Upload
damaris-huff
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CMS Outer Hadron CMS Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO) ProjectCalorimeter (HO) Project
Naba K Mondal
Tata Institute, Mumbai, India
HO-EDR Presentation, 10th June, 1999
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO EDR AgendaHO EDR Agenda
June 10, 1999
HO design and test beam results Naba Mondal HO Hanging structure design D. Dattola HO production with emphasis on QC/QA Sudeshna Banerjee Tile grooving and test facilities at Panjab University J. Singh HO organisation and Planning Naba Mondal
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Responsibility ChartResponsibility Chart
HO MechanicsCERN
Optics ManufacturingTata Institute, MumbaiPanjab University, ChandigarhCentral Workshop, BARC, Mumbai
Decoder box, ElectronicsUS-CMS groups
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Need for HONeed for HO
In the central region, HB is not thick enough to contain hadronic shower fully, particularly those fluctuated showers which develop deep inside the HCAL.
Need to extend HCAL outside the solenoid magnet and make additional sampling of the shower.
This part outside the magnet coil is referred as Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO)
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO LocationHO Location
Geographically located just below the muon system and hence is constrained by the geometry of the muon system.
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO CoverageHO Coverage
HO covers the central rapidity region ( < 1.26) occupied by the five Muon Rings. ( numbered as -2,-1,0,1,2)
For Ring 0, there will be two HO layers ( Layer 0 & 1) on either side of the 18 cm thick tail catcher iron at R=3.82 m and 4.07 m
For Rings -2,-1,1 & 2, there will be a single HO layer ( Layer 1) at R= 4.07 m
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Simulation StudySimulation Study
Use CMSIM Version 113 for CMS detector simulation Use tracker geometry as in post-ECAL pre-Tracker TDR Use ECAL geometry as in ECAL TDR Barrel inner hadron calorimeter with 17 layers in front of the coil HO consists of:
Two layers in ring 0 on either side of the tail catcher iron One layer in rings 2,1,-1 & -2
Showers are generated using GEANT for electromagnetic and GHEISHA for hadronic component
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Simulation StudySimulation Study
Effect of leakage is visible from 70 GeV and increases with energy
Effect of leakage is smaller at higher
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Simulation StudySimulation Study
Energy resolution:
The constant term improves after addition of HO
Fraction of events having measured energies 3 below the mean value
Leakage is < 1%
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
1996 Test beam results1996 Test beam results
Energy Resolution
Leakage
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Simulation StudySimulation Study
Effect of HBO on missing energy
QCD events
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Design ConsiderationDesign Consideration
• Basic Detector Elements should map the barrel hadron Calorimeter ( HB) towers of granularity 0.087 X 0.087 in and
• Should be able to see MIPS.
10 mm thick Bicron BC408 scintillatorto be used as the active element.
Use 0.94 mm dia WLS Kuraray double clad fibers ( in shapped grooves), splicedto clear fibers to carry light to HPDs locatedon the outer edge of the muon system.
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO segmentationHO segmentation
HO Segmentation along HO in each ring is divided into 12 identical sectors, each covering
300 in Each sector has six slices- each covering 50 ( = 0.087)
Width of slices in mm
Ring 0: Layer 0:
285.9 349.2 338.5 333.4 333.4 279.6
Ring 0: Layer 1:
311.3 369.9 358.6 353.2 353.2 303.8
Ring -2,-1,1 and 2: Layer 1:
328.8 372.1 360.8 355.3 355.3 417.7
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO segmentationHO segmentation
segmentation along Total coverage along in each ring : 2.51 mLength along in mm ( Edge towers are truncated due to geometrical constraints}
Ring 0 - eight towers Ring 1/-1 - six towers Ring 2/-2 - five towers
Tower # Lay-0 Lay-1 Tower # Lay 1 Tower # Lay 1
4 249.1 189.3 5 & -5 391.8 11 & -11 420.4
3 339.5 359.7 6 & -6 394.7 12 & -12 545.6
2 334.5 354.3 7 & -7 411.4 13 & -13 583.8
1 331.9 351.7 8 & -8 431.4 14 & -14 626.6
-1 331.9 351.7 9 & -9 454.5 15 & -15 333.7
-2 334.5 354.3 10 & -10 426.2
-3 339.5 359.7
-4 249.1 189.3
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO Tile designHO Tile design
Light from individual tile is collected using WLS fiber.
Fibers are held inside the tile in keyhole type grooves
There will be 4 identical shaped grooves per tile.
HO has 95 different tile dimensions, 75 for layer 1 and 20 for layer 0.
Total number of tiles -- 2736
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO Tray DesignHO Tray Design
All the tiles in the same slice of a ring will be packed as a single mechanical unit called the “tray”.
It will cover the entire length of a muon ring along Z.
Along , it will only be one tile wide ( 50)
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO Tray AssemblyHO Tray Assembly
Tiles in a tray will be covered with tyvek and tedler.
Will be sandwiched between two plastic plates of 2mm and 1mm thickness for mechanical stability and ease of handling.
2mm thick plastic cover will have grooves to route the fibers from tiles to edge connector.
Additional groove for the source tube
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Picture of a trayPicture of a tray
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Full TrayFull Tray
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Light collectionLight collection
Clear fibers spliced to WLS fiber will transport scintillation light to an optical connector located at the edge of the tray.
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Optical Cable RoutingOptical Cable Routing
Optical cables made of 0.94 mm diameter clear fibers carry light from the tray connector to the HPDs located in a Decoder box outside the muon system
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
List of HO itemsList of HO items
No of Tiles : 2736
No of Trays : 432
No of Pigtails : 864
No of Optical cables : 864
Area of Scintillator : 380 m2
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Material Safety InformationMaterial Safety Information
Scintillator Name : BC 408
Chemical Name : Polyvinyl Toluene ( >97% wt)
& Organic Fluors ( < 3% wt)
Formula : C10H11
Flash Point : None
Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards : None
Avoid : Temperatures above 3000 C
Respiratory Protection : When machining or polishing
wear and approved dust respirator
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Pre Production Prototype Pre Production Prototype SectorSector
Aim:
To test a small number of modules using test beam to establish the production procedure and to optimise the detector design:
PPP1: Cover 200 in and one half barrel ( 2 and 1/2 rings) in Z
Need: 8 half length Trays ( 1.27 m) for ring 0
8 full length Trays ( 2.54 m) for rings 1 & 2
# of Tiles : 76
# of pigtails : 32
These Trays were exposed to test beams at CERN in the summer of 98
PPP2: Additional 8 trays made and transported to CERN this year to cover one
sector completely for this year’s combined run with HB and HE modules
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Test Beam ModulesTest Beam Modules
PPP tile with 4 grooves visible
Pigtial with connector
Finished
Tray
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
1998 Test Beam Setup 1998 Test Beam Setup
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Test Beam ResultsTest Beam Results
Response of the HO tiles was measured With Cosmic ray Muons (with PMTs) at TIFR With muon beams at CERN
Using HPDs with D0 pre-amplifier electronics Using HPDs with QIE prototype electronics ( Proof of principle)
Using radioactive wire source Using X-Y scanner
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Cosmic Test SetupCosmic Test Setup
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Cosmic Ray test of PPP Cosmic Ray test of PPP traystrays
After fabrication the trays were tested using cosmic ray muons at TIFR, Mumbai .
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Test Beam ResultsTest Beam Results
Pedestal subtracted muon ADC signal from a ring 0 HO tower-
(layer 0 and layer 1 combined)
Signal = 34.7, p= 9.4, S/N = 4
Pedestal subtracted muon ADC signal from a ring 1 tile ( Single layer).
Signal = 18, p=10, S/N = 1.8
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Test Beam ResultsTest Beam Results
Fine scan of an HO tile ( Tile # 124) using 2 cm X 2cm beam spot to test tile uniformity
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Test Beam CalibrationTest Beam Calibration
LED data was used for calibration of individual channels.
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Photo Electron yield due to Photo Electron yield due to MIPMIP
For HO tiles, we have estimated p.e. yields using test beam muon spectrum and the LED calibration data
Ring 0 Tiles
Ring 1 Tiles
TileID
PedestalRMS
SignalPeak
S/N CalibrationPE/ADC
Yield(No ofP.E./Mip
O23 7.2 28 4 0.6 17
024 6.6 22 3 1.1 24
033 6.7 21 3 1.0 21
032 8.1 23 3 0.7 17
012 9.1 35 4 0.5 20
114 6.5 10.5 1.6 0.9 10
113 5.6 9.7 1.7 1.3 12
123 6.5 12.9 2 0.6 8
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Source CalibrationSource Calibration
HO trays have also been calibrated using wire source scanner as well as X-Y source scanner
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO with QIE + HPDHO with QIE + HPD
Muons could be seen in HO with the QIE + HPD contained within 2 time slices of 40 MHz.
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
SummarySummary
Need for an Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO) in the barrel region has been established. Simulations and test beam results show that HO will improve the energy resolution and is necessary for physics involving missing Et.
We have a detailed Engineering design for HO. We have tested Pre-Production Prototype (PPP) Modules with HPD
readouts using muon beam at CERN in 1998. Results show that we are sensitive to MIPs which is one of our design goals.
We have also tested these modules using radioactive wire source as well as using X-Y source scan.
Through the exercise of producing the PPP modules, we have developed all the tools and necessary procedures for QC/QA and are ready to enter the production stage.
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO Technical BoardHO Technical Board
Within India-CMS collaboration we have a Technical Board to discuss and decide on various technical issues related to HO.
Current Members of the Technical Board: Naba K Mondal (Coordinator) Atul Gurtu M.R.Krishnaswamy K.Sudhakar J.B.Singh R.S.Koppikar S.N.Ganguli (India-CMS contact person)
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
HO Task CoordinatorsHO Task Coordinators
Task Production in charge QC inchargeMaterial Acceptance B.S.Acharya
Machining of tiles at Mumbai K.Sudhakar S.R.Dugad
Machining of tiles at Chandigarh Jasbir Singh Suman Beri
Pigtail Manufacturing S.R.Chendvankar & B.Satyanarayana Manas Maity
Final Assembly Sudeshna Banerjee & Manas Maity S.D.Kalmani
Final Testing P.Nagaraj & Mandakini Patil K.Mazumdar
Storage & Shipping L.V.Reddy
HO related Database P.V.Deshpande & P Nagaraj
Naba K Mondal : Technical Coordinator M.R.Krishnaswamy : Incharge of overall Quality Control J.M.Kohli : Incharge of the Chandigarh Center
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Production ResponsibilitiesProduction Responsibilities
Machining of Scintillator tiles will be done at two centers 25% of tile grooving and the necessary QC will be done at Chandigarh 75% of tile grooving at Mumbai ( TIFR & BARC)
All the remaining jobs will be done at the Optics Centre, TIFR, Mumbai with participation from Chandigarh group
Procurement of all raw materials ( Scintillator sheets,WLS and Clear fibers, Tyvek and Tedler sheets, plastic sheets, cutters etc) will be done through the Mumbai center.
Shipment of all the trays will be done through the Mumbai centre
CMS HCAL-HO EDR, June 99
Introduction to HO ProjectIntroduction to HO Project
Naba K Mondal
TIFR, Mumbai, India