Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of … · but forms part of the wider framework ... “The Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence ... hierarchy

CJOS COE Transforming Allied Maritime Potential into Reality

Combined Joint Operations from the Sea

Centre of Excellence


Ethos

What is a Centre of Excellence (COE)?

Definition:

“A COE is a nationally or multi-nationally sponsored entity, which offers recognised expertise and experience to the benefit of the Alliance, especially in support of transformation.”

“A COE is not part of the NATO command structure, but forms part of the wider framework supporting NATO Command Authority.”

MCM 236-3, dated 4 Dec 2003


E&

T

Analy

sis

/LL

CD

& E

Do

ctr

ine

De

ve

lop

& S

tan

da

rds

Transformation

Centres of Excellence

COE Support to Transformation

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

• NATO COEs broadly support

the 4 pillars of transformation

• CJOS COE primarily focuses

on two of them:

– Concept Development and

Experimentation

– Doctrine Development &

Standards


Current COE Status

Accreditation Process

1. Military Police (MP / POL)

1. Mountain Warfare (MW / SVN) Multi-Nationalized

Concept Development

1. Crisis Management for Disaster Relief (CMDR / BGR)

1. Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC / DEU) 2. Defence Against Terrorism (DAT / TUR) 3. Naval Mine Warfare (NMW / BEL) 4. Combined Joint Operations from the Sea (CJOS / USA) 5. Civil Military Cooperation (CIMIC / NLD) 6. Cold Weather Operations (CWO / NOR) 7. Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological & Nuclear Defence COE (JCBRN / CZE) 8. Air Operations Analysis and Simulation Centre (CASPOA / FRA) 9. Command & Control COE (C2 / NLD) 10. Cooperative Cyber Defense COE (CCD / EST) 11. Operations in Confined and Shallow Waters COE (CSW / DEU) 12. Military Engineering COE (MILENG / DEU) 13. Military Medicine (MILMED / HUN) 14. Human Intelligence COE (HUMINT / ROU) 15. Counter – Improvised Explosive Devices COE (C-IED / ESP) 16. Explosive Ordnance Disposal COE (EOD / SVK) 17. Modeling and Simulation COE (M&S / ITA)

1. Military Police

Total: 21

1. Energy Security COE (ENSEC / LTU)

NATO Accredited

MOU Negotiations


CJOS COE Mission

“The Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence (CJOS COE) is an independent, multinational, NATO-accredited organization hosted by U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) charged with developing and promoting innovative maritime concepts and doctrine in order for NATO, sponsoring nations, Allies and other international partners and organizations to effectively counter current and emerging global security challenges.”

Vice Admiral Michelle Howard

Deputy Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces

Command

Director, Combined Joint Operations From

The Sea Centre of Excellence

Commodore Steve Chick

Deputy Director, Combined Joint Operations

From The Sea Centre of Excellence

“Transforming Allied Maritime Potential into Reality”


CJOS COE Current Organisation

DR 11 Fiscal Officer

OF-4 (N) (130)

DR 01 Director OF-8 (N)

DR 02 Deputy Director OF-6 (N/M)

Pl 25 SO INTEL IM

OF-4 (I) SC 2/08

TB26 SO MO

OF-4 (A)

Pl 26 SO IM

OF-4 (F)

DR 10 DDO

OF-4 (N) (220) DR03 Mil Aide

OF-2/3 (N) (120)

PL 01 Plans and Policy Branch Head

OF-5 (I)

TB12 SO EO

OF-4 (A)

TB24 SO MO

OF-4 (N) (200)

PL21 Head

Info Management Section

OF-4 (N) (180)

PL16 SO PP

OF-4 (N) (210)

TB11 Head

Expeditionary Ops Section

OF-4 (N)

TB 01 Transformation Branch Head

OF-5 (I)

TB15 SO EO

OF-4 (N/M)

PL22 SO IM

OF-4 (N)

TB22 CIS MO

OR-8 (A/M)

TB21 Head

Maritime Ops Section

OF-4 (I)

DR 12 Admin Assist

OR-6 (N) (140)

PL13 SO PP

OF-4 (I)

PL11 Head

Plans & Policy Section

OF-4 (I)

PL24 SA CIS IM

OR-8 (N) (230)

TB16 SO EO

OF-4 (N) (150)

TB13 SO EO

OF-4 (F)

TB14 SO EO

OF-4 (I)

PL14 SO PP

OF-4 (N/M)

N: Navy M: Marine F: Air Force A: Army I: Indifferent

UNFUNDED/UNASSIGNED FUNDED

PL12 SO PP

0F-4 (I)

PL15 SO PP

OF-4 (N)

PL23 SO IM

OF-4 (N) (160)

TB23 SO MO

OF-4 (N) (170)

TB25 SO MO

OF-4 (I)


CJOS Proposed Organisation

Fiscal Officer DR11 OF-4 (N)

Director OF-8 (N)

Deputy Director OF-6 (N/M)

Outreach and Coordination BH OC01 Civ GS

Mil Aide

OF-2/3 (N)

Strategic Planning and Policy BH

OF-5 (N)

Reserve CO

OF-5(N)

Transformation BH

OF-5 (N)

DR 12 Admin Assist OC04 OR-6 (N)

ITCM OC03 OR-8 (N)

N: Navy M: Marine F: Air Force A: Army I: Indifferent

FUNDED

Directorate Coordinator OC02 OF-2/3

Section Head

Expeditionary Ops Section

OF-4 (N)

Section Head

Maritime Ops Section

OF-4 (N)

Section Head

Strategy and Policy Analysis

OF-4 (N)

Section Head

Maritime Info Dominance

OF-4 (N)

UNASSIGNED/UNFUNDED

TB26 SO MO OF-4 (N)

TB24 SO MO OF-4 (N)

TB15 SO EO OF-4 (M)

TB22 CIS MO OR-8 (A/M)

TB13 SO EO OF-4 (F)

TB14 SO EO OF-4 (N/M)

TB23 SO MO OF-4 (N)

TB25 SO MO OF-4 (N)

PL 25 SO INTEL SC&KM OF-4 (I)

PL 26 SO SC&KM OF-4 (F)

PL16 SO SPA OF-4 (N)

PL22 SO SC&KM OF-4 (N)

PL13 SO SPA OF-4 (I)

PL14 SO SPA OF-4 (N/M)

PL12 SO SPA 0F-4 (N)

PL15 SO SPA OF-4 (N)

PL23 SA SC&KM OF-4 (N)

TB12 UNASSIGNED SUMMER 2013

TB13 FUNDED AND VACANT

TB12 SO EO OF-4 (A)


CJOS COE Programme of Work

• Ties into SACT Mission with:

– Review and input into NATO strategic initiatives

– Conceptual Framework for Allied Operations (CFAO) – detailed tasks and

missions for NATO operations

– Connected Forces Initiative - leveraging existing forces and structures

– Strategic Foresight Work – future security environment for NATO

– NATO Sea Based Operations Concept

• Ties into USFF Mission with:

– Allied Interoperability Handbook, liaison to non-U.S. warships

– Support USFFC Force Generation (WCC, FST, C2X)

– Support Exercises (BA12, BA13, Ex UNITAS, RIMPAC)

– Maritime Security Conference (MSC) Series

– Littoral CONOPS


CJOS Support Relationships

NLR

SACT

Support NATO missions

Lead NATO transformation

Improve external

relationships / cooperation

USFF Force Provider – train, cert

C2 Assigned Forces

Support NORTHCOM, NORAD

& STRATCOM

Nations

National Guidance to SACT

“Customers” for CJOS PoW

Bi- lateral and Multi-lateral

cooperation with U.S.N.

Direct Engagement

Program of Work

CJOS

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

Funding


• Interoperability/HADR - Supported COMPTUEX, FST-J , and Purple Solace throughout 2012

• Chaired MAROPS WG, Jan’ 12

• Interoperability/Lessons learned - Supported BOLD ALLIGATOR 12, Feb’ 12

• Published Cutting the Bow Wave , Mar’ 12

• Published “An Introduction to Joint Operations on and from the Sea”, Mar’ 12

• Published updated L.I.F.E Concept on Relief Web , Apr’ 12

• Distributed revised Allied Interoperability Handbook , Apr’ 12

• Produced Initial draft of Joint Sea Based Operations Concept , May 12

• Published the Autonomous Vessels Protection Detachments White Paper, May 12

• HADR /Interoperability - Supported RIMPAC Exercise, May/Jul 12

• Conducted Maritime Security Conference 2012 , Jun’ 12

• Published Maritime Unmanned Systems Guidance , Jul’ 12

• Contributed to MNE 7 (Concept and Handbook) resulting in further development of MSA, Sep’ 12

• Interoperability - Supported UNITAS Exercise, Sep 12

• Published the final draft of the concept for alternate CATF/CLF C2 relationship, Oct’12

• Published “A Warfighting Concept for Littoral Sea Control Operations”, Oct’ 12

2012 Programme of Work Achievements


“Maritime Strategy”

1

1

2013 Programme of Work


• Introduction:

• The CFAO interim version (last updated version June 2012) is a comprehensive document covering all aspects for Alliance operations both in and out-of-area., Art V and Crisis Response Operations. The aim of the document is to re-establish the hierarchy of documents extending from the Strategic Concept, and bring coherence and greater clarity of purpose.

The Concept:

• Review the Bilateral Strategic Command (BiSC) CFAO with a view of providing recommendations that link ongoing and emerging Maritime Domain concepts with CFAO, MC 400/3, Alliance Maritime Strategy (AMS) and NATO Strategic Concept, CFI, SFI.

Way ahead:

• Continuous evaluation, scrutinize gaps in adjacent maritime papers, make proposals for changes / supplements.

Conceptual Framework for Allied

Operations (CFAO)


Introduction:

• Fall out of the Chicago summit

• Allies shall continue to effectively use capabilities together in view of a decreasing operational tempo. Specifically, aims to ensure that the Alliance retains the valuable gains in interoperability achieved in recent operations.

The Concept:

• Deals with the ability to connect all NATO forces, including those from the NATO Command structure (NCS), NATO Force structure (NFS) and national headquarters, (also from non NATO countries) when required, to maintain and enhance NATO’s combat effectiveness. Interoperability will be a key consideration.

Way ahead (contribute to ongoing ACT work in two areas):

– Review the key NATO documents to assess their relevance to CFI implementation, providing initial feedback from a maritime perspective and making recommendations for further in-depth analysis.

– Remain involved in discussions with the NATO Command Structure (NCS) and NATO Force Structure (NFS) HQs to contribute to the development of a Joint Task Force (JTF) HQ concept for the NFS HQs and their collaboration with Maritime Command (MARCOM) Northwood.

Connected Forces Initiative (CFI)


Introduction:

• SFI is to establish the means within ACT / NATO to review and evaluate ongoing futures work in order to gain and maintain a shared perspective of the Future Security and Operations Environment 2030 and beyond that contributes to NATO’s enduring transformational efforts.

• Focuses on post-AFG era

• Main goal is to provide inputs to the NATO Defense Planning Process and to interweave all transformation initiatives

The Concept:

• Define a consistent, coordinated methodology for conducting Strategic Foresight Analysis (SFA) to distill possible futures from examining common themes, trends, drivers, and scenarios (Think Tanks, Academia, International Organizations, etc..)

• Describe and continually update Future Security and Operating Environments using SFA outcomes to enable ACT to identify potential game changers and reduce the risk of encountering “black swans” and “wild cards.

Way ahead:

• Attend 3 workshops (Oct, Nov, Dec 2012)

Strategic Foresight Initiative (SFI)


“Maritime Security”

1

5



Implementation Concept for

Maritime Security Operations - ICMSO

1

6

Introduction:

• MSO Concept (MC 588) was approved in 2011. IMS tasked both strategic commands to develop the Implementation Concept for MSO

• ACO is leading the overall concept development with support of ACT

The Concept:

• CJOS COE along with other supporting COEs and relevant NATO Commands will support ICMSO concept development. ICMSO will clearly define how NATO is to execute MSO tasks effectively in order to achieve required effects, without introducing new costly capabilities

Way ahead:

• CJOS to provide support to ACT and ACO in ICMSO Concept Development - 2013

• CJOS to attend the CD&E Conference 2012 (Lithuania); provide a presentation on MSC and moderate two Syndicates during the ICMSO Workshop

• CJOS to lead the concept development for "MSO Support to MSA" ICMSO subtask as part of ICMSO concept development plan - 2013


Introduction:

• Maritime Security Operations Concept (MC 588) was approved in 2011. In September 2011, IMS tasked both strategic commands to propose development of necessary Implementation Concept (ICMSO)

• CJOS COE will lead the Concept Development for “MSO Support to MSA” subtask of ICMSO

The Concept:

• "MSO Support to MSA" is identified as one of the subtasks of MSO and the related concept will be developed as part and parallel to ICMSO concept development

Way ahead

• CJOS to provide support to ACT and ACO in ICMSO Concept Development - 2013

• CJOS to attend the CD&E Conference 2012 (Lithuania); provide a presentation on MSC and moderate two Syndicates during the ICMSO Workshop

• CJOS to lead the concept development for "MSO Support to MSA" ICMSO subtask as part of ICMSO concept development plan - 2013

Maritime Situational Awareness (MSA)


Maritime Security Conference - MSC

1

8

Introduction:

• Further MSC’s to be planned. MSC series will now evolve into a series of workshops and working groups to rationalize the development efforts of the MS Concepts and not having annual international conferences

The Concept:

• Conduct further world class events to promote and generate constructive dialogue to help resolve complex maritime security issues. Target audience remains (senior maritime leaders and decision makers from the military, civilian government, commercial maritime communities, international organizations and academia brought together from all around the world

• CJOS COE and COE CSW, in conjunction with other supporting COEs and relevant NATO Commands, will seek to formulate a strategic campaign development plan which will enable NATO to implement the NATO MSO concept.

The Way ahead:

• MSC will not be organized in 2013; the decision is not to organize annual conferences but workshops focusing on PoW projects.

• A series of workshops will be organized in support of ICMSO/"MSO Support to MSA" concept development; which may lead to MSC 2014


Introduction:

• MNE 7 will be closed in Dec 2012

• Conduct follow up on action items and efforts resulting from MNE 7

The Concept:

• Addressing operational access challenges by focusing on the versatile, agile capabilities required to project combined forces into an operational area with sufficient freedom of action to accomplish their mission

Way ahead:

• Senior Leader Seminar MNE 7 in Oslo (Dec 2012)

• Awaiting further decision on exact topic for MCDC (“entry operations”?)

• Scrutinizing CJOS COE’s specific role in the maritime remit

Multinational Capability Development

Campaign (MCDC)


Introduction:

• Increased operational complexity and multiple maritime stakeholders involved, make the existing environments particularly vulnerable to cyber attacks, which could result in severe maritime service disruptions.

The Concept:

• Conduct a literature review of the current state of Maritime Cyber strategies, policies and concepts to determine if Maritime Cyber related issues are being adequately addressed. Identify cyber arena gaps that need to be addressed with new and future concepts, as a common and comprehensive approach, eventually not only from a military prospective, but also from the civilian and industry side .

Way ahead:

• TBD based on the outcome of the review with the proposed deadline on 20th of Nov (CDRE’s Brief) and 14th of Dec (Final Report).

Maritime Cyber Review

Maritime Information Dominance


“Operations On and From the Sea”

2

1



NATO Joint Sea Based Operations

(NJSBO) Concept

2

2

Introduction:

• CJOS COE produced a Handbook: “An Introduction to Joint Operations on and from the Sea” published on Apr’12

• CJOS COE sponsored the concept development within NATO

• ACT is leading and CJOS COE assisted in writing

• Bi-SC staffing process of final draft initiated following the Sept WS co-hosted by ACT & CJOS

The Concept:

• To achieve a common understanding of how JSBO enhances operational independence and provides military and political decision-makers a viable option to achieve a wide range of joint effects across the full spectrum of Alliance operations

Way ahead:

• 15 Nov 12: Concept will be sent to IMS for approval (Bi-SC signed)

• Mid Jan 13: Briefing of NATO’s Military Committee


Introduction:

• With the aim to inform current NATO doctrine, COM French MARFOR requested CJOS COE to develop a Riverine concept.

The Concept:

• The concept will address Riverine operations in the Fluvial and Littoral environments It will be developed in coordination with USN CRG-2, CSW COE, Norwegian and Swedish Coastal Rangers, and Colombian Infanteria de Marina.

Way ahead:

• This concept should further support NATO in the development of an operational doctrine for Riverine operations and assist in the revision of ATP-8(B).

Riverine Operations Concept


“Analysis and Lessons Learned”

2

4



Introduction:

• Follow up MNE 7 “Access to Global Commons”

• CJOS COE provided “intellectual piece “ for maritime domain

The Concept:

• Addressing operational access challenges by focusing on the versatile, agile

capabilities required to project combined forces into an operational area with

sufficient freedom of action to accomplish their mission

Way ahead:

• Close MNE 7 (Senior Leader Seminar, Oslo, Dec 2012)

• Wait for final decision on topic MCDC (“Entry Operations”?)

• Contribute to maritime issues

Multinational Capability Development

Campaign (MCDC)


Introduction:

• ACT requested CJOS COE support, under the coordination of M&S COE, in developing a NATO M&S concept.

The Concept:

• The concept will define the NATO’s vision on M&S to better support NATO’s mission

Way ahead:

• A conference will be tentatively held by ACT and M&S COE in May 2013 to further define the task.

Contribution of the COEs to the Modeling and

Simulation vision and objectives of NATO


Introduction:

• CJOS COE’s effort to contribute to joint analysis of maritime NATO issues that could

be used to inform decision-making at all levels

The Concept:

• Support to Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre (JALLC)

• Create Community of Interest

• CJOS COE internal enabling function

Way ahead:

• Derive LL from other Program of Work items (exercises, validation process)

• Provide the insight necessary to enable customer to address issues effectively and propagate best practices

Lessons Learned Process


LT Colette LaCompte, USN

Directorate Coordinator

[email protected]

757-836-2611

CDRE S. Chick RN, DDIR

CJOS COE Deputy Director

[email protected]

757-836-2465

CAPT Peter Crain, CAN N

Plans and Policy Branch Head

[email protected]

757-836-2450

CAPT Alberto Maffeis, ITA N

Transformation Branch Head

[email protected]

757-836-2449

http://www.cjoscoe.org/

Questions

mailto:[email protected]




http://www.cjoscoe.org/

Documents

Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of … · but forms part of the wider framework ... “The Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence ... hierarchy