23
NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospect Bonn, September 1, 2009 Andrey M. Shirokov Moscow State University & Iowa State University Collaborators: V. Kulikov (Moscow State University) J. Vary, T. Weber, and P. Maris (Iowa State University) A. Mazur, E. Mazur and S. Zaytsev (Pacific National University)

Collaborators: V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

  • Upload
    barth

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospect Bonn, September 1, 2009 Andrey M. Shirokov Moscow State University & Iowa State University. Collaborators: V. Kulikov (Moscow State University) J. Vary, T. Weber, and P. Maris (Iowa State University) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospect

Bonn, September 1, 2009

Andrey M. ShirokovMoscow State University & Iowa State University

Collaborators: V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)J. Vary, T. Weber, and P. Maris (Iowa State University) A. Mazur, E. Mazur and S. Zaytsev (Pacific National University)

Page 2: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

JISP

= J-matrix inverse scattering potential

Page 3: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

J-matrix:

• Scattering theory in L2 basis: oscillator basis or Laguerre basis• First in atomic physics: H. A. Yamani, L. Fishman, J. Math. Phys. 16 410 (1975).• In nuclear physics (oscillator basis): G. F. Filippov and I. P. Okhrimenko, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 32, 480 (1980)

• Inverse scattering: S. A. Zaytsev, Theor. Math. Phys. 115, 575 (1998); A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev, J. P. Vary, T. A. Weber, Phys.

Rev. C 70, 044005 (2004).

Page 4: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

J-matrix formalism:scattering in the oscillator basis

Page 5: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

JISP NN interaction

• NN interaction is a small matrix of the in the oscillator basis:

9ћ truncation, ћ = 40 MeV

fast convergence of shell model calculations

• Good description of NN data

Page 6: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

JISP16 properties

• 1992 np data base (2514 data): 2/datum = 1.03• 1999 np data base (3058 data): 2/datum = 1.05

Page 7: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Ambiguity of JISP interaction

• Any unitary transformation of NN Hamiltonian H generates a Phase-equivalent transformation (PET).

• Simplest PETs with continuous parameters are used to fit properties of light nuclei in

No-core Shell Model (NCSM) calculations.

Page 8: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

JISP NN interaction

• A. M. Shirokov, A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev, J. P. Vary,

T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. C 70, 044005 (2004): A ≤ 4• A. M. Shirokov, J. P. Vary, A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev,

T. A. Weber, Phys. Lett. B 621, 96 (2005): A ≤ 6 — JISP6• A. M. Shirokov, J. P. Vary, A. I. Mazur, S. A. Zaytsev,

T. A. Weber, Phys. Lett. B 644, 33 (2007): A ≤ 16 — JISP16

Page 9: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)
Page 10: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)
Page 11: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)
Page 12: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)
Page 13: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)
Page 14: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

From effective interactions to full configuration calculations

• Extrapolation:

Egs(Nmax) = ae-bNmax + Egs()

• Works with bare interaction only• Example:

P. Maris, J. P. Vary, A. M. Shirokov, Phys. Rev. C 79, 014308 (2009)

Page 15: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)
Page 16: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Improved interaction JISP16-09

• Obtained by a more accurate fit to nuclear data

Page 17: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Nuclear matter with JISP16

Thanks to Scott Bogner!

Page 18: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Nuclear matter

• JISP16-09 improves NM properties.

• Strong dependence on high partial waves makes it possible to fit NM to phenomenological data without violating description of light nuclei.

Page 19: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

NN interaction JISP16 is used without NNN forces

Page 20: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Why would be nice to avoid NNN forces?

Page 21: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Role of NNN force?

• W. Polyzou and W. Glöckle theorem (Few-body Syst. 9, 97 (1990)):

H=T+Vij H’=T+V’ij+Vijk,

where Vij and V’ij are phase-equivalent, H and H’ are isospectral.

Hope:

H’=T+V’ij+Vijk H=T+Vij

with (approximately) isospectral H and H’ .

JISP16 seems to be NN interaction minimizing NNN force.

Without NNN force calculations are simpler, calculations are faster, larger model spaces become available.

Page 22: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Conclusions

• JISP16 provides a good description of NN data and binding energies, spectra, EM transitions in light nuclei, etc., without NNN forces.

• An improved version JISP16-09 providing a more accurate description of nuclei will be available soon.

Later this version will be additionally fitted to nuclear matter too.

• Further development: description of other observables, e.g., rms radii in heavy enough nuclei, description of heavier nuclei, design of charge-dependent version of

the interaction.

Page 23: Collaborators:  V. Kulikov (Moscow State University)

Thank you!