Upload
clifton-richards
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cognitive Processes in Web searching HFWEB June 3, 1999 How to develop this model? uSTEP 1: –Theoretical Interactivity framework based on literature uSTEP 2: –Empirical study uSTEP 3: –Analysis of the results using the Interactivity framework & External Cognition Develop the empirical Model uSTEP 4: –Experimental validation of the Model
Citation preview
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN WEB SEARCHING
RAQUEL NAVARRO-PRIETOYVONNE ROGERS
MIKE SCAIFESchool of Cognitive and Computer ScienceSchool of Cognitive and Computer Science
University of Sussex (U.K.)University of Sussex (U.K.)
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Objectives and Questions
Develop a Cognitive model of web searching – How people search for information in such
a complex environment?– What are the main users problems?– Role of interactivity, external
representations, mental models?
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
How to develop this model? STEP 1:
– Theoretical Interactivity framework based on literature
STEP 2:– Empirical study
STEP 3:– Analysis of the results using the Interactivity framework &
External CognitionDevelop the empirical Model
STEP 4:– Experimental validation of the Model
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Interactivity framework
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
EXTERNAL EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONREPRESENTATIONTASKTASK
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
What we know about searching tasks:
Tasks– Web studies: Shneiderman ‘s model (1997), details vs. general information
(Braham, 1997)– Interactive multimedia: Effects of interactivity, cognitive principles for CAI.
Strategies– Web studies: Effect of: experience (Kellogg and Richards, 1995), strategies
(Nielsen, 1997, Pejtersen and Fidel, 1998)
External representations– Interactive multimedia: Information retrieval in hypertext system– External Cognition: Interaction between external representations and
internal representations
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Getting data Methodology & Design:
– Observational (video recording) – Interviews– Questionnaire: experience, web knowledge,
satisfaction. Tasks: 4 tasks Subjects
– Experienced & novice web users– Computer Science and Psychology students
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Searching Conditions
S pecific F act-finding Exploration of availbilit y
D ispersed structure
Exploration of availbilit y Specific F act-finding
Category structure
Ho w th e in fo rmatio n is stru ctu red in the W eb
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Searching Conditions
S pecific F act-finding Exploration of availbilit y
D ispersed structure
Exploration of availbilit y Specific F act-finding
Category structure
Ho w th e in fo rmatio n is stru ctu red in the W eb
Structure of information
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Searching Conditions
S pecific F act-finding Exploration of availbilit y
D ispersed structure
Exploration of availbilit y Specific F act-finding
Category structure
Ho w th e in fo rmatio n is stru ctu red in the W eb
Structure of information
Tasks
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Design
SEARCHING CONDITIONS EXPERIENCEDUSERS
NOVICE USERS
fact-findingDISPERSEDSTRUCTURE
exploration
fact-findingCATEGORYSTRUCTURE
exploration
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
ProcedureSearching task
(experimenter take notes)
Interview about the searching
Questionnaire
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
FINDINGS
Questionnaire Results– Experienced users / novices
Behavior data & Interviews– Integration of data from video data analysis
and interviews to identify the common patterns
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Cognitive Strategies 1:
Top- down: descending in the hierarchyeducation
librariesInternet Public Library
Reference Center
Arts & Humanities
Book list and Awards Reference
N Prize Foundation
Looking for a encyclopaedia to find information about Nobel prize
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Cognitive Strategies 2:
Bottom-up: ascending in the hierarchy
query: ‘Literature Nobel Prize 1997”
click on ‘Dario Fo’ click on
‘Bibliography’save
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Cognitive Strategies 3: Mixed strategy:
BOTTOM-UP:
TOP-DOWN:Nobell.com (general resource page)
query ‘New York Times’
specific queries ‘Literature NobelPrize 1997’
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Overview of the Interactions:Task/Experience/StrategiesSEARCHING
TASKEXPERIENCEDWEB-USERS
NON-EXPERIENCEDWEB-USERS
SCIENTIFIC FACT-FINDING: Bottom-up/Mixed strategy at
the beginning and selectingBottom-up
INFORMATIONIN WEB
DISPERSEDSTRUCTURE
EXPLORATORY: Top-down
Starting with top-downand changing at the endto bottom-up
INFORMATIONIN WEB
CATEGORYSTRUCTURE
Mixed strategy at thebeginning and selecting top-down
Top-down
Top-down followingbrowser categories
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Interactivity framework
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
EXTERNAL EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONREPRESENTATIONTASKTASK
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Model for experienced users
Search Planning
Category Use the Web categories
Structure of Information in Web?
Goal of the task?
DisperseExploratoryExploratory
Top-down: maximize structured information retrieval
Mixed Strategy: Testing
Fact FindingFact Finding
Top-downBottom-up
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Model for novice users
Start with the Categories from Web or keywords provided to them
Driven by the External Representations
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
How searchers use External Representations
Making inferences: meaning of link, subcategories, etc.
From a general category/query to a specific topic/precise query or changing topic following the suggestions
Differentiate the relevant/irrelevant information
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Design Implications
Cognitive overload: what is in each window where they are where they have been
Constraining: the structure of the information
DIMENSIONS:EXT. REPRESENT. SHOULD MAKE VISIBLE:
Re-representation: relevant information/scanning
Cognitive Processes in Web searching
HFWEB June 3, 1999
Conclusions
Methodological conclusions
Hypothesis for experimentation– Manipulate:
• Structure of the information/Experience/External representation
Design implications