Upload
lamkiet
View
237
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CITY WIDE INFORMAL SETTLEMENT
PUTTING ACCRA METROPOLITAN ASSEMBLY’S (AMA) INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS ON
THE MAP
LAND, SERVICES AND CITIZENSHIP (LSC) PROJECT II
SEPTEMBER, 2016
(KNOW)
YOUR CITY
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Urbanization comes with it some challenges including poverty, inequality, exclusion and
environmental degradation, resulting in rapid expansion of settlements due to increased
agglomeration and migration. Some of these challenges can be addressed by interventions such as
improved governance, strengthened planning and management, adoption of innovative technology
and sustainable interventions. The complexities of the challenge require effective targeting of the
poorest of the urban population. Informal urban dwellers, often located at the “waste” areas of the
urban space, engaged in menial jobs and surviving on unpredictable incomes from the informal sector
becomes a veritable target.
The Land, Services and Citizenship (LSC) II is a buildup on LSC I which was implemented between
2011- 2013 in four Municipalities (Ashaiman, Tema, Ledzokuku-Krowor, and Adentan). LSC I
increased public knowledge and provided information on characteristics of selected slums in the four
municipalities. It also contributed to the development of the advocacy and negotiation capacity of
community leaders, representatives of urban poor communities, as well as assembly members and
selected municipal officials. It created the unique platform for the Ghana Federation of the Urban
Poor (GHAFUP) and People’s Dialogue (PD) to effectively engage with local government and to
leverage technical expertise and other resources.
LSC II (2015-2016) covers seven MMAs including AMA. The main objective of LSC II include the
development of citywide settlement profiles and maps within the GAMA enclave. This primarily
involved profiling markets and informal economic activities. The project also seeks to strengthen the
collaboration and partnership with ILGS, KNUST, MLGRD and GIZ to influence the activation of
advocacy forums and city level dialogues. All sub metros in AMA were profiled and mapped,
advocacy and capacity building activities were also done.
This report is a summary of the highlights and findings from the detailed reports of the individual
sub-metros. It provides a snap-shot of the key activities, outcomes and findings of the LSC II
programme in AMA.
Two hundred and sixty-five (265) slums were identified with varied stages of development and
characteristics. Slums were characterised according to their socio origins and stages of slum
development.
ii
SOME KEY FINDINGS
The following were some key findings from the
survey:
Most of the slums in the sub-metros can be
classified as early to maturing stages as can be
seen in Table 1 below. This means a proactive
dialogue and resettlement with slum dwellers
can help find them suitable alternative shelter.
Land tenure security is a major challenge for
many of the slum settlements.
Level of vulnerability to fire, cholera/health,
flood and threats of eviction in many of these
slums is high. Refer to Annex 1 for a matrix
ranking of the levels of flood vulnerability in
the slums.
Governance systems and dialogues were found
to be weak as the participation channels meant
to facilitate the involvement of urban poor
groups and slum dwellers in mainstream
community planning and development is
ineffective.
APPROACH/METHODOLOGY USED
The slums were defined and catalogued
based on the number of essential
services including WASH, health,
housing and educational facilities.
Settlement profiling was conducted
through repeated consultations and
discussions with residents. This was
undertaken by a carefully chosen
survey and mapping team primarily
drawn from federation membership.
The profiling was followed by mapping
to know the spatial and physical
locations of services and how they meet
the needs of the people.
Validation of the profiles and maps by
community leaders and key informants
to confirm the results of the workshops.
iii
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... i
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ v
Lists of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ vi
List of plates ................................................................................................................................................ vii
Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................... viii
1.0 Introduction and Background..................................................................................................................1
2.0 Demography and Profile of AMA ..........................................................................................................1
3.0 Methodology Used ..................................................................................................................................1
4.0 Highlights of Findings ............................................................................................................................3
4.1 Nature of Informal Settlements .......................................................................................................3
Table 1: Informal Settlements in the City .................................................................................................3
Figure 1: Number of Slums in Each Sub-Metropolitan Assembly .......................................................4
Table 2: Slums Typology and Stages of Growth .....................................................................................5
4.2 Land Tenure and Security of tenure ................................................................................................7
Figure 2: Slums under threat of eviction in AMA ...............................................................................7
Table 3: Names of Slums Facing Threats of Eviction ..............................................................................8
4.3 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Infrastructure .................................................................8
Figure 3: Public Water Facilities in Slum Communities in AMA ........................................................9
Table 4: Water and Indicators Measured in the Sub-Metros ................................................................. 10
Table 5: Sanitation Facilities ................................................................................................................. 11
Figure 4: Public Sanitation Facilities in Slums Communities in AMA ............................................. 13
Table 6: Sub-Metro Health Indicators ................................................................................................... 14
Figure 5: AMA slums flood risk assessment map ............................................................................. 15
Health/ Cholera .......................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 6: Incidence of Open Defecation in the slums of AMA ......................................................... 17
4.4 Local Economic Development (LED) ......................................................................................... 17
4.5 Local Governance ........................................................................................................................ 18
4.6 Other Services in the communities .............................................................................................. 19
Table 7: Solid Waste Management Indicators from Sub-metros ........................................................... 19
Table 8: Energy/Electricity Supply and coverage in the Slums ............................................................. 20
Table 9: Educational Facilities and Enrolment in Slums ....................................................................... 20
iv
5.0 Development Priorities ........................................................................................................................ 22
Table 10: Development Prioritization of Sub-Metropolitan Areas in AMA ......................................... 22
ANNEX 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 24
DEGREE OF VULNERABILITY AND RISKS TO FLOODS ................................................................ 24
v
List of Tables Table 1: Informal Settlements in the City .....................................................................................................3
Table 2: Slums Typology and Stages of Growth .........................................................................................5
Table 3: Names of Slums Facing Threats of Eviction ..................................................................................8
Table 4: Water and Indicators Measured in the Sub-Metros ..................................................................... 10
Table 5: Sanitation Facilities ..................................................................................................................... 11
Table 6: Sub-Metro Health Indicators ....................................................................................................... 14
Table 7: Solid Waste Management Indicators from Sub-metros ............................................................... 19
Table 8: Energy/Electricity Supply and coverage in the Slums ................................................................. 20
Table 9: Educational Facilities and Enrolment in Slums ........................................................................... 20
Table 10: Development Prioritization of Sub-Metropolitan Areas in AMA ............................................. 22
vi
Lists of Figures
Figure 1: Number of Slums in Each Sub-Metropolitan Assembly .......................................................4
Figure 2: Slums under threat of eviction in AMA ...............................................................................7
Figure 3: Public Water Facilities in Slum Communities in AMA ........................................................9
Figure 4: Public Sanitation Facilities in Slums Communities in AMA ............................................. 13
Figure 5: AMA slums flood risk assessment map ............................................................................. 15
Figure 6: Incidence of Open Defecation in the slums of AMA ......................................................... 17
Figure 7: Local Government Structure .............................................................................................. 18
vii
List of plates
Plate 1: Fire outbreak and demolition in slum communities………………………………………..........16
viii
Abbreviations and Acronyms
AMA Accra Metropolitan Assembly
CBD Central Business District
FDG Focus Group Discussion
GAMA Greater Accra Metropolitan Area
GHAFUP Ghana Federation of the Urban Poor
GIZ Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (German Development Agency)
GWCL Ghana Water Company Limited
HH Household
ILGS Institute of Local Government Studies
KNUST Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
LED Local Economic Development
LSC Land Services and Citizenship
MLGRD Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development
MMAs Metropolitan Municipal Assemblies
NBSSI National Board for Small-Scale Industries
PD People’s Dialogue on Human Settlements
SMEs Small and Medium Scale Enterprises
WASH Water Sanitation and Hygiene
1
1.0 Introduction and Background
This is a synthesized report of ten (10) sub-metros on profiling and mapping under Accra Metropolitan
Assembly (AMA). The sub-metros are, Ayawaso East, Ayawaso Central, Ablekuma South, Ablekuma
Central, Ashiedu- Keteke, Okai-koi South, Ablekuma North, Ayawaso West, Okai-koi North and Osu-
Klottey. All these sub- metros in the metropolis have slums settlements within them. Statistics from the
Ghana 2010 Population and Housing Census indicate an increase in urban population from 43.8% in
2000 to 50.9% in 2010.The greatest urban concentration occurs in the Greater Accra Region which has an
estimated population of five (5m) million1. The Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA)2 alone
accounts for more than 3.6 million people. The ever-increasing growth of GAMA and the unpreparedness
of city authorities to face this phenomenon has meant that today a majority of urban residents are forced
to live on undesirable lands in areas that lack secure tenure and access to basic infrastructure and
services. City authorities are battling to provide adequate and potable water, improved toilets and liquid
and solid waste management facilities to the populace. Over the years, the GAMA region has
experienced regular cholera outbreaks because of lack of these facilities. The 2014 cholera outbreak
recorded several deaths and significant morbidity cases, but most casualties occurred in poor urban
neighborhoods and slums such as Chorkor Old Fadama and James Town. These combined factors
contributed to the selection of GAMA as the focus area for the Land, Services and Citizenship (LSC)
programme in Ghana.
2.0 Demography and Profile of AMA
Accra is Ghana’s political and administrative capital and the largest city in the country. The Accra
metropolis has a total land size of 200 square kilometers. In 2000, the total population was estimated at
1,658,937 with an annual growth rate of about 3.4%. The urban population of Accra in 2010 was
estimated at 2,035,064 with a growth rate of 2.2%. (World Bank 2015: Rising through Cities in Ghana).
The city of Accra has sprawled to an extent that it overlaps into both the Central (Kasoa) and Eastern
Regions (Nsawam, Berekuso and Aburi). The increase in population is attributed to rapid rural-urban
migration with about 60% of the population in Accra living in informal settlements or slums (Van
Rooijen et.al., 2008).
3.0 Methodology Used
Generally, participatory rapid appraisal (PRA) tools were used for the field work and to collect data as
well. Core members of the field team were drawn from the federation who gained experience from LSC
I. The specific methods used were:
Slum definition and targeting: This was used to gather information on slums and socio-
economic infrastructure available and in use in each of the slums. The slums available in each
settlement is of prime concern to federation members during the data gathering stage.
Settlement Profiling: Profiling enabled the field team to enumerate their settlements to gather
invaluable planning data and catalyze community action and partnership. Settlement profiling
1 This figure is from the 2010 PHC from the GSS. 2 GAMA comprise eleven (11) of the sixteen (16) MMAs in Greater Accra mainly occupying the inner circus of the
region.
2
provided slum dwellers and city planners/decision makers with a city-wide understanding of the
status of slums in their areas. This created the platform for the community to be seen and
recognized by the local authority and other key stakeholders.
Mapping: This was led by the federation of the urban poor. Transect walk was used and
community members sketched the locations of slums and the spatial location of services in
relation to the population. The transect walk took the form of the following:
1. Local Team Selection
This involved identifying the groups of people to talk about their perceptions of their community
and its resources.
2. Provision of introductions and explanations
Working with each group, the federation leadership and the team began by introducing
themselves and explaining carefully and clearly the objectives of the walk and discussion. The
walk was to draw the social map of the community where important land marks and interesting
water and sanitation points within the community are located.
3. Transect diagram
The route to be taken were discussed. This decision was based on the community resource map.
As the walk progressed, stops were made at key features or borders of a new zone (such as
residential, topographic, land usage) and the distance from the last zone was recorded. After the
transect walk finished, the team sat down to discuss and record the information and data
collected. An illustrative diagram of the transect walk using the information was drawn.
4. Analysis of Transect Diagram
Key questions included the following:
What resources are abundant or scarce?
How do these resources change through the area?
Which resources have the most problems?
Where do people obtain water and access sanitation?
What constraints or problems are in the different areas?
What possibilities or opportunities are in the different areas?
How will a proposed policy change or implementation affect the features and characteristics
of different areas?
3
4.0 Highlights of Findings
The following section analyses the key findings in the slums during the field mapping and profiling.
This captures the highlights with the details captured in the detailed report.
4.1 Nature of Informal Settlements
Informal settlements in AMA vary in size, nature, sophistication as well as deprivation. Table 1 below
gives a picture of the stage of each slum identified in the various sub-metros. The map below shows the
locations of the sub metros in the metropolis and their boundaries.
Table 1: Informal Settlements in the City
Sub-Metro No. of
Informal
settlements
Stage of informal settlement
Developing/
Infant
Growing/
Consolidating
Matured
Ablekuma South 28 18 4 6
Ablekuma North 22 8 6 8
Ablekuma Central 23 10 7 6
Ayawaso Central 24 11 7 6
Ayawaso East 26 10 9 7
Ayawaso West 17 10 3 4
Ashiedu Keteke 40 15 14 11
Okai-Koi North 33 17 8 8
Okai-Koi South 23 7 9 7
Osu- Klottey 29 10 6 13
Totals 265 116 73 76
Summary of
prescription
Relocate, Redesign, Upgrade
Negotiate
Upgrade
4
Figure 1: Number of Slums in Each Sub-Metropolitan Assembly
The Table below summarizes how, when and why the various slums came into being and got developed.
The history and reasoning for the existence of the slums were extracted from key informant interviews.
The detailed report gives the reasons behind the start and growth of each slum but this report captures
them under the sub-metros.
5
Table 2: Slums Typology and Stages of Growth
Sub-Metro Total
No. of
slums
Year of
Dev’t
Reason for Development Stage of slum Typology
of slum
Ayawaso
Central
24 1990s The slums developed as relatives of
the initial settlers came to occupy
available spaces within the settlement
without any proper documentations
and permits. Others also developed
and extended their structures and
rented them out to migrants.
Matured Cosmopolitan
Okai Koi
South
23 1989 and
1990s
Slums started developing after
migrants had encroached on available
state lands in the 90s. These state
lands were ceded to the Ghana Water
Company Limited (GWCL) and
Ghana Telecom for development and
expansion. Some of these slums
include; Kaneshie Golf Slum, P&T
Cable and Wireless, Central Slum.
Some other slums within this sub
metro developed from indigenous
settlements and later got expanded by
relatives. Some of these slums
include; Red Light Slum,
Maamomoemi settlement, Atimornor
slum, Gonten Zongo and Datus Slum.
Matured Cosmopolitan
Ablekuma
Central
23 1990s, The slums started developing in the
early 90s because of economic
reasons, for instance, Maame Nsimaa
Slum was started by one woman
called Maame Nsimaa. She put up
structures to accommodate traders
from outside Accra, which led to
others also developed shacks around
the area to live in. Province Slum is
the only slum that has been existing
since the 60s just after the overthrow
of the first president of Ghana.
Matured Cosmopolitan
Ashiedu
Keteke
40 1960s Slums within the sub-metro are
indigenous. They were started by
community members and relatives as
they grew in numbers. There was
therefore, the need to expand their
existing family structures. In the
Matured Indigenous
6
process of the expansion, some
shacks were developed and buildings
were poorly arranged. Zongo lane is
noted as a slum with both indigenous
and migrants slum characteristics.
Okai Koi
North
33 1980s Slums in the Okaikoi North were
started mostly by migrants, and
merchants who came to trade.
Notable amongst them are Antie
Korkor, Kopevi and Old Achimota.
Matured Migrant
Ayawaso
East
26 1970s and
1990s
Slums in Ayawaso East such as Nima
Gorilla, Alafia and Maamobi started
developing in the 70s due to its
proximity to the Central Business
District (CBD).
Matured and
Consolidating
(eg. Kanda
Car Wash,
Nima Two
Two Lane)
Migrant
and
Transient
Ablekuma
North
22 1950s Slum communities within Odorkor,
Odorkor Otaten, Sakaman, and
Kwashieman have been in existence
since 1950s.Darkuman west,
Darkuman east and Awoshie have
been in existence for over 50 years.
These slums can be classified as
matured and will therefore require
upgrading.
Matured Cosmopolitan
Ablekuma
South
28 1970s and
1980s
Slum communities within Mamprobi,
Mamponse and Chorkor have been in
existence since the 80s despite the
existence of the original settlements
in the 1830s. Slum communities
within Gbebu and Opetekwei have
been in existence for over 40 years
whereas Shaibu was just established
in the early years of the 1970s.
Hence, the slums can be classified as
matured.
Matured Cosmopolitan
Ayawaso
West
17 1980s Slums including Okponglo,
Okponglo Up Community, Shiashie
Junction and Bawaleshie are
indigenous slums which have existed
for over 30 years.
Matured
Indigenous
Osu-Klottey 29 1980s Indigenous settlements developed the
slums after the numbers of people
within the communities have
increased. Many of these settlers felt
no need to relocate and therefore,
Matured Indigenous
7
developed unplanned structures in
order to remain in the community.
4.2 Land Tenure and Security of tenure
Land is a critical resource for the survival of human beings. It is important for social, economic and
cultural development of any community. It is inelastic in nature, hence the need to identify its right use for
all competing users. Who owns land, how is the ownership vested and divided, and what title do people
have on lands in the various sub-metropolis? Security of tenure is the greatest concern of settlers who are
constantly facing threats of eviction. As can be seen in the map below, many of the slums in Ablekuma
South, Ashiedu Keteke and Osu-Klottey face threats of eviction. Ayawaso Central and East sub-metros
have few scattered slums with eviction threats.
Figure 2: Slums under threat of eviction in AMA
SLUM COMMUNITIES
FACING THREATS OF
EVICTION IN AMA
Ashiedu Keteke = 17
Ablekuma North = 1
Ablekuma South = 13
Ayawaso West = 5
Ayawaso East = 1
Ayawaso Central =2
Osu/Korley Klottey =3
Okai Koi South = 1
Security of tenure is the greatest
concern of settlers who are
constantly facing threats of
eviction. In many parts of Accra
urban poor households are faced
with threats of eviction from city
Authorities.
This affects livelihoods of the
urban poor and limits their social
and economigc survival
8
Table 3: Names of Slums Facing Threats of Eviction
AYAWASO
EAST
OKAI
KOI
SOUTH
AYAW
ASO
CENTR
AL
OSU/KO
RLEY
KLOTT
EY
AYAWAS
O WEST
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH
ABLEK
UMA
NORTH
ASHIEDU
KETEKE
Nima police
station
Kaneshie
Golf
Raaco
down
Arch
Center
Aviation
railway
Ebenezer
down
Otatain Gbese
Ayigbe
Town
Amantra Last chance Tuesday
market slum 1
Tafo
Asylum
down
Opeibia Tuesday
market slum 2
Sempe
The Saint 1 Sampe Asere
The Saint 2 Saving arm Bukom
Oly dade Gmaanaa
Gbegbeyire Brazil Lane
Akate Mang Abola
Glefe Nshosaa
MPS slum Salaga
Market
Slum
Akoto ADB Slum
Mullah Timber
market
down slum
Korle bu
quarters
Cow lane
Old fadama
Galloway
Palladium
Agbogblosh
ie
4.3 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Infrastructure
The sprawling nature of the growth of the city coupled with the rapid rate of urbanization has put incessant
pressure on basic social amenities including water supply. Poor WASH facilities is a sign of a failing city. In
many of the sub-metros, inadequate WASH has impacted on the health and livelihoods of the urban poor.
Even though, there has been improvements since the 2014 devastating cholera which claimed more than 150
lives, it is still a huge challenge. Poor hygiene impacts on the wellbeing of women and children and limit
their growth and development potentials. Inadequate water services also limit the ability of the urban poor to
9
create wealth since they pay exorbitant rate, sometimes, up to 4-5 times the official rate to access potable
water from GWCL.
Water
From Table 4 below, water availability and accessibility is not a challenge for many of the slums. Many of
these settlements are close to the Weija dam that supplies water to the western part of Accra. Common
water sources include individual taps in homes, shared water taps and boreholes. Water vending becomes
prevalent during water cuts. As can be seen in figure 3 below, there are a number of shared water points in
the settlements explaining the high accessibility.
Figure 3: Public Water Facilities in Slum Communities in AMA
10
Table 4: Water and Indicators Measured in the Sub-Metros
SUB-METRO
WATER
INDICATOR
Sources of water Walking distance
(time) to nearby
city during acute
water shortage
Average monthly
HH expenditure on
water (GHc)
Number of
days’ pipe
water flows in a
week
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH
Individual Type, shared
water taps and Borehole
30 minutes 50 5 days
ABLEKUMA
NORTH
Individual Type, Borehole
and water kiosk
45 minutes 40 7 days
ABLEKUMA
CENTRAL
Individual taps, shared
taps and borehole and
water kiosk.
15 minutes 34 7days
AYAWASO
WEST
Individual water taps,
shared water taps,
communal water taps
30 minutes 47 7days
AYAWASO
EAST
Individual taps, shared
taps and borehole and
water kiosk.
30 minutes 37 4 days
AYAWASO
CENTRAL
Individual taps, shared
taps and borehole and
water kiosk
20 minutes 62 7 days
ASHIEDU
KETEKE
Individual Type, Borehole
and water kiosk
45 minutes 40 5 days
OSU/ KORLEY
KLOTEY
Individual taps, shared
taps and borehole and
water kiosk.
15 minutes 50 7 days
OKAI KOI
NORTH
Individual water taps,
shared water taps,
communal water taps
40 minutes 35 6 days
OKAI KOI
SOUTH
Individual taps, shared
taps and borehole and
water kiosk.
25 minutes 50 4 days
Sanitation
Sanitation in this report is mainly restricted to toilets and open defecation practices as the slums
do not have properly engineered constructed drains. Grey water is disposed of in the open with
many using soak away. Table 5 below explains the situation on the number of public toilets and
other indicators on monthly expenditures from households.
11
Table 5: Sanitation Facilities
SUB-METRO
SANITATION (TOILET)
INDICATORS
Toilet facilities
available
Percentage
practicing
open
defecation
(from FGDs)
Available
Public Toilets
Waiting time at
public toilet
Average HH
monthly
expenditure
on public
toilet use
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH Public
Toilet
Individual
Toilet
28 10 5 minutes 100
ABLEKUMA
NORTH Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
43 6 6 minutes 53
ABLEKUMA
CENTRAL Communal
Individual
toilet
Shared
toilet
facilities
21 13 5 minutes 120
AYAWASO
WEST Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
10 3 10 minutes 56
AYAWASO
EAST Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
15 6 10 minutes 60
12
AYAWASO
CENTRAL Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
43 4 6 minutes 140
ASHIEDU
KETEKE Communal
toilet
Individual
toilet
Shared
toilet
facilities
21 13 5 minutes 120
OSU/ KORLEY
KLOTEY Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
10 7 10 minutes 80
OKAI KOI
NORTH Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
15 8 10 minutes 160
OKAI KOI
SOUTH Individual
toilet
Communal
toilet
Shared
toilet
Public
Toilet
15 6 6 minutes 100
13
Figure 4: Public Sanitation Facilities in Slums Communities in AMA
Access to improved sanitation was a major challenge identified in each of the slums as can be seen in the
map above. Open defecation is a very high social norm in many of the slums especially the ones close to the
sea with some recording as high as 43%. More than twice the national average of about 19%. Many other
inhabitants use communal and public toilets as means of easing themselves. Many of these facilities in the
slums are managed and operated poorly. Average waiting time for using the public facility is 5 minutes
because of high patronage.
Health/Hygiene
As can be seen in the Table below, the most prevalent diseases are environmentally related. Common
diseases such as malaria, cholera, diarrhoea and typhoid are very common diseases reported at the OPDs.
Access to health facilities is not a major challenge for many of these slums. The detailed report has numbers
of the various health facilities in the slums. Even though, majority have clinics and health posts, lack of
access roads make it difficult for easy conveyance of sick people to health centres. On the average, families
spend between GHc 150-250 per month on health bills, which is difficult to get because of poor livelihood
sources. Sometimes, families postpone going to clinics for medical care because of inadequate incomes.
Policy and governmental support for informal dwellers to benefit from free medical care and National
Health Insurance is important.
14
Table 6: Sub-Metro Health Indicators
SUB-METRO
HEALTH
INDICATORS
Available Health
Facilities
Locational
Accessibility
Average HH
monthly
expenditure on
health (GHc)
Common diseases
available
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH Health clinic
Hospital
Within 170 Malaria, Cholera and
Diarrhoea
ABLEKUMA
NORTH Health clinic
Hospital
Herbal
centres
Within 180 Skin rashes and Malaria
ABLEKUMA
CENTRAL Herbal
centres
Hospital
Hospitals are outside
the sub metropolitan
area
200 Malaria, Cholera,
Diarrhoea and Typhoid
AYAWASO
WEST Hospital
Clinic
Within 120 Malaria
AYAWASO
EAST Health Clinic
Hospital
Within 250 Malaria and Cholera
AYAWASO
CENTRAL Health clinic
Hospital
Herbal
centres
Within 180 Skin rashes, Cholera and
Malaria
ASHIEDU
KETEKE Herbal
centres
Hospital
Within 200 Malaria, Cholera,
Diarrhoea and Typhoid
OSU/
KORLEY
KLOTEY
Hospital
Clinic
Within 120 Malaria
OKAI KOI
NORTH Health Clinic
Hospital
Within 250 Malaria and Cholera
OKAI KOI
SOUTH Health clinic
Hospital
Herbal
centres
Within 180 Cholera and Malaria
City Resilience - Risks and Vulnerability Issues
15
Understanding and identifying risks and vulnerability in cities is the first step towards reducing and
mitigation. Citywide informal settlements profiles contribute to mitigation and understanding resilience
through self-assessment and reflection on areas of critical concern.
Vulnerability in this context refer to the persistent deprivation of certain groups of people from benefitting
from basic life survival, social and economic services or participating in decision-making. In all the sub-
metros in AMA, participation is weak resulting in exclusion from the mainstream planning processes.
Vulnerability raised by the communities included the following- Evictions, Flooding, Fire and
Health/Cholera.
Threats to eviction
In many parts of Accra, slum dwellers face evictions from city Authorities without re-course to mediation
methods and compensation. This affects livelihoods of the urban poor and limit their social and economic
survival. Refer to Figure 2 and Table 3 above for slums facing eviction threats.
Flooding
Perennial flooding renders many of slum communities homeless and limits their livelihoods. In areas like
Alajo and Paloma, families loose livelihoods and access almost on annual basis. Yet for some, the whole
sub metro - like Okai Koi North, is susceptible to flooding.
Figure 5: AMA slums flood risk assessment map
Fire Incidence
16
Frequent fire hazard resulting from poor and irregular electricity connection is a plight of the urban poor.
In some areas, they experience an average of two (2) fire incidences per year which contributes to
increased level of deprivation and impoverishment.
Plate 1: Fire outbreak and demolition in slum communities
Health/ Cholera
Open defecation practices have direct effect on the health status of slums dwellers. About 43% of
slum dwellers practice open defecation in Accra (deduced form the focus group discussions)
which is more than twice higher than the regional average. This has been found to be the major
cause of cholera. The map in Figure supports this claim as all the red dots indicate slum
communities that practice open defecation. It was found that the non-availability of toilet
facilities in slum communities is the leading cause of open defecation, since some slum dwellers
cannot afford to pay for their households to use the few overcrowded public toilet facilities.
17
Figure 6: Incidence of Open Defecation in the slums of AMA
4.4 Local Economic Development (LED)
The purpose of LED is to build up the economic capacity of the local area to improve its economic future
and quality of life. The MMDAs are supposed to apply the national LED policy framework to ensure that
infrastructure is developed and enabling environment put in place by Municipal Assemblies to promote
livelihoods and job creation for the youth and women in particular. In almost all the sub-metropolitan
areas, informal economy dominates. Some very popular informal markets include Nima, Maamobi and
Mallam-Atta markets. The main sources of livelihood to the community members include food vending,
petty trading, selling of second hand clothing, auto mechanic and carpentry. These livelihood sources fall
into the National Board for Small-Scale Industries (NBSSI) classification of the informal economy
activities which includes: (i) agro-industrial (ii) agro-processing (iii) fabrication, including welding and
(iv) petty trading. Some of the challenges identified with Small and Micro enterprises(SMEs) include poor
record keeping, limited management capacities, and inadequate financial capital.
Open defecation practices have direct effect on
the health status of slums dwellers.
About 43% of slum dwellers practice open
defecation in Accra (deduced from the focus
group discussions) which is more than twice
higher than the regional average.
This has been found to be the major cause of
cholera.
18
4.5 Local Governance
Accra Metropolitan Assembly operates on a 4-tier level of governance as seen in the local government
structure in figure 7. This local governance structure begins with the Unit Committee, to the Town Council,
to the Sub-Metropolitan level then finally to the Metropolitan Assembly. The Regional Coordinating Council
plays the role of coordinating activities in Metropolitan Municipal Districts Assemblies (MMDAs). The Sub-
metro is directly under the Metropolitan assembly. There are also youth groups, keep fit or fun clubs, as well
as religious and traditional leaders. Some of the slums have active CBOs working within the communities
like GHAFUP.
Figure 7: Local Government Structure
Adopted from the Local Government Act, 2016, Amended
National Development Planning Commission
Regional Coordinating Council
Unit Committees
Town Council
Sub-metropolitan
Assembly
District Assembly Municipal Assembly Metropolitan Assembly
Urban / Town/Area
Councils Zonal Council
19
4.6 Other Services in the communities
Solid Waste Management
Management of solid waste in all the slums was identified as a major challenge. Many resort to nearby
drains and other open spaces to dispose of municipal waste. The only recognisable waste trucks within the
streets of the communities are the 'bola' taxis (tricycles) who can meander through very narrow places.
Skip containers are placed in open spaces such as parks and institutions that are serviced by private waste
collectors such as Zoom lion Ghana Limited, Asadu, J. Stanley-Owusu and in some cases the assembly.
Refuse disposal attract fees even for the communal skips where people pay between GHc0.50-Ghc2.00
depending on waste size. Refer to table 8 below for more details.
Table 7: Solid Waste Management Indicators from Sub-metros
SUB-METRO
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
INDICATORS
Available waste facilities Frequency of
collection
Average HH Monthly
expenditure on waste
collection (GHc)
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH Household collection bins
Centralised collection bin
Once a week 60
ABLEKUMA
NORTH Household collection bins
Centralized collection bin
Once a week 37
ABLEKUMA
CENTRAL Centralized collection bin
Household collection bin
2 times in a week 25
AYAWASO
WEST Household collection bins 7 times in a week 64
AYAWASO
EAST Centralized collection bin
Household collection bin
3 times in a week 27
AYAWASO
CENTRAL Household collection bins
Centralized collection bin
Once a week 40
ASHIEDU
KETEKE Centralized collection bin
Household collection bin
2 times in a week 25
OSU/ KORLEY
KLOTEY Household collection bins 7 times in a week 64
OKAI KOI
NORTH Centralized collection bin
Household collection bin
3 times in a week 30
OKAI KOI
SOUTH Household collection bins
Centralized collection bin
Once a week 35
Energy
The main source of energy for electricity is the one supplied by the national grid. All the slum
communities were found to have been connected to the grid. In terms of percentage of people who
have access to electricity, the least was 90% as can be seen in the table below.
20
Table 8: Energy/Electricity Supply and coverage in the Slums
SUB-METRO
ENERGY (ELECTRICITY)
INDICATORS
Percentage of population
who have access to
electricity
Average HH monthly
expenditure on
electricity (GHc)
Challenges in using electricity
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH
95 88 Intermittent power outages
ABLEKUMA
NORTH
100 94 Regular power outages
ABLEKUMA
CENTRAL
100 70 High electricity tariff and regular
power outages
AYAWASO
WEST
99 44 Intermittent power outages
AYAWASO
EAST
90 60 Regular power outages
AYAWASO
CENTRAL
100 94 Regular power outages
ASHIEDU
KETEKE
100 70 High electricity tariff and regular
power outages
OSU/ KORLEY
KLOTEY
99 44 High electricity tariff and regular
power outages
OKAI KOI
NORTH
100 94 Regular power outages
OKAI KOI
SOUTH
100 70 High electricity tariff and regular
power outages
Education
Many children of school going age are found in schools. The slums in Ashiedu Keteke were found to have
the least school turn out at 76% for school children as seen in the table below:
Table 9: Educational Facilities and Enrolment in Slums
SUB-METRO
EDUCATION
INDICATORS
Educational facilities available Percentage of children in
basic school
ABLEKUMA
SOUTH Pre-School
Primary school
Senior High School
90
ABLEKUMA
NORTH Pre-School
Primary School
Secondary School
76
ABLEKUMA
CENTRAL Pre-school 99
21
Primary school
Junior High School
Senior High School
AYAWASO
WEST Pre-school
Primary school
Junior High School
Senior High School
99
AYAWASO
EAST Pre-school
Primary school
Junior High School
Senior High School
Tertiary
90
AYAWASO
CENTRAL Pre-School
Primary school
Senior High School
90
ASHIEDU
KETEKE Pre-School
Primary School
Secondary School
76
OSU/ KORLEY
KLOTEY Pre-school
Primary school
Junior High School
Senior High School
99
OKAI KOI
NORTH Pre-school
Primary school
Junior High School
Senior High School
99
OKAI KOI
SOUTH Pre-school
Primary school
Junior High School
Senior High School
Tertiary
90
28
5.0 Development Priorities
Slums dwellers face many challenges from eviction threats, flooding, fire, environmental degradation, etc. Many others lack infrastructural and
social amenities. When communities were asked about developmental needs, priority was placed on construction of drainages; provision of
sanitation facilities; provision of health centres; access roads among other things. The table below gives a summarised prioritisation of
community developmental needs. The prioritised needs of each slum can be sourced from the detailed report.
Table 10: Development Prioritization of Sub-Metropolitan Areas in AMA
DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES OF SUB-METROPOLITAN AREAS IN AMA
Ayawaso
East
Ayawaso
Central
Okai-Koi
South
Osu/
Korley
Klottey
Ablekuma
Central
Ashiedu
Keteke
Ablekuma
South
Okai Koi North Ayawaso
West
Ablekuma
North
1.Constru
ction of
drains
2.Constru
ction of
Access
roads
3.Provisio
n of clinic
1.Constructi
on of drains
2.Constructi
on of Access
roads
3.Improved
solid waste
collection
4.Reduction
in refuse and
garbage
collection
prices
1. Provision of
Households &
public toilets
2. Construction
of
water/drainage
systems
3.Electricity
(stable power
supply)
1.Construct
ion of
water/drain
age
systems
2.Provion
of solid
waste
collection
bin
3.Health
facilities
Secondary
School
1.Construct
ion of
drains
2.Construct
ion of
Access
roads
3.Provision
of clinic
1. Provision of
Household
Toilet
2.Construction
of drains
3.Provision of
Streetlight
4. Provision of
solid waste
collection bin
4.Provision of
health Centre
5.Provision of
1.Constructi
on of drains
2.Constructi
on of Access
roads
3.Provision
of clinic
1.Provision of
toilet facilities
2. Construction of
water/drainage
3.Improving
housing facilities
and land tenure
issues
4. Subsidizing of
electricity bills
1.Constructi
on of drains
2.Constructi
on of Access
roads
4.Reduction
in malaria
incidence
4. Reducing
instances of
power
outages
5. Provision
of clinic
1.Constructi
on of drains
2. Provision
of clinic
3.Constructi
on of Access
roads
28
5.Provision
of clinic
6.Improved
healthcare
7.Reduction
in electricity
costs
Public Library
28
ANNEX 1
DEGREE OF VULNERABILITY AND RISKS TO FLOODS
SUB METROPOLITAN
AREA
LOW MEDIUM HIGH
ABLEKUMA SOUTH
KARIKARI TUESDAY MARKET
AGEGE TUESDAY MARKET
SLUM
GALELE
ZLA SLUM SAMPE SLUM TEE GARDEN SL UM
NIGHT MARKET KORLE
BU
QUART
ERS
EBENEZER DOWN
SALVATION ARMY AKOTO OPETEKWEI
OLY DADE 205 SHEIBU GBEGBEYIRE
CAMARA JUNCTION AKATEMANG
AZUMAH NELSON GLEFE
KARIKARI ZONE 6 MPS SLUM
SHEPERD BUSH OTATENG
CHEMUNAA SLUM
ATO QUASHIE
MULLAH
AYAWASO EAST
NIMA GORILLA NIMAALAFIA
NIMA MARKET NIMATOMTOM
NIMA FILIDOTSIN NIMA BRIDGE
NIMA TWO TWO
LANE
NIMA KUMSUNTULINE
KANDA CULTURE NIMA ALATA
KANDA RUGAH NIMA NAFIU
NIMA POLICE
STATION
NIMA441
NEWTOWN SLUM 2
NIMA GUTTER
KANDA BRIDGADE MAAMOBI S LU M 2
NIMA UGANDA
KANDA CAR WASH
28
NIMA DE YOUNGSTER
ABLEKUMA NORTH
ZONGO A
ZONGO 2B
JACK AND JILL
RIVER WAYS SLUM
TSUIMAN 2
TSUI MAN
SAMPE
ODOKOR MARKET
SLUM
KWASHIEMAN
ZONGO
HAPPY KID DOWN
KWASHIEMAN
SCHOOL PARK
OTATAIN SLUM
MACHINE SLUM
MACEDONIA SLUM
TWENEBOAH
KOKOMPE
ANSARUDEEN SLUM
DARKUMAN
MARKET
MOTHER MARRY
MODEL
ABLEKUMA CENTRAL
GBORTSUI CHIEF SOMETHING
AYIGBE TOWN
ADWENBU
PENTECOST
CHURCH
HAMDALLAHI
MATAHEKO LAST
STOP
ADWENBU PUSH
CHURCH
28
CHANKIDA
GASKIA
SIKOPA
ZAMARAMA
NASARAWA
BORLA JUNCTION
KONKADA PARK
KORLE WOYO
MANYA PALACE
ABOSSEY OKAI SPARE
PARTS
WAKISAREA
ZONGO TOTAL
AWEINBU
PROVIDENCE
MAAME NSIMAA
ASHIEDU KETEKE
WALLSTREET SLUM LONDON MARKET
SLUM
TIMBER MARKET SLUM
MQ SLUM AFIENAA OLD SLAUGHTER
HOUSE
FOWL SELLERS
MARKET
AKAMANEA ASA GONNE
NZEMA YAM
MARKET
ASERE MANTSE OLD FADAMA
MANTSE
AGBONAA
NLA SLUM MAKOLA MARKET NO.
2
KOKOTAKO OBONKWASHIE SLUM TIMBER MARKET
PALLADIUM OIL AND FAT SHEEP
SLUM AGBOGBOSHIE
BR
AZ
IL
LA
NE
AKWEI HOUSE SLUM GALLOWAY
28
ABO LA TAFO SLUM
NSHOSAA GBESE SLUM
ABD SLUM AGBOBA HAPPY
HOME
AKOTOSHIE SLUM SALAGA MARKET
SLUM
ASHABIENNA SLUM MAKOLA MARKET
ABUJA
ABUJA MARKET
AYAWASO CENTRAL
CAR PRICE 1 SLUM GERRALDO SLUM
SHAOLIN SLUM POLO PARK SLUM
HP 1 SLUM BARAS SLUM
HP SLUM CITECH SLUM
ADONMANG ARAB CITY SLUM
ADANMANG
MANGO
PANAMA SLUM
EBONY
SURAJ SLUM
55 SLUM
AGORTIN SLUM
BRITANIA SLUM
ALAJO NORTH
CITE CH
CAR PRICE 2
SAPHIANU AREA SLUM
BEHIND ALAJO
MARKET
AYAWASO WEST
AVIATION
RAILWAY
SHIASHIE VILLAGE
LAST CHANCE THE SAINT
ROUND HOUSE ABELENKPE MARKET
OPEI BIA SLUM BAWALESHIE
MECHANIC SHOP
THE SAINT 2 SLUM BAWALESHIE ABORNI
MEMPESEM
SHIASHIE JUNCTION
OLD
ABELENKPE/MAWA
28
KO
OKPONGLO
OKPONGLO UP
COMMUNITY
SOBER DOWN
SANTANA MARKET
OSU/KORLEY KLOTTEY
DAY MARKET SAVI LE QUARTERS
COMMUNITY
SAVILE 1 TOFFEE HOUSE
FORMER AMERICAN
EMBASSY ODORNA MARKET
SALEM PARK GARAGIES
ATUWEI
MANDELA SLUM
ARTS CENTER
BLOG OD
AMENFONG
AGBOLOSHIE
AMANTRA
ASHINTEY
TOLO
AJUMAKO
ASYLUM DOWN
JANJA YARD
POLICE STATION
OSU CEMETRY
AYIGBE TOWN
ADABRAKA MARKET
OKAI KOI NORTH
FADAMA MARKET CHRISTIAN VIILLAGE
AB1 SLUM HAATSO AYIGBE
KILLER
ZELOS COMMUNITY RWSLUM
BANBOLINIO SLUM JOJE
NKORLA SUSUA
SLUM
OLD ACHIMOTA
28
KS SLUM CHANTAN ONE
KUBEHMU SLUM AUNTIE KORKOR
SDA SLUM KOPEVI
LIITLE ANGELS SLUM HIGH TENSION
AKWETEMAN KISSEHMAN MARKET
FISH POND LAF SLUM
CHARISMATIC
ANORHUMA
MARKET
POST OFFICE
ABEKA VOGE
QUARTERS
MANTSEMAN
NIGERIA QUARTERS
OKAI KOI SOUTH
BUBII ZONGO MAAMOMOEMI A DAMAN
P AND T CABLE KANESHIE GOLF KOJOMAN
BUBI VALLEY OTTATEIN MAMOMO
SLUM
CENTRAL SLUM ATIMORNOR
RED LIGHT SLUM
FIRST OTU STREET
PICADILY
AGYAPAYE
NORTH KANESHIE LAST
STOP
AWUDOME SLUM
GONTEN ZONGO
KANSIAH SLUM
KANESHIE MARKET
LORRY STATION
28
(KNOW) YOUR CITY
Ghana Federation of the Urban Poor (GHAFUP), is a network of savings groups in slums/informal settlements and depressed
communities in eight (8) regions of Ghana and affiliate to Slum Dwellers International (SDI - A network of community-based
organisations of the urban poor in 34 countries and hundreds of cities and towns across Africa, Asia and Latin America).
GHAFUP functions effectively at the community level and lead community projects. Activities of GHAFUP are supported
technically by People’s Dialogue on Human Settlements (PD) which is a community-based non-governmental organization
(NGO). It is the mission of PD, that urban poor lead the process of acquiring safe and secure livelihood, decent shelter, land,
water, sanitation and voice representation.
To learn more about us, visit our website: www.pdghana.org or www.knowyourcity.info
Address: Nii Afrokwei Street, Kokomlemle, Accra, Ghana.
Phone: +233 302 245 844 / +233 244 668 855
Email: [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected]