24
Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

...the model that says ‘learn while you are at school the skills that you will apply during your lifetime’ is no longer tenable. These skills will be obsolete by the time you get into the workplace and need them, except for one skill – the skill of being able to learn. It is the skill of being able, not to give the right answer to questions about what you were taught in school, but to make the right response to situations that are outside the scope of what you were taught in school. We need to produce people who know how to act when they are faced with situations for which they were not specifically prepared.(Papert, 1998) What do we need students to learn?

Citation preview

Page 1: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Classroom aggregation technologies:

third generation pedagogy

Dylan WiliamInstitute of Education, University of London

Page 2: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London
Page 3: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

...the model that says ‘learn while you are at school the skills that you will apply during your lifetime’ is no longer tenable. These skills will be obsolete by the time you get into the workplace and need them, except for one skill – the skill of being able to learn. It is the skill of being able, not to give the right answer to questions about what you were taught in school, but to make the right response to situations that are outside the scope of what you were taught in school. We need to produce people who know how to act when they are faced with situations for which they were not specifically prepared. (Papert, 1998)

What do we need students to learn?

Page 4: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Preparation for future learning (PFL)

Cannot be taught in isolation from other learning

Students still need the basic skills of literacy, numeracy, concepts and facts

Learning power is developed primarily through pedagogy, not curriculum

We have to change the way teachers teach, not what they teach

Page 5: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Successful educationThe test of successful education is not the amount of knowledge that a pupil takes away from school, but his [sic] appetite to know and his capacity to learn. If the school sends out children with the desire for knowledge and some idea how to acquire it, it will have done its work. Too many leave school with the appetite killed and the mind loaded with undigested lumps of information. The good schoolmaster [sic] is known by the number of valuable subjects which he declines to teach.

(Sir Richard Livingstone, President of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, 1941)

Page 6: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Learning power environments

Key concept: Teachers do not create learning Learners create learning

Teaching as engineering learning environments

Key features: Create student engagement (pedagogies of

engagement) Well-regulated (pedagogies of contingency)

Page 7: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Why pedagogies of engagement?

Intelligence is partly inherited So what?

Intelligence is partly environmental Environment creates intelligence Intelligence creates environment

Learning environments High cognitive demand Inclusive Obligatory

Page 8: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Motivation: cause or effect?

competence

challenge

Flow

apathyboredom

relaxation

arousalanxiety

worry control

high

low

low high

(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990)

Page 9: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Why pedagogies of contingency?

For evaluating institutionsFor describing individualsFor supporting learning

Monitoring learningWhether learning is taking place

Diagnosing (informing) learningWhat is not being learnt

Forming learningWhat to do about it

Page 10: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Effects of formative assessment

Several major reviews of the research Natriello (1987) Crooks (1988) Kluger & DeNisi (1996) Black & Wiliam (1998) Nyquist (2003)

All find consistent, substantial effects

Page 11: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Cost/effect comparisonsIntervention Extra

learningCost/yr/

classroom

Class-size reduction (by 30%) 20% £20k

Increase teacher content knowledge by 1 sd

5% ?

Formative assessment/Assessment for learning

75% £2k

Page 12: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Three generations of pedagogy

First generation Traditional pedagogy

Second generation All student response systems

Third generation Automated aggregation technologies

Page 13: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Five-process architecture

Task selectionTask presentationEvidence elicitationEvidence identificationEvidence accumulation

After Almond, Steinberg and Mislevy (2002)

Page 14: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Evidence elicitation

Single student response systemsAll-student response systems

Flash-cards/dry erase boards Classroom ‘clickers’ Traditional keyboards (wired/wireless) Anoto pens

Page 15: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Anoto pen

Wireless penSpecial coated paperPen ‘knows where it is’

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 16: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Palm with wireless keyboard

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Text-based inputLimited task-presentation

capabilityPortable

Page 17: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Classroom ‘clickers’

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 18: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Wilson & Draney, 2004

Questioning in science: diagnosis

The ball sitting on the table is not moving. It is not moving because:

A. no forces are pushing or pulling on the ball. B. gravity is pulling down, but the table is in the way.C. the table pushes up with the same force that gravity pulls downD. gravity is holding it onto the table. E. there is a force inside the ball keeping it from rolling off the table

Page 19: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Questioning in math: diagnosis

In which of these right triangles is a2 + b2 = c2 ?

A a

c

b

C b

c

a

E c

b

a

B a

b

c

D b

a

c

F c

a

b

Page 20: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Discourse®

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

www.ets.org/discourse

Page 21: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Evidence capture

Automated essay scoring (e-rater)Paraphrase analysers (c-rater)Graphical analysers (m-rater)

Page 22: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

All-student response systems

unstructuredstructured

evidence structure

teacher-mediated

automatedclickers

aggr

egat

ion

ABCDcards

dry-eraseboards

c-rater

Discourse®

latent semantic analysis

Page 23: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Evidence accumulation

Unidimensional student modelsBayesian inference networks

Proficiency model Task model Evidence model Student model

Page 24: Classroom aggregation technologies: third generation pedagogy Dylan Wiliam Institute of Education, University of London

Evidence utilization

Whole-classSub-groups

Homogenous Heterogenous

Individualization