Upload
stacy
View
45
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Codification of Flip Chip Knowledge. Antonio Prats March 2002. Objective. Facilitate practical applications of research results Design optimization Specs Materials selection Product specific process development Trouble shooting. Two Parts. Yield Prediction Software - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Codification of Flip Chip Knowledge
Antonio Prats
March 2002
2
ObjectiveFacilitate practical applications of research results
• Design optimization• Specs• Materials selection• Product specific process development• Trouble shooting
3
Two PartsYield Prediction Software
• “Placement Yield” – in-plane variations• “Assembly Yield” – out-of-plane variations
Codification Documents• “Underfill Codification” – Materials evaluation and
underfill process design• “Reflow Encapsulant Codification” – Materials
evaluation and reflow encapsulant process design
4
Placement Yield SoftwareGoal
• Conservative estimate of defect levels associated with in-plane (primarily substrate) tolerances
Defect• A solder bump not in contact with its pad
User Input• Substrate layout, pad shapes and sizes, variations in
size and location, mask thickness, bump dimensions, machine accuracy
5
Example Pad Design Screen
6
Example Thickness Consideration Screen
7
Assembly Yield SoftwareGoal
• Conservative estimate of defect levels associated with warpage, bump height variations, and solder collapse
Defect• A solder bump not in contact with its pad/paste• Solder Bridging (New for 2001)
User Input• Bump locations and variations in bump height, pad
diameters and thicknesses, paste volume, component and board warpage
8
Assembly Yield Software Screen
9
Underfill Codification Manual
• Discussion of issues important to the underfill process
• Establishment of a materials knowledge base to save time during process development
• Procedures for process development
• Troubleshooting (to be expanded in 2002)
10
Table of Contents1 INTRODUCTION2 DISPENSER EVALUATION
2.1 Specific Flip Chip Issues3 MATERIALS SELECTION4 DATA BASE
4.1 Thaw4.2 Flow & 'Gel' Times4.3 Life4.4 Flow Time Optimization4.5 Fillet Thickness Dependence4.6 Cure4.7 Automatic Fillet Formation4.8 Proximity Test4.9 Bakeout Requirements4.10 Diagnostic Tests (Reference
Performance)5 MATERIALS SPECIFIC
EQUIPMENT CHARACTERIZATION
6 MATERIALS HANDLING6.1 Substrates6.2 Chips6.3 Underfill Materials
7 PRODUCT SPECIFIC PROCESS7.1 Underfill Process7.2 Bake7.3 Standoff7.4 Substrate Temperature7.5 Preferred Fillet Thickness7.6 Volumes7.7 Dispensing7.8 Final Flow Optimization7.9 Footprint & Keep Out7.10 Curing7.11 Wetting & Voiding7.12 SMT Process Integration
8 TROUBLESHOOTING9 REFERENCES
11
Typical Correlation Between Nominal Dispensed Volume and Fillet Thickness
Johnson & Matthey 8802, 3 mil Gap
0
4
8
12
16
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Nominal Dispense Value (mg)
Fille
t Thi
ckne
ss (m
il)
12
Taper Flow Experimental Setup
ClampClamp
0 mil5 mil
13
Different Dispense Patterns
14
Reflow Encapsulant Codification Manual
• Discussion of issues important to assembly with reflow encapsulants, with emphasis on differences from underfill process
• Establishment of a materials knowledge base to save time during process development
• Procedures for process development
15
Table of ContentsINTRODUCTIONDISPENSER EVALUATION
• Board Handling• Ease of programming, calibration (offsets)• Vision System• Pump Type• Dispense Volume Control• Uniformity and Precision• Heating• Cleaning• Technical support• Potential Alternatives: Stencil Printing
MATERIAL EVALUATION• Life• Bakeout• Dispensing
• Needle Size and Type• Volume
• Dispense Voids• Due to Substrate Features• From High Shear Rate• Absorption of Voids
• Placement• Wetting• Placement Force and Hold Time• Placement Voiding
• Reflow Soldering Window• Post Curing• Statistics
PROCESS DEVELOPMENT• Dispensing
• Repeatability of Volume/Fillet Thickness• Dispense Pattern
• Bakeout• Placement• Reflow Soldering Window• Post Curing
16
Reflow Profiles for Testing Reflow Process Window
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 60 120 180 240 300Seconds
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
No-Flow #1 No-Flow #2No-Flow #3 No-Flow #4No-Flow #5 No-Flow #6No-Flow #7 No-Flow #8No-Flow #9 No-Flow #10
17
Some Possible Dispense Patterns
Dot Full Square
Small Square X Small Squarewith Arms
AsteriskDotDot Full SquareFull Square
Small SquareSmall Square XX Small Squarewith Arms
Small Squarewith Arms
AsteriskAsterisk
18
SummaryDefect Prediction Programs
• Design optimization• Specs
Codification Documents• Equipment and materials evaluation• Rapid product specific process design• Troubleshooting