CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 5 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS, [email protected], [email protected]

CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal

Presentation to the UTFABTuesday, March 1, 2005, 5 PM, Library

Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS, [email protected], 1-1325Andre’ Smith, Manager, CSS-OIS, [email protected],

1-1325

mailto:[email protected]




UTFAB - 2004-02-16

Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

2

Outline Background

Classrooms – status regarding technology Peer institutions

Current project Status Budget

Proposed project Scope – proposed rooms Budget projection

3-yr. plan Analysis – “fit” with UTFAB funding criteria Q&A

Background

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


4

CSU GA Classrooms Status 154 total GA (General Assignment)

classrooms at CSU All have Internet access 85 have technology (55% by May ‘05)

Still insufficient number to meet a growing demand

Need more mid to small-sized classrooms with computer projection systems

Many have old, dim projectors and older optics New computer projector technology can avoid

expensive lighting modifications

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


5

Comparison to Peers – GA Classrooms with

Technology CU Boulder has 160 GA classrooms –

about the same number as CSU About 100 (63%) have computer projectors About 30 of these (20%) have “all the bells

and whistles” AHEC in Denver has 100% of GA

classrooms equipped with technology

Status of Current Project for FY 05 (this year)

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


7

FY 05 Project Approved by UTFAB

1. Refresh technology in 5 smart classrooms where old technology exists

New projectors are brighter and sharper, and function with modern laptop computers

To avoid maintenance and repair problems Mixture of upgraded projectors, document

cameras, podiums, control systems, etc.

2. Build 11 new smart classrooms by adding computer projection systems

3. Total – $117K

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


8

Implementation Status New smart classrooms completed:

Wagar 231 and 232 Engineering D102, E204 and E205 Clark A07, Gifford 332 Scheduled for completion by May ‘05:

A/Z 112, Animal Science 110 and 112, and Forestry 107--All equipment on hand

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


9

Implementation Status (cont’d)

Refresh of technology completed in Eddy 113-117

Additional technology refresh completed in Aylesworth 111, Chemistry A101 and 103, Clark C248 and Education 7 from an UTFAB supplemental request

Eddy 7, Pathology 101, Glover 130 and Engineering 120 will be completed by June

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


10

QUESTIONS?

Proposed Project for FY 06

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


12

Classroom Prioritization Physical Development Plan (PDP) Process

Departments prioritize their PDP elements and forward to their Vice President (VP)

Each VP reviews department submissions, establishes their priorities and forwards to the University PDP Committee

The University PDP Committee reviews VP submissions, and establishes University priorities

Classroom elements are forwarded to the Classroom Review Board (CRB) for their recommendations and actions

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


13

Classroom Prioritization (cont’d)

The CRB prioritizes and allocates resources to projects Due to budget cuts, all CRB resources are

consumed by non-IT elements Chairs, lighting, carpeting, white boards, ADA, etc.

CRB recommendations integrated into the University physical I&IT prioritization process Building rewires, classrooms, and wireless nets UTFAB Chair on CRB. Agenda/Minutes on Web

www.ois.colostate.edu/CRB/index.html

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


14

Proposed New Smart Rooms - Technology

Upgrades

Classrooms Equip. Mat. Constr. Install. TotalMil. Science 200 $11,087 $350 $550 $1,551 $13,538Eddy 1 $11,087 $350 $550 $1,551 $13,538Micro A113 $7,590 $350 $550 $1,504 $9,994Clark C238 $7,590 $350 $550 $1,504 $9,994Gifford 146 $11,087 $350 $550 $1,551 $13,538Wagar 107B $7,590 $350 $550 $1,504 $9,994ClarkA102,A103,A104, A201,A202 $4,000 $2,250 $0 $2,625 $8,875

Subtotal (new) $60,031 $4,350 $3,300 $11,790 $79,471

Note: The Clark A rooms are “clicker” installs

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


15

Proposed Smart Classrooms for Technology

Refresh

Classrooms Equip. Mat. Constr. Install. TotalClark103,104,201, 202,204,205,207 $36,500 $0 $0 $1,155 $37,655

Subtotal (refresh) $36,500 $0 $0 $1,155 $37,655Total (new+refresh) $96,531 $4,350 $3,300 $12,945 $117,126

The technology refresh are new computer projectorsin Clark A wing that replace projectors from 1998-2001

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


16

FY 06 Technology Upgrades

Building Room CapacityMil. Science 200 60Eddy 1 49Microbiology A113 41Clark C238 42Gifford 146 44Clark A102-104,201,202 921Wagar 107B 25

Total 1182

New Rooms

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


17

FY 06 Technology Refresh

Building Room CapacityClark A103 174

" A104 208" A201 208" A202 123" A204 123" A205 123" A207 123

Total 1,082

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


18

Summary of Proposal for FY 06

6 rooms for new technology 7 rooms for technology refresh 1182 student seats total, a mix of

large and smaller classrooms The need continues to be great

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


19

Additional Proposal for FY 06 2 New Smart Classrooms 1 Large Classroom Upgrade 5 Classrooms to replace button

panels with touch screens Total = $39,964

Note: Original UTFAB Classroom Funding at ~ $175,000

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


20

Proposed New Smart Rooms - Technology

Upgrades

Classrooms Equip. Mat. Constr. Install. TotalMil. Science 201 $11,133 $350 $550 $1,551 $13,584Natural Res 108 $7,590 $350 $550 $1,504 $9,994

Subtotal (new) $18,723 $700 $1,100 $3,055 $23,578

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


21

Proposed Smart Classrooms for Technology

Refresh

Microbiology A101 $10,245 $350 $0 $1,551 $12,146Eddy 100 $754 $0 $0 $94 $848Clark C248 $754 $0 $0 $94 $848Eddy 7 $754 $0 $0 $94 $848Arts F103 $754 $0 $0 $94 $848Miltary Sc. 105 $754 $0 $0 $94 $848

Subtotal (refresh) $14,015 $0 $0 $1,155 $16,386Total (new+refresh) $32,738 $700 $1,100 $4,210 $39,964

Microbiology A101 would be a full replacement of thecomponents, and the other rooms are touch panels

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


22

University Cost Share Complete VTH $583,000 Physiology $135,000 Gen Svcs Bldg $109,000 Spruce Hall $51,000 Painter Center $51,000 Industrial Sc. $17,000

Total $946,000

Initial Ratings for Building Rewires

* Substantially completed.** Partially completed.

Ranked Size Ranked SizeNo. Order (ASF) No. Order (ASF)

1 NESB* 46,136 18 AIDL 6,0672 Ind. Sciences (X) 22,767 19 ARDEC 43,7233 Airport 1,196 20 CETT 9,4474 AERC 14,127 21 Green Hall** 20,275 5 Coop. Unit (IEP) 4,261 22 Hazardous Waste 2,4016 GSB (X) 48,381 23 Heating Plant 1,3117 Guggenheim **, *** 9,969 24 OFCHS 126,1918 Ind. Sci. Labs (Annex) 19,141 25 Painter (X) 14,3209 Physiology (X) 37,310 26 Facilities 25,936

10 NRRL 2,880 27 Alumni Center 2,52411 Spruce (X) 11,797 28 Mil Sci. Annex 5,55212 Engines Lab (EECL) 21,238 29 PERC 4,87413 Mil. Sci. 9,582 30 Prospect Plaza 40,00014 Repeat Facility 2,619 31 Tiley (Visitors Center) 4,08415 Solar House One 3,725 32 Weed Research 15,12516 University Greenhouses 29,081 33 Insectary 3,87917 Visual Arts 72,472

3-Year Plan

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


25

3-Year Plan or Process UTFAB consider continuing funding

technology in classrooms for 3 additional years, for both some new rooms and some technology refresh 27 New rooms (7 annually plus 6 in FY06) 31 rooms for technology refresh

(8 annually after 7 in FY06) 120 (78%) total smart rooms by Fall 2009

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


26

UTFAB Funding Criteria1. Benefit as many students as possible

Est. 3,600+ students will pass through these classrooms in any single semester. Clark rooms add approx. 15,000/semester

CSUIITE eventually will benefit all students, faculty and staff Current rewire proposal benefits campus: the network is bi-

directional

2. Ability to effectively utilize the fee - judgment3. Not funded by CFT - correct4. Adherence to budget and accountability – quotations for

classroom equipment5. Potential for direct student use - judgment6. Effort and thought reflected in the plan - judgment7. Justification and clarity of the project plan - judgment

UTFAB - 2004-02-16


27

Summary

Thank you for your support.

Discussion and questions are most welcome.

Documents

CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 5 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS, [email protected], [email protected]