Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Coagulation of fractal-like aerosols in the transition regime
E. Goudeli, M.L. Eggersdorfer and S.E. PratsinisParticle Technology Laboratory
ETH Zürich
2
IPCC, 2007
AerosolsRadiative Forcing - Emissions
Negative RadiativeForcing
• Larger error bar than greenhouse gases• Impact in global radiation budget by absorbing & scattering light• Investigate & regulate emissions from aerosol measurements
31. Eggersdorfer ML, Pratsinis SE. (2014) Adv. Powder Technol., 24, 71-90.
rm: mobility radius free molecular regime
DMA
rva: volume-equivalent radius
Filter weighingAPMTEOM
rg: radius of gyration
Light ScatteringMicroscopy
Agglomerate Characterizationrm: mobility radius continuum regime
Df 3 1
10g
va
rr
measurementsoverpredict emissionsby 1000 times
4
Understanding agglomerateGoal:
Motivation:• Connect emissions to aerosol size measurements
rva rg, rm
• Facilitate understanding of aerosol contribution in climateforcing (minimize hopefully error bar)
• Structure (relate to agglomerate mass)• Dynamics
in the free molecular, transition and continuum regime of aged aerosols in the atmosphere
Previous Work Brownian coagulation of spheres1,2
Non-spherical particlesdetermination of evolving structure3,4,5
collisional growth and dynamics6
on-line measurements of agglomerate size and structure7,8
3. Kostoglou M, Konstandopoulos AG (2001), J. Aerosol Sci., 32, 1399-1420.4. Schmid HJ, Al Zaitone B, Artelt C, Peukert W (2006), Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, 293-305.5. Eggerdorfer ML, Kadau D, Herrmann HJ, Pratsinis SE (2011), Langmuir, 27, 6358-6367.6. Thajudeen T, Gopalakrishnan R, Hogan CJ Jr. (2012), Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 1174-1186.7. Eggersdorfer ML, Gröhn AJ, Sorensen CM, McMurry PH, Pratsinis SE (2012), J. Colloid Interface Sci., 378,12-23.8. Gröhn AJ, Eggersdorfer ML, Pratsinis SE, Wegner K (2014), J. Aerosol Sci., 73, 1-13.
5
1. von Smoluchowski M. (1917), Z. Phys. Chem. Stoechiom. Verwandtschafts., 92, 129-168.2. Buesser B, Heine MC, Pratsinis SE (2009), J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 89-100.
6
SiO2 particles (like fly ash)T = 27 oC
DLCA
8 Bp
p
k Tum
Ballistic trajectories:
2. Heine MC, & Pratsinis SE. (2007). Langmuir, 23, 9882-9890.
Continuum regime: Langevin Dynamics 2
Free molecular regime: Event-driven method 1
BCCA
3. Eggersdorfer ML, Kadau D, Herrmann HJ, & Pratsinis SE. (2010). J. Colloid Interface Sci., 342, 261-268.
time
if N<N0/2double
if N<N0/2double
1. Allen MP, & Tildesley DJ. (1991). Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, New York.
72. Fuchs NA. (1964). Mechanics of Aerosols. Macmillan, New York.1. Dahneke, B. (1983). Academic Press, New York, 97‐133.
3. Gopalakrishnan R, Thajudeen T, Hogan CJ Jr. (2011). J. Chem. Phys., 135, 054302‐1 – 054302‐9.
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020.3
1
5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020.3
1
5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020.3
1
5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020.3
1
5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 1020.3
1
5
β,10
-15 ,
m3 /s
Kn = λair/rp
Dahneke1
Fuchs2
Gopalakrishnan et al.3CMD-based β
7.34%
Free molecular
(Kn >10)
Continuum (Kn <0.1)
17.9%
Enhancement due to
polydispersity&
attainment of self-preserving size distribution
Validation – Full CoalescenceCollision Frequency Function, β
4. Husar RB, Whitby KT. (1973). Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 241 – 247.
r g (
), r m
( ),
r va(
), nm
time, s
n p(
)
Df ?
1. Eggersdorfer ML, Pratsinis SE. (2014) Adv. Powder Technol., 24, 71-90.
10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4100
101
102
10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-410-1
100
101
102
103
104
Results – Agglomerate Size Evolution
50 nm
8
33 nm
13 nm
4a
g
v
rr
64 times overprediction
9
100 101 102 103 1041.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Number of primary particles, np
Results – Agglomerate Structure EvolutionE
ffect
ive
fract
al d
imen
sion
, Df
PP radius:1 nm2 nm7 nm
15 nm100 nm500 nm
fD
gp n
p
rn k
r
10
Effe
ctiv
e fra
ctal
dim
ensi
on, D
f
1. Jullien R, Botet R. (1987). World Scientific, River Edge.2. Tence M, Chevalier JP, Jullien R. (1986). J Phys-Paris, 47, 1989–1998.
KnD,m = λp/rm10-3 10-1 101 103 105
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
10-3 10-1 101 103 1051.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Df = 1.91 ± 0.03
Free molecular (BCCA)
Continuum (DLCA)
Df = 1.78 ± 0.05
Results – Agglomerate Structure Evolution
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
KnD,m = λp/rm1. Vemury S, Pratsinis SE. (1995). J. Aerosol Sci. 26: 175-185.
11
σg,g,FM = 2.27
Results – Geometric Standard Deviationσ g
σg,vσg,v,C = 1.31(Df = 2)
σg,v,FM = 1.41
σg,v = 1.421
agglomeratesσg,g: rg-basedσg,m: rm-basedσg,v: rva-based
spheresσg,g: rg-basedσg,v: rva-based
σg,m
σg,g
σg,v
σg,g
, ,( )g g D mf Kn
σg,g,C = 1.95 σg,m,FM = 2.03
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
12
Conclusions
Structure• Transition regime: smooth shift of Df• FM regime: Df = 1.91 ± 0.03• Continuum regime: Df = 1.78 ± 0.05
Geometric Standard Deviation of Quasi-Self-PreservingSpheres Agglomerates
FM Continuum FM Continuum• σg,v 1.33 1.32 1.41 1.31• σg,m 1.46 1.44 2.03 -• σg,g 1.46 1.44 2.27 1.95 , ,( )g g D mf Kn
Agglomerate SizeFor np > 10 rg > rm , rva
overpredictemissions
Df evolution from spherical to fractal-like structures: ( )f pD f n
, 1v
g
va a
mrr
rr
,( )f D mD f Kn
13
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
Index
Contents