2
Sergei Eisenstein, “A Dialectical Approach to Film Form” 1. How is good art “dynamic” (47)? Is a good joke dynamic in the same way? 2. After putting forward the idea that “the quantity of the interval determines the pressure of the tension” (47), Eisenstein adds the proviso, “There can be cases where the distance of separation is so wide that it leads to a break.” What does this mean? Does it apply to jokes, as well? 3. What is wrong with the idea that shots are the building blocks of sequences (49)? (This is the same as the distinction Eisenstein makes, on p. 53, between an “element” of montage and a “montage cell,” by the way.) 4. On page 50, Eisenstein describes a process remarkably like Noël Carroll’s explanation of the sight gag: “The incongruence in contour of the first picture—already impressed on the mind—with the subsequently perceived second picture engenders, in conflict….” Why does Eisenstein consider this effect artistic rather than comic? 5. What constitutes irregularity in a work of art (51) and why is that so important? 6. What is the difference between dynamic montage and “lifeless” or “hollow” literary symbolism (58)? 7. What is the difference between tension calculated for psychological effect and tension calculated to produce new ideas (61)? Can humor be associated with one or the other? Sergei Eisenstein, “A Few Thoughts about Soviet Comedy” 8. What is the purpose of good socialist comedy? 9. Why does the ending of Chaplin’s The Pilgrim supposedly evoke good Bolshevik laughter? How does this relate to Eisenstein’s idea of dialectical montage? Siegfried Kracauer, excerpts from Theory of Film 10. What is physical reality, according to Kracauer, and what does it mean to “redeem” it? 11. Why should a film artist be concerned with redeeming physical reality? 12. Mr. Hulot’s Holiday is not necessarily more engaging or funnier than the typical Hollywood comedy, but it is definitely more cinematic, Kracauer maintains. Why is it more cinematic?

Classical Theories

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

from Sergei Eisenstein, “A Dialectical Approach to Film Form”

Citation preview

  • SergeiEisenstein,ADialecticalApproachtoFilmForm

    1. Howisgoodartdynamic(47)?Isagoodjokedynamicinthesameway?

    2. Afterputtingforwardtheideathatthequantityoftheintervaldeterminesthepressureofthetension(47),Eisensteinaddstheproviso,Therecanbecaseswherethedistanceofseparationissowidethatitleadstoabreak.Whatdoesthismean?Doesitapplytojokes,aswell?

    3. Whatiswrongwiththeideathatshotsarethebuildingblocksofsequences

    (49)?(ThisisthesameasthedistinctionEisensteinmakes,onp.53,betweenanelementofmontageandamontagecell,bytheway.)

    4. Onpage50,EisensteindescribesaprocessremarkablylikeNolCarrolls

    explanationofthesightgag:Theincongruenceincontourofthefirstpicturealreadyimpressedonthemindwiththesubsequentlyperceivedsecondpictureengenders,inconflict.WhydoesEisensteinconsiderthiseffectartisticratherthancomic?

    5. Whatconstitutesirregularityinaworkofart(51)andwhyisthatso

    important?

    6. Whatisthedifferencebetweendynamicmontageandlifelessorhollowliterarysymbolism(58)?

    7. Whatisthedifferencebetweentensioncalculatedforpsychologicaleffect

    andtensioncalculatedtoproducenewideas(61)?Canhumorbeassociatedwithoneortheother?

    SergeiEisenstein,AFewThoughtsaboutSovietComedy

    8. Whatisthepurposeofgoodsocialistcomedy?

    9. WhydoestheendingofChaplinsThePilgrimsupposedlyevokegood

    Bolsheviklaughter?HowdoesthisrelatetoEisensteinsideaofdialecticalmontage?

    SiegfriedKracauer,excerptsfromTheoryofFilm

    10. Whatisphysicalreality,accordingtoKracauer,andwhatdoesitmeanto

    redeemit?

    11. Whyshouldafilmartistbeconcernedwithredeemingphysicalreality?

    12. Mr.HulotsHolidayisnotnecessarilymoreengagingorfunnierthanthetypicalHollywoodcomedy,butitisdefinitelymorecinematic,Kracauermaintains.Whyisitmorecinematic?

  • 13. Accidentsaretheverysoulofslapstick,Kracauermaintains(62).Explain.

    14. InwhatwaydoesGrouchoMarxswisecrackingdialogredeemphysicalreality?

    15. Somefunnythingsthatarenotparticularcinematic,Kracauersuggests,

    whileotherfunnythingsare.Howcanyoutellwhichiswhich?

    NolBurch,StructuresofAggression

    16. Why(orwhen)issurpriseinamovieaggressive?

    17. Insimpleformalterms,howisshockoraggressioncreatedinamovie?

    18. HowisthissamestructureofaggressionreflectedintheSherlockJr.gag?InTexAveryssyncopatedrhythms?

    19. Howcancomedyredeemtaboobehaviors,liketakingascissorstosomebodystie,fakinganorgasminarestaurant,oreventhreateningtoblowuptheworldwithnuclearbombs?

    AndrBazin,Mr.HulotandTime

    20. WhatswrongwiththePrevertscomedies,accordingtoBazin?Bycontrast,whatmustberightaboutTatis?

    21. DoesBazinthinkPlaytimeisfunnybecause(a)itshowsfunnythings,(b)it

    showsordinarythingsinafunnyway,or(c)somecombination?HowisthisexemplifiedinTatisuseofsound?

    22. HowwouldMr.Hulotbelessfunnyordifferentlyfunnyifhisstoryweretold

    withlotsofcloseupsandediting?

    AndrBazin,CharlieChaplin

    23. Theactivityofasocialbeing,suchasyouorI,Bazinwrites,isplannedwithforesightandasitdevelops,itsdirectionischeckedbyconstantreferencetotherealitythatitisconcernedtoshape(151).ThekeytoChaplinscomedy,Bazinsuggests,isthathisLittleTrampdoesnotbehavethisway.Whatissofunnyaboutthat?(Youllhavetoreadthewholeessay.Theanswerisnotinanyoneparagraph,Imafraid.)

    24. Howisthemediumofcinemaanaidtothiskindofhumor?