Upload
beverly-day
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Clinical Research Strategies in MSA
Gregor K. Wenning MD PhD MSCDivision of NeurobiologyDepartment of Neurology & NeurosurgeryMedical University [email protected]
JiePieAward, BrusselsOctober 2nd, 2014
EMSA Sites 10 / 2014
24 Study Sites in 12 EU Countries + Israel
www.emsa-sg.org
EMSA Registry
Köllensperger et al., 2010
• 436 consecutive patients recruited
• Mean age at disease onset: 57.8 years
• Baseline disease duration: 5.8 years
• 68.2% MSA-P
• Symptomatic autonomic failure in 99%• Urinary incontinence in 83%• Orthostatic dysregulation in 75%
• Parkinsonism in 87%
• Ataxia in 63%
EMSA Registry
Köllensperger et al., 2010
Pharmacological Treatment
• Autonomic failure
• Orthostatic symptoms treated in 27%
• Midodrine – 69%
• Fludrocortisone – 25%
• Urinary dysfunction treated in 19%
• Tolterodine – 52%
• Oxybutinin – 45%
• Parkinsonism
• L-Dopa – 73% (beneficial response in 38%)
• DA – 29%
• MAO-B inihbitors – 11%
EMSA Registry
Köllensperger et al., 2010
Under-Treatment
Trial considerations
• Progression of motor impairment
• Progression of non-motor impairment
• Progression of global disability
• Worsening of Hr-QoL
• Progression of surrogate markers
Male : female 13 : 21 Age (yrs) 64.0 ± 7.1 Age at symptom onset (yrs)
59.9 ± 6.6
Disease duration at baseline (yrs)
4.1 ± 3.1
Follow-up duration (months)
11.8 ± 1.4
UPDRS III progression in MSA-P
H&Y
Mean UPDRS-III change: 10.8 (95%CI 8.5 – 13.1)
H&Y 3 (n=22): 13.1 (95%CI 10.9 – 15.3)
H&Y 4 (n=12): 6.5 (95%CI 2.1 – 10.9)
Seppi K et al, 2005
Annual UPDRS-III increase in PD: 1.5% ranging from 0.6-4.5
Olanow 1995; Louis 1999; Goetz 2000; Jankovic 2001
Male : female 13 : 21 Age (yrs) 64.0 ± 7.1 Age at symptom onset (yrs)
59.9 ± 6.6
Disease duration at baseline (yrs)
4.1 ± 3.1
Follow-up duration (months)
11.8 ± 1.4
H&Y
Male : female 13 : 21 Age (yrs) 64.0 ± 7.1 Age at symptom onset (yrs)
59.9 ± 6.6
Disease duration at baseline (yrs)
4.1 ± 3.1
Follow-up duration (months)
11.8 ± 1.4
H&Y
EMSA – Natural History
Wenning et al. 2013
Baseline
• Minimal Data Set
• Rating Scales (UMSARS, H&Y, S&E, EQ5D, ...)
• Red Flag Screen
6-Months
• Minimal Data Set
• Rating Scales (UMSARS, H&Y, S&E, EQ5D, ...)
• Red Flag Screen
12-Months
• Minimal Data Set
• Rating Scales (UMSARS, H&Y, S&E, EQ5D, ...)
• Red Flag Screen
18-Months
• Minimal Data Set
• Rating Scales (UMSARS, H&Y, S&E, EQ5D, ...)
• Red Flag Screen
24-Months
• Minimal Data Set
• Rating Scales (UMSARS, H&Y, S&E, EQ5D, ...)
• Red Flag Screen
EMSA - Natural HistoryN 141Diagnostic certainty
Possible (%) 19.9Probable (%) 77.3
SexFemale (%) 44.0Male (%) 56.0
AgeStudy entry (years, mean ± SD) 62.1 ± 7.7Disease-onset (years, mean ± SD) 56.2 ± 8.4Disease duration baseline (years, mean ± SD) 5.5 ± 3.8
Global disability scale (mean ± SD) 2.3 ± 0.7Schwab & England ADL (mean ± SD) 4.9 ± 2.2Hoehn & Yahr Parkinson (mean ± SD) 3.7 ± 1.0Symptomatic autonomic dysfunction (%) 96.5Parkinsonism (%) 90.8
Beneficial L-Dopa Response(%) 31.2Response duration (years, mean ± SD) 3.5 ± 2.7
Ataxia (%) 71.6
Wenning et al., 2013
EMSA – Natural History
Wenning et al., 2013
EMSA – Natural History
Wenning et al., 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
6-Months 12-Months 18-Months 24-Months
ADL MEPer Protocol Analysis
UMSARS Progression Clinical Milestones
EMSA supported sample sizecalculation for trials
Wenning et al., 2013
30% effect size 159 patients per group (80% power)
30% effect size 186 patients per group (80% power)
Factors associated with rapid progression of motor impairment in MSA
• Lower baseline impairment Seppi et al, 2005
• Absent L-Dopa response Wenning et al, 2013
• Short disease duration Seppi et al, 2005; Geser et al, 2006; Wenning et al, 2013
• Cerebellar features at baseline Geser et al, 2006
Trial considerations
• Progression of motor impairment
• Progression of non-motor impairment
• Progression of global disability
• Worsening of Hr-QoL
• Progression of surrogate markers
Progression of self perceived dysautonomia in MSA
6 months
Trial considerations
• Progression of motor impairment
• Progression of non-motor impairment
• Progression of global disability
• Worsening of Hr-QoL
• Progression of surrogate markers
H&Y progression in pathologically confirmed parkinsonian disordes
Median H&Y III latency in MSA: 43 months (6 – 100)Median H&Y IV latency in MSA: 56 months (6 - 118)
Mueller et al., 2000
N = 18; 13; 11; 15; 24
PD
MSADLBPSP
0
20
40
60
80
100
Cas
es (
%)
PD CBD DLB MSA PSP
Diagnosis
HY I
HY II
HY III
H&Y I
H&Y II
H&Y III
PD CBD DLB MSA PSP
Ca
se
s (
%)
H&Y stages within 1 year of motor onset H&Y progression
N = 81
PROGRESSION IN MSADisability-milestones
MEDIAN TIME TO years
Walking aids 3 – 5
Wheelchair 5 – 6
Bedridden state 8
Death 9.0 – 9.5
· approx. 50-60% of patients wheelchair-bound at 5 years· Survival rate at 5 years approx. 84% · Survival rate at 10 years approx. 40%
Wenning et al. 1994, N=100; Watanabe et al. 2002, N=230
Trial considerations
• Progression of motor impairment
• Progression of non-motor impairment
• Progression of global disability
• Worsening of Hr-QoL
• Progression of surrogate markers
Health-related Quality of Life in MSA(Schrag et al, 2006)
- N = 115 pts. from EMSA-SG NH Study
- Impairment in all EQ-5D and SF-36 domains
- Significant impairments also relative to PD ! (except pain)
- Autonomic dysfunction (COMPASS), motor impairment (UMSARS) and depression (BDI) closely associated with poor Hr-QoL
- CAVE: No change in SF-36, scores in sample of 27 MSA pts. from 4 EMSA-SG centres over 6 mths (Köllensperger et al, 2006)
Trial considerations
• Progression of motor impairment
• Progression of non-motor impairment
• Progression of global disability
• Worsening of Hr-QoL
• Progression of surrogate markers
• Dopamine D2R DA-D2R-Imaging
(IBZM-SPECT,
Raclopride-PET)• Striatal glucose metabolism FDG-PET • Dopamine transporter DAT-SPECT
(beta-CIT, FP-CIT)• Striatal LD metabolism F-DOPA-PET• Activated microglia PK11195-PET• Basal ganglia atrophy MRT, MRV• Putaminal diffusivity DWI (ADCs)• CSF/Plasma Biomarkers
SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN MSAConsiderations
Completed Interventional Trials
rhGH Trial: Negative- trophic factor support -
Holmberg et al. 2007, Aberg et al. 2000
Study design: Double-blind RCT
Primary outcome: UPDRS (52 weeks)
N 43
Phase: Phase 2
PI: B. Holmberg
Current Status: Published
Study identifier: Not registered
Minocycline (MEMSA): Negative- microglial de-activation -
Stefanova et al. 2007, Dodel et al. 2010
Study design: Double-blind RCT
Primary outcome: UMSARS II (48 weeks)
N 63
Phase: Phase 3
PI: W. H. Oertel
Current Status: Published
Study identifier: NCT00146809
CD11b + Cresylviolet
PK11195-PET
Riluzole (NNIPPS): Negative- anti-glutamatergic efficacy -
Scherfler et al. 2005, Diguet et al. 2005, Bensimon et al., 2009
Study design: Double-blind RCT
Primary outcome: Survival
N 398
Phase: Phase 3
PI: P. N. Leigh
Current Status: Published
Study identifier: NCT00211224
Rasagiline: Negative- neuronal protection -
MSA
MSA+R 2.5
MSA
MSA+R 2.5
Cytochrome c releaseCaspase activation
Opening of MPTP pore
Apoptosis -
-
- -
Study design: Double-blind RCT
Primary outcome: ∆ UMSARS (48 weeks)
N 174
Phase: Phase 2
PI: W. Poewe
Current Status: Completed
Study identifier: NCT00977665Stefanova et al. 2008, Poewe et al. 2012 (Poster 1182)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells - cell replacement -
Lee et al 2012
Study design: Double-blind RCT
Primary outcome: UMSARS (52 weeks)
N 27
Phase: Phase 2
PI: P. H Lee
Current Status: Published
Study identifier: NCT00911365
Intravenous immunoglobulins- Immunomodulation -
Study design: Open label
Primary outcome: Safety
N 9
Phase: Phase 2
PI: P. Novak
Current Status: Published
Study identifier: NCT00750867
Ongoing Interventional Trials
Rifampicin- α-synuclein clearance -
Ubhi et al. 2008
Study design: Double-blind RCT
Primary outcome: ∆ UMSARS (52 weeks)
N 100
Phase: Phase 3
PI: P. Low, S. Gilman, D. Robertson
Current Status: Data analysis
Study identifier: NCT01287221
Fluoxetine- trophic factor restoration -
Study design: Double-blind RCTPrimary outcome:
∆ UMSARS (52 weeks)
N 87Phase: Phase 2PI: O. RascolCurrent Status: Data analysisStudy identifier: NCT01146548
Ubhi et al. 2012
Future MSA TrialsTargets
• Toxic alpha Synuclein species („prion-like“)• Oligodendroglia versus neurons• Oxidative stress (CoQ 2 mutations)• Neuroinflammation
Future MSA TrialsDesign
• Placebo-controlled vs open label• Parallel group vs cross over• Large versus small• Other?
Future MSA TrialsPopulation
• MSA-P• MSA-C• MSA-AF (OH, UGF, both)• Early, mid-stage• Large size (>200)
Future MSA TrialsEndpoints
• Motor • Autonomic• Cognitive• Psychiatric• QoL/pharmacoeconomics
Future MSA TrialsLogistics
• Funds EU (7FP/Horizon 2020), NIH• Academic networks EMSA, US-ADRC, JAMSA• Registries EMSA-R, GLOMSAR
Important: Support by national MSA groups incl. UK MSA Trust, Belgian/Dutch/French/German MSA Societies, US MSA Coalition, US MSA Awareness, US Fight MSA Initiative
Division of NeurobiologyDepartment of Neurology
Medical University Innsbruck