6
MINOS Collaboration Meeting March, 2003 1 P.Shanahan – Fermilab Closing the Loop on ND vs FD We will measure , p, e response spectra for ND and FD electronics How do differences between CALDET and Near and Far detectors affect calibration E.g. – light level Is it worth trying to understand response in terms of low-level electronics response?

Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

  • Upload
    moana

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Closing the Loop on ND vs FD. We will measure p , p, e response spectra for ND and FD electronics How do differences between CALDET and Near and Far detectors affect calibration E.g. – light level Is it worth trying to understand response in terms of low-level electronics response?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

MINOS Collaboration MeetingMarch, 2003

1P.Shanahan – Fermilab

Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

• We will measure , p, e response spectra for ND and FD electronics

• How do differences between CALDET and Near and Far detectors affect calibration

– E.g. – light level

• Is it worth trying to understand response in terms of low-level electronics response?

Page 2: Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

MINOS Collaboration MeetingMarch, 2003

2P.Shanahan – Fermilab

Detector Response

• Response to an energy distribution can be characterized as – Channel energy deposition distribution for type of

interaction• Mip, EM shower, Hadronic shower

• Same for ND, FD, but not know without bias of one or the other

– Mean PE per channel energy (channel by channel)• Measurable with standard MINOS techniques

– Electronics response difference?• Measured by LI, but will we fit little wiggles?

Page 3: Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

MINOS Collaboration MeetingMarch, 2003

3P.Shanahan – Fermilab

MINOS analysis of ADC/PE and PE/MIP

• ADC/PE “unbiased”– statistical treatment gives underlying mean PE

• Data for ADC/PE taken with no readout suppression

• Muon Calibration:– Mean response (with corrections) to muons. Threshold

effects at low light levels?

Page 4: Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

MINOS Collaboration MeetingMarch, 2003

4P.Shanahan – Fermilab

MIP distribution for electrons in ND, FD electronics

• True energy distribution not known with great precision

• Measurement biased by lightlevel, electronics

• These measured distributions differ mostly due to light level, but also threshold effects

• It would be hard to use these distributions to model ND/FD response difference

Page 5: Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

MINOS Collaboration MeetingMarch, 2003

5P.Shanahan – Fermilab

Possible approach to caldet crosscheck

• For “less biased” measure of shower channel energy distributions…– can we increase PEs/MIP in CALDET vs Near and Far detectors?

– Can we run at all with lower thresholds at CALDET? (no?)

– Does it really matter? By definition, low energies are involved.

• Map ND and FD response with teststand system– Similar to studies Nicolai Tobien and P.S. did for QIE

– Laser/POPOP/WLS to illuminate PMTs

– No readout suppression

– High linearity PIN diode with 20-bit ADC for reference

Page 6: Closing the Loop on ND vs FD

MINOS Collaboration MeetingMarch, 2003

6P.Shanahan – Fermilab

Teststand possibility

• Fermilab Lab-5 teststand• Readout of QIE via CAMAC• Possible (in principle) to read out small number of

FD channels– If we can get them…

• Good summer student project with a post-doc to supervise?