Upload
baldwin-roger-carroll
View
220
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COL David W. Craft PhD D(ABMM)Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
FY10 Major AMEDD Board
Promotion Board Update
Secretariat forSecretariat for
• Conduct all centralized active component officer selection boards
• Provide administrative and technical support to DA Selection
Boards• Coordinate membership for DA
Selection Boards
Our Mission
OVERVIEW
The Sec Army’s MOI
OVERVIEW
• Provides MAX & MIN selection capability
• Provides Special Skill Requirements
• Authority for Board
• Board Mission
• Defines Zones of Consideration
• OER Cut-off Authority
• Additional Guidance from SA as required
(OER, Training Base, Reserve Component Duty)
• Joint Duty Goals
• EO Information
ENCLOSURES
SEC ARMY
COVER
MEMO
Board Member Selection
Statute (Title X) Requires:
5 or more active duty members Senior to officers being
considered Reserve officer representation
Joint representation Cannot sit 2 consecutive
boards
Army Policy Requires:
Branch representation Ethnic and female
representation LTC (O5) or above 50% O5/O6 CSL
Commander
OVERVIEW
Board Room Procedures and Security
• No personal knowledge allowed*
BOARD OPS
• All board members & a recorder must be present for board discussions, deliberations and decisions
• No informal office visits (to include career managers)
• All board related material & discussion stays in the board room
• No visitors allowed in the board room
Fully Qualified Best Qualified
(AR 600-8-29)
Fully qualified officers who
“meet specific branch,
functional area or skill
requirements”… to meet the
Needs of the Army.
(Command & most promotion boards)
Numerical Constraints
“… qualified professionally
and morally to perform the
duties expected of an
officer in the next higher
grade.”
(SELCON)
100% Select Rate Capability
BOARD OPS
Board Member Voting
MOI
CONVENING AUTHORITY’S MOI
= VOTE= VOTE
BOARD MEMBER EXPERIENCE &
JUDGMENT
++
SCORING CRITERIA
Word Picture
1 - 6+++++
BOARD FILE
BOARD OPS
• Phase I - In/Above Zone Voting (FQ) • Phase II - BZ Voting• Phase III - Comparison & Requirements• Phase IV - Show Cause • Phase V - Paperwork
BOARD OPS
Identify Fully Qualified Officers
• Vote Files (1 thru 6 +/-)
• ID Possible Show Cause Cases
• Establish OML
• Establish Fully Qualified Line
PHASE I
Word Picture (IAZ)
6 +/-
5 +/-
4 +/-
3 +/-
2 +/-
1
Top Few
Superior Performer
Superior Potential
Select Ahead of Peers
Outstanding Performer
Outstanding Potential
Select with Peers
Solid Performer
Good Potential
Select if there is a Requirement
Average Performer/Potential
Do not Select
Weak Performer
Show Cause
FULLY QUALIFIED
NOT FULLY QUALIFIED
NOT FULLY QUALIFIED
FULLY QUALIFIED
FULLY QUALIFIED
FULLY QUALIFIED
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
FULLY
QUALIFIED
FULLY
QUALIFIED
MAX Score
MIN Score
IAZ
PopulationHard Vote
PHASE I
Identify Fully Qualified Officers
13
14
15
• Determine “FQ” line• Determine “FQ” line
NOT FULLY
QUALIFIED
NOT FULLY
QUALIFIED
AR 600-8-29 Officer Promotions
1-34b. Below the zone promotions are an
essential part of the promotion system. They are
intended to provide officers of exceptional ability
an opportunity to advance quickly to more
responsible positions, help retain high quality
officers, and give officers an incentive to perform
at their highest level.
PHASE II
Identify Potential BZ Selects
DA MEMO 600-2• The Army must identify its best officers and promote them earlier to afford them sufficient remaining service to be available as our senior leaders. • Officers selected from BZ replace those who otherwise would be promoted from in and above the promotion zone; therefore, they must be clearly superior to those who would otherwise be promoted.
PHASE IIIdentify Potential BZ Selects
18 YES
17 YES
16 YES
15 YES
14 YES
13 YES
12 YES
11 YES
10 YES
4 YES
3 YES
2 YES
1 YES
0 YES
Screen Vote:
YES/NO/SC
PHASE II
Identify Potential BZ Selects
OML # SCORE
1 78+13
2 77-1
3 77-4
4 75-1
5 75
6 74+7
7 73-4
8 72+3
9 72+2
10 71-5
11 60+1
12 55+1
13 26
BZ MOI Guidance: MIN = 0,
MAX= 2
BZ MOI Guidance: MIN = 0,
MAX= 2
Hard Vote:
2-6+/-
I/AZ
Comparison Files
NAME RANK SKILL SCOREOML
#
JONES MAJ A 60+10 1
SMITH MAJ A 60+9 2
JAMES MAJ C 60 3
JOHN MAJ B 58 4
DOE MAJ D 58-1 5
SCHMOE MAJ A 58-4 6
KELLY MAJ C 57+9 7
GIBSON MAJ C 57+8 8
JACOBS MAJ A 57+7 9
STEWART MAJ B 56+10 10
BARRETT MAJ D 56+10 10
ANDERSON MAJ B 54 12
HARVEY MAJ B 53 13
COX MAJ C 53-2 14
MICHAELS MAJ C 29 15
MAYO MAJ AR 27 16
FRITZ MAJ AR 26 17
Phase I: Fully Phase I: Fully
Qualified LineQualified Line NOT FULLY QUALIFIED
Phase III: Tentatively Phase III: Tentatively
Best Qualified LineBest Qualified Line
Requirements:Requirements:
Optimum = 10Optimum = 10
Max BZs = 2Max BZs = 2
Order of Merit List (OML)
IAZ OML
Fully
Qualified
Not Fully
Qualified
TBQTBQ
BZ OML
1
2
• The lowest scoring BZ officer is compared against the highest
scoring I/AZ Officer
• Head to Head comparison
Phase III:
Identify Best Qualified Officers
Phase III:
Identify Best Qualified Officers
2*
1
9
10
I/AZ FILE IS DISPLACED;
OFFICER NOT RECOMMENDED FOR
PROMOTION
Phase I: Fully
Qualified Line
Phase III:
Best Qualified Line
Requirements:
Optimum = 10
Max = 11
Max BZs = 2
P1P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
NAME RANK SKILL SCOREOML
#
JANSON MAJ C
JONES MAJ A 60+10 1
SMITH MAJ A 60+9 2
JAMES MAJ C 60 3
JOHN MAJ B 58 4
DOE MAJ D 58-1 5
SCHMOE MAJ A 58-4 6
KELLY MAJ C 57+9 7
GIBSON MAJ C 57+8 8
JACOBS MAJ A 57+7 9
STEWART MAJ B 56+10 10
BARRETT MAJ D 55 11
ANDERSON MAJ B 54 12
HARVEY MAJ B 53 13
COX MAJ C 53-2 14
MICHAELS MAJ C 29 15
MAYO MAJ AR 27 16
FRITZ MAJ AR 26 17
NOT FULLY QUALIFIED
Order of Merit List (OML)
Recess (Today)Recess (Today) ReleaseResults Published
ReleaseResults Published
Specifics of MOISpecifics of MOI((as publishedas published))
StatisticsStatistics((as publishedas published))
What it took to be What it took to be selectedselected
Name of specific Name of specific board served onboard served on
Specifics of MOISpecifics of MOI((as publishedas published))
StatisticsStatistics((as publishedas published))
What it took to be What it took to be selectedselected
Name of specific Name of specific board served onboard served on
• Comments concerning individuals or groups of individuals made during Deliberations.
• Relative Standing of any individual or groups of individuals on the Order of Merit List.
• Any Statistical Analysis not published with board results.
• Comments concerning individuals or groups of individuals made during Deliberations.
• Relative Standing of any individual or groups of individuals on the Order of Merit List.
• Any Statistical Analysis not published with board results.
Procedures, General Procedures, General – Concept of ops. Concept of ops.
Processes Processes (Tools for Consistency)(Tools for Consistency)
– Voting toolsVoting tools– Word pictureWord picture
– Scoring systemScoring system– ASBSASBS
File Make-UpFile Make-Up
Contents of Information Contents of Information
BriefingsBriefings
Procedures, General Procedures, General – Concept of ops. Concept of ops.
Processes Processes (Tools for Consistency)(Tools for Consistency)
– Voting toolsVoting tools– Word pictureWord picture
– Scoring systemScoring system– ASBSASBS
File Make-UpFile Make-Up
Contents of Information Contents of Information
BriefingsBriefings
AdjournmentSec A Acts on Results
AdjournmentSec A Acts on Results
Recorder will notify member Recorder will notify member
Method of selectionMethod of selection(ie Best or Fully Qualified)(ie Best or Fully Qualified)
Board compositionBoard composition
((representation, number of representation, number of members, makeup)members, makeup)
Recorder will notify member Recorder will notify member
Method of selectionMethod of selection(ie Best or Fully Qualified)(ie Best or Fully Qualified)
Board compositionBoard composition
((representation, number of representation, number of members, makeup)members, makeup)
MAY / MAY NOT SUMMARYMAY / MAY NOT SUMMARY
Promotion List MFR
Promotion List MFR
Promotion List MFR
MOI
MOI
MOI
MOI
MOI
MOI
MOI
MOI