View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cognition and Cognition and PerceptionPerception
Psych 448CPsych 448C
11/10/0811/10/08
ObjectivesObjectives
Basic cognitive and perceptual Basic cognitive and perceptual processes may not be universal.processes may not be universal.
Holistic reasoning (middle-class, Holistic reasoning (middle-class, Western) vs. Western) vs. analyticalanalytical reasoning reasoning (middle-class, East Asian):(middle-class, East Asian):– 1. Attention to objects versus 1. Attention to objects versus
relationshipsrelationships– 2. Categorization using abstract rules 2. Categorization using abstract rules
versus versus similarity informationsimilarity information
Cultural Variations in Socio-Cognitive Processes
( Markus & Kitayama, Psychological Review, 1991 )
In East Asia, people tend to conceptualize “the self” as a relational and contextual existence= Interdependent View of Self
In North America, people tend to conceptualize “the self” as an entity detached from others and its context.= Independent View of Self
Self Concepts
Analytic Thought
•Origin: Greek Philosophy•The dominant patterns are observed in Euro-Americansocieties
Determinants :Relatively mild climates; economy does not require strong social ties; nature can be easily controlled.
World View: Things exist by themselvesand can be defined by their attributes(context independent, object-oriented).
Holistic Thought•Origin: East Asian Philosophy(Taoism, Buddhism, East Asian Animism)•The dominant patterns are observable in China,Japan, Korean cultures.
Determinants:Frequently changing climate; Economy requires strong social ties.
World view: Things are inter-related. Various factors are involved in an event (context dependent, context-sensitive).
Early Social Differences in Ancient Greece Early Social Differences in Ancient Greece and Chinaand China
Social Structure:Social Structure:– China: family, village, emperorChina: family, village, emperor– Greece: city-states, kingGreece: city-states, king
Harmony in China: relationshipsHarmony in China: relationships Debate in Ancient Greece: argumentsDebate in Ancient Greece: arguments Differences in social systems remain Differences in social systems remain
between East Asians and the Westbetween East Asians and the West
Socio-Cognitive ProcessesSelf Concept
Causal AttributionAttitude Inference
Attention
The assumption of Cultural Psychology (1): Culture as a worldview shapes human socio-cognitive processes.
Biological Factors
The advanced assumption of Cultural Psychology (2): Culture as a worldview shapes even basic psychological processes, especially attention.
General Assumption in Psychology: Cultural factors are superficial or simply treated as noise.
Culture Ecological Factors
Basic Processes
Cognitive Differences Follow Cognitive Differences Follow from Social Differences:from Social Differences:
Attention and PerceptionAttention and Perception Categorization and ReasoningCategorization and Reasoning
Attention and Attention and PerceptionPerception
Attention and Memory: Attention and Memory: Masuda and Nisbett (2001)Masuda and Nisbett (2001)
Masuda and Nisbett (2001):Masuda and Nisbett (2001):
American American Participants:Participants:– Object Object – Moving ObjectsMoving Objects
Japanese Japanese Participants:Participants:– Background Background – Inert ObjectsInert Objects
Attention to the Center Figure as a Function of Time and Culture
50
60
70
80
90
100
~1000msec ~2000msec ~3000msec
Th
e r
ati
o o
f th
e A
tte
nti
on
to
th
e C
en
ter
Fig
ure
AmericanJapanese
Attention and Memory: Attention and Memory: Recognition TaskRecognition Task
Phase 1-Judge how much you like the target animals.
Phase 2-Identify previously seen animals.
Masuda and Nisbett (2001):Masuda and Nisbett (2001):
American American Participants:Participants:– Object Object – Moving ObjectsMoving Objects– Accurate recognition Accurate recognition
of fish when of fish when background is background is changedchanged
Japanese Japanese Participants:Participants:– Background Background – Inert ObjectsInert Objects– Less accurate Less accurate
recognition of fish recognition of fish when background is when background is changedchanged
Recognition of Fish in Original and Novel Backgrounds
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
Original Novel
Background
Recogn
itio
n o
f Fis
h
JapaneseUS
Attention to Change:Attention to Change:
Attention to Change: Attention to Change: What has changed?What has changed?
Change Blindness:Change Blindness:
0
1
2
3
4
Nu
mb
er
of
det e
cted
ch
an
ges
USAUSA JPNJPN
Contextual Information
Focal Object Information
(Masuda & Nisbett, under review; Nisbett & Masuda, PNAS, 2003)
Change Blindness Results
A drawing produced by an American student
The Scenery (Picture-Drawing) Task
A drawing produced by an Asian student
Picture produced by an American Pictures produced by a Japanese
The Portrait (Picture-Taking) Task
Results of Results of The Picture-Drawing TaskThe Picture-Drawing Task
American drawings East Asian drawings N M SD N M SD t p
The ratio of the horizon 43 56.37 18.92 46 67.16 15.06 2.98 .005to the frame
The numbersof additional 43 6.19 6.94 46 10.72 12.02 2.16 .05 objects
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Th
e r
ati
o o
f th
e f
ace
to t
he f
ram
e (
%)
LaboratorySitting Model
LaboratoryStanding Model
Americans
East Asians
AtriumSitting Model
AtriumStanding Model
Results of The Picture-Taking Task
Culture and Attention :The Rod & Frame Task
Measuring the contextdependency-The RFT(Witkin & Berry, 1977)
(Ji, Peng, & Nisbett, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000)
Task: Making the rod vertical while ignoringthe angle of the frame.
(Ji, Peng, & Nisbett, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000)
East Asians were sensitive to the contextual information (Frame). As a result, they made errors when the frame was angled.
For North Americans: They focused on the rod by itself. As a result, they made fewer errors when the frame was angled.
Culture and Attention :The Frame-Line Task
( Kitayama, Duffy, Kawamura, & Lersen, Psychological Science, 2003 )
Absolute Task
Relative Task
East Asians performed the relative task better than the absolute task. North Americans performed the absolute task better than the relative task.
North AmericansNorth Americans East AsiansEast Asians
FISHFISH
ReportReportMain FishMain Fish Main Fish as well asMain Fish as well as
ContextContext
ANIMALANIMAL
RecognitionRecognitionThe Background The Background effect was weakeffect was weak
Influenced by theInfluenced by thechanges in changes in backgroundbackground
Change Change
ParadigmParadigmFind changes inFind changes in
Focal objectsFocal objectsFind changes inFind changes in
ContextContext
EmotionEmotionEye MovementEye Movement
Consistent JudgmentConsistent JudgmentCenter 95%Center 95%
After 1 sec somewhat goes to After 1 sec somewhat goes to
the contextthe context
Infuenced by the background Infuenced by the background Center 85% Center 85%
After 1sec>Goes to the After 1sec>Goes to the Context InformationContext Information
EstheticsEsthetics Object-OrientedObject-Oriented
(Western Perspectives,(Western Perspectives,
Portraits)Portraits)
Context-OrientedContext-Oriented
(East Asian Perspectives,(East Asian Perspectives,
Portraits with context)Portraits with context)
RFTRFT Attending to the rodAttending to the rod Attending to the Attending to the frameframe
FLTFLT AbsoluteAbsolute >> RelativeRelative AbsoluteAbsolute << RelativeRelative
Cultural Variations in Attention: Summary
ReasoningReasoning
Object Categorization:Object Categorization:(Ji & Nisbett, 2000; Choi, Nisbett & Smith, 1999)(Ji & Nisbett, 2000; Choi, Nisbett & Smith, 1999)
Americans:Americans:– Categories:Categories:
Pig and Dog are both Pig and Dog are both examples of animalsexamples of animals
Chinese and Chinese and Koreans:Koreans:– Relationship:Relationship:
Pig eats cornPig eats corn
What goes with this ? A or B
A B
ReasoningReasoning
Differences in Similarity J udgments between Americans and East Asians
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
EuropeanAmerican
AsianAmerican
East Asian
Perc
en
t S
imil
ari
ty J
ud
gm
en
t
Rule
FamilyResemblance
Cognitive StylesCognitive Styles: : Analytic vs. Holistic ReasoningAnalytic vs. Holistic Reasoning
Holistic:Holistic:– Focus on field in Focus on field in
which object is which object is locatedlocated
– Relationship b/w Relationship b/w object and field to object and field to predict and explainpredict and explain
– Absence of universal Absence of universal lawslaws
Analytic:Analytic:– Focus on object and Focus on object and
attributesattributes– Use attributes to Use attributes to
categorizecategorize– Use universal laws Use universal laws
about categories to about categories to modelmodel