12
ESC HF Guidelines 2012 University Medical Center Groningen HFrEF and CKD: what do the guidelines say? Prof. Adriaan Voors, Cardiologist University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands

CKD and CHF

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CHF with reduced EF and CKD guidelines

Citation preview

Page 1: CKD and CHF

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

HFrEF and CKD: what do the guidelines say?

Prof. Adriaan Voors, CardiologistUniversity Medical Center Groningen

The Netherlands

Page 2: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

Page 3: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

Disclosures• AAV received consultancy fees and/or research grants

from: Alere, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardio3Biosciences, Celladon, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Servier, Torrent, Trevena, Vifor.

• AAV was a member of the ESC 2012 Guidelines Committee

• AAV is supported by a grant from the European Commission: FP7-242209-BIOSTAT-CHF

• AAV is Clinical Established Investigator and supported by other grants of the Dutch Heart Foundation

Page 4: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

ESC 2012 HF Guidelines: General Statements

• The GFR is reduced in most patients with HF, especially if advanced, and renal function is a powerful independent predictor of prognosis in HF.

• Consider Causes:• Renal artery stenosis• Sodium and water depletion and hypotension• Volume overload, right heart failure, and renal venous congestion• Prostatic obstruction• Other drugs (e.g. NSAID, trimethoprim, gentamicin)• Use of RAAS-blockers• Use of thiazide and/or loop diuretics

McMurray et al. ESC-HF Guidelines; EJHF 2012

Page 5: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

• Contraindicated in known bilateral renal artery stenosis• Caution when significant renal dysfunction (creatinine

>221 μmol/L [>2.5 mg/dL] or eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)• In case of Worsening Renal Function:

• Creatinine ↑ ≤ 50% or 266 μmol/L (3 mg/dL)/eGFR <25 mL/min/1.73 m2, is acceptable

• Consider stopping nephrotoxic drugs or triamterene/amiloride and, if no signs of congestion, reducing the dose of diuretic

• Greater rises in creatinine: ½ dose RAAS-blockers• If creatinine ↑ by >100% or to >310 μmol/L (3.5 mg/dL)/eGFR

<20 mL/min/1.73 m2, stop RAAS-blocker

RAAS-blockers and CKD (appendix C and E)

McMurray et al. ESC-HF Guidelines; EJHF 2012

Page 6: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

• Significant renal dysfunction (creatinine >221 μmol/L [>2.5 mg/dL] or eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)–may be made worse by diuretic or patient may not respond to diuretic (especially thiazide diuretic)

• Worsening Renal function; • Hypovolaemia/dehydration? • Nephrotoxic agents, e.g. NSAIDs, trimethoprim? • Withhold MRA and/or thiazide? • Reduce dose of ACE inhibitor/ARB? • Haemofiltration/dialysis?

Loop diuretics and CKD (appendix F)

McMurray et al. ESC-HF Guidelines; EJHF 2012

Page 7: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

• Insufficient diuretic response/diuretic resistance: • Check compliance and fluid intake• Increase dose of diuretic• Consider switching from furosemide to bumetanide or

torasemide• Add MRA/increase dose of MRA • Combine loop diuretic and thiazide/metolazone• Consider short-term i.v. infusion of loop diuretic; • Consider ultrafiltration

Loop diuretics and CKD (appendix F)

McMurray et al. ESC-HF Guidelines; EJHF 2012

Page 8: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

WRF WHF Mortality re-Hosp0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Q1: GoodQ2Q3Q4Q5: Poor

Diuretic Response in AHFPROTECT: 2033 AHF patients;

Diuretic Response = kg weight loss/40 mg furosemide

*

*

**

*p<0.001

Valente et al. EHJ 2014

%

Page 9: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

ESC HF Guidelines 2012

McMurray et al. ESC-HF Guidelines; EJHF 2012

Page 10: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

CARESS-HF: primary endpoint

Bart et al. NEJM 2012

96 hours after randomization

N=188 ADHF pts with WRF

Page 11: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

ROSE-AHF: low dose dopamine in AHF

72 hour Urine volume

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,000

10,000

placebo

Urin

ary

Out

put (

L)

P=0.59

dopamine

Change in Cystatin C

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

placebo

dopamine

P=0.72

Mg/

dL

N=360 AHF patients with eGFR 15-60 ml/min

Chen et al. JAMA 2013

Page 12: CKD and CHF

Nov

artis

Sat

ellit

e E

SC

Bar

celo

na 2

014

University Medical Center Groningen

ES

C H

F G

uide

lines

201

2

University Medical Center Groningen

• CKD and WRF often occur in HF• Always consider cause of WRF• RAAS-inhibitors: mild increase in creatinine allowed;

excessive increase: stop RAAS-blocker• Loop diuretic; less response in CKD• WRF: reduce stop loop diuretic, NSAIDs, trimethoprim,

MRA, thiazide, ACEi/ARB• Diuretic resistance: poor outcome• Ultrafiltration: as yet not proven to be effective• No benefit of low dose dopamine

Conclusions