Clause 40 PMA Conformance Test Suite v2.2 Report · 2014-04-16 · Physical Medium Attachment Test Suite v2.5 Report DUT: Company Com DUT GROUP 1 – PMA Electrical Specifications

Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 40 PMA Conformance Test Suite v2.5 Report

UNH-IOL — 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 — Durham, NH 03824 — +1-603-862-0090 GE Consortium Manager: Gerard Nadeau — [email protected] — +1-603-862-0166

John Vendor 25-Jun-2008 Company Com Report Rev. 1.0 123 Anywhere Rd, Tech City, CA 94000

Enclosed are the results from the Clause 40 Conformance testing performed on:

Device Under Test (DUT): Company Com DUT Hardware Version: HW v2.3A Firmware Version: Not Available Software Version: SW v1.4.46 Miscellaneous: Port 0 IOL ID: GE-CCOM-0000000001

The test suite referenced in this report is available at the UNH-IOL website:

ftp://ftp.iol.unh.edu/pub/ethernet/test_suites/CL40_PMA/PMA_Test_Suite_v2.5.pdf

Issues Observed While Testing Access to the TX_TCLK was not available during the testing; therefore not all tests could be completed. 40.1.1 – Peak Differential Output Voltage and Level Accuracy – The DUT was observed to have point A/B amplitude less than 670 mV on pair B. 40.1.8 – Common-mode Output Voltage – The DUT was observed to have a common mode voltage greater than 50 mV on pair D. 40.2.1 – Bit Error Ratio Verification – The DUT was observed to receive more than 7 packets in error at 100% attenuation for both risetimes.

Testing Completed: 07/08/2008 Review Completed: 07/08/2008

Joe Tester Joseph Reviewer [email protected] [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

ftp://ftp.iol.unh.edu/pub/ethernet/test_suites/CL40_PMA/PMA_Test_Suite_v2.5.pdf



Physical Medium Attachment Test Suite v2.5 Report DUT: Company Com DUT

Digital Signature Information This document was created using an Adobe digital signature. A digital signature helps to ensure the authenticity of the document, but only in this digital format. For information on how to verify this document’s integrity proceed to the following site:

http://www.iol.unh.edu/certifyDoc If the document status still indicates “Validity of author NOT confirmed”, then please contact the UNH-IOL to confirm the document’s authenticity. To further validate the certificate integrity, Adobe 6.0 should report the following fingerprint information:

MD5 Fingerprint: E0CC 6585 6D0C 9BE6 0F10 2A52 D92E BDE6 SHA-1 Fingerprint: 8BBA 64F2 AFC5 54E9 A875 AF4E C623 DCE9 EC9C EB74

Table 1 – Hardware Information

1000BASE-T PHY Manufacturer PhyMaker Model Phy2000 Version Not Available Magnetics Manufacturer MagMaker Model MAG2000 Version Not Available Test System Hardware Real-time DSO TEKTRONIX,CSA7404,Q13,CF:91.1CT FV:2.5.3 Vector Network Analyzer “HEWLETT-PACKARD,8712B,US34400165,B.03.02” Arbitrary Waveform Genearator SONY/TEK,AWG2041,0,CF:91.1CT FV:1.27 Test System Software UNH-IOL PMA Test System v3.3

Test Setup All tests in this report were performed using the test setup specified in the 1000BASE-T PMA Test Suite in the Test Setup section of each test.

UNH-IOL GE Consortium 2 Clause 40 PMA Test Report Rev. 1.0

http://www.iol.unh.edu/certifyDoc


GROUP 1 – PMA Electrical Specifications Table 2 – Test Requirements

Test Title Min Max Units 40.1.1 – Peak Differential Output Voltage and Level Accuracy A Magnitude of point A 670 820 mV B Magnitude of point B 670 820 mV C Difference between the magnitudes of points A and B 0 1 % D Difference between the magnitude of point C and 0.5 times

the average of the magnitudes of points A and B 0 2 %

E Difference between the magnitude of point D and 0.5 times the average of the magnitudes of points A and B

0 2 %

40.1.2 – Maximum Output Droop A Ratio of the voltage at point G to the voltage at point F 73.1 100 % B Ratio of the voltage at point J to the voltage at point H 73.1 100 % 40.1.3 – Differential Output Templates A-D The waveforms around points A, B, C, and D, after

normalization, shall lie within time domain template 1.

E-F The waveforms around points F and H, after normalization, shall lie within time domain template 2.

40.1.4 – MDI Return Loss A The return loss of the MDI shall be at least 16 dB from 1 to

40 MHz and at least 10–20 log10(f /80 MHz ) dB from 40 to 100 MHz for all differential signals incident upon the MDI from an 85 or 115 Ω source.

40.1.5 – Transmitter Timing Jitter A The Test Mode 2 Jtxout value is informative B The Test Mode 3 Jtxout value is informative C The peak-to-peak jitter on the MASTER TX_TCLK

relative to an unjittered reference 0 1.4 ns

D The peak-to-peak jitter on the MASTER TX_TCLK when passed through a 5kHz high-pass filter

0 0.3 – (Max Test Mode 2 Jtxout)

ns

E The peak-to-peak jitter on the SLAVE TX_TCLK relative to a Link Partner’s MASTER TX_TCLK

0 1.4 ns

F The peak-to-peak jitter on the SLAVE TX_TCLK relative to a Link Partner’s MASTER TX_TCLK, when passed through a 32kHz high-pass-filter plus Max Test Mode 3 Jtxout

0 0.4 + (Link Partner 5k HPF

jitter) – (Max Test Mode 3 Jtxout)

ns

G The peak-to-peak jitter on the Link Partner’s MASTER TX_TCLK, when passed through a 5kHz high-pass-filter

0 0.3 ns

40.1.6 – Transmitter Distortion A The maximum peak transmitter distortion within 60% UI 0 10 mV B The percent of UI under 10mV distortion limit 60 100 % 40.1.7 – Transmit Clock Frequency A Frequency minus 125 MHz -12.5 +12.5 kHz 40.1.8 – Common-mode Output Voltage A Peak-to-peak Common-mode Output Voltage 0 50 mV



Table 3 – Summary of results

Test Parameter Min Max BI_DA BI_DB BI_DC BI_DD Units Figure 40.1.1 – Peak Differential Output Voltage and Level Accuracy

A Point A amplitude 670 820 710 662 707 706 mV B Point B amplitude 670 820 709 662 710 705 mV C Point A/B symmetry 0 1 0.141 0.000 0.424 0.142 % D Point C symmetry 0 2 1.127 0.578 0.565 0.567 % E Point D symmetry 0 2 0.845 0.578 1.130 0.567 %

40.1.2 – Maximum Output Droop A Droop from F to G 73.1 100 95.50 95.19 95.14 95.18 % B Droop from H to J 73.1 100 96.04 95.58 95.77 95.66 %

40.1.3 – Differential Output Templates A Point A waveform Pass Pass Pass Pass 1B Point B waveform Pass Pass Pass Pass 2C Point C waveform Pass Pass Pass Pass 3D Point D waveform Pass Pass Pass Pass 4E Point F waveform Pass Pass Pass Pass 5F Point H waveform Pass Pass Pass Pass 6

40.1.4 – MDI Return Loss A Return Loss margin 0 Inf 2.727 2.553 1.066 3.160 dB 7

40.1.5 – Transmitter Timing Jitter A Jtxout, Test Mode 2 Informative 0.163 0.145 0.160 0.174 ns 8B Jtxout, Test Mode 3 Informative 0.155 0.145 0.164 0.169 ns 9C Master unfilt. pk-pk 0 1.4 0.139 ns 10

D Master filt. pk-pk 0 0.3 - Jtxout

0.119 ns

Master filt. plus Jtxout 0 0.3 0.293 ns E Slave unfilt. pk-pk 0 1.4 0.409 ns 11, 12

F Slave filt. pk-pk 0 0.4 +

(part G) - Jtxout

0.123 ns

Slave filt. plus Jtxout 0 0.4 + (part G) 0.292 ns

G LP Master filt. pk-pk 0 0.3 0.294 ns

40.1.6 – Transmitter Distortion A Max Peak Distortion 0 10 6.7 9.0 8.5 7.4 mV 14, 15, 16B % of UI under 10mV 60 100 100.0 100.0 85.0 100.0 %

40.1.7 – Transmit Clock Frequency A Clock deviation -12.5 +12.5 0.414 kHz

40.1.8 – Common-mode Output Voltage A Common-mode p-p 0 50 43.257 45.266 44.692 52.862 mV



GROUP 2 – PMA Receive Tests Table 4 – Test Requirements and Summary of Results

Test # Parameter 40.2.1 – Bit Error Ratio Verification Requirements The receiver shall maintain a bit error rate better than 10-10 over test channels

representing 10% to 100% (10% increments) of the worst-case cable attenuation. This implies that no more than 7 out of 2,500,000 1518 byte packets may be received in error

Results Attenuation Level Errors, Low Rise Time Errors, High Rise Time

10% 0 0 20% 0 0 30% 0 0 40% 0 0 50% 0 0 60% 0 0 70% 0 0 80% 0 0 90% 0 0

100% 14 19




Annex A – Supplemental figures

Figure 1: Waveform around point A

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DA

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)B

I_D

B

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DC

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DD

Figure 1: Waveform around point A



Figure 2: Waveform around point B

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DA

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)B

I_D

B

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DC

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DD

Figure 2: Waveform around point B



Figure 3: Waveform around point C

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DA

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)B

I_D

B

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DC

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DD

Figure 3: Waveform around point C



Figure 4: Waveform around point D

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DA

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)B

I_D

B

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DC

0 10 20 30−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DD

Figure 4: Waveform around point D



Figure 5: Waveform around point F

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DA

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)B

I_D

B

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DC

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DD

Figure 5: Waveform around point F



Figure 6: Waveform around point H

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DA

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)B

I_D

B

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DC

0 10 20 30 40 50−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Time (ns)

BI_

DD

Figure 6: Waveform around point H



Figure 7: Return Loss vs. frequency

0 20 40 60 80 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

Frequency (MHz)

BI_

DA

0 20 40 60 80 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

Frequency (MHz)B

I_D

B

0 20 40 60 80 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

Frequency (MHz)

BI_

DC

0 20 40 60 80 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Frequency (MHz)

BI_

DD

Limit Z

S = 85Ω

ZS = 100Ω

ZS = 115Ω

Figure 7: Return loss vs. frequency



Figure 8: Test Mode 2 Jtxout

1.462 1.464 1.466 1.468 1.47 1.472 1.474

x 10−8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Ref Edge: rise

BI_

DA

PKPK 1.631e−010, Mean 1.469e−008

−2.732 −2.73 −2.728 −2.726 −2.724 −2.722

x 10−8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Ref Edge: riseB

I_D

B

PKPK 1.449e−010, Mean −2.727e−008

−5.25 −5.2 −5.15

x 10−9

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Ref Edge: rise

BI_

DC

PKPK 1.596e−010, Mean −5.189e−009

−3.12 −3.115 −3.11

x 10−8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Ref Edge: rise

BI_

DD

PKPK 1.736e−010, Mean −3.115e−008

Figure 8: JTXM Histogram



Figure 9: Test Mode 3 Jtxout

1.462 1.464 1.466 1.468 1.47 1.472 1.474

x 10−8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Ref Edge: rise

BI_

DA

PKPK 1.552e−010, Mean 1.469e−008

4.68 4.7 4.72 4.74 4.76 4.78

x 10−9

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Ref Edge: riseB

I_D

B

PKPK 1.446e−010, Mean 4.728e−009

−5.25 −5.2 −5.15

x 10−9

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Ref Edge: rise

BI_

DC

PKPK 1.641e−010, Mean −5.191e−009

−3.122 −3.12−3.118−3.116−3.114−3.112 −3.11

x 10−8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Ref Edge: rise

BI_

DD

PKPK 1.690e−010, Mean −3.115e−008

Figure 9: JTXS Histogram



Figure 10: Jitter Histogram, Master Timing Mode

−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

x 10−11

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Unfiltered Master TX_TCLK ref: extracted clock

Ref

. Edg

e: r

ise

PKPK 1.391e−010Mean −4.562e−015

−5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5

x 10−11

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Filtered Master TX_TCLK ref: extracted clock

Ref

. Edg

e: r

ise

PKPK 1.194e−010Mean −2.957e−016

Figure 10: Jitter Histogram, Master Timing Mode



Figure 11: Jitter Histogram, Slave Timing Mode

−2.904 −2.9035 −2.903 −2.9025 −2.902 −2.9015

x 10−7

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Unfiltered Slave TX_TCLK ref: Unfiltered Master TX_TCLK

Ref

. Edg

e: r

ise

PKPK 4.092e−010Mean −2.903e−007

−6 −4 −2 0 2 4

x 10−11

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Filtered Slave TX_TCLK ref: extracted clock

Ref

. Edg

e: r

ise

PKPK 1.232e−010Mean −9.530e−017





−1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

x 10−10

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Unfiltered Master TX_TCLK ref: extracted clock

Ref

. Edg

e: r

ise

PKPK 3.416e−010Mean −4.568e−015

−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

x 10−10

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Filtered Master TX_TCLK ref: extracted clock

Ref

. Edg

e: r

ise

PKPK 2.942e−010Mean 6.792e−016




Figure 13: PAM-5 Eye Diagram

Time (ps)

Diff

eren

tial V

olta

ge (

V)

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

−1

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Figure 13: 1000−T Eye Diagram



Figure 14: Peak Distortion vs. Phase Offset

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 13.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

Phase offset (UI)

BI_

DA

(m

V)

Max 6.71 at 0.82 UI, Min 4.44 at 0.52 UI

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 15

6

7

8

9

10

Phase offset (UI)B

I_D

B (

mV

)

Max 9.02 at 0.03 UI, Min 5.99 at 0.75 UI

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

9

9.5

Phase offset (UI)

BI_

DC

(m

V)

Max 8.52 at 0.35 UI, Min 6.35 at 0.97 UI

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 14

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

Phase offset (UI)

BI_

DD

(m

V)

Max 7.36 at 0.35 UI, Min 4.98 at 0.23 UI

Figure 14: Peak Distortion vs. Phase Offset



Figure 15: Distortion Waveform

500 1000 1500 2000−6

−4

−2

0

2

4

6

Unit Interval (UI)

BI_

DA

MaxPk: 6.71mV at 1813, MinPk: 4.44mV at 993

0.82 Ph. Off0.52 Ph. Off

500 1000 1500 2000

−5

0

5

10

Unit Interval (UI)B

I_D

B



500 1000 1500 2000−8

−6

−4

−2

0

2

4

6

8

Unit Interval (UI)

BI_

DC



500 1000 1500 2000

−6

−4

−2

0

2

4

6

8

Unit Interval (UI)

BI_

DD



Figure 15: Distortion waveform



Figure 16: PSD of Distortion Waveform

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

−70

−65

−60

−55

−50

−45

Frequency (MHz)

BI_

DA

PS

D (

dB/H

z)

0.82 Phase Offset0.52 Phase Offset

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

−70

−65

−60

−55

−50

−45

Frequency (MHz)B

I_D

B P

SD

(dB

/Hz)


0 10 20 30 40 50 60

−70

−65

−60

−55

−50

−45

−40

Frequency (MHz)

BI_

DC

PS

D (

dB/H

z)


0 10 20 30 40 50 60

−70

−65

−60

−55

−50

−45

Frequency (MHz)

BI_

DD

PS

D (

dB/H

z)


Figure 16: PSD of Distortion Waveform

Documents

Clause 40 PMA Conformance Test Suite v2.2 Report · 2014-04-16 · Physical Medium Attachment Test Suite v2.5 Report DUT: Company Com DUT GROUP 1 – PMA Electrical Specifications