Upload
amela-simmons
View
25
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cloud Lightning from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). Ronald L. Holle, Nicholas Demetriades, and Martin Murphy Vaisala, Inc. Tucson, Arizona. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
Cloud Lightningfrom the NationalLightningDetection Network(NLDN)
Ronald L. Holle, Nicholas Demetriades, and Martin Murphy
Vaisala, Inc.
Tucson, Arizona
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
-- Value of LF cloud data
-- Overview of LF cloud data
-- Spatial representation of lightning activity
-- Validation of LF cloud performance
Outline
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
Low frequency (LF) cloud data in the NLDN
• Low frequency (LF) cloud lightning is typically located near cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning
• Cloud lightning precedes CGs in ~70% of all thunderstorms
• Cloud lightning typically precedes CGs by several minutes, but can precede CGs by > 60 minutes in some severe thunderstorms
• Cloud flash rates are typically 3 times larger than CG flash rates, but may be >10 times larger in some severe thunderstorms
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
-- Value of LF cloud data
-- Overview of LF cloud data
-- Spatial representation of lightning activity
-- Validation of LF cloud performance
Outline
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
Low frequency (LF) cloud lightning data in theNational Lightning Detection Network (NLDN)
• Activated April 2006 to all users
• Detection methods are based on independent validation studies
• Weak positive cloud-to-ground (CG) flashes less than +15kA are now identified as cloud flashes, not as CGs
• 1/3 of the NLDN datastream is now LF cloud
• A network configured for optimal detection of CGs on a national level will not detect most LF cloud flashes
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
The main challenge for LF cloud lightning detection:Source signal strengths
The median LF large cloud pulse The median LF large cloud pulse amplitude is 5% as strong as for amplitude is 5% as strong as for CGsCGs
A network configured for optimal A network configured for optimal detection of CGs on a national detection of CGs on a national level will not detect most LF level will not detect most LF cloud flashescloud flashes
CGCG LargeLarge
cloudcloud
All cloudAll cloud
• •
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
LF cloud data - NLDN
• The vertical component of the cloud flash is located with a median accuracy of 500 meters
• Cloud data are available in both the CG flash and CG stroke datastreams
• A fraction of all cloud flashes that occur can be detected by the NLDN - the detection efficiency (DE) is typically 5-15% with the standard sensor spacing of the NLDN
• LF cloud does not provide mapping of cloud lightning
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
-- Value of LF cloud data
-- Overview of LF cloud data
-- Spatial representation of lightning activity
-- Validation of LF cloud performance
Outline
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
LF cloud lightning detection data - Flash level
Blue: Total VHF lightning mapping (1190 sources)
Red: LF cloud lightning (5 sources)
Dallas-
Fort Worth
region
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
Green: NLDN CG flashes - Sources at storm levelRed: NLDN-based test network LF cloud sources
LF cloud flashes are typically located near the flash initiation point
Dallas-
Fort Worth
region
18-minute period
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
VHF total lightning mappingAreal coverage of flashes at the storm level
Dallas-
Fort Worth
region
18-minute period
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
-- Value of LF cloud data
-- Overview of LF cloud data
-- Spatial representation of lightning activity
-- Validation of LF cloud performance
Outline
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
The main challenge for LF cloud lightning detection:Source signal strengths
The median LF large cloud pulse The median LF large cloud pulse amplitude is 5% as strong as for amplitude is 5% as strong as for CGsCGs
A network configured for optimal A network configured for optimal detection of CGs on a national detection of CGs on a national level will not detect most LF level will not detect most LF cloud flashescloud flashes
CGCG LargeLarge
cloudcloud
All cloudAll cloud
• •
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
LF cloud validation with LDAR II VHF mapping networkIsolated storms, Dallas/Fort Worth, close NLDN spacing
DE = detection efficiency
Date Storm LDAR NLDN LF Relative Modeled
flashes cloud DE (%) DE (%)
01 May 04 A 431 72 17% 15-25%
01 May 04 B 91 35 38 25-30
01 May 04 C 275 101 37 25-30
13 May 04 39 9 23 25-30
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06
The end
Photo by James Gluba, Bloomington, IL