coalition of Caring

Coalition

Building

Page 7: Commack Coalition of Caring

Best Processes for Implementing the Strategic Prevention Framework

1. Analyzing Information About the Problem, Goals, and Factors Affecting Them

1. Analyzing Information About the Problem, Goals, and Factors Affecting Them

2. Establishing Vision and Mission2. Establishing Vision and Mission

3. Defining Organizational Structure and Operating Mechanisms

3. Defining Organizational Structure and Operating Mechanisms

5. Developing and Using Strategic and Action Plans

8. Developing and Using Strategic and Action Plans

6. Arranging Resources for Community Mobilization

6. Arranging Resources for Community Mobilization

7. Developing Leadership5. Developing Leadership

8. Implementing Effective Interventions

9. Implementing Effective Interventions

9. Assuring 4. Assuring Technical Assistance

10. Documenting Progress and Using Feedback

12. Documenting Progress and Using Feedback

11. Making Outcomes Matter11. Making Outcomes Matter

12. Sustaining the Work10. Sustaining the Work

A. AssessmentA. Assessment

B. CapacityB. Capacity

D. ImplementationD. ImplementationC. PlanningC. Planning

E. EvaluationE. Evaluation

4. Developing a framework or model of change

7. Developing a framework or model of change

1Best processes identified through a literature review conducted by Dr. Renee Boothroyd, University of Kansas – used with permission.

Page 8: Commack Coalition of Caring

STUDENT

SCHOOL

FAMILIES

YOUTH SERVICES

RECREATION PROGRAMS

BUSINESS

LIBRARY

PRIVATEINDUSTRY

SENIORS

HEALTHCARE

MEDIA

FAITHGROUPS

POLICE

GOV’TOFFICIALS

COLLEGESOCIALSERVICES

Page 9: Commack Coalition of Caring

• Research has identified risk factors in four domains:

• Risk factors are predictive of higher levels of adolescent substance abuse, delinquency, teen pregnancy, school drop-out and violence.

Risk factors

Page 10: Commack Coalition of Caring

Availability of Firearms

Availability of Drugs

Community Laws and Norms Favorable toward Drug Use, Firearms and Crime

Media Portrayals of Violence

Transitions and MobilityLow Neighborhood Attachment and

Community Disorganization

Extreme Economic Deprivation

Page 11: Commack Coalition of Caring

Family History of the Problem Behavior

Favorable Parental Attitudes and Involvement in the Problem Behavior

Family Management Problems

Family Conflict

-17

Page 12: Commack Coalition of Caring

Academic Failure Beginning

in Late Elementary SchoolLack of Commitment to School

Page 13: Commack Coalition of Caring

Key Leader Orientation 2-19Key Leader Orientation 2-19

Early and Persistent Antisocial Behavior

Constitutional Factors

Rebelliousness

Friends who Engage in the Problem Behavior

Favorable Attitudes toward the Problem Behavior

Early Initiation of the Problem Behavior

Gang Involvement

Page 14: Commack Coalition of Caring

• Research has identified protective factors in four domains:

• Protective factorsbuffer young people’s exposure to risk.

Protective factors

Page 15: Commack Coalition of Caring

– Individual Factors• Belief in Self

• Connection with one caring adult

• Resilient temperament/competencies

• Prosocial orientation

• Sense of Humor

– Family Factors• Positive parenting strategies• Parental emotional stability• Economic stability

Page 16: Commack Coalition of Caring

– School Factors• Clear rules and regulations

• Competent role models

• Opportunities for connections with students

• Reinforcement of social competencies

• High expectations for all students

– Community Factors• Clear norms• Intergenerational ties• External support systems

Page 17: Commack Coalition of Caring

– Risk and protective factors exist in all areas of children’s lives.

– The more risk factors present, the greater the chances of problem behavior.

– Risk and protective factors can be present throughout development.

– Risk factors are buffered by protective factors.

Page 18: Commack Coalition of Caring

Prevention Needs Assessment

• Bach-Harrison Prevention Needs Assessment

• Funded by SAMHSA Grant• Grades 7 & 9 were surveyed in April 2008

– 508 grade 7– 539 grade 9– Surveys were anonymous– Scored by Bach-Harrison– District does not have individual student

responses• Compared to National Norms (Monitoring

the Future & 8 State Norms)• Same students will be surveyed in 2011

Page 19: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

Ever Used

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Grade 7 2008 Grade 8 MTF 2006 Grade 9 2008 Grade 10 MTF 2006

Page 20: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

Used Within Past 30 Days

05

10152025303540

Grade 7 2008 Grade 8 MTF 2006 Grade 9 2008 Grade 10 MTF 2006

Page 21: Commack Coalition of Caring

Summary

• Our students in grades 7 & 9 fall well below the national levels for substance use.

• However, there is a trend toward increased use of alcohol and marijuana from 7th to 9th grade.

Page 22: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

At-Risk Behavior

02468

1012141618

Grade 7 National Norm 7 Grade 9 National Norm 9

Page 23: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

010203040506070

grade 7 grade 9

Page 24: Commack Coalition of Caring

Summary

• Commack students engage in less “at-risk” behavior than national norms.

• However, there is a trend toward greater involvement in drug use, as evidenced by increase in “being drunk or high in school” and involvement with “illegal drugs”

• Many Commack students are involved in gambling activity, which represents a “risk factor”

Page 25: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

RISK PROFILE

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Lo

w N

eig

hb

orh

oo

d

Att

ach

men

t

Co

mm

un

ity

Dis

org

an

izati

on

Law

s &

No

rms F

avo

r

Dru

g U

se

Perc

eiv

ed

Avail

ab

ilit

y

of

Dru

gs

Po

or

Fam

ily

Man

ag

em

en

t

Fam

ily C

on

flic

t

Sib

lin

g D

rug

Use

Exp

osu

re t

o A

du

lt

AS

B

Pare

nt

Att

itu

des F

avo

r

AS

B

Pare

nt

Att

itu

des F

avo

r

Dru

g U

se

Acad

em

ic F

ail

ure

Lo

w C

om

mit

men

t to

Sch

oo

l

Reb

ell

iou

sn

ess

Earl

y I

nit

iati

on

of

AS

B

Earl

y I

nit

iati

on

of

Dru

g U

se

Att

itu

des F

avo

rab

le t

o

AS

B

Att

itu

des F

avo

rab

le t

o

Dru

g U

se

Perc

eiv

ed

Ris

k o

f

Dru

g U

se

Inte

racti

on

wit

h

An

tiso

cia

l P

eers

Fri

en

d's

Use o

f D

rug

s

Rew

ard

s f

or

AS

B

Dep

ressiv

e S

ym

pto

ms

Gan

g I

nvo

lvem

en

t

Hig

h R

isk Y

ou

th

Perc

en

tag

e o

f Y

ou

th a

t R

isk

Commack School District 2008 8 State Norm

2008 Commack School District Student Survey, Grade 7

Community Family School Peer / Individual High Risk

Page 26: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

RISK PROFILE

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Lo

w N

eig

hb

orh

oo

d

Att

ach

men

t

Co

mm

un

ity

Dis

org

an

izati

on

Law

s &

No

rms F

avo

r

Dru

g U

se

Perc

eiv

ed

Avail

ab

ilit

y

of

Dru

gs

Po

or

Fam

ily

Man

ag

em

en

t

Fam

ily C

on

flic

t

Sib

lin

g D

rug

Use

Exp

osu

re t

o A

du

lt

AS

B

Pare

nt

Att

itu

des F

avo

r

AS

B

Pare

nt

Att

itu

des F

avo

r

Dru

g U

se

Acad

em

ic F

ail

ure

Lo

w C

om

mit

men

t to

Sch

oo

l

Reb

ell

iou

sn

ess

Earl

y I

nit

iati

on

of

AS

B

Earl

y I

nit

iati

on

of

Dru

g U

se

Att

itu

des F

avo

rab

le t

o

AS

B

Att

itu

des F

avo

rab

le t

o

Dru

g U

se

Perc

eiv

ed

Ris

k o

f

Dru

g U

se

Inte

racti

on

wit

h

An

tiso

cia

l P

eers

Fri

en

d's

Use o

f D

rug

s

Rew

ard

s f

or

AS

B

Dep

ressiv

e S

ym

pto

ms

Gan

g I

nvo

lvem

en

t

Hig

h R

isk Y

ou

th

Perc

en

tag

e o

f Y

ou

th a

t R

isk

Commack School District 2008 8 State Norm

2008 Commack School District Student Survey, Grade 9

Community Family School Peer / Individual High Risk

Page 27: Commack Coalition of Caring

Summary

• There is an increase in “perceived availability of drugs” from 7th to 9th grade

• Family management is an important risk factor

• Commitment to school and sense of rebelliousness improves from 7th to 9th grade

Page 28: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

PROTECTIVE PROFILE

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Op

po

rtu

nit

y f

or

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Fam

ily A

ttach

men

t

Op

po

rtu

nit

y f

or

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Op

po

rtu

nit

y f

or

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Reli

gio

sit

y

So

cia

l S

kil

ls

Beli

ef

in t

he M

ora

l

Ord

er

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Hig

h P

rote

cti

on

Yo

uth

Perc

en

tag

e o

f Y

ou

th w

ith

Pro

tecti

ve F

acto

r

Commack School District 2008 8 State Norm

2008 Commack School District Student Survey, Grade 7 Community Family School Peer / Individual High Protection

Page 29: Commack Coalition of Caring

What did the students tell us?

PROTECTIVE PROFILE

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Op

po

rtu

nit

y f

or

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Fam

ily A

ttach

men

t

Op

po

rtu

nit

y f

or

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Op

po

rtu

nit

y f

or

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Reli

gio

sit

y

So

cia

l S

kil

ls

Beli

ef

in t

he M

ora

l

Ord

er

Pro

so

cia

l In

vo

lvem

en

t

Rew

ard

s f

or

Pro

so

cia

l

Invo

lvem

en

t

Hig

h P

rote

cti

on

Yo

uth

Perc

en

tag

e o

f Y

ou

th w

ith

Pro

tecti

ve F

acto

r

Commack School District 2008 8 State Norm

2008 Commack School District Student Survey, Grade 9 Community Family School Peer / Individual High Protection

Page 30: Commack Coalition of Caring

Summary

• Lacking in “rewards for pro-social involvement in the community,” but students perceive these rewards occur in school

• Significant drop in involvement in faith based activities.

Page 31: Commack Coalition of Caring

Where do we go from here?

• 2008 – 09 Community Forums– October: Faith Leaders– February: Youth Leagues, Booster

Clubs, Youth Agencies

– June: Business Community

• Grant application submitted in March 2009

• 2009 – 2010 Community Forums to complete the Coalition

Page 32: Commack Coalition of Caring

The Commack School District Mission Statement

• Within the context of a caring community of learners, our primary mission is to provide an exemplary learning experience that will allow each child to acquire the necessary knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values to become a successful, contributing member within our school community and greater society.

Page 33: Commack Coalition of Caring

Commack Coalition of Caring Mission Statement

• The Commack Coalition of Caring, through a dedicated group of parents, school professionals, experts in substance abuse, and community leaders are concerned with the development of the whole child in helping to prevent substance use and abuse. The Coalition recognizes the important influences of the child’s environment and is focused on interventions beyond the school.