24
COBRE Grant Writing Workshop Significance and Innovation Dawn Elliott Thanks to Wendy Sanders, M.A. Assistant Dean for Research Career Development U Maryland School of Medicine and the NIH OER

COBRE Grant Writing Workshop

  • Upload
    arvid

  • View
    42

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

COBRE Grant Writing Workshop. Significance and Innovation Dawn Elliott. Thanks to Wendy Sanders, M.A. Assistant Dean for Research Career Development U Maryland School of Medicine and the NIH OER. Overall Impact versus Significance. Significance: Did you ask an important question - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

COBRE Grant Writing Workshop

Significance and InnovationDawn Elliott

Thanks to Wendy Sanders, M.A. Assistant Dean for Research Career Development U Maryland School of

Medicine and the NIH OER

Page 2: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Overall Impact versus Significance

• Significance: Did you ask an important question– Overall Impact includes significance, but also assesses

feasibility, investigators and environment• Do you have the right team to carry out this research? • Did you propose the best approach?

• Most common criticism in Overall Impact: – “Our enthusiasm about the overall impact of the proposal was

diminished by concerns about feasibility . . .”

2

Page 3: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Significance (NIH Directions)

• Explain the importance of the problem or critical barrier to progress in the field that the proposed project addresses.

• Explain how the proposed project will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice in one or more broad fields.

• Describe how the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services or preventative interventions that drive this field will be changed if the proposed aims are achieved.

3

Page 4: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Significance

• Role of this subsection crucial• 1st subsection of Strategy (1st impression)• Significance will be read by all reviewers

4

Page 5: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

5

Writing the significance section

• NIH doesn’t specify length; suggested length ¾ -1 page• Begin: Identify research problem that you propose to address

– Explain importance of resolving problem link to mission of NIH institute, include public health aspects

– Briefly identify most important, relevant studies of other researchers –and identify important issues (questions) that have not yet been addressed

– Specify how your study will differ from previous work; how it will contribute to scientific knowledge/clinical practice

– Address anticipated impact of your research • on your field• on public health

Page 6: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Paragraph Structure

• Organization: Overview first, then details.• Overview: topic sentence, keep it short and simple.• Details: supporting sentences.

Page 7: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

7

Writing about the Significance of Your Research Can Be Difficult . . .

vs

Page 8: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

8

How to Write about Significance: Be Straightforward –and Current

• Does this study address an important problem? “This research question was identified as a major research focus (cite NIH program announcement or http://www.niams.nih.gov/About_Us/Mission_and_Purpose/long_range.asp) . . .”

• If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced?

– “Our knowledge of . . . will be advanced by . . .”• What will be the impact of these studies on the concepts or

methods that drive this field?• How will your studies speed advances, hasten translation?• Keep in mind new NIH focus on public health: identify how your

research will improve public healthhttp://www.boneandjointburden.org/

Page 9: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

9

Significance ≠ Illness

• Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common knee surgeries performed in the United States; 500,000 primary TKA procedures are performed each year with 97% of these procedures being performed in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) at a cost of $42,000.00 per patient. The prevalence of TKA is expected to increase to 3.4 million per year by 2030.

• Don’t argue that a particular illness is significant. • Significance: What will you do to help cure the illness/lessen its

consequences/prevent sequelae?

Page 10: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

10

Just because it hasn’t been done doesn’t mean it needs to be done

Page 11: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Writing Significance• The Significance subsection is where you begin to

increase the level of detail that will extend and validate what was written in the Specific Aims section.

• Provide a critical analysis of the primary literature that describes the existence of a critical gap in knowledge.– This is where you include some of the material that used

to be in the “Background” section, which substantiates and validates that there is an important problem.

• Explain why its continued existence represents an important problem that must be resolved.

Page 12: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Writing Significance• Describe the positive impact your contribution

will have.– How will your contribution enable subsequent thinking

and research?– If applicable, call attention to decreased

mortality/morbidity, improvements in the quality of life or medical outcomes, reduction in cost of medical care.

• Example: “Improved medication adherence through mail order pharmacy use has the potential to decrease CVD-related hospitalizations and deaths in diabetes patients. Through a full assessment of the risks and benefits of mail order pharmacy use, we can gain important knowledge on how to potentially improve and expand the use of mail order pharmacy services.”

Page 13: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

13

Review Instructions on Significance

• Reviewers are instructed to “evaluate significance within context of a research field”

• Take home message: – include sufficient information about the field so that reviewers

can make informed judgment

Page 14: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

14

Critiques

• “Low impact” research• “Incremental changes” –death knell for

significance• “Confirmatory research, duplicative”

Page 15: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

15

Innovation (NIH Directions)• Explain how the application challenges and seeks to shift

current research or clinical practice paradigms.• Describe any novel theoretical concepts, approaches or

methodologies, instrumentation or intervention(s) to be developed or used, and any advantage over existing methodologies, instrumentation or intervention(s).

• Explain any refinements, improvements, or new applications of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation or interventions.

Page 16: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

16

Think Broadly about Innovation

• A new specific aim, a new MECHANISTIC hypothesis• A new combination of expertise (unusual multi-disciplinary team),

leading to new perspective• A new combination of 2 previously used methods• A refinement of existing model, technology 

– If all previous studies on cartilage using an acute traumatic model, but you develop a model simulating chronic cartilage lesions that’s novel!

• Unique sample, opportunity provide the novelty– “The proposed study is distinctive in our ability to continue to

test a cohort of individuals after ACLR and collect clinical, functional and biomechanical data in a longitudinal sample who are also at risk for the development of knee OA :

Page 17: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

17

Make Sure Your Research Question is Unique

• Search NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database to see if anyone else has been funded to carry out similar research

• http://report.nih.gov

Page 18: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

18

How to Write about Innovation?Be Straightforward!

• Note: NIH makes no recommendations re: length; suggested length ½ -¾ page

• Does your research incorporate a new perspective on your subject?– Does the proposed research employ novel concepts,

approaches or methods? “The proposed research employs a novel method that we developed . . .”

– Are the aims original and innovative? “These aims are original in that . . . While they build on . . . , they are designed to advance our understanding of . . .” 

– Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?

Page 19: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

19

Remember: Innovation is Necessary, But Not Justification for Research

• “This model has been tested in rabbits, mice, rats, drosophila, dogs, cats, chickens, zebrafish and hamsters, but no one has looked at it in a frog yet.”

Page 20: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

20

But…

• “This model has been tested in rabbits, mice, rats, drosophila, dogs, cats, chickens, zebrafish and hamsters, but no one has looked at it in humans or better yet patients with the condition of interest.”

is a different story…

Page 21: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

21

Too much “innovation”

• Be careful about arguing you’re “outside the mainstream” • Need to balance innovation with:

– Feasibility (preliminary data, scope of research) – Credibility (training, publications)

Page 22: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Writing Innovation• Provide the context (with citations from the

literature) so reviewers will be able to understand how your project is innovative.– For example, if you plan to assert that innovation stems

from a new approach that you will take, you need to support that claim with discussion of previous approaches and why they were unsatisfactory.

– This is another place where you include material that was previously in the “Background” section.

Page 23: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Writing Innovation• Write a statement that begins with the

phrase, “The proposed research is innovative because…..”– Complete this sentence by stating what

objectively sets your project apart, such as a different approach you are taking or a different technology you have created, compared to past investigators.

• Example: “The proposed research is innovative because it addresses the potential of a healthcare system-level factor – in this case, the provision of mail order pharmacy service – rather than patient-level or provider-level factors to improve patient adherence to medications. “

Page 24: COBRE  Grant Writing Workshop

Writing Innovation• Describe the positive impact that will

result from your innovative approach. – Positive impact under Significance stems from

concrete benefit that is relevant to NIH’s mission.

– Positive impact under Innovation stems from advancement that would have been unlikely without substantive – not incremental – departure from the status quo.

• Example: “Many researchers and policy makers have lamented that the field of medication adherence research is “stuck” with few good options for moving forward. Research that comprehensively assesses the impact of system-level interventions such as mail order pharmacies can significantly advance the field of structural interventions to improve patient health.”