Upload
bridget-hodges
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Colorectal Cancer Control Program WorkgroupEmory University – Co-chairHarvard UniversityUniversity of CA Los Angeles – Co-chairUniversity of COUniversity of NCUniversity of SCUniversity of Texas HoustonUniversity of WA – ChairWashington University at St. Louis
CRCCP Workgroup Goals
Study EBI adoption, implementation, maintenance
Implement Annual Grantee Survey 2011-2014
Develop additional studies
Collaborate with CDC evaluation team
Annual Grantee Survey Goals
1. Understand how grantees are implementing
CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program
(CRCCP)
2. Establish a baseline to assess how
implementation changes each year
3. Collect information related to technical assistance
and training needs
Collaboration with CDC Evaluation Team
Develop Annual Grantee Survey & additional studies
Data collection, analysis, and interpretation
Integrate survey findings with other evaluation activities
Feedback to grantees (highlights report, webinars)
Broader dissemination
What We Did
2011-2014: annual grantee survey (2014 TBD, OMB)
2012: surveyed 24 of 33 unfunded states and tribes.
2013-2014: conducted interviews with 14 grantees to deepen understanding of EBI implementation efforts
2014-2015: collaborating with CDC on other components of CRCCP evaluation
What We Accomplished, So Far
3 peer-reviewed publications, 1 under review
4 scientific meetings (5 presentations/posters)
Shared findings with grantees in their annual grantee highlights report (prepared by CDC)
Prepared brief for Dr. Kathi Wilson as part of a CPCRN Report that could be shared with Congress to demonstrate research and practice activities related to the Community Guide
How We Worked Together
Organization and leadership Chair + 2 Co-chairs, research staff
Participation 9 centers, varying roles and levels
Contributions Lots of survey development/drafts, especially at first Tried to have funded participants doing most “grunt” work
Productivity Proposed papers shared with group; authors based on interest
What Worked
What worked well…Opportunity to develop strong collaboration with CDC CRCCP staffActivities still generating publication opportunitiesCo-chairs enjoyed working together
What could have worked better… Late development of publication expectations Project activities still ongoing, how does transition in CPCRN
member centers fit in?
Lessons Learned
Be open to new opportunities/shifts in workplan
Build strong relationships with co-chairs
Plan for IRB: multicenter issues and CDC sign-off
Agree on publication expectations early on
What “counts” for authorship
Number of authors per center
Think carefully about staffing needs for subprojects
Thank you!
Discussion