1
COLLEGE ENROLLMENT AND PERSISTENCE IN RURAL PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOLS Understanding college enrollment and persistence rates in rural schools is one of the main goals of the Rural College Readiness Research Alliance of REL Mid-Atlantic. Working with the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools, the Research Alliance examined how college enrollment and persistence among graduates of Pennsylvania’s rural schools compare with rates for graduates of city, suburban, and town high schools. STUDY SAMPLE: PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS IN PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS DISTRICTS, BY LOCALE, 2010/11 RURAL 63% RURAL–DISTANT 36% RURAL–FRINGE 20% RURAL–REMOTE 7% TOWN 28% SUBURB 8% CITY 1% The findings suggest that in Pennsylvania, the relative poverty of rural areas, rather than a rural location itself, may compromise college enrollment and persistence. COLLEGE ENROLLMENT AND FIRST-TO-SECOND-YEAR PERSISTENCE RATES OF PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS DISTRICTS, BY SCHOOL LOCALE AND POVERTY CATEGORY, 2010/11 COHORT COLLEGE ENROLLMENT RATE DELAYED ENROLLMENT RATE IMMEDIATE ENROLLMENT RATE FIRST-TO-SECOND-YEAR PERSISTENCE RATE 52.2 51.2 72.1 74.4 44.7 7.6 44.2 7 66.8 5.3 66.2 8.1 59.1 86.8 87.6 86.6 RURAL HIGH POVERTY NONRURAL HIGH POVERTY RURAL LOW POVERTY NONRURAL LOW POVERTY Level of poverty – not location – seems to be more strongly related to college enrollment rate and immediate college enrollment rate. Rural location and level of poverty were not strongly related to delayed enrollment. Rural, high-poverty students had the lowest first-to-second-year persistence rate. SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS: Examine factors associated with persistence, such as high school course-taking patterns, high school grade point averages, achievement scores, and college credit accumulation patterns. Explore how proximity to cities, suburbs, or towns may offer students from rural–fringe schools access to resources and supports that are less available in rural–distant and rural–remote schools. Identify evidence-based college access and success strategies that target economically disadvantaged youth who attend rural schools that serve a large population of these students. The information in this infographic can be found in the full report: Howley, C., Johnson, J., Passa, A., & Uekawa, K. (2014). College enrollment and persistence in rural Pennsylvania schools. (REL 2015–053). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=370. www.relmidatlantic.org/publications @RELMidAtlantic

College Enrollment and Persistence in Rural Pennsylvania Schools · 2017. 3. 28. · RURAL 63%. RURAL–DISTANT . 36%. RURAL–FRINGE. 20%. RURAL–REMOTE. 7%. TOWN. 28%. SUBURB

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: College Enrollment and Persistence in Rural Pennsylvania Schools · 2017. 3. 28. · RURAL 63%. RURAL–DISTANT . 36%. RURAL–FRINGE. 20%. RURAL–REMOTE. 7%. TOWN. 28%. SUBURB

COLLEGE ENROLLMENT AND PERSISTENCE IN RURAL PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOLS

Understanding college enrollment and persistence rates in rural schools is one of the main goals of the Rural College Readiness Research Alliance of REL Mid-Atlantic. Working with the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools, the Research Alliance examined how college enrollment and persistence among graduates of Pennsylvania’s rural schools compare with rates for graduates of city, suburban, and town high schools.

STUDY SAMPLE: PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS IN PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS DISTRICTS, BY LOCALE, 2010/11

RURAL 63% RURAL–DISTANT

36%

RURAL–FRINGE20%

RURAL–REMOTE7%

TOWN28%

SUBURB8%

CIT Y1%

The findings suggest that in Pennsylvania, the relative poverty of rural areas, rather than a rural location itself, may compromise college enrollment and persistence.

COLLEGE ENROLLMENT AND FIRST-TO-SECOND-YEAR PERSISTENCE RATES OF PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS DISTRICTS, BY SCHOOL

LOCALE AND POVERTY CATEGORY, 2010/11 COHORT

COLLEGE ENROLLMENT RATE

DELAYED ENROLLMENT RATE

IMMEDIATE ENROLLMENT RATE

FIRST-TO-SECOND-YEAR PERSISTENCE RATE

52.2 51.2

72.1 74.4

44.7

7.6

44.2

7

66.8

5.3

66.2

8.1

59.1

86.8 87.6 86.6

RURAL HIGH POVERT Y NONRURAL HIGH POVERT Y RURAL LOW POVERT Y NONRURAL LOW POVERT Y

• Level of poverty – not location – seems to be more strongly related to college enrollment rate and immediate college enrollment rate.

• Rural location and level of poverty were not strongly related to delayed enrollment.

• Rural, high-poverty students had the lowest first-to-second-year persistence rate.

SUGGESTED NEX T STEPS:Examine factors associated with persistence, such as high school course-taking patterns, high school grade point averages, achievement scores, and college credit accumulation patterns.Explore how proximity to cities, suburbs, or towns may offer students from rural–fringe schools access to resources and supports that are less available in rural–distant and rural–remote schools. Identify evidence-based college access and success strategies that target economically disadvantaged youth who attend rural schools that serve a large population of these students.

The information in this infographic can be found in the full report: Howley, C., Johnson, J., Passa, A., & Uekawa, K. (2014). College enrollment and persistence in rural Pennsylvania schools. (REL 2015–053). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=370.

www.relmidatlantic.org/publications @RELMidAtlantic