Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Codling Moth Trapping and Degree-Day Accumulations in Northern Utah
Shawn SteffanDept. of Biology
Utah State UniversityLogan, UT
November 5th, 2003
Why was it such a bad year for CM?
• Large overwintering populations?• Mild winter?• Cool, prolonged spring?• Record-breaking summer
heat?• Resistance to insecticides?• Imperfect control tactics?
Codling Moth Degree-Days• What are D-Ds?
Unit of measure (time and temperature unit).
Time spent within a specific temperature range.
Varies by pest species because temperature thresholds are species-specific.
Why are D-Ds so useful for managing CM?
All arthropods are cold-blooded and grow only as much as temperatures allow.
Arthropod pests generally don’t care about calendar dates.
D-Ds help pin down the developmental stage of pests, allowing us to more accurately predict pest activity.
Important Stages in a Codling Moth’s Life
• Pre-ovip. Flight:• Eggs:
• Larval Feeding:• Pupae:
• Total for Generation:
58 D-Ds158 D-Ds471 D-Ds431 D-Ds1,118 D-Ds
D-D Accumulations at Each Generation’s
Egg-hatch:
220 D-Ds(1st egg-hatch)
1,120 D-Ds(2nd egg-hatch)
2,160 D-Ds(3rd egg-hatch)
General Pattern of Codling Moth Flight and Egg-hatch, Relative to Degree-Days
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2620
2820
3020
3220
D-D Running Total
# C
augh
t/ 20
D-D
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
# H
atch
ed/ 2
0 D-
D
Moth catchEgg-hatch
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
020
040
060
080
010
0012
0014
0016
0018
0020
0022
0024
0026
2028
2030
2032
20
D-D Running Total
Egg
s ha
tche
d / 2
0 D
-D
0
25
50
75
100
Per
cent
Hat
ched
Egg-hatch
% Egg-hatch
General Pattern of Codling Moth Egg-Hatch and % Hatch Completed (Relative to Degree-Days)
0
25
50
75
100
020
040
060
080
010
0012
0014
0016
0018
0020
0022
0024
0026
2028
2030
2032
20
Degree-Day Running Total
Perc
ent C
ompl
eted
per
Gen
erat
ion
(%)
% Moth flight% Egg-hatch
Percentages (%) of CM Flight and Egg-hatch Relative to Degree-Days
Case Studies from ’03 SeasonCase 1: No mating disruption; high CM pop; poorly timed apps; over-reliance on a single material; insecticide resistance documented.Case 2: No mating disruption; moderate CM pop; well-timed apps; use of IGR and conventional materials.Case 3: Mating disruption; moderate CM pop; well-timed apps; use of various materials.Case 4: Mating disruption; moderate CM pop; many applications; use of various materials.Case 5: Mating disruption (applied 1 week late); high CM pop; well-timed applications; various materials.Case 6: No mating disruption; high CM pop; well-timed apps early in season; insufficient management late in season.
Case 1: Codling Moth Flight and Degree-Day Accumulation for Apples in Perry (Boxelder Co.)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
21-A
pr1-M
ay12
-May
24-M
ay
3-Jun
16-Ju
n30
-Jun
16-Ju
l30
-Jul
12-A
ug28
-Aug
8-Sep
24-S
ep
8-Oct
Sample Date
Mot
hs/tr
ap-d
ay
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
D-D
Acc
umul
atio
n
1st ge ne ration e gg-hatch (220 D-Ds).
2nd fl igh t be gins (860-900 D-Ds).
2nd ge n e gg-hatch be gins (1,120 D-Ds).
3rd fl ight be gins (1,920 D-Ds).
3rd ge n e gg-hatch be gins (2,160 D-Ds).
Case 2: Codling Moth Flight and Degree-Day Accumulation for Apples in Kaysville (Davis Co.)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
22 -Apr6-M
ay20 -M
ay
2-Jun
17 -Jun
1-Jul
15 -Jul
30 -Jul
12 -Aug27 -Aug10 -Sep24 -Sep
8-Oct
Date
Mot
hs/tr
ap-d
ay
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
D-D
Accu
mul
atio
n
1st ge n e gg-hatch (220 D-Ds).
2nd fl ight be gin s (860-900 D-Ds).
2n d ge n e gg-hatch be gins (1,120 D-Ds).
3rd fl ight be gin s (1,920 D-Ds).
3rd ge n e gg-hatch be gins (2,160 D-Ds).
Case 3: Codling Moth Flight and Degree-Day Accumulation for Apples in Payson (Utah Co.)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
18-Apr-0
328-A
pr-03
10-May-0
313-M
ay-03
23-May
-033-Ju
n-0311
-Jun-03
16-Ju
n-0327-Ju
n-037-Ju
l-03
14-Jul-0
323-Ju
l-03
1-Aug-03
11-Aug
-0325-A
ug-03
3-Sep-03
17-Sep-03
1-Oct-
03
Sample Date
Mot
hs c
augh
t/tra
p-da
y
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
D-D
Accu
mul
atio
n
1st ge n e gg-h atch be gins (220 D-Ds)
2nd ge n fl ight be gins (860-900 D-Ds)
2n d ge n e gg-hatch be gin s (1,120 D-Ds)
3rd ge n fl ight be gin s (1,920 D-Ds)
3rd ge n e gg-hatch (2,160 D-Ds)
Case 4: Codling Moth Flight and Degree-Day Accumulation for Apples in Genola (Utah Co.)
0
0.8
1.6
2.4
3.2
4
4/15/2
0034/2
9/2003
5/13/2
0035/2
9/2003
6/10/2
0036/2
3/2003
7/7/20
037/2
2/2003
8/5/20
038/2
1/2003
9/3/20
039/1
7/2003
10/1/
2003
10/16
/2003
Sample Date
Mot
hs/tr
ap-d
ay
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
D-D
Acc
umul
atio
n
1st ge ne ration e gg-hatch (220 D-Ds).
2n d fl igh t be gin s (860-900 D-Ds).
3rd fl igh t be gin s (1,920 D-Ds).
3rd ge n e gg-h atch be gin s (2,160 D-Ds).
2nd ge n e gg-hatch be gins (1,120 D-Ds).
Case 5: Codling Moth Flight and Degree-Day Accumulation for Apples in Lincoln Point (Utah Co.)
0
2
4
6
8
10
4/15/2
0034/2
9/2003
5/13/2003
5/29/2003
6/10/2003
6/23/20
037/7/
2003
7/22/20
038/5
/2003
8/21/20
039/3/20
039/1
7/2003
10/1/
200310/16
/2003
Sample Date
Mot
hs/tr
ap-d
ay
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
D-D
Acc
umul
atio
n
1st ge ne ration e gg-hatch (220 D-Ds).
2nd fl ight be gin s (860-900 D-Ds).
2n d ge n e gg-h atch be gins (1,120 D-Ds).
3rd fl igh t be gin s (1,920 D-Ds).
3rd ge n e gg-h atch be gins (2,160 D-Ds).
Case 6: Codling Moth Flight and Degree-Day Accumulation for Apples in North Logan (Cache Co.)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
25 -Apr3-M
a y11 -M
ay19 -M
ay27 -M
ay4-Ju
n12 -Ju
n20 -Ju
n28 -Ju
n7-Ju
l15 -Ju
l24 -Ju
l2-Au g
10 -Aug18 -Aug26 -Aug
3-Se p11 -Sep19 -Sep27 -Sep
5-Oct
13 -Oct
Date
Mot
hs/tr
ap-d
ay
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
2800
Degr
ee-D
ay A
ccum
ulat
ion
1st ge n e ration e gg-hatch (220 D-Ds).
2nd fl igh t be gin s (860-900 D-Ds).
2n d ge n e gg-hatch be gins (1,120 D-Ds).
3rd fl ight be gins (1,920 DDs).
3rd ge n e gg-h atch be gin s (2,160 D-Ds).
Pupate or hibernate?
CM Damage EstimatesCase 1: Not harvested due to CM damage (83% worm entry).
Case 2: Moderate CM damage (1.3% worm entry).
Case 3: Very low CM damage (damage estimates forthcoming).
Case 4: Very low CM damage (damage estimates forthcoming).
Case 5: High CM damage (approx. 20% worm entry).
Case 6: Moderate CM damage.
Why was it such a bad year for CM?
• Large overwintering populations?• Mild winter?• Cool, prolonged spring?• Record-breaking summer
heat?• Resistance to insecticides?• Imperfect control tactics?
Effects of Scaling
Live5%
Dead95%
Improve the Odds for 2004
• Use Pheromone Mating Disruption to reduce the egg load.
• Time the cover sprays based on known biological events(run traps).
• Achieve better coverage by using higher gallonages and verifying uniformity within the canopy.
• Sanitation (remove infested apples from orchard).
• Rotate insecticide classes(implications for spray timing).