Upload
joseph-incandela
View
91
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Just Cause Competent Authority Comparative Justice Right Intention Last Resort Probability of Success Proportionality
Discrimination Proportionality
According to Just War Thinking:Good consequences cannot make an otherwise bad (i.e., indiscriminate) act good; but ...
Bad consequences can make an otherwise good (i.e., discriminate) act bad.
vtvt
What’s your reaction to Major Kilner’s statement from the video: “You can’t say that you believe in human dignity or human rights if you’re not willing to defend them”? Work into your response your understanding of what the Church means in The Challenge of Peace about the ‘already, but not yet’ dimension of the Kingdom of God.
review the two main categories of just war norms and how they originated,
examine what the Church sees as the relationship between the tradition of justified violence and the tradition of Christian pacifism, and
evaluate the application of these norms to specific contemporary conflicts.
I. The Just War CriteriaA. Pacifism vs. Just War Thought
1. “Already, but not yet” (§ 58)2. Pacifism | Just War (2 traditions, §§ 62, 73)
How are they related? (§§ 73-74, 120-121)
B. Two Sets of Criteria
II. Some cases applying these criteria.
Jus ad bellumJus ad bellum
Jus in belloJus in bello