COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED€¦ · Description Production or Design Capacity 12 Screening, etc. of material Not more than 50,000 tonnes per year ... Bund area for bulk neutraliser, dosing

Commercial in Confidence

7 August 2018

Application Submissions Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Locked Bag 33 Cloisters Square WA 6850

Dear Chief Executive Officer,

RE: Application for Works Approval – Cockburn Cement Munster Odour Neutralising Trial

1. INTRODUCTION Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL) proposes to trial a non-hazardous neutralising product, Aireactor OWD™ from CoolMist Systems Australia Pty Ltd, to be injected into the stack exhaust gases of Kilns 5 and 6 at Lot 242, Russell Road East, Munster, to reduce the potential odour impact at ground level.

Aireactor OWD has been certified and authorised internationally by both environmental and health agencies and proven to be harmless with the total absence of toxicity for man, animals and plants, as well as having rapid biodegradability properties. Thus, its introduction into the stack exhaust gases has insignificant impact on the waste emissions profile.

This document has been prepared to support the formal Works Approval Application for submission to the Department of Water and Environment Regulation (DWER).

CCL Munster operates under EP L4533/1967/15 for Prescribed Premises Category 43 – Cement or lime manufacturing.

2. PROPONENT 2.1. The Proponent

The proponent for this Works Approval Application is Cockburn Cement Limited LINCENSEE AND OCCUPIER Name: Cockburn Cement Limited

ABN: 008 673 470 Lot 242 Russell Road East MUNSTER WA 6166 PO Box 38, HAMILTON HILL WA 6963

PREMISES Name: Cockburn Cement Limited

Lot 242 Russell Road East MUNSTER WA 6166


2.2. Prescribed Premises Category

Table 1: Prescribed Premises Category from Schedule 1 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987.

Category Number

Description Production or Design Capacity

12 Screening, etc. of material Not more than 50,000 tonnes per year

43 Cement or lime manufacturing

More than 100,000 tonnes per year

61A Solid waste facility More than 100,000 tonnes per year

62 Solid waste depot More than 5,000 tonnes per year

63 Class I Inert landfill site More than 50,000 tonnes per year but no more than 500,000 tonnes per year

2.3. Company Representative

The contact person within the organisation for this Application is Justin Miller.

Name: Justin Miller Technical Manager WA/NT Cockburn Cement Limited T: (08) 9411 1096 E: [email protected]

3. PROPOSAL 3.1. Key Proposal Characteristics

The Odour Neutralising Trial is proposed to be conducted in three (3) stages with Stage 1 Commissioning of injection unit and Stage 2 Dosage Optimisation to be completed upon receipt of Works Approval. The third and final Stage 3 is proposed to be conducted during Spring/Summer months to coincide with the optimum meteorological conditions for the generation of odour plumes with the potential to impact at ground level.

The proposal involves one physical element and four operational elements, as described in Table 2 and the location of the proposal is shown in Figure 1.

Table 2: Key Characteristics Table for the Proposal

Summary of the Proposal

Proposal Title Odour Neutralising Trial

Applicant’s Name Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL)

Short Description CCL seeks DWER approval to trial a non-hazardous neutralising product, Aireactor OWD from CoolMist Systems Australia Pty Ltd, which is injected into the

mailto:[email protected]


stack exhaust gasses to reduce the potential odour impact at ground level.

Physical Elements

Element Location Proposed Extent

Installation of a 1000L storage IBC, isolation valve; flow control valve; pump and spray nozzle bar, post pollution control equipment on Kilns 5 and 6.

As shown on Figure 1

Duration of the Trial and potential permanent basis if Trial found to be successful.

Operational Elements

Element Location Proposed Extent

Baseline sampling of the stack gasses and odour concentration determined by olphactometric testing.

Kiln Stack Sampling Ports

Commencement of Trial to provide baseline values.

Commissioning of Aireactor OWD injection into the quicklime kiln stacks with varying addition rates to determine optimum injection rates based on sampling of the stack gasses and odour concentration determined by olphactometric testing and compared to baseline conditions.

Injection Points on Kilns 5 and 6 as shown on Figure 1

Up to 96 hours, from the start to the end of trials, running day shift only (maximum 48 hours operation).

Trial of Aireactor OWD injection into the quicklime kiln stacks at optimum addition rates.


48 hour period, again day shift only (maximum 24 hours of operation) and potential permanent basis if Trial found to be successful.

Extended continuous use of Aireactor OWD at the optimum addition rates.


3 months and potential permanent basis if Trial found to be successful.

An electronic copy has been submitted to [email protected].

Yours Sincerely,

Colin Powers

Operations Manager WA



Legend

Bund area for bulk neutraliser, dosing system, storage tank and pumps Location of injection points on stack (Far, Kiln 6), (Near, Kiln 5)

Figure 1: Location


CC: Jonathan Bales DWER Acting Senior Manager – Industry Regulation, Process Industries

Lauren Trott DWER Senior Environmental Officer

Attachments: Part V Works Approval Application

1A – Certificate of Title

1B – ASIC Current Company Extracts

2 – Plan of Premises

3A – Proposed Activities

4 – Consultation Information

6 – Emissions and Discharges

7 – Sitting and Location


PART V WORKS APPROVAL APPLICATION FORM

Application Form: Works Approval, Licence, Renewal, Amendment or Registration (July 2017 v7) 1 IR-F09 v7.0

Application form:

Works Approval / Licence / Renewal Amendment / Registration

Part V, Division 3, Environmental Protection Act 1986 Environmental Protection Regulations 1987

Application Type INSTRUCTIONS: The application form must be completed with all relevant information attached. This form is a statutory requirement

under section 54(1)(a) for works approval applications, section 57(1)(a) for licence applications, section 59B(1)(a) for amendments, and regulation 5B of the Environmental Protection Regulations (EP Regulations) 1987 for registration.

If an application form has been submitted which is incomplete or materially incorrect, the CEO will decline to deal with the application under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) and advise the Applicant accordingly.

The instructions set out in this application form are general in nature. A reference to ‘you’ in these instructions is a reference to the Applicant. “Works approval” only applies for new works approvals. “Licence” only applies for new licences. For Premises which

already have a works approval or licence, please select “Amendment”. If there is an existing Licence, please apply for a Licence Amendment, rather than a Works Approval Amendment.

Concurrent applications for a Works Approval and Licence (or registrations) are encouraged. This means only a single application is submitted.

Applicants seeking further information relating to requirements under the EP Act, are recommended to review the Act through the State Law Publisher (www.slp.wa.gov.au). Schedule 1 of the EP Regulations contains the categories of Prescribed Premises. The EP Regulations are also available from the State Law Publisher’s website.

For Premises where activities fall within more than one category of Prescribed Premises, ALL categories must be identified. This applies for existing Prescribed Premises seeking renewal or amendment, as well as new Prescribed Premises.

If there is insufficient space on any part of this form, please continue on a separate sheet of paper and attach to this form.

This is an application for: [select only one option] under Part V, Division 3 of the EP Act

Please see Guidance Statement: Decision Making for more information relating to the process for assessing and determining applications.

Works Approval Concurrent Works Approval and Licence or Registration Licence

Existing registration number(s): [ ] Existing Works Approval number(s): [ ]

Renewal Existing Licence number: []

Amendment Number of the existing Licence or Works Approval to be amended: []

Registration (Works Approval already obtained) Existing Works Approval number(s): [ ]

Where clearing of native vegetation is required, has a clearing application already been submitted?

In accordance with the Guidance Statement: Decision Making, where clearing of native vegetation is of an exempt kind under the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 or is being assessed by a relevant authority which would lead to an exemption under Schedule 6 of the EP Act, the clearing will not be reassessed by DWER or be subject to any additional controls by DWER.

If the proposed clearing action is to be assessed in accordance with, or under, an Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act) accredited process, such as the assessment bilateral agreement, the Clearing Permit Application Form Annex C7 – Assessment bilateral agreement must be completed separately.

Yes – clearing application number: [ ] No – this application includes clearing N/A – clearing application not required.

Clearing does not form part of this Application.

No clearing required as part of Works Approval Scope.

This application is for the following categories of Prescribed Premises:

[Category 43] Cement and lime manufacturing

http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/

https://www.der.wa.gov.au/our-work/regulatory-framework



https://www.der.wa.gov.au/our-work/clearing-permits/46-clearing-permit-application-forms

https://www.der.wa.gov.au/our-work/clearing-permits/46-clearing-permit-application-forms

Department of Water and Environmental Regulation


All activities that meet the definition of a Prescribed Premises as set out in Schedule 1 of the EP Regulations have been specified above (tick if Yes).

Completion Matrix The matrix below explains what sections are required to be completed for different types of applications.

Application Form Section New Application/ Registration Renewal Amendment

Part 1 Applicant details – section 1.1 ● ● ●

Part 1 Applicant details – section 1.2 onwards ● ● Δ

Part 2 Premises ● ● Δ

Part 3 Proposed activities ● ● ●

Part 4 Other approvals ● ● Δ

Part 5 Fit and competent operator ● ● N/A

Part 6 Emissions and waste ● ● Δ

Part 7 Siting and location ● ● N/A

Part 8 Submission of any other relevant information ● ● If required.

Part 9 Proposed fee calculation ● ● ●

Part 10 Submission of application ● ● ●

Acknowledgement and signature ● ● ●

Attachment 1A: Proof of occupier status ● ● N/A

Attachment 1B: ASIC company extract ● ● N/A

Attachment 2: Premises map/s ● ● Δ

Attachment 3A: Description of activities ● ● Δ

Attachment 3B: Map for proposed area to be cleared (only applicable if clearing is proposed)

● ● N/A

Attachment 4: Other approvals and consultation documentation

● ● Δ

Attachment 6A: Emissions and discharges If required. If required. If required.

Attachment 6B: Waste acceptance If required. If required. If required.

Attachment 7: Siting and location ● ● Δ

Attachment 8: Other relevant information If required. If required. If required.

Attachment 9: Proposed fee calculation ● ● ●

Attachment 10: Request for exemption from publication If required. If required. If required.

Key: ● Must be submitted Δ to the extent changed/required in relation to the amendment N/A Not required with application, but may be requested subsequently depending on DWER records “If required” Sections for applicants to determine.



Part 1. Applicant Details INSTRUCTIONS: The Applicant must be an individual(s), a company, body corporate, or public authority, but not a partnership, trust, or

joint-venture name. Applications made by or on behalf of business names or unincorporated associations will not be accepted.

If applying as an individual, your full legal name must be inserted. If applying as a company, body corporate, or public authority, the full legal entity name must be inserted. Australian Company Number's (ACN) must be provided for all companies or body corporates. Details for a contact person must be provided for DWER inquiries in relation to your application. This contact person

can be a consultant if authorised to represent the Applicant. Companies or body corporates making an application must nominate an authorised representative from within their

organisation. If you are applying as an individual, you are the representative. Details of the occupier of the Premises must be provided. One of the options must be selected and if you have been

asked to specify, please provide details. For example, if “Lease holder” has been selected, please specify the type of lease (for example, pastoral lease, mining lease or general lease) and provide a copy of the lease document(s). Note that contracts for sale of land will not be sufficient evidence of occupancy status.

1.1 Applicant name/s (full legal name/s): [the proposed holder of the works approval, licence or registration]

Cockburn Cement Limited

ACN (if applicable): 008 673 470

1.2 Trading as (if applicable): Cockburn Cement Limited

1.3 Authorised representative details: [the person authorised to receive correspondence and notices under the EP Act – all correspondence will be sent to this email address apart from statutory notices served under the EP Act (see below)]

Name Colin Powers

Position Operations Manager WA

Telephone

Email

1.4 Address for notices to be served under the EP Act: [this must be a physical address to which a notice under the EP Act may be hand delivered]

Lot 242 Russell Road East

Munster

Western Australia 6166

1.5 Postal address for general correspondence: [if different from 1.4]

1.6 Contact person details for DWER inquiries relating to the application (if different from the authorised representative): [for example, could be a consultant or a site based employee]

Name

Position

Organisation (if different to Applicant)

Address (if different from above)

Telephone

Email



1.7 Occupier status: [Occupier is defined in section 3 of the EP Act and includes a person in occupation or control of the Premises.]

Registered proprietor on certificate of title

Lease holder (please specify, including date of expiry of lease)

Public authority that has care, control or management of the land

Other (please specify – for example, joint venture operating entity. Note: Contractual arrangements will need to be provided to evidence occupancy arrangements)

Attachments N/A Yes

1.8 Attachment 1A: Proof of occupier status

Copies of certificate of title, lease or other instruments evidencing proof of occupier status including the expiry date or confirmation that there is no expiry date have been provided and labelled as Attachment 1A.

1.9 Attachment 1B: ASIC current company information extract

A current company information extract purchased from the ASIC website(s) for all new applications/registrations has been provided and labelled as Attachment 1B.



Part 2. Premises

2.1 Premises legal description (whole or part to be specified): [Land description: volume and folio number, lot or location number(s), Crown lease or reserve number, pastoral lease number or mining tenement number of all properties, as shown on title details registered with Landgate AND street address]

Street Address

Lot Number

Plan / Diagram

Volume Folio

Rockingham Rd, Munster

450 P 249735 2045 99

Russell Rd, Munster

50 D 6065 1417 148

Munster 88 P 22127 2115 676

Russell Rd, Munster

246 P 226012 1417 148

Russell Rd, Munster

311 P 300770 1304 658

Russell Rd, Munster

5 D 18525 1258 508

Russell Rd, Munster

4 D 18525 1174 541

Premises name (if applicable):

2.2 Local Government Authority area: [City, Town or Shire]

City of Cockburn

2.3 GPS or map coordinates: [GPS coordinates (latitude and longitude) must be provided where cadastre or mining tenements are not used as the Premises boundary]

Latitude: -32.140833 Longitude: 115.795

Attachments N/A Yes

2.4 Attachment 2: Premises map/s

An aerial photograph, map and site plan of the Premises must be included as an attachment to this application form labelled Attachment 2. You must provide an aerial photograph of sufficient scale showing the Prescribed Premises. You must also provide a map or maps of the Prescribed Premises, identifying: layout of key infrastructure and buildings, clearly labelled; the Premises boundary; emission and discharge points (with GPS coordinates where

available); sensitive receptors and land uses; and all areas proposed to be cleared (if applicable). Maps must contain a north arrow, clearly marking the area in which the activities are carried out. The map or maps must be of reasonable clarity and have a visible scale.



Part 3. Activities (including clearing)

INSTRUCTIONS: You must provide a description and the scope, size and scale of all prescribed activities of Schedule 1 to the EP

Regulations including the maximum production or design capacity of each prescribed activity. If applying for a Works Approval or Licence amendment involving the construction of new infrastructure, you must

provide information on infrastructure to be constructed and how long construction is expected to take. You must confirm if commissioning is to occur and how long it will take.

If applying for a Works Approval or Licence amendment not involving the construction of new infrastructure, provide details of the proposed amendment.

You must identify all emission sources on the Premises map/s. You must also provide information on activities which directly relate to the Prescribed Premises category which have,

or are likely to result in, an emission or discharge.



3.1 Description/overview:

It is proposed to trial the injection of neutralising agent Aireactor OWD into the exhaust stacks of quicklime kilns 5 and 6, to determine if there is a reduction in olphactometric measurement and if so, to determine the optimum addition rate.

Aireactor OWD is required to be mixed with water and introduced to the stack gasses through a spray system, ensuring the neutraliser solution is well distributed and mixed with the stack gasses.

Trial Protocol

CCL seek three distinct trial periods to evaluate the effectiveness of the Aireactor OWD.

1. Stage 1: This initial trial period would be up to 96 hours, from the start to the end of trial. Running day shift only (maximum 48 hours operation). The aim being to commission the injection system and trial the different addition rates as detailed in tables 1 and 2. When each addition rate is stabilised, samples would be taken of the stack gasses and odour concentration determined by olphactometric testing and compared to baseline conditions. This would then determine the optimum addition rate for each kiln.

Table 1: Proposed Aireactor OWD Trial Addition Rates - Quicklime Kiln 5

Dilution water rate (L/min) 10 10 10 10

Dilution ratio 0.0006 0.001 0.0015 0.002

% Aireactor OWD in K5 stack 0.00001% 0.00002% 0.00003% 0.00004%

Table 2:Proposed Aireactor OWD Trial Addition Rates - Quicklime Kiln 6

Dilution water rate (L/min) 10 10 10 10

Dilution ratio 0.0006 0.001 0.0015 0.002


2. Stage 2: This secondary trial period would run over a 48-hour period, again day shift only (maximum 24 hours of operation). The aim of this trial being to run at the optimum addition rate determined in stage 1 of the trial, then conduct stack emission testing, as per operating licence (L4533/1967/15), condition 37, bi-annual requirements. Results from stack emission testing would be compared to past results and a report prepared for discussion with DWER, before progressing to trial 3.

3. Stage 3: This stage of the trial would be an extended continuous use of Aireactor OWD at the optimum addition rates. Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the odour neutraliser by prior agreement with DWER before commencement of the continuous use trial. It is proposed it would be in accordance with DWER’s Draft Odour Guideline for Prescribed Premises concentrating on field odour surveys and the German standard, VDI 3940 “Measurement of odour impact by field inspection – Measurement of the impact frequency of recognisable odours Parts 1 and 2” (2006), with methodology prepared by field expert consultants.

3.2 Estimated operating period of Premises (for example, based on estimated infrastructure life):

The overall period for this trial is estimated at 6 months, split as approximately 150 hours for stages 1 and 2 of trial and the stage 3 of continuous use of neutraliser agent to extend over Spring / Summer 2018/2019 where the weather conditions would enable field monitoring of the trial effectiveness. Periodically throughout stage 3 of the trial, assessment of its effectiveness will be evaluated in consultation with DWER to determine integration into existing EP Licence.

3.3 Proposed date/s for commencement of works (if applicable): Stages 1 and 2 of trial would commence as soon as approval is granted.



3.4 Proposed date/s for commissioning of works (if applicable): It is proposed to commission the injection system and injection rate optimisation as soon as approval is granted.

3.5 Proposed date/s for commencement of operations (if applicable): Stage 3 of continuous use is proposed to commence in late Spring 2018 to enable collection of background data with continuous injection to commence in the Summer months December 2018 through to February 2019.

3.6 Maximum production or design capacity for each category applied for (based on infrastructure operating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week): [Refer to categories listed on page 1. Units must be consistent with Schedule 1 of the EP Regulations]

Production capacity is not to be affected by trial of neutraliser agent.

3.7 Estimated/actual throughput for each category applied for: [Refer to categories listed on page 1. Units must be consistent with Schedule 1 of the EP Regulations]

Estimated throughput for each category is to remain as existing.

3.8 Proposed activities: You must provide details of proposed activities, identifying: scope, size and scale, including details as to frequency and production or design capacity; key infrastructure and equipment; description of processes or operations (a process flow chart may be included as an attachment); emission/discharge points; locations of waste storage or disposal; and activities occurring during construction, commissioning and operation (if applicable). Additional information relating to the proposed activities may be included in Attachment 3A (see 3.10 below).

Details of proposed activities are provided in Attachment 3A.

Attachments N/A Yes

3.9 Attachment 2: Premises map

Emission/discharge points are clearly labelled on the map/s required for Part 2.4 (Attachment 2).

3.10 Attachment 3A: Proposed activities

Additional information relating to the proposed activities has been included in Attachment 3A (if required).

Clearing Activities [3.11 to 3.16 are only required if the application includes clearing of native vegetation]

3.11 Proposed clearing area (hectares and/or number of individual trees to be removed): Not Applicable.

3.12 Proposed method of clearing (or final land use): Not Applicable.



3.13 Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken: [for example, May 2017 – June 2017]

Not Applicable.

3.14 Purpose of clearing:

Not Applicable.

Clearing Activities - Attachments N/A Yes

3.15 Attachment 3B: Map of area proposed to be cleared

You must provide an aerial photograph or map of sufficient scale showing the proposed clearing area and Premises boundary or if you have the facilities, a digital map on CDROM of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon Shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic

latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994).

3.16 Attachment 3C: Additional information for clearing assessment

Additional information to assist in the assessment of the clearing proposal may be attached to this application (for example, reports on salinity, fauna or flora studies or other environmental reports conducted for the site).


Application Form: Works Approval, Licence, Renewal, Amendment or Registration (July 2017 v7) 10

IR-F09 v7.0

Part 4. Other Approvals and Consultation INSTRUCTIONS: Please provide copies of all relevant documentation indicated below, including any conditions, exclusions, or expiry

dates. Where planning approval is required, in accordance with the Guidance Statement: Land Use Planning, DWER’s formal

determination will only be made after the relevant planning decisions have been made. Major Project means:

A State Development Project, where the lead agency is the Department of Jobs, Tourism, Science and Innovation (including projects to which a State Agreement applies); or

A Level 2 or 3 Major Resource Project, as defined by the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety.

N/A No Yes

4.1 Is the proposal a Major Project?

4.2 Has the proposal been referred to the Environmental Protection Authority?

4.3 Is the proposal subject to a Ministerial Statement(s) under the EP Act?

If yes, please specify statement number(s):

4.4 Has the proposal been referred and/or assessed under the EPBC Act (Commonwealth)?

If yes, please specify referral, assessment and/or approval number:

4.5 Has the proposal obtained all relevant planning approvals?

If planning approval is not necessary, please provide details indicating why:

Planning approval is not necessary.

4.6 For renewals or amendment applications, are the relevant planning approvals still valid (that is, not expired)?

4.7 Has the proposal obtained all other necessary statutory approvals?

If no, please provide details of approvals already obtained, outstanding approvals and expected dates for obtaining these outstanding approvals:

This application forms the basis of all statutory approvals required.

N/A No Yes

4.8 Has consultation been undertaken with parties considered to have a direct interest in the proposal (that is, interested parties or persons who are considered to be directly affected by the proposal)? DWER will give consideration to submissions from interested parties or persons in accordance with the Guidance Statement: Decision Making.

Attachments N/A Yes

4.9 Attachment 4: Other approvals and consultation documentation

Details of other approvals specified in Part 4 of this application, including copies of relevant decisions and any consultation undertaken with direct interest stakeholders have been provided and labelled Attachment 4.





IR-F09 v7.0

Part 5. Fit and Competent Operator Note: Under this section, DWER will undertake an internal due diligence of the Applicant’s fitness and competency based

on DWER’s compliance records. If you wish to provide additional information for DWER to consider in making this assessment, you may provide that

information as a separate attachment. N/A No Yes

5.1 If the Applicant is an individual, has the Applicant ever held a Licence or Works Approval under Part V of the EP Act?

5.2 If the Applicant is a corporation, has any director of that corporation ever held a Licence or Works Approval under Part V of the EP Act?

5.3 If yes to 5.1 or 5.2 above, specify the name of company and/or Licence or Works Approval number:

5.4 If the Applicant is an individual, has the Applicant ever been convicted, or paid a penalty, for an offence under a provision of the EP Act, its subsidiary legislation or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.5 If the Applicant is a corporation, has any director of that corporation ever been convicted, or paid a penalty, for an offence under a provision of the EP Act, its subsidiary legislation or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.6 If the Applicant is a corporation, has any person concerned in the management of the corporation, as referred to in section 118 of the EP Act, ever been convicted of, or paid a penalty, for an offence under a provision of the EP Act, its subsidiary legislation or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.7 If the Applicant is a corporation, has any director of that corporation ever been a director of another corporation that has been convicted, or paid a penalty, for an offence under a provision of the EP Act, its subsidiary legislation or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.8 Has the Applicant had a licence or other authority suspended or revoked due to a breach of conditions or an offence under the EP Act or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.9 If the Applicant is a corporation, has any director of that corporation ever had a licence or other authority suspended or revoked due to a breach of conditions or an offence under the EP Act or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.10 If the Applicant is a corporation, has any director of that corporation ever been a director of another corporation that has ever had a licence or other authority suspended or revoked due to a breach of conditions or an offence under the EP Act or similar environmental protection legislation in Australia?

5.11 If Yes to any of 5.3 - 5.9 above, you must provide details of any convictions, penalties paid for an offence or licences or other authorisation suspended or revoked:

In 2015, the NSW EPA investigated Morgan Cement International Pty Ltd (MCI), a related body corporate of Cockburn Cement Limited, concerning the unexpected overflow of ground granulated blast furnace slag from a storage silo at MCI’s premises at Port Kembla, NSW, on Saturday 14 March 2015. The NSW EPA determined to commence prosecution proceedings in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales regarding the incident. It alleged that MCI committed an offence against section 64(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) in that MCI breached a condition of its environmental protection licence by failing to maintain a certain item of plant in a proper and efficient condition. MCI pleaded guilty to the alleged offence.

On 2 November 2016, the Court delivered judgement convicting MCI of the offence as charged, fining MCI $50,250 and ordering MCI to pay the NSW EPA’s agreed legal and investigation costs of $55,492.50. MCI was also ordered to publish a notice regarding its conviction in specified newspapers and an industry publication.

In March 2016 – the EPA SA investigated an emission from the ship loading boom at Cockburn Cement Ltd’s related body corporate Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd’s (ABC) Birkenhead plant in South Australia. ABC co-operated with the EPA SA’s investigation. Upon receiving an invitation from the SA EPA to do so, ABC agreed on a Civil Penalty of $34,870.50 under the applicable process, which does not result in any conviction or finding of guilt.



IR-F09 v7.0

Part 6. Emissions and Waste INSTRUCTIONS: Please see Guidance Statement: Risk Assessments and provide all information relating to emission sources,

pathways and receptors relevant to the application. You must provide details on sources of emissions (for example, kiln stack, baghouses or discharge pipelines)

including fugitive emissions (for example, noise, dust or odour), types of emissions (physical, chemical, or biological), and volumes, concentrations and durations of emissions.

The potential for emissions should be considered for all stages of the proposal (where relevant), including during construction, commissioning and operation of the Premises.

No Yes

6.1 Are there potential emissions arising from the proposed activities?

If yes, identify all potential emissions arising from the proposed activities and complete the Emission Table below.

Gaseous and particulate emissions (e.g. emissions from stacks, chimneys or baghouses)

Dust (e.g. from equipment, unsealed roads and/or stockpiles)

Wastewater discharges (e.g. treated sewage, wash water, or process water discharged to lands or waters)

Waste and leachate (e.g. emissions through seepage, leaks and spills of waste from storage, process and handling areas)

Noise (e.g. from machinery operations and/or vehicle operations)

Odour (e.g. from wastes accepted at putrescible landfills)

Contaminated or potentially contaminated stormwater (e.g. stormwater with the potential to come into contact with chemicals or waste materials)

Electromagnetic radiation*

Other (please specify) [ ]

*For electromagnetic radiation, copies/details of other relevant approvals (such as from the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety or the Radiological Council) must be provided where applicable.

Details of any pollution control equipment or waste treatment system including control mechanism to ensure proper operation of this equipment must be included in the proposed controls column of the Emissions and Discharges Table below. Details of management measures employed to control emissions should also be included.

Additional rows may be added as required and/or further information may be included as an attachment (see 6.3).

Emissions and Discharges Table:

Source of emission or discharge

Emission or discharge type

Volume and frequency

Proposed controls

Location (on site layout plan -see 3.7)

No change from existing emissions profile from either Kiln 5 or Kiln 6 is expected. Potential for reduction in odour emissions.




IR-F09 v7.0

No Yes

6.2 Is there waste accepted, buried, stored or recycled on the Premises? (includes leachate and contaminated stormwater generated and stored on the Premises)

Solid waste types must be described with reference to Landfill Waste Classification and Waste Definitions 1996 (as amended December 2009) and the Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste) Regulations 2004. Liquid waste types must be described with reference to the Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste) Regulations 2004. Detail must be provided on storage type (for example, hardstand and containment infrastructure), capacity, likely storage volumes and containment features (for example, lining and bunding).

Additional rows may be added as required and/or further information may be included as an attachment (see 6.3).

Waste Acceptance Table:

Waste type Quantity (e.g. tonnes, litres, cubic metres)

Storage infrastructure (including specifications)

Monitoring (if applicable)

Location (on site layout plan – see 3.7)

Trial does not represent a change to waste acceptance of the site.

Attachments N/A Yes

6.3 Attachment 6A: Emissions and discharges (if required)

If required, further information for Part 6.1 has been included as an attachment labelled Attachment 6A.

6.4 Attachment 6B: Waste acceptance (if required)

If required, further information for Part 6.2 has been included as an attachment labelled Attachment 6B.

Part 7. Siting and Location

7.1 What is the distance to the nearest sensitive land uses (that is, a residence or other land use which may be affected by an emission or discharge associated with the proposed activities):

Not applicable – already established by EP Licence.

No Yes

7.2 Are the Premises located within, or within close proximity to, any Specified Ecosystems? (See Guidance Statement: Environmental Siting)

If no, identify the distance in which there are no Specified Ecosystems. If yes, provide details of the Specified Ecosystems and the distance to these:

Not applicable – already established by EP Licence.

7.3 If yes to 7.2, you must also provide further information including details on topography, geology, soil type, depth to groundwater and quality of groundwater at the Premises. For Premises answering no to 7.2, additional information including topography, geology, soil type, groundwater depth and water quality is recommended to be included if this information is available.

Attachments N/A Yes

7.4 Attachment 7: Siting and location

You must provide details and a map describing the siting and location of the Premises, including identification of distances to sensitive land uses and/or any Specified Ecosystems.




IR-F09 v7.0

Part 8. Submission of Any Other Relevant Information

Attachments No Yes

8.1 Attachment 8: Additional information submitted

Applicants seeking to submit further information may include information in Attachment 8. Where supplementary documentation is submitted, please specify the name of documents below.

List title of supplementary document/s attached:

Part 9. Proposed Fee Calculation

INSTRUCTIONS: Fee calculators are available online to assist in completing this section.

Licence: www.der.wa.gov.au/LicenceFeeCalculator Works approval: www.der.wa.gov.au/WorksApprovalFeeCalculator Amendment:: www.der.wa.gov.au/AmendmentFeeCalculator

Different Fee Units apply for different fee components. Fee Units may also have different amounts depending on the period in which the calculation is made.

9.1 Only the relevant fee calculations are to be completed as follows: [tick to indicate sections completed - for concurrent applications, each relevant fee section is to be completed]

Section 9.3 for Works Approval Applications Section 9.4 for Licence Applications Section 9.5 for Registration Applications Section 9.6 for Amendment Applications Section 9.7 for applications requiring clearing

of native vegetation

9.2 All information and data used for the calculation of proposed fees has been provided in section 9.8

9.3 Proposed Works Approval fee

Proposed Works Approval fee (see Schedule 3 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987) Fees relate to the cost of the works, including all capital costs (inclusive of GST) associated with the construction and establishment of the works proposed under the Works Approval application. This includes, for example, costs associated with earth works, hard stands, drainage, plant hire, equipment, processing plant, relocation of equipment and labour hire.

Costs exclude: - the cost of land; - the cost of buildings to be used for purposes unrelated to the purposes in respect of which the Premises are,

or will become, Prescribed Premises; costs for buildings unrelated to the Prescribed Premises activity or activities; and

- consultancy fees relating to the works.

Fee component Proposed fee

http://www.der.wa.gov.au/LicenceFeeCalculator

http://www.der.wa.gov.au/WorksApprovalFeeCalculator

http://www.der.wa.gov.au/AmendmentFeeCalculator



IR-F09 v7.0

9.4 Proposed Licence Fee

Detailed licence fee calculations

Part 1 Premises component (see Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987) The production or design capacity should be the maximum capacity of the Premises. For most categories the production or design capacity refers to an annual rate. The figure should be based on 24 hour operation for 365 days, unless there is another regulatory approval or technical reason that restricts operation. The Premises component fee applies to the category incurring the highest fee unit number in accordance with regulation 5D(2) of the EP Regulations. Insert additional rows as required.

Category Production or design capacity Fee units

Sub total $

Part 2 Waste (see Part 2 of Schedule 4 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987) If your Premises includes one or more of the following categories specify any applicable Part 2 waste amounts. Do not include Part 3 waste components of these discharges in the below sections. Categories: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 44, 46, 53, 54A, 70, 80 or 85B Part 2 waste means waste consisting of –

(a) tailings; or (b) bitterns; or (c) water to allow mining of ore; or (d) flyash; or (e) waste water from a desalination plant.

If your Premises does not fall into one of the categories listed above, or there are no applicable Part 2 waste amounts, the sub total for this section will be $0. Insert additional rows as required.

Discharge quantity (tonnes/year) Fee units

Sub total $

Part 3 Waste - Discharges to air, onto land, into waters (see Part 3 of Schedule 4 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987) Choose the appropriate location of the discharge and enter the discharge amount(s) in the units specified in the EP Regulations. This should be the amount of waste expected to be discharged over the next 12 months, expressed in the units and averaging period applicable for that waste kind (for example, g/minute or kg/day). Amounts can be measured, calculated, or estimated and can be based on data acquired over the previous 12 months, but should be based on the maximum Premises capacity and not the forecast operating hours. Where there are discharges, all prescribed waste types must be considered in the fee calculation. If a specified waste type is not present in the discharge, this must be justified using an appropriate emission estimation technique (for example, sampling data, industry sector guidance notes, National Pollution Inventory guides and emission factors).



IR-F09 v7.0

Discharges to air

Discharges to air Discharge quantity (g/min) Discharges to air Discharge rate

(g/min)

Carbon monoxide Nickel

Oxides of nitrogen Vanadium

Sulphur oxides Zinc

Particulates (Total PM) Vinyl chloride

Volatile organic compounds Hydrogen sulphide

Inorganic fluoride Benzene

Pesticides Carbon oxysulphide

Aluminium Carbon disulphide

Arsenic Acrylates

Chromium Beryllium

Cobalt Cadmium

Copper Mercury

Lead TDI (toluene-2, 4-di-iso-cyanate)

Manganese MDI (diphenyl-methane di-iso-cyanate)

Molybdenum Other waste

Subtotal $

Discharges onto land or into waters Discharge quantity

1. Liquid waste that can potentially deprive receiving waters of oxygen (for each kilogram discharged per day) —

(a) biochemical oxygen demand (in the absence of chemical oxygen demand limit)

(b) chemical oxygen demand (in the absence of total organic carbon limit)

(c) total organic carbon

2. Biostimulants (for each kilogram discharged per day) —

(a) phosphorus

(b) total nitrogen

3. Liquid waste that physically alters the characteristics of naturally occurring waters —

(a) total suspended solids (for each kilogram discharged per day)

(b) surfactants (for each kilogram discharged per day)

(c) colour alteration (for each platinum cobalt unit of colour above the ambient colour of the waters in each megalitre discharged per day)

(d) temperature alteration (for each 1°C above the ambient temperature of the waters in each megalitre discharged per day) —

(i) in the sea south of the Tropic of Capricorn

(ii) in other waters



IR-F09 v7.0

4. Waste that can potentially accumulate in the environment or living tissue (for each kilogram discharged per day) —

(a) aluminium

(b) arsenic

(c) cadmium

(d) chromium

(e) cobalt

(f) copper

(g) lead

(h) mercury

(i) molybdenum

(j) nickel

(k) vanadium

(l) zinc

(m) pesticides

(n) fish tainting wastes

(o) manganese

5. E coli bacteria as indicator species (in each megalitre discharged per day) —

(a) 1,000 to 5,000 organisms per 100 ml

(b) 5,000 to 20,000 organisms per 100 ml

(c) more than 20,000 organisms per 100 ml

6. Other waste (per kilogram discharged per day) —

(a) oil and grease

(b) total dissolved solids

(c) fluoride

(d) iron

(e) total residual chlorine

(f) other

Subtotal $

Summary – Proposed licence fee

Part 1 Component

Part 2 Component

Part 3 Component

Total proposed licence fees: $



IR-F09 v7.0

9.5 Prescribed Fee for Registration

A fee of 24 units applies for an application for registration of Premises, unless the occupier of the Premises holds a licence in respect of the Premises in accordance with section 5B2(c) of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987.

(Tick to acknowledge)

9.6 Works Approval or Licence Amendment Fee

Proposed Works Approval and Licence Amendment fee (see Schedule 4 Part 1 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987 (the Regulations)) The fee prescribed for an application for an amendment to a Works Approval or Licence is based on a unit value for 2016–2017 of $3.40 per unit, calculated (in accordance with regulation 5BB of the Regulations): for a single category of Prescribed Premises to which the Works Approval or Licence relates, by using the fee

unit number corresponding to the Prescribed Premises category and relevant production or design capacity threshold in Schedule 4 Part 1 of the Regulations.

for multiple categories of Prescribed Premises to which the Works Approval or Licence relates, by using the highest fee unit number corresponding to the Prescribed Premises categories and production design or capacity threshold in Schedule 4 Part 1 of the Regulations.

The relevant fee unit under Schedule 4 Part 1 of the Regulations for calculating the application form amendment fee is to be determined by reference to the actual production or design capacity reported for the preceding year’s annual licence fee. If an annual licence fee has not previously been paid or is not applicable as is the case for works approvals, the fee unit for an application for amendment is to be determined by reference to the production or design capacity currently prescribed in the Licence or Works Approval.

Fee Units Proposed fee

$

9.7 Prescribed Fee for Clearing Permit

In accordance with the Guidance Statement: Decision Making , where a concurrent application for clearing of native vegetation is made, DWER may elect to either jointly or separately determine the clearing component of the application. Where DWER separately determines the clearing component of a concurrent application, the application will be deemed to be an application for a clearing permit under section 51E of the EP Act and the CEO will waive the payment of the fee prescribed for an application for clearing permit. Note: If a clearing permit application has been separately submitted and accepted by DWER, a refund for the clearing permit application will not be provided where DWER determines to address clearing requirements as part of a related works approval application.

(Tick to acknowledge)

9.8 Information and Data Used to Calculate Proposed Fees

The detailed calculations of fee components, including all Information and data used for the calculations are to be provided as attachments to this application. Please specify the relevant attachment number in the space/s provided below.

Proposed fee for works approval Attachment No

Details for cost of works

Proposed fee for licence Attachment No

Part 1: Premises

Part 2: Waste types

Part 3: Discharges to air, onto land, into waters




IR-F09 v7.0

Part 10. Submission of Application NOTE: Information submitted as part of this application may be made publicly available. If you wish to submit information that you believe to be commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential, then you should submit that information in an attachment to this application labelled Attachment 10 with a written statement of reasons why you request that each item of information be kept confidential. DWER will take reasonable steps to protect genuinely confidential or commercially sensitive information. Please note in particular that all submitted information may be the subject of an application for release under the Freedom of Information Act 1992. All information which you would propose to be exempt from public disclosure has been separately placed in Attachment 10 (located at the end of this form). Grounds for claiming exemption in accordance with Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 must be specified.

A full, signed electronic copy has been submitted via: [email protected]

OR A full hard copy has been sent to: APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Locked Bag 33 Cloisters Square PERTH WA 6850




IR-F09 v7.0

ATTACHMENT 10 - Confidential or Commercially Sensitive Information

Request for Exemption from Publication

Information which you consider should not be published on the grounds for claiming exemption in accordance with Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 must be specified in this Attachment.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IF GROUNDS FOR EXEMPTION ARE DETERMINED

Section [x]:

Ground for claiming exemption:

Section [x]:

Ground for claiming exemption:


ATTACHMENT 1A Certificate of Title


ATTACHMENT 1B ASIC Current Company Extracts

Current & Historical Company Extract

Name: COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITEDACN: 008 673 470

Date/Time: 02 February 2018 AEST 10:44:02 AM

This extract contains information derived from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) database under section 1274A of the Corporations Act 2001.

Please advise ASIC of any error or omission which you may identify.

Current & Historical Company Extract COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITEDACN 008 673 470

02 February 2018 AEST 10:44:02 AM 1

Organisation Details Document Number

Current Organisation DetailsName: COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED DP0161NACN: 008 673 470ABN: 50008673470

Registered in: Western AustraliaRegistration date: 21/07/1952Next review date: 30/06/2018Name start date: 22/05/1967

Previous state number: C0520055JStatus: Registered

Company type: Australian Public CompanyClass: Limited By Shares

Subclass: Unlisted Public Company

Previous Organisation Details from 16/11/2001 to 01/01/2002

Name: COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED CR1046N1Name start: 22/05/1967

Status: Strike-Off Action In ProgressCompany type: Australian Public Company

Class: Limited By SharesSubclass: Unlisted Public Company


Name: COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED CR1046N1Name start: 22/05/1967

Status: RegisteredCompany type: Australian Public Company



Name: COCKBURN CEMENT PTY. LIMITEDName start: 21/07/1952

Status: RegisteredCompany type: Australian Proprietary Company


Address Details Document Number

Current

Registered address: Level 1, 157 Grenfell Street, ADELAIDE SA 5000 020023651Start date: 01/04/2004

Principal Place Of Business address:

Lot 242 Russell Road East, MUNSTER WA 6166 00867347G

Start date: 24/06/1997



Historical Registered address: Lot 242 Russell Road East, MUNSTER WA 6166 00867347G

Start date: UNKNOWNCease date: 31/03/2004

Principal Place Of Business address:

Lot 242 Russell Road, East S, COOGEE WA 6166 0867347A

Start date: 03/05/1991Cease date: 23/06/1997

Contact Address

Section 146A of the Corporations Act 2001 states 'A contact address is the address to which communicationsand notices are sent from ASIC to the company'.

Address: GPO BOX 2155, ADELAIDE SA 5001


Address: C/- COCKBURN CEMENT LTD, PO BOX 38, HAMILTON HILL WA 6963


Officeholders and Other Roles Document NumberDirector

Name: ANDREW MICHAEL KELLY 7E2888046Address: 85 Surrey Street, DARLINGHURST NSW 2010

Born: 22/07/1967, DOWNPATRICK, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 30/04/2010

Name: DARRYL KENT HUGHES 7E6280882Address: 4 Plum Close, CASULA NSW 2170

Born: 10/01/1971, BALLINA, NSWAppointment date: 07/08/2014

Name: BRADLEY DONALD LEMMON 7E6280882Address: 18 Porto Santo Green, SECRET HARBOUR WA

6173Born: 24/09/1970, TENTERFIELD, NSW

Appointment date: 07/08/2014Secretary

Name: MARCUS ROLAND DEAN CLAYTON 7E1700196Address: 'Dumbleton', 272 Mt Barker Road, ALDGATE SA

5154Born: 31/07/1964, STIRLING, SA

Appointment date: 23/03/2004Name: LUBA ALEXANDER 7E9413270

Address: Unit 73, 365-377 Kent Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000Born: 03/01/1955, ADELAIDE, SA

Appointment date: 03/12/2014Previous Prev. PEO

Name: DONALD ERNEST HUGH MCDONALDAddress: 10 Hillway, NEDLANDS WA 6009

Born: 24/04/1937, FOSTER, VICAppointment date: 27/04/1989

Cease date: 08/12/1995Previous Director



Name: MARTIN BRYDON 7E0444432Address: 3 Houston Place, MOUNT CLAREMONT WA 6010

Born: 15/05/1955, LUTON, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 20/07/1999

Cease date: 07/08/2014Name: SAMANTHA JANE TOPPENBERG 7E5454782

Address: 111 Lawrence Street, ALEXANDRIA NSW 2015Born: 25/03/1969, MELBOURNE, VIC

Appointment date: 15/08/2013Cease date: 07/08/2014

Name: THOMAS DOUGLAS 7E0294783Address: 9 Nolan Place, WEST LAKES SHORE SA 5020

Born: 20/11/1948, ADELAIDE, SAAppointment date: 15/12/2004

Cease date: 15/08/2013Name: ANDREW DAVID POULTER 020023651

Address: 10 Burnalta Crescent, BURNSIDE SA 5066Born: 16/12/1954, YORKSHIRE, UNITED KINGDOM


Name: MARK PETER CHELLEW 017709832Address: "Amberside", Argyle Street, MITTAGONG NSW

2575Born: 24/07/1956, SYDNEY, NSW


Name: MARK HOAD 00867347LAddress: 6 Flinders Street, KENT TOWN SA 5067

Born: 05/06/1970, CHATHAM, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 29/10/2002

Cease date: 31/03/2003Name: CHARLES HENRY PERKINS 011860580

Address: 11 Walter Street, CLAREMONT WA 6010Born: 05/08/1939, PERTH, WA


Name: PHILIP JOHN WRIGHT 017709832Address: 21 Charlick Circuit, ADELAIDE SA 5000

Born: 09/09/1953, HARARE, ZIMBABWEAppointment date: 03/01/2001

Cease date: 14/09/2001Name: CHRISTOPHER JOHN FOLL 017709832

Address: 125 Wendouree Crescent, WESTLAKE QLD 4074Born: 16/08/1956, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM


Name: PETER CHARLES CROWLEY 015053078Address: DUNSMORE, Church Walk, Bilton, Rugby, United

KingdomBorn: 11/07/1957, BRISBANE, QLD




Name: ROGER MICHAEL SHARP 013395564Address: The Millhouse Thurlaston Rugby Cv23 9js, United

KingdomBorn: 02/11/1944, KENILWORTH, UNITED KINGDOM


Name: DAVID JOHN CHARLTON MCATEER 010516207Address: Norcroft House 91 Rugby Rd Dunchurch,

Warwickshire, EnglandBorn: 06/10/1939, SHEFFIELD, UNITED KINGDOM


Name: DONALD ERNEST HUGH MCDONALDAddress: 10 Hillway, NEDLANDS WA 6009

Born: 24/04/1937, FOSTER, VICAppointment date: 07/07/1983

Cease date: 31/12/1997Name: JOHN SIMON CURTIS 00867347E

Address: 55 Yarranabbe Road, DARLING POINT NSW 2027Born: 22/02/1950, SYDNEY, NSW


Name: PIETER WILLIAM TENCATE 00867347EAddress: 7 Mader Crescent, MOUNT NASURA WA 6112

Born: 22/04/1940, BATANG TOROE, INDONESIAAppointment date: 27/10/1992

Cease date: 31/12/1997Name: CYRIL PATRICK JACKSON 0867347A

Address: The Close Sutton-under-brailes Banbury, O, United Kingdom

Born: 06/01/1936, HERTFORDSHIRE, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 05/04/1988

Cease date: 11/12/1996Name: MICHAEL STEVENSON GREGG

Address: 31 View Street, PEPPERMINT GROVE WA 6011Born: 19/12/1933, ADELAIDE, SA


Name: PATRICK JOHN SCANNELLAddress: 20 Rugby Rd Dunchurch Rugby, United Kingdom

Born: 14/12/1951, LEAMINGTON, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 11/10/1989

Cease date: 26/04/1993Name: DEREK WILLIAM BIBBY

Address: 5 Rosser Street, COTTESLOE WA 6011Born: 06/01/1924, , UNITED KINGDOM

Appointment date: UNKNOWNCease date: 30/06/1990



Name: ANDREW HUBERT TEAREAddress: C - The Rugby Portland Cement Pl Crown, House

Rugby, United KingdomBorn: , ,


Name: BARRIE HARDCASTLEAddress: C - The Rugby Portland Cement Pl Crown, House

Rugby, United KingdomBorn: 26/01/1935, LEEDS, UNITED KINGDOM


Name: CHARLES MICHAEL EUSTACEAddress: 76 Preston Point Road, EAST FREMANTLE WA

6158Born: 21/06/1946, , UNITED KINGDOM


Name: TERENCE WILLIAM HOGANAddress: 12 Browne Avenue, DALKEITH WA 6009

Born: 02/05/1939, NEDLANDS, WAAppointment date: UNKNOWN

Cease date: 30/06/1988Name: WILLIAM HAROLD CLOUGH

Address: 93 Stanley Street, NEDLANDS WA 6009Born: 30/09/1936, SUBIACO, WA


Previous SecretaryName: LUBA PRZEDWORSKI 017709832

Address: 5 Flavia Court, NORTH HAVEN SA 5018Born: 03/01/1955, ADELAIDE, SA


Name: MARK HOAD 00867347LAddress: 6 Flinders Street, KENT TOWN SA 5067

Born: 05/06/1970, CHATHAM, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 26/04/2001

Cease date: 31/03/2003Name: CHRISTOPHER JOHN FOLL 017709832

Address: 125 Wendouree Crescent, WESTLAKE QLD 4074Born: 16/08/1956, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM


Name: ANTHONY OWEN DOBBS 012306081Address: 62 Newbold Road, CASUARINA WA 6167

Born: 17/07/1945, WALLASEY, UNITED KINGDOMAppointment date: 31/01/1997

Cease date: 03/01/2001Name: BARRY JOHN FARRELL



Address: 6 Ferguson Street, ALFRED COVE WA 6154Born: 27/01/1932, SYDNEY, NSW


Name: CHARLES MICHAEL EUSTACEAddress: 76 Preston Point Road, EAST FREMANTLE WA

6158Born: 21/06/1946, , UNITED KINGDOM


Appointed AuditorName: KMPG PEAT MARWICK 0867347A

Address: 152-158 Saint Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000Start date: 30/04/1993

Name: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 016859773Address: 1 William Street PERTH WA 6000


Ultimate Holding CompanyName: ADELAIDE BRIGHTON LTD. 020023651ACN: 007 596 018ABN: 15007596018

Previous Ultimate Holding CompanyName: RMC GROUP PLC 00867347L

Org No.: 053 118 442Name: RMC GROUP PTY LTD 00867347KACN: 075 723 081ABN: 17075723081

Name: RUGBY GROUP PLC 0867347AOrg No.: 070 714 653

Share Information

Share Structure

Class Description Number issued

Total amount paid

Total amount unpaid

Document number

ORD ORDINARY 30000000

15000000.00 0.00 00867347B

Financial Reports

Balance date

Report due date

AGM due date

Extended AGM due

AGM held date

Outstanding Document number

31/12/1998 30/04/1999 31/05/1999 no 015409320

31/12/1999 30/04/2000 no 017072239

31/12/2000 30/04/2001 24/05/2001 no 016859773



Charges Summary

Note : A charge is some form of security given over the property/assets of the company. In order to obtain detailsof the 'amount secured by a charge', 'the property charged', the property released from a charge or thedocuments relating to a satisfaction, assignment or change in details, it is necessary to obtain a 'CHARGESEXTRACT'.This extract may not contain all charges for corporations registered prior to 1991 and it may be advisable to alsosearch the State or Territory records held by ASIC.

ASIC Charge 197694

Status: SATISFIEDDate and time registered: 08/09/1978

Fixed/floating: NOT RECORDEDDate created: 23/08/1978

Chargee/trustee: PERPETUAL TRUSTEES W.A. LTD

Previous charge number: 520055/1

Form type Description Date lodged

Processed Number of pages

Document number

312 Notification Of Discharge 16/04/1999 yes 1 014762543

Documents

Note: Where no Date Processed is shown, the document in question has not been processed. In theseinstances care should be taken in using information that may be updated by the document when it is processed.Where the Date Processed is shown but there is a zero under No Pages, the document has been processed buta copy is not yet available.

Date received Form type Date processed

Number of pages

Effective date

Document number

05/02/1991 C1 Notice Of Charge 11/02/1991 2 05/02/1991 000480970

03/05/1991 316 (AR 1990) Annual Return316E Corrections 316G Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company 316F Change Of Class Or Subclass

13/05/1991 28 03/05/1991 0867347A

21/04/1992 316 (AR 1991) Annual Return316E Corrections 316G Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

14/05/1992 29 21/04/1992 00867347B

13/11/1992 304A Notification Of Change To Officeholders Of AustralianCompany

25/11/1992 2 27/10/1992 003658083

05/05/1993 316 (AR 1992) Annual Return316C Change To Officeholders 316G Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

10/05/1993 33 07/04/1993 00867347C

15/04/1994 316G (AR 1993) Annual 09/05/1994 34 05/04/1994 00867347D



Return Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

08/05/1995 316 (AR 1994) Annual Return316P Change Of Name Or Address Of Officeholder 316G Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

01/06/1995 34 05/04/1995 00867347E


17/10/1995 3 24/08/1995 010516207

18/04/1996 316G (AR 1995) Annual Return Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

19/04/1996 32 02/04/1996 00867347F


13/09/1996 2 19/07/1996 011860580


20/01/1997 2 11/12/1996 011215843


04/03/1997 2 31/01/1997 012306081


11/07/1997 34 24/06/1997 00867347G


06/11/1997 2 15/10/1997 013070686


28/01/1998 2 31/12/1997 013395584


28/01/1998 2 11/12/1997 013395564

16/03/1998 304C Notification Of Change Of Name Or Address Of Officeholder

24/03/1998 2 20/02/1998 013994089


24/06/1998 36 29/05/1998 00867347H


12/02/1999 3 29/01/1999 00867347I

16/04/1999 312A Notification Of Discharge

21/04/1999 1 16/04/1999 014762543

26/07/1999 205J Notification Of Resolution Altering The Constitution

27/07/1999 3 28/06/1999 015246570



30/07/1999 304 Notification Of304A Change To Officeholders Of Australian Company 304C Change Of Name Or Address Of Officeholder

04/08/1999 2 20/07/1999 015053078


12/08/1999 2 31/03/1999 015461881

31/08/1999 106 Notice Of Cancellation Or Revocation Of A Lodged Document

31/08/1999 1 31/08/1999 015443976

07/09/1999 388A (FR 1998) Financial Report Financial Report - Public Company Or Disclosing Entity

07/09/1999 33 31/12/1998 015409320

23/12/1999 2602A Notification Of Financial Assistance Details Approval By Company's Own Members

23/12/1999 6 23/12/1999 015714144

01/02/2000 316 (AR 1999) Annual Return316C Change To Officeholders 316G Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

07/03/2000 3 31/01/2000 00867347J


07/01/2002 4 24/12/2001 00867347K

24/12/2001 388A (FR 1999) Financial Report Financial Report - Public Company Or Disclosing Entity

25/01/2002 31 31/12/1999 017072239

24/12/2001 388 (FR 2000) Financial Report

388E Company - Appoint Change Name/address Of Auditor 388A Financial Report - Public Company Or Disclosing Entity

10/01/2002 31 31/12/2000 016859773


04/01/2002 3 07/02/2000 017709832

19/06/2002 389B Annual Notice By Wholly-Owned Entity Annual Notice By Wholly-Owned Entity - Companies

24/06/2002 3 31/12/2001 018137265

13/02/2003 316 (AR 2001) Annual Return316C Change To

18/02/2003 3 11/02/2003 00867347L


02 February 2018 AEST 10:44:02 AM 10

Officeholders 316G Annual Return - Unlisted Public Company

24/03/2004 485B Statement In Relation To Company Solvency Solvency Resolution Not Passed

31/03/2004 2 21/09/2003 019932635

24/03/2004 A104 Supplementary Pages To Imaged Document

31/03/2004 1 24/03/2004 019932639

25/03/2004 484 Change To Company Details

484B Change Of Registered Address 484D Change To Ultimate Holding Company 484E Appointment Or Cessation Of A Company Officeholder

29/03/2004 6 16/12/2003 020023651


22/04/2004 3 23/03/2004 00867347M


04/05/2004 3 31/12/2003 019916794


25/06/2004 1 27/05/2004 020413611

28/05/2004 218 Constitution Of Company 25/06/2004 43 27/05/2004 020413615

06/07/2004 488N Application To Change Review Date Of A Company Or Scheme Synchronise Review Date By Office Holder- No Fee

12/07/2004 5 06/07/2004 019815895

01/09/2004 484A1 Change To Company Details Change Officeholder Name Or Address

01/09/2004 2 01/09/2004 7E0220910

05/01/2005 484E Change To Company Details Appointment Or Cessation Of A Company Officeholder

05/01/2005 2 05/01/2005 7E0294783


25/01/2005 3 31/12/2004 020985380


25/07/2005 2 25/07/2005 7E0444432


02 February 2018 AEST 10:44:02 AM 11


20/02/2006 3 31/12/2005 022605330


12/04/2006 1 27/02/2006 022365374


14/02/2007 3 31/12/2006 023523008


14/02/2008 3 31/12/2007 024493544


08/07/2008 2 08/07/2008 7E1700196


13/05/2010 2 13/05/2010 7E2888046

12/07/2013 355 Revocation Deed Relating To Class Order

02/08/2013 10 12/07/2013 028662189

12/07/2013 351 Deed Relating To Class Order

16/10/2013 19 12/07/2013 028797541


21/08/2013 2 21/08/2013 7E5454782


11/08/2014 3 11/08/2014 7E6280882


03/12/2014 2 03/12/2014 7E6569179


04/09/2017 2 04/09/2017 7E9413270

28/12/2017 351 Deed Relating To Class Order

05/01/2018 30 28/12/2017 030132947

Annual Return Document List

Year Return due date

Extended due date

AGM due date

Extended AGM due date

AGM held date

Outstanding

1988 no


02 February 2018 AEST 10:44:02 AM 12

1989 30/06/1990 31/05/1990 09/04/1990 no

1990 30/06/1991 31/05/1991 08/04/1991 no

1991 30/06/1992 31/05/1992 06/04/1992 no

1992 30/06/1993 31/05/1993 07/04/1993 no

1993 30/06/1994 31/05/1994 05/04/1994 no

1994 30/06/1995 31/05/1995 05/04/1995 no

1995 30/06/1996 31/05/1996 02/04/1996 no

1996 30/06/1997 31/05/1997 26/05/1997 no

1997 30/06/1998 31/05/1998 27/05/1998 no

1998 31/01/1999 no

1999 31/01/2000 no

2000 31/01/2001 no

2001 31/01/2002 no

2002 31/01/2003 no

Note: Where the expression 'Unknown' is shown, the precise date may be available from recordstaken over on 1 January 1991 and held by ASIC in paper or microfiche.

***End of Extract of 12 Pages***


ATTACHMENT 2 Premises Maps

Rectangle – bund area for bulk neutraliser, dosing system, storage tank and pumps, crosses – location of injection point on stack, (far, Kiln 6), (near, Kiln 5)


ATTACHMENT 3A Proposed Activities

ATTACHMENT 3A

Proposed Activities

Introduction Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL) is located at the northern end of the Kwinana Industrial Area with the nearest residential property approximately 700m from the plant operations. As the residential development has increased in the surrounding area of the CCL premises, odour complaints have been recorded, some substantiated as a result of the Munster Operations and others unsubstantiated with a potential source other than the CCL Munster Operations.

CCL has invested considerable time and effort into trying to determine the point source emission profile and compounds responsible for the odour that may be emitted from the lime kilns. To date there has been no conclusive determination of what causes the potential odour sometimes attributed to the lime kilns, and consequently how to control this emission.

CCL propose to trial a non-hazardous neutralising product, Aireactor OWD ™1 from CoolMist Systems Australia Pty Ltd, which is injected into the stack exhaust gasses to reduce the potential odour impact at ground level.

This summary paper details past experience and relevant information for the proposed trial use of Aireactor OWD.

Past Experience The proposed trial is based on low injection rates of Aireactor OWD which is classified as non-hazardous, with no changes to the risk profile of the emissions.

Cockburn Cement has undertaken independent laboratory analysis by NATA accredited Australian Chemical Laboratories which confirmed the manufacturer’s claims of the Aireactor OWD being non hazardous, non toxic to human health and the environment.

Aireactor OWD has been used throughout Europe in similar applications as CCL with good results. Colacem Spa is a leading Italian cement company that have used Aireactor OWD to achieve a 50% reduction in odour concentration expressed as odour units per cubic metre from the clinker kiln stacks (refer to Figure 1 below).

Cockburn Cement proposes to use the Aireactor OWD in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and experiences. The Aireactor OWD is to be diluted with potable water only and not mixed with any other chemical prior to injection. The Aireactor OWD will be contained in a purpose built bunded area, ensuring safe handling and containment to prevent release to the environment resulting from an incident.

Aireactor OWD is classified as non-hazardous, and is considered to be a neutraliser as opposed to a deodorant, or masking agent which replaces one odour with another odour which is perceived as less offensive.

1 Air Reactor Inc OWD ™ is an Organic Waste and Decomposition Odour Counteractant


The Aireactor OWD is introduced to the kiln stacks, post pollution control equipment, via a 1000L storage IBC, isolation valve, flow control valve, pump and spray nozzle bar (for example refer Photo 1 and Photo 2). This system has been tested at Colacem Spa in Italy.

Figure 1: Results from the initial trials of the Aireactor OWD at Colacem Spa in Italy showing a 50% reduction in odour of the stack gasses, via olphactometric testing. (Graph axes: Odour unit measurements versus concentration of Aireactor in solution).


Photo 1: Colacem Spa neutraliser spray bay

Photo 2: Colacem Spa spray nozzle bar stack installation


Certification and Authorisation The developer of OWD, Aireactor Inc., and the distributors, Labiotest, Technical data sheets (TDS) and material safety data sheets (MSDS) are presented in Appendix A to D. The following information has been supplied by CoolMist Systems Australia Pty Ltd, from Labiotest, the European distribution agent for Aireactor OWD:

Aireactor OWD has been certified and authorised by the following global organisations:

▪ U.S.E.P.A. (United States Environmental Protection Agency)

▪ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USA)

▪ Dipartimento Di Chimica Industriale Del Politecnico Di Milano (Department of Industrial Chemistry at the Polytechnical Institute of Milan) (Italy)

▪ Ministero Della Salute (Ministry of Health) (Italy)

▪ Istituto Superiore per la Prevenzione e la Sicurezza del Lavoro (Institute for Occupational Safety) (Italy)

▪ C.N.R Reparto idrobiologia applicata (Department of applied hydrobiology of the National Research Council) (Italy)

▪ Dipartimento Medicina Del Lavoro – Milano (Department of work Medicine – Milan) (Italy)

Details of proposal It is proposed to trial the injection of Aireactor OWD into the exhaust stacks of quicklime Kilns 5 and 6, to determine if there is a reduction in olphactometric measurement and if so, to determine the optimum addition rate.

Aireactor OWD is supplied undiluted as this is the most economical way to transport it. Aireactor OWD is required to be mixed with water and introduced to the stack gasses through a spray system, ensuring the neutraliser solution is well distributed and mixed with the stack gasses.

Table 1 and Table 2 below detail the proposed addition rates of Aireactor OWD to be trialled in the stacks of quicklime Kilns 5 and 6. It is proposed to maintain a consistent injection rate of 10L/minute whilst varying the concentration of Aireactor OWD.

Aireactor OWD will be introduced to stack gases within Kilns 5 and 6 as a diluted solution, as such the conditions leading thermal decomposition of the product will not be triggered due to the extremely high dilution ratio as shown below.

Olphactometric sampling and analysis in Stage 1 will be used. Changes to the odour profile will be analysed before proceeding to Stage 2.


Injection water rate (L/min) 10 10 10 10

Dilution ratio of Aireactor OWD in water

0.0006 0.001 0.0015 0.002




Injection water rate (L/min) 10 10 10 10

Dilution ratio of Aireactor OWD in water

0.0006 0.001 0.0015 0.002


Figure 2 below shows the basic process flow diagram of the equipment to be used for the proposal. The system would be integrated into the control system for each Kiln and would be enabled when the process parameters are greater than 80% of the design flow, ensuring no over addition of neutraliser.

Figure 2: Process Flow Diagram of the proposed equipment to be used for the trial

Mechanism of Aireactor OWD The following information has been supplied by CoolMist Systems Australia Pty Ltd, from Labiotest, the European distribution agent for Aireactor OWD:

▪ The mechanism by which Aireactor OWD operates is referred to as osmogenic barrier technology. As detailed below, Aireactor OWD is not a deodorant, replacing one odour with another, but a neutraliser, encapsulating and blocking malodorous compounds so they are not able to be detected.

▪ An osmogenic barrier is made by injecting in the stack gasses mists made of microscopic water drops, each one of which contains billions of micelles. During mixing in the stack gasses, the micro-drops and micelles inside them intercept the malodorous molecules, firmly blocking them, thus neutralizing the functionalities that make them osmogenically active. This action removes malodourous molecules quickly and inoffensively from the natural environment and stack gasses.

▪ The desired characteristics for using anti-odorous products in osmogenic barriers are: harmlessness and the total absence of toxicity for man, animals and plants, as well as rapid biodegradability. The maximum neutralising action will occur under conditions in which micronisation generates the maximum possible number of micelles. This can be ensured by using an adequate spraying system operating a high pressure, creating small size mist.


Trial Protocol CCL seek three distinct trial periods to evaluate the effectiveness of the Aireactor OWD. The trial stages, proposed duration and sought outcomes of each stage are presented in tabular form below.

Table 3: Trial Protocol

Trial Stage

Description Duration Outcome Sought

Stage 1

This initial trial period would be up to 96 hours, from the start to the end of trials, running day shift only (maximum 48 hours operation). The aim being to commission the injection system and trial the different addition rates as detailed in tables 1 and 2. When each addition rate is stabilised, samples would be taken of the stack gasses and odour concentration determined by olphactometric testing and compared to baseline conditions. This would then determine the optimum addition rate for each kiln.

48 hours

Commissioning of injection system.

Carry out olphactometric

testing for comparison to baseline conditions for assessment of trial

effectiveness.

Stage 2

The secondary trial period would run over a 48 hour period, again day shift only (maximum 24 hours of operation). The aim of this trial being to run at the optimum addition rate determined in the initial trial, then conduct stack emission testing, as per operating licence (L4533/1967/15), condition 37, bi-annual requirements. Results from stack emission testing would be compared to past results and a report prepared for discussion with DWER, before progressing to trial 3.

48 hours

Carry out stack testing in accordance with

biannual requirements of L4533/1967/15 for

comparison to historical data sets.

Stage 3

The third trial would be an extended continuous use of Aireactor OWD at the optimum addition rates. Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the odour neutraliser can be discussed and agreed with the DWER before beginning the continuous use trial. It is proposed it would include a combination of evaluation of community complaints and field odour surveys used in determining the effectiveness of reducing odour impact at ground level.

3 – 6 months

Field measurements and evaluation of trial

effectiveness in the neutralisation of odour

emissions.


Trial Verification Method As part of this Trial, an Invitation to Tender will be extended to a shortlisted number of technical experts in the odour and air quality assessment fields with the aim to have a scientifically robust methodology developed for the verification of odour neutralisation efficiency.

DWER Odour Guideline for Prescribed Premises (Draft)

The verification method will be developed in accordance with the DWER recently released for consultation – Odour Guideline for Prescribed Premises (Draft) which focuses on important dimensions of odour nuisance as being characterised by the FIDOL acronym:

1. Frequency of odour impacts

2. Intensity (or strength) of the odour

3. Duration of the exposure events

4. Offensiveness of the odour

5. Location of the impacts (the sensitivity of the receiving environment)

1. Screen Analysis Based on the DWER’s Odour Guideline for Prescribed Premises (Draft) – Appendix 1 – Screen Analysis, as a comparison of the sensitive receptor distance (700m from the Stack Exhausts to the nearest residential dwelling) with the screening distance nominated for Category 43 Cement or lime manufacturing (2,000m) a detailed analysis of the odour emissions is required.

2. Detailed Analysis It is DWER’s expectation that multiple tools from the

Table 4 below as extracted from Odour Guideline (Draft) will be included as part of a detailed analysis, including the use of site-specific data where possible.

The Odour Guideline identifies the followings steps as necessary for a detail analysis:

1. Undertake a mandatory Operational Odour Analysis (OOA) and location review as detailed in Appendix 3 of Odour Guideline (Draft).

2. Undertake further analysis using selected tools from Table 1 of Odour Guideline (Draft) as required.

3. Compile additional information required to support the detailed analysis.

3. Reporting Requirements In accordance with DWER’s Odour Guidelines the reporting requirements for the verification of the trial, based on a detailed analysis are as follows:

The detailed analysis deliverables comprise:

1. A detailed analysis summary report table (template provided in Appendix 4 of Odour Guideline).

2. Conclusion from the screening and detailed analyses.


3. Attachments including the results of the screening analysis, operational odour analysis, location review, outcomes of other analysis tools selected from Appendix 3 of Odour Guideline and any supporting documentation.

Table 4: Summary of detailed analysis tools (extract from DWER Odour Guideline)

Detailed analysis tool For changes to existing premises For new premises

Emission source tools

Operational odour analysis (OOA) (mandatory)

Information on operations and odour sources with emissions that have the potential to create offsite odour impacts, together with proposed monitoring and management procedures.

Odour source assessment (OSA)

Characterisation of odour sources to provide information on emission rates for each source.

N/A

Pathway and receptor tools

Location review (mandatory) Examination of the sensitive receptor distance in relation to the screening distance, the nature of receptors and environmental factors such as local meteorology and topographical features.

Odour field assessment (OFA)

Survey of odour levels in the field arising from: - the existing premises - other premises or sources in the area.

Survey of odour levels in the field arising from odour emissions from other premises or sources in the area.

Complaints data analysis Analysis of odour complaint histories to indicate odour impacts from: - the existing premises - other premises or sources in the area.

Analysis of odour complaint histories to indicate odour impacts from other premises or sources in the area.

Community surveys Survey of community members to identify current or past odour issues related to: - the existing premises - other premises or sources in the area.

Survey of community members to identify current or past odour issues related to other premises or sources in the area.

Relative dispersion modelling Computer modelling to compare different emissions scenarios (such as variations in emissions or changes in number, configuration or control of sources) through the analysis of the relative variations in predicted ground-level odour concentrations. This tool does not involve odour modelling against criteria. This type of modelling is not accepted.

Comparison with similar operations

Analysis of data from facilities of similar size, throughput, operational conditions, topography, meteorology and emission sources


APPENDIX A: Aireactor Inc. Technical Data Sheet


APPENDIX B: Aireactor Inc. Material Safety Data Sheet






APPENDIX C: Labiotest Technical Data Sheet


APPENDIX D: Labiotest Material Safety Data Sheet




ATTACHMENT 4 Consultation Information

COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED A.B.N. 50 008 673 470

LOT 242, RUSSELL ROAD EAST MUNSTER

POST OFFICE BOX 38 HAMILTON HILL

WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6963 TELEPHONE: (08) 9411 1000

FACSIMILE: (08) 9411 1150

ATTACHMENT 4

Consultation Information Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL) has consulted with the City of Cockburn, the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) and various residents and members of the public on the proposed Odour Neutralising Trial. A summary of consultation undertaken to date is provided below.

City of Cockburn CCL Munster Operations are situated within the City of Cockburn.

CCL maintains regular contact with the City of Cockburn representatives, and on a number of occasions as listed below, details of the proposed Odour Neutralising Trial were discussed.

Date CCL Representatives City of Cockburn Representatives

20th of November 2017

Dan Gregory – General Manager Operations SA/WA

Justin Miller – Technical Manager WA/NT

Nick Jones – Manager Environmental Health

Daniel Arndt – Director Planning and Development

July and September 2017

Brad Lemmon – Executive General Manager

Dan Gregory – General Manager Operations SA/WA

Fran Logan – MLA Member, Cockburn

Phillip Eva – Central Ward Councillor

The purpose of the above meetings was to discuss recent odour complaints from the local residents and CCL’s Odour Management Plan. Details of the proposed trial were discussed, CCL sought feedback from the council, including details of any council specific requirements.

Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) A pre-submission meeting was held with DWER on 11th of January 2018 at DWER’s Booragoon Office.

The meeting was attended by:

▪ Jonathan Bailes – DWER Acting Senior Manager – Industry Regulation, Process Industries; ▪ Lauren Trott – DWER Senior Environmental Officer; ▪ Dan Gregory – CCL Operations Manager WA; ▪ Justin Miller – CCL Technical Manager WA/NT; ▪ Earl Cranley – CCL HSE Compliance Coordinator WA/NT; ▪ Carmen Solorzano – CCL Environmental Consultant.


The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the Appeals Convenor’s advice to remove the Odour Neutralising Trial from a pending Licence Appeal, present details of the proposed trial and determine the way forward.

DWER advised CCL a Works Approval would be required for the commissioning of the equipment. If approved, DWER may initiate the Licence Amendment process if trial was deemed successful.

DWER advised they may consult with the Department of Health if deemed necessary.

Verification and validation methods to assess the effectiveness of the odour neutraliser in reducing odour emissions were discussed. DWER advised a Draft Odour guideline for prescribed premises was under review and due for release in the near future.

A second engagement meeting was held on 9th May, 2018 at DWER’s Perth City Office.

The meeting was attended by:

▪ Jonathan Bailes – DWER Acting Senior Manager – Industry Regulation, Process Industries; ▪ Lauren Trott - DWER Senior Environmental Officer; ▪ Colin Powers – CCL – WA Operational Manager; ▪ Justin Miller – CCL Technical Manager WA/NT; ▪ Earl Cranley – CCL HSE Compliance Coordinator WA/NT;

The purpose of this second meeting was to outline CCL’s engagement strategy for the Odour Neutralising Trial and provide an updated timeframe of submission to the department. The community engagement forum plan was informally introduced, and an invitation extended to participate. It was noted that the forum would be utilised to communicate Works Approval application.

Community Consultation In accordance with EP Licence L4533/1967/15 Condition 5, CCL maintains a Complaints Register concerning the impact of emissions from the premises and responds to the complainant within a 72-hour period.

Odour complaints received during the November 2017 to May 2018 were recorded and investigated as per CCL protocol and discussions held with various members of the community regarding the proposed trial. Feedback was sought from these community members on their opinions and thoughts on the trial, and their willingness to participate in a community odour survey recorded.

On the 28th May, 2018 CCL hosted a community forum event at the Jackovich Centre, Munster. Attendees ranged from a variety of stakeholder groups including residents, community groups, industry groups and local council. The group was positively received, with a total of 19 participants (including CCL personnel). The full list of invitees is below:

▪ Honourable Francis Logan, MLA, Minister for Emergency Services and Corrective services, Local member for Cockburn

▪ Shaun Hodges, Executive Director, Department of Water Environment Regulation ▪ Nick Jones, Manager Environmental Health, City of Cockburn ▪ Cr Phillip Eva, City of Cockburn ▪ Cr Chontelle Sands, City of Cockburn ▪ Deanie Carbon, Community Engagement Officer, City of Cockburn


▪ Wendy Campbell, President Beeliar Community Voice ▪ Leigh Chatt, President Yangebup Progress Association ▪ Kim Sadlier, President Success Residents Association ▪ Chris Oughton, Kwinana Industries Council ▪ John Riegler, Beeliar Resident ▪ Anthony Panino, Beeliar Resident ▪ Elizabeth Pendlebury, Munster Resident ▪ Jarrad Brookes, Next Real Estate and Beeliar Resident ▪ Greg Hocking, Beeliar Resident ▪ Karun Bhusal, Beeliar Resident ▪ Lynn Beard, Principal South Coogee Primary School ▪ Louise O’Donovan, Principal Beeliar Public School ▪ Narelle Brookes, President P&C, South Coogee Primary School ▪ Kelly Fontana, P&C representative, Beeliar Primary School ▪ Kristy Mostert, Centre Manager, Buggles Childcare Beeliar ▪ Karen Stackpole, Director Kids Corner Child Care Centre, Beeliar ▪ Frank Van Wees, Yangebup Progress Association ▪ John Saunders, Resident Beeliar ▪ Bruce Hall, Resident Beeliar

The purpose of the forum was to provide a further platform for ongoing engagement with stakeholders, and to address concerns as they arise. This forum is expected to run throughout the trial phase and is not limited to discussing the odour neutraliser trial, but general concerns and initiatives as warranted.

A second community forum event was hosted on the 18th of July 2018 at the Jackovich Centre, Munster and attended by:

▪ Kim Sadlier, President Success Residents Association ▪ John Saunders, Local Resident ▪ Chris Oughton, Director KIC ▪ Cr Phillip Eva, City of Cockburn ▪ Vanessa Rodeghiero, Community Adviser, Cement and Lime, Adelaide Brighton ▪ Colin Powers, WA Operations Manager, Cockburn Cement ▪ Dan Gregory, SA/WA Operations Manager, Cement and Lime, Adelaide Brighton ▪ Steve Dangerfield, Facilitator, Communikate et al


ATTACHMENT 6A Emissions and Discharges

COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED A.B.N. 50 008 673 470

LOT 242, RUSSELL ROAD EAST MUNSTER

POST OFFICE BOX 38 HAMILTON HILL

WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6963 TELEPHONE: (08) 9411 1000

FACSIMILE: (08) 9411 1150

ATTACHMENT 6A

Emissions and Discharges

Layout

CCL Munster site layout is presented as Attachment 2 – Plan of Premises where the site lot boundaries and the outer site land uses (bushland and landfill) are shown.

Emissions and Discharges

Mechanism of Aireactor OWD

The following information has been supplied by CoolMist Systems Australia Pty Ltd, from Labiotest, the European distribution agent for Aireactor OWD:

▪ The mechanism by which Aireactor OWD operates is referred to as osmogenic barrier technology. As detailed below, Aireactor OWD is not a deodorant, replacing one odour with another, but a neutraliser, encapsulating and blocking malodorous compounds so they are not able to be detected.

▪ An osmogenic barrier is made by injecting in the stack gasses mists made of microscopic water drops, each one of which contains billions of micelles. During mixing in the stack gasses, the micro-drops and micelles inside them intercept the malodorous molecules, firmly blocking them, thus neutralizing the functionalities that make them osmogenically active. This action removes malodourous molecules quickly and inoffensively from the natural environment and stack gasses.

▪ The desired characteristics for using anti-odorous products in osmogenic barriers are: harmlessness and the total absence of toxicity for man, animals and plants, as well as rapid biodegradability. The maximum neutralising action will occur under conditions in which micronisation generates the maximum possible number of micelles. This can be ensured by using an adequate spraying system operating a high pressure, creating small size mist.

Table 1: Emissions and Discharges

Source of Emission or Discharge

Emission or Discharge Type

Volume and Frequency

Proposed Controls

Location

Stack Exhausts Chemical/physical reactions of Aireactor OWD with compounds resulting in odorous or hazardous emissions.

N/A – chemical analysis of Aireactor OWD by the Chem Centre WA using GCMS confirms manufacturer’s claims of the product being non-flammable, environmentally safe and harmless with total absence of toxicity for man, animals and plants as well as being of rapid biodegradability.

No change to current waste emissions or discharges subject to EP licencing are expected as a result of the use Aireactor OWD.

Table 2: Risk Assessment

Parameter Risk Likelihood Consequence Rating Controls Likelihood Consequence Residual

Rating

1 Stack Emission Reduction in temperature of the stack gasses from injection of neutraliser solution effects the dispersion of the stack gasses causing higher ground level concentration of odour closer to plant

Possible Moderate Medium The proposed injection rate of water at 10 L/minute would cool the stack gasses by a maximum of 5°C, which would have little to no effect on stack gas dispersion

The dosing system pumps are rated to a maximum flow rate of 23L/minute, with a potential maximum decrease in stack gas temperature of 15°C. This maximum potential

Possible Minor Medium

decrease in stack gas temperature would still have little to no effect on stack gas dispersion.

Injection of Aireactor OWD will be managed via dedicated dosing system connected into the Plant Control System with set process parameter and alarmed logic controls to maintain dosing rates within set limits.

2 Stack Emission Chemical/physical reactions of Aireactor OWD with compounds in the stack gasses causing increased odour or hazardous

Possible Minor Medium Aireactor OWD is a neutralising agent, encapsulating and blocking malodorous compounds so they are not able



emissions to be detected, not a deodorant that masks one odour with another that is perceived to be less offensive.

Aireactor OWD is classified non-hazardous;

Addition rate and dilution of product in stack gasses is extremely small in comparison to stack flow rate (essentially unmeasurable).

Isokinetic testing in accordance with prescribed biannual stack monitoring licence conditions will be carried out in conjunction with

olphactometric stack testing during the optimisation stage.

Detailed review of stack testing results with and without air reactor will be performed. Any changes will be investigated before proceeding to the next stage.

3 Odour Neutralisation / Process

Over/under dosing of product into the stack gasses (including start up/shutdowns)

Unlikely Minor Medium Injection of Aireactor OWD will be managed via dedicated dosing system connected into the Plant Control System with set process parameter and alarmed logic

Rare Minor Low


controls to maintain dosing rates within set limits.

Control system will limit dosing such that it will not run until the kilns are running at near full production rates.

Control system will have alarms and automatic injection system shutdowns for abnormal conditions.

Commissioning and optimisation stages will involve isokinetic and olphactometric testing to enable quantitative analysis of odour reduction and

determine optimum dosing rate.

Isokinetic testing in accordance with prescribed biannual stack monitoring licence conditions will be carried out in conjunction with olphactometric stack testing during the optimisation stage.

Detailed review of stack testing results with and without air reactor will be performed. Any changes will be investigated before proceeding to the next stage.


Testing will be conducted before and after commissioning to compare stack emissions.

4 Odour Neutralisation / Process

Control system / injector failure

Possible Minor Medium Continual preventative maintenance ensures failure of systems is reduced;

Control system will limit dosing will not run until kilns are running at near full production rates.

Scheduled maintenance stops during shutdown periods.


5 Odour Neutralisation /

Loss of supply / run out of product

Unlikely Minor Medium Reliable supplier with Australian

Rare Minor Low

Process distributor;

Long term agreement sought;

Long term storage option on site.

6 Odour Neutralisation / Community

Product injection causes additional odour

Unlikely Minor Medium Product is neutralising agent only designed to remove malodourous molecules from air particles.

Commissioning and optimisation stages prior to Stage 3 will indicate any offensive odour caused by the product and optimum rate of injection.

Site crews advised to report

Rare Minor Low


any odours to supervisors;

Community odour complaints (as per procedure) will be investigated and followed up with site personnel;

Isokinetic and olphactometric stack testing during commissioning and optimisation stages will allow early detection of changes in odour concentration and stack gas composition.

Notes to explain why this will not result in new chemicals being released to the environment –

rates, dilution, before and aftger etc etc etc etc

7 Environmental Chemical spill into sensitive receptor during transport/ application / maintenance

Unlikely Minor Medium Undiluted chemical stored in purpose built bund as per SDS;

SDS to be stored onsite;

Spill equipment stored nearby on site;

Chemical is classified as non-hazardous

Rare Minor Low

8 Environmental / Safety

Product addition causing fire during transport / application/ maintenance

Unlikely Minor Medium Product will be transported as per SDS;

Product will be diluted on site with water;

Product will be stored and utilised according

Rare Minor Low


to SDS.

9 Environmental/ Safety

Product causing burns during transport/ application/ maintenance

Unlikely Minor Medium Product will be transported as per SDS;

Site personnel will be provided with adequate PPE on site.

Product will be stored and utilised according to SDS.

Rare Minor Low

10 Environmental / Regulatory

Product trialled without authorising body’s knowledge

Unlikely Major Medium CCL to work proactively with regulator to ensure trial terms are agreed to prior to start up.

Results of trial communicated to regulator

Rare Moderate Medium