10
Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University of NC University of SC University of Texas Houston University of WA – Chair Washington University at St. Louis

Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

Colorectal Cancer Control Program WorkgroupEmory University – Co-chairHarvard UniversityUniversity of CA Los Angeles – Co-chairUniversity of COUniversity of NCUniversity of SCUniversity of Texas HoustonUniversity of WA – ChairWashington University at St. Louis

Page 2: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

CRCCP Workgroup Goals

Study EBI adoption, implementation, maintenance

Implement Annual Grantee Survey 2011-2014

Develop additional studies

Collaborate with CDC evaluation team

Page 3: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

Annual Grantee Survey Goals

1. Understand how grantees are implementing

CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program

(CRCCP)

2. Establish a baseline to assess how

implementation changes each year

3. Collect information related to technical assistance

and training needs

Page 4: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

Collaboration with CDC Evaluation Team

Develop Annual Grantee Survey & additional studies

Data collection, analysis, and interpretation

Integrate survey findings with other evaluation activities

Feedback to grantees (highlights report, webinars)

Broader dissemination

Page 5: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

What We Did

2011-2014: annual grantee survey (2014 TBD, OMB)

2012: surveyed 24 of 33 unfunded states and tribes.

2013-2014: conducted interviews with 14 grantees to deepen understanding of EBI implementation efforts

2014-2015: collaborating with CDC on other components of CRCCP evaluation

Page 6: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

What We Accomplished, So Far

3 peer-reviewed publications, 1 under review

4 scientific meetings (5 presentations/posters)

Shared findings with grantees in their annual grantee highlights report (prepared by CDC)

Prepared brief for Dr. Kathi Wilson as part of a CPCRN Report that could be shared with Congress to demonstrate research and practice activities related to the Community Guide

Page 7: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

How We Worked Together

Organization and leadership Chair + 2 Co-chairs, research staff

Participation 9 centers, varying roles and levels

Contributions Lots of survey development/drafts, especially at first Tried to have funded participants doing most “grunt” work

Productivity Proposed papers shared with group; authors based on interest

Page 8: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

What Worked

What worked well…Opportunity to develop strong collaboration with CDC CRCCP staffActivities still generating publication opportunitiesCo-chairs enjoyed working together

What could have worked better… Late development of publication expectations Project activities still ongoing, how does transition in CPCRN

member centers fit in?

Page 9: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

Lessons Learned

Be open to new opportunities/shifts in workplan

Build strong relationships with co-chairs

Plan for IRB: multicenter issues and CDC sign-off

Agree on publication expectations early on

What “counts” for authorship

Number of authors per center

Think carefully about staffing needs for subprojects

Page 10: Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University

Thank you!

Discussion