31
Closing Achievement Gaps Catherine Good Columbia University January 14, 2005 Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce: Women, Underrepresented Minorities, and their S&E Careers

Closing Achievement Gaps

  • Upload
    wynona

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Closing Achievement Gaps. Catherine Good Columbia University January 14, 2005. Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce: Women, Underrepresented Minorities, and their S&E Careers. The Achievement Gap. Males outperform females on the math portion of the SAT by 36 points. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Closing Achievement Gaps

Closing Achievement Gaps

Catherine Good

Columbia UniversityJanuary 14, 2005

Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce: Women, Underrepresented Minorities, and their S&E Careers

Page 2: Closing Achievement Gaps

The Achievement Gap

• Males outperform females on the math portion of the

SAT by 36 points.

• Compared to white students, Blacks and Latinos

– Earn lower standardized test scores and grades.

– Are less likely to go to college.

– Have higher drop out rates.

Page 3: Closing Achievement Gaps

% of Degrees Going to Women

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Bachelor's Master's Doctoral

S&E DegreesPsychologyMathEngineering

Page 4: Closing Achievement Gaps

“In the perception of society my athletic talents are genetic; I am a likely mugger-rapist; my academic failures are expected; and my academic successes are attributed to others. To spend most of my life fighting these attitudes levies an emotional tax that is a form of intellectual emasculation”

-Dr. Neil de Grasse Tyson

http://research.amnh.org/users/tyson/speeches/PhDConvocationAddress.html

Page 5: Closing Achievement Gaps

Unpleasant apprehension arising from the awareness of a negative ability stereotype in a situation where the

stereotype is relevant, and thus confirmable.

Stereotype ThreatSteele & Aronson, 1995

Page 6: Closing Achievement Gaps

Stereotype Threat

Page 7: Closing Achievement Gaps

Stereotype Threat Effects on Black Students’ Performance

Steele & Aronson, 1995

blacks

blackswhites whites

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

STEREOTYPE THREAT NO STEREOTYPE THREAT

# o

f it

em

s s

olv

ed

Page 8: Closing Achievement Gaps

• Showed greater cognitive activation of racial stereotypes.

• Rated standardized tests as more biased against minorities.

• Rated stereotypical things (liking rap music, or being lazy) as less self-characteristic.

• Were less likely to indicate their race on the test booklet.

Black students who were about to take a diagnostic test...

Page 9: Closing Achievement Gaps

Additional Studies Finding Performance Effects

• Women taking math tests (Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev, 2000; Spencer, Steele, & Quinn 1999)

• Latinos taking verbal tests (Aronson & Salinas, 1997)

• Low SES students taking verbal tests (Croizet & Claire, 1998)

• Blacks and miniature golf (Stone, 2002)

• White males taking math tests when compared to Asians (Aronson, Lustina, Good, Keough, Steele, & Brown, 1999)

Page 10: Closing Achievement Gaps

Females’ identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat

Pronin, Steele, & Ross, 2003

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

No Threat Threat

Low RelevanceHigh Relevance

Page 11: Closing Achievement Gaps

Self-Theories of IntelligenceDweck, 1999

• Intelligence is fixed– Trait largely determined by nature

• Intelligence is malleable– Quality that can be increased through

nurture

Entity Theorists Incremental Theorists

• Learning goals– seeking to develop ability

• Performance goals– seeking to validate ability as good

relative to others

Desire similar outcome• achieving good scores, doing “well”

Different motivation for pursuing this outcome

“When I take a course in school, it is very important for me to validate that I am smarter than other students.”

“In school I am always seeking opportunities to develop new skills and acquire new knowledge.”

Page 12: Closing Achievement Gaps

Reducing Stereotype Threat: The Role of Implicit Theories

• Directly teaching an incremental theory – increased enjoyment of education, valuing

academics, and GPA for African American college students (Aronson, Fried, & Good, 2002).

– increased standardized test scores for 7th grade girls in math and Hispanic students in reading comprehension (Good, Aronson & Inzlicht, 2003).

Page 13: Closing Achievement Gaps

Increasing College GPA Aronson, Fried, & Good, 2002

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

Control Pen Pal

BlackWhite

Page 14: Closing Achievement Gaps

Maintaining Academic Identification in the Face of Threat

Aronson, Fried, & Good, 2002

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Control Pen Pal

BlackWhite

“Considering all the things that make you who you are, how important is academic achievement?”

Page 15: Closing Achievement Gaps

Increasing Math Standardized Test Scores

Good, Aronson, & Inzlicht, 2003

40

50

60

70

80

90

Control Malleable

FemaleMale

Page 16: Closing Achievement Gaps

Increasing Reading Comprehension Standardized Test Scores

Good, Aronson, & Inzlicht, 2003

40

50

60

70

80

90

Control Malleable

Hispanic

Page 17: Closing Achievement Gaps

Conclusions So Far

• Stereotype threat contributes to the achievement gaps.• Stereotype threat causes women to bifurcate their social

identities.• Eliminating stereotype threat can reduce the achievement

gap.• Directly teaching incremental theories about intelligence

– helps stereotyped students maintain high achievement.– reduces disidentification from academics.

Page 18: Closing Achievement Gaps

Creating an Entity versus an Incremental Environment

• Extolling the “genius” of prominent scientists and mathematicians.

• Valuing quick, effortless solutions.

• De-emphasizing the hard work that underlies scientific discovery.

• Creating a culture of talent.

Page 19: Closing Achievement Gaps

Hypotheses

• Academic contexts that convey the idea that intelligence is a fixed trait – create a fragile sense of belonging.– create vulnerability to stereotype threat.

• Academic contexts that portray skills as acquirable– foster a more hardy sense of belonging.– provide resiliency against stereotype threat.

Page 20: Closing Achievement Gaps

Sense of Belonging

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 21: Closing Achievement Gaps

ProcedureGood, Dweck, & Rattan, 2004

• Participants– Calculus I and Calculus II students– 320 Females

• Procedure– Perceptions of Environmental Stereotyping (PEST)– Perceptions of Environmental Entity Theory of Math

Intelligence (PEET)– Sense of Belonging to Math (SOB)

• Time 1: 3 weeks into the semester• Time 2: after midterms• Time 3: 1 week before finals

Page 22: Closing Achievement Gaps

Sense of BelongingWhen I am in a math setting…

• Membership = .95– I typically have felt that I belong to the math community.

• Acceptance = .91– I feel like an outsider.

– I feel accepted.

• Fade = .79– I try to say as little as possible.

• Affect = .89– I feel anxious.

– I feel comfortable.

• Trust = .75– I trust my instructors to be committed to helping me learn.

Page 23: Closing Achievement Gaps

• PEET (4 items) = .97– believe that people have a certain amount of math

intelligence and they can’t really do much to change it.– believe that people can learn new things, but they can’t

really change their basic math intelligence.

• PEST (6 items) = .93– believe that females are as good as males in calculus.– would trust a woman just as much as they would trust a

man to figure out important math problems.– believe that females can do just as well as males in math.

People in my calculus class…

Page 24: Closing Achievement Gaps

Effects of Perceiving an Entity Environment and Stereotyping on

Females’ Sense of Belonging to Math

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Hi PEET Low PEET

High PESTLow PEST

Page 25: Closing Achievement Gaps

Effects of Perceiving an Entity Environment and Stereotyping on

Females’ Intent to Pursue Math

1

2

3

4

5

6

High PEET Low PEET

High PESTLow PEST

Page 26: Closing Achievement Gaps

PEET

PEST

P x P

SOB

-.21

-.26

-.18

Interest.47 Future

Intent

.48

p = .73

NFI = .99; RMSEA = .000p for test of close fit = .99

SAT

.33 .16 .10

Page 27: Closing Achievement Gaps

PEET

PEST

P x P

SOB Final Grade

-.20

-.26

-.18

.26

SAT

.34 .30

p = .07

NFI = .99; RMSEA = .04; p for test of close fit = .58

Page 28: Closing Achievement Gaps

The Effects of Perceiving an Entity Environment and Stereotyping on

Middle School Girls’ Sense of Belonging Good, Dweck & Rattan, 2004

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

Hi PEET Low PEET

High PESTLow PEST

Page 29: Closing Achievement Gaps

The Effects of Perceiving an Entity Environment and Stereotyping on Middle School Girls’ Math Grades

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Hi PEET Low PEET

High PESTLow PEST

* p = .10

Page 30: Closing Achievement Gaps

Conclusions

• The race and gender gaps in achievement are due (in part) to the negative stereotypes about minorities’ and females’ abilities.

• The gaps can be reduced by fostering an incremental theory of intelligence.

• Learning environments that convey stereotyping and a fixed view of intelligence undermine females’ sense of belonging to math which in turn affect grades.

Page 31: Closing Achievement Gaps

Conclusions

• The race and gender gaps in achievement are due (in part) to the negative stereotypes about minorities’ and females’ abilities.

• The gaps can be reduced by fostering an incremental theory of intelligence.

• Learning environments that convey a fixed view of intelligence and stereotyping undermine females’ sense of belonging to math which in turn affects grades.

• Learning environments that convey a malleable view of intelligence enable females to maintain a sense of belonging and high grades, even in the face of stereotypes.