CMAP Reinvest for Oak Park

1

INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Reinvest Alternative in Oak Park

Sertus 2009

2


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

CONTEXT

PROBLEM

CMAP VISION

COMPARISON

Left image from ForRent.com, Right image from Downtown Oak Park


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Downtown Oak Park

3

Redeveloping Downtown Oak Park INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

• Remake of Marion Street

– Led to rebirth of businesses

4

http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/on

e?public_place_id=1007#

http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/one?public_place_id=1007

http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/one?public_place_id=1007


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

• Mid-1990’s experience development of national retailers

– Gap, Old Navy

5

secondcitystyle.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451595d...


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

• Followed by smaller building interior and exterior remodeling

– Chipotle, Borders, etc.

Left image from OakParkDining.com 6

Image from the Oak Park Greater Downtown Master Plan

Greater Downtown Master Plan INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

7


Intermodal Transportation INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

8


Opportunities Beyond Parking Lots INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

9

10


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

PROBLEM

CONTEXT

CMAP VISION

COMPARISON

Problem Statement INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

• Oak Park is built out

• Oak Park will experience a population increase

• Lack of mixed use development

• Overdependence on automobile

11

12


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

CMAP VISION

CONTEXT

PROBLEM

COMPARISON

Image from CMAP Community Workshop for Arlington Heights

Reinvest INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

13

Reinvest

14


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

What if we reinvest in our existing communities, by rebuilding current infrastructure to support growth and development? Instead of developing in areas that have never had development before, we could focus growth in existing communities that already have roads, water and sewer lines to support them.

CMAP Scenario – Reinvest Goals

15


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

This scenario benefits the region in many ways, including:

1.More efficient land use

2.Less congestion

3.Improved Mode Share

4.More Jobs – Housing Access

The Benefits of Reinvesting

16


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

1. More efficient land use. Land consumption will improve with 18% more infill


17


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

2. Less congestion 14% reduction in auto travel times and 9% reduction in

transit travel times.

Looking

East on

Lake

Street in

Oak Park Image: www.livehereoakpark.com


18


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

3. Improved Mode Share Mode share improves with 10% more transit use,

walking and biking due to more Transit Oriented Development.


19


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

4. More Jobs – Housing Access Jobs- Housing access improves with 12% - 52% more

accessible jobs due to high density near transit.

20


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

COMPARISON

CONTEXT

PROBLEM

CMAP VISION

Reinvestment at Lake and Forest Ave

21


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Sertus 2009

Current Conditions at Lake and Forest

22


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Deteriorating Parking Structure, housing 340 public

parking spaces…

Maguire 2010

Current Conditions at Lake and Forest Ave:

23


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

…and vacant building with adjacent unoccupied

parking lot.

Maguire 2010 Maguire 2010

Transit Oriented Development

• Transit Oriented Developments are a primary tool in CMAP’s reinvest scenario.

• CMAP defines a TOD as an area with

– Mixed land uses

– Moderate to high density residences

– High quality access to transit stations


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

24

Proposed Development at Lake and Forest

Ave

25


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Sertus 2009


Mixed Land Uses


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Height: 20 stories (190 feet)

Retail: 28,000 sq feet

Service [Hotel]: 140 rooms

Residential: 85

condominiums

Parking: 510 spaces

300 public spaces

180 private spaces [hotel

and residential]

30 shared public/private

spaces

26


Moderate to High-Density Residences


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Retail-(floors 1-4) Condominiums (5-20)

Hotel

Ground Space- 75,000 square feet- 1.7 acres Total Utilized Space- 450,400 square feet 10.3 acres Residential Units per Acre- 50

27


High-Quality Walking Environments to Transit Stations

Lake Street near Forest Image from Village of Oak Park Greater Downtown Master Plan


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

28

Transit Oriented Development Community Impact

Residents of transit oriented developments spend more of their money locally


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Lake Street near Forest Image from Village of Oak Park Greater Downtown Master Plan 29


Community Impact- Housing Stock


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

http://p.rdcpix.com/v01/l3ded5a42-m0m.jpg

30





Community Impact- Congestion


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Image provided by: city-data.com 31


Regional Impact- Congestion

32


PRESERVE CONCLUSION


Regional Impact- Agricultural Land

33


PRESERVE CONCLUSION

http://central.illinoisfarmbeginnings.org/Images/red_farm.jpg

or



Conclusion INTRODUCTION REINVEST INNOVATE

PRESERVE CONCLUSION

Sertus 2009 34

Works Cited

35

• “Go to 2040.” Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning.

<http://www.goto2040.org/> (2010).

• “Planning Together: Character Plans for Oak Park Commercial Districts.”

University of Illinois at Chicago. <http://www.oak-

park.us/public/pdfs/UIC/10.31.03 planningtogether3.pdf> (2003).

Documents

CMAP Reinvest for Oak Park