Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    1/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    Commonalities & Differences

    In Project Management

    Around the World

    A Survey of Project Categories and Life

    Cycles

    Russell D. Archibald

    & Vladimir Voropaev

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    2/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    2

    Purpose of This Survey

    To encourage global agreement on:

    Definition of basic project categories & sub-

    categories in common use for essentially all

    types of projects

    Identification & definition of life cycles in use

    for each project category

    To identify differences in these areas sothat these can be understood and

    minimized

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    3/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    3

    Presentation Outline

    1. A Global Vision: PM Practices

    2. Systematic Model of Project

    Management

    3. Proposed Project Categories/Sub-

    Categories

    4. Life Cycles for Various Categories5. Survey Questionnaire and Conduct

    6. Next Steps

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    4/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    4

    1. A Vision of Global Project

    Management Practices Widely used set of concepts, methods,

    systems and tools

    High degree of uniformity and

    understanding across economic, cultural &

    political boundaries

    Enabling broad collaboration with

    minimum conflict

    Interchangeable managers & specialists

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    5/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    5

    2. Systematic

    Model of Project Management

    The following figure is from

    Voropaev et al, Systematic Model ofProject Management, presented at the

    17th IPMA World Congress 2003 in

    Moscow

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    6/44

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    7/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    7

    This Survey Focuses On:

    Managed Objects: Projects and Programs

    Life cycle phases of projects

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    8/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    8

    Projects:

    Are the common denominator for all

    aspects of project management

    Exist in many sizes & types

    Produce many different products & results

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    9/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    9

    Required

    Analytical Framework Systematic grouping into defined

    categories and sub-categories

    Many possible classification schemes

    Most practical scheme reflects the

    productsof the projects at the first levelsof classification

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    10/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    10

    3. Proposed Major Categories

    of Projects1. Aerospace/Defense

    2. Business &

    Organizational

    Change Projects3. Communication

    Systems Projects

    4. Event Projects5. Facilities Projects

    6. Information Systems

    7. International

    Development

    8. Media &Entertainment

    9. Product/Service

    Development10.Research & Dev.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    11/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    11

    Other Major Categories

    May Be Required See Table 1 in the paper

    Survey will determine how practical and

    complete these recommended categories

    are

    Further breakdown is obviously required

    A few examples follow

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    12/44

    3. Communication Systems Projects

    3.1 Network communications systems

    3.2 Switching communications systems

    Microwave communications network.

    3rd generation wireless communication system.

    4. Event Projects

    4.1 International events

    4.2 National events

    2004 Summer Olympics; 2006 World Cup Match.

    2005 U. S. Super Bowl; 2004 Political Conventions.

    5. Facilities Projects

    5.1 Facility decommissioning

    5.2 Facility demolition

    5.3 Facility maintenance and modification

    5.4 Facility design/procurement/construction

    Civil

    Energy

    Environmental

    High rise

    Industrial

    Commercial

    Residential

    Ships

    Closure of nuclear power station.

    Demolition of high rise building.

    Process plant maintenance turnaround.

    Conversion of plant for new products/markets.

    Flood control dam; highway interchange.

    New gas-fired power generation plant; pipeline.

    Chemical waste cleanup.

    40 story office building.

    New manufacturing plant.

    New shopping center; office building.

    New housing sub-division.

    New tanker, container, or passenger ship

    6. Information Systems (Software) Projects New project management information system. (Information system hardware is considered to be in the

    product development category.)

    7. International Development Projects

    7.1 Agriculture/rural development

    7.2 Education7.3 Health

    7.4 Nutrition

    7.5 Population

    7.6 Small-scale enterprise

    7.7 Infrastructure:energy (oil, gas, coal, power generation and distribution), industrial,

    telecommunications, transportation, urbanization, water supply and sewage, irrigation)

    People and process intensive projects

    in developing countries funded by The World Bank, regional development banks, US AID, UNIDO,other UN, and government agencies; and

    Capital/civil works intensive projects

    often somewhat different from 5. Facility Projects as they may include, as part of the project, creating

    an organizational entity to operate and maintain the facility, and lending agencies impose their project

    life cycle and reporting requirements.

    8. Media & Entertainment Projects

    8.1 Motion picture

    8.2 TV segment

    8.2 Live play or music event

    New motion picture (film or digital).

    New TV episode.

    New opera premiere.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    13/44

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    14/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    14

    Example:

    Category 5. Facilities ProjectsSubcategories:

    Facility decommissioning

    Facility demolition Facility maintenance & modification

    Facility design/procure/construct1.Civil 2.Energy 3.Environmental 4.Industrial 5.Commercial

    6.Residential 7.Ships 8.Other:

    Other: ?

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    15/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    15

    Categories Are

    Not Mutually Exclusive Programs and large projects usually

    involve more than one category or sub-

    category

    These projects are placed in their

    predominate category

    Must Mega projects be treated

    separately? Probably: yes

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    16/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    16

    Classifying Within Categories &

    Sub-Categories Project size

    Project complexity

    External or internal customer Degree of customer involvement

    Levels of risk

    Other:

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    17/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    17

    Classifying

    Within Categories (Contd) Major & minor projects

    Mega projects: not categorizable

    Stand-alone versus create supportinginfrastructure

    Standard versus transitional

    Other: ?

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    18/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    18

    Commonalities & Differences: A

    Framework for Analysis Define appropriate project categories and

    sub-categories

    Identify life cycles within each of these

    Identify PM practices & tools in use by life

    cycle phase within various regions or

    countries

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    19/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    19

    4. Life Cycles: Searching for

    Common Processes Life cycle definition enables:

    All involved persons to understand the

    processes to be used

    Capture of best experience

    Assignment of responsibilities

    Repetition of success

    Important starting point in our search forcommon processes

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    20/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    20

    Generic Life Cycle Phases

    General agreement on four generic life

    cycle phases:

    1. Concept

    2. Definition

    3. Execution

    4. Closeout

    However these are too broad for our

    purposes

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    21/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    21

    Designing Life Cycles:

    Phases and Decision Points Three basic design parameters:

    Number and definitions of phases/sub-phases

    Whether sequential or overlapping, once-

    through or re-cycling, predictive or adaptive

    Number and placement of decision points

    (approvals, go/kill, go/hold, go back)

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    22/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    22

    Basic Life Cycle Model Types

    Predictive

    Most common

    Generic, waterfall, other

    Adaptive/heuristic

    Incremental build

    Short-term cycles

    Evolutionary

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    23/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    23

    Life Cycle Models

    Differ by Category Different project categories (and sub-

    categories) often require very different life

    cycle designs

    Incomplete literature search produced list

    shown in Table 2 of our paper

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    24/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    24

    Examples of

    Predictive Life Cycles Generic/Standard:

    Concept, definition, execution, closeout

    Waterfall:

    Generic with overlapping, more detailed

    phases

    Cyclical (when number is known)

    Spiral

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    25/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    25

    Examples of

    Adaptive Life Cycle Models Adaptive Software Development/ASD:

    Component based, iterative time-boxed cycles, risk-

    driven, change tolerant

    Extreme Programming/XP: Programming in pairs, teams include managers &

    users, each team codes & tests, fluid cost & schedule

    SCRUM:

    Iterative 30 day sprints, short daily meetings (scrums),several small teams

    Source: Desaulniers & Anderson 2002

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    26/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    26

    Extreme Programming/XP

    A cooperative style of software

    development promises to deliver better

    applications on time and on budget.

    PC Magazine, Feb. 25, 2003 p. 68

    For helpful links, see ExtremeProgramming Resources at

    www.pcmag.com/onlineextras/

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    27/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    27

    NASA Process Based Mission

    Assurance Program Life Cycle1. Program Management

    2. Concept Development

    3. Acquisition

    4. Hardware Design

    5. Software Design

    6. Manufacturing

    7. Pre-Operations Integration & Test

    8. Operations

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    28/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    28

    Information Systems

    Life Cycle Examples Desaulniers & Anderson 2002:

    Predictive (waterfall, prototyping, rapid

    application development/RAD, incremental

    build)Adaptive (ASD, XP, SCRUM)

    Whitten 1995:

    Code and fix, waterfall, incremental,interative

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    29/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    29

    Product & Service Development

    Life Cycle Examples

    Cooper & Kleinschmidt 1993:

    Stage-Gate Process Model

    Thamhain 2000:

    Phase-Gate Model

    Murphy 1989:

    Pharmaceutical Model

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    30/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    30

    Stage-Gate Model

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    31/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    31

    5. Global Survey: Project

    Categories & Sub-Categories Purpose: To determine:

    If such a concept is used & if so how common

    it is around the world

    Whether the recommended categories areused or useful

    What additions or changes are needed

    What are the common practices in furtherclassification within sub-categories

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    32/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    32

    Global Survey: Project

    Life Cycles Within Categories Purpose: To determine for each

    category/sub-category within eachcountry:

    Which of the listed life cycles are in use

    Whether other life cycles are used, & if so

    their names and references

    How the life cycle models are used and thebenefits they produce

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    33/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    33

    Conducting the Survey

    The questionnaire is available on-line at

    http://ipmaglobalsurvey.com

    Completed questionnaires are to be

    completed on-line prior to November 1st,

    2003

    http://ipmaglobalsurvey.com/http://ipmaglobalsurvey.com/
  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    34/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    34

    Project Categories Survey

    Enter These Codes for Each Item in Table 1:

    U Universally accepted and used

    W Widely accepted and used

    A Accepted and used by some

    R Rarely accepted and used

    N Never accepted or usedALT Alternative term used as noted

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    35/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    35

    Project Categories Survey (Contd)

    Questions:

    Useful to have an agreed list of project

    categories? Why?

    What other classification systems are in

    use?

    What subordinate classifications are

    used?

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    36/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    36

    Project Life Cycle

    Survey Codes Each CategorySEQ Sequential

    WF Waterfall Model

    PAR Parallel

    CYC Cyclical

    Spir Spiral

    INCR - Incremental

    ITER Iterative

    ADAP Adaptive

    GATE Stage-Gate

    CFIX Code and fix

    Spec Special

    (describe)

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    37/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    37

    Project Life Cycle Survey -

    Other Information Number of life cycle phases

    Number of decision points

    Additional comments

    .for each project category listed in Table 2

    plus any that have been added by therespondent

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    38/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    38

    Project Life Cycle Survey

    Questions:

    Useful to have an agreed list of project life

    cycle types? Why?

    List any other life cycle models or type

    that you know are in use, with descriptions

    or references.

    Any other comments or suggestions

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    39/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    39

    Promoting the Survey

    ISGI Workshop participants are invited to

    respond and encourage their

    colleagues to do the same

    The survey is being publicized through

    appropriate PM associations around the

    world primarily using the Internet and

    Web

    I d

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    40/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    40

    Inducements

    To Complete the Survey Respondents will receive a complete copy

    of the survey report

    Their names will be listed in the report (ifdesired)

    They will have the satisfaction of havingcontributed to the advancement of theproject management profession

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    41/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    41

    6. Next Steps

    Survey conduct: June October

    Compilation of results and preparation of

    the survey report: Sept. December

    Release of final report:

    December 31, 2003

    Presentation of results at the 18th

    IPMAWorld Congress in Budapest June 2004

  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    42/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    42

    Download this paper &

    complete the on-linesurvey questionnaire at:

    http://ipmaglobalsurvey.com

    The site, paper & questionnaire areavailable in English & Spanish

    http://ipmaglobalsurvey.com/http://ipmaglobalsurvey.com/
  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    43/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    43

    Volunteers Welcome!

    We would like to have a survey leader

    within each country to promote the widest

    possible participation Please contact us:

    Russ Archibald: www.russarchibald.com

    [email protected] Voropaev: [email protected]

    http://www.russarchibald.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.russarchibald.com/
  • 7/30/2019 Comm Diff Slides Lille Aug 103

    44/44

    "Organisational Learning & Knowledge Management in "projectised" environments: what is at stake"

    44

    Your Feedback Is Requested!

    Thank you for listening

    Please complete the on-line survey

    questionnaire prior to November 1st

    Please give us your comments or

    suggestions on the survey

    Is this worth all the effort?