View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction
Team Overview Project Overview Design Requirements Project Approach Final Design Questions
Team Overview
Sarah Bireley– Project Manager Amee Wicks – Project Engineer Brad Pickering – Project Engineer Troy Cunat – Project Engineer
Project Overview
Greencastle Water Treatment Plant Located in Greencastle, Indiana south
of Big Walnut Creek Six wells provide 4,000 gpm peak Serves population of 10,000
Site subject to flooding Located in the flood plain Rains on Labor Day flooded site
Design Requirements
Confirm finished floor elevation of filter facility Confirm base flood elevation Investigate flood protection options Investigate security options Deliverables
Proposal Progress report Final report
Project Approach
Site assessment Codes and regulations Research design options
Flood protection Security
Choose final design Complete final design
Site Assessment
Topographic map Finished floor elevation = 688.54 feet (MSL)
Filter Facility
Lagoon
Big
Wal
nut C
reek
Site Assessment (cont.)
Watershed area obtained 216 mi2
Determined base flood elevation Obtained Big Walnut Creek topographic map 100-year flow determined
Q = 21,400 cfs Maximum flows used in HEC-RAS to
determine base flood elevation 690.0 feet (MSL)
Site Assessment (cont.)
Low head dam
0 100 200 300 400 500 600665
670
675
680
685
690
695
Big Walnut Creek (inline struc ture) Plan: Plan 01 1/14/2004
Main Channel Distance (f t)
Ele
vatio
n (f
t)
Legend
EG PF 1
WS PF 1
Crit PF 1
Ground
Big Walnut Creek Water Plant
Finished floor elevation
Codes and Regulations
Cannot raise base flood elevation more than 0.15 feet
Water tower must be enclosed in fence Maximum levee side slope of 1:2.5 No levee construction restrictions
Design Options (cont.)
Initial Cost
(35%)
Lifespan
(35%)
Maintenance
(20%)
Constructability
(20%)Overall
Levee 4 4 3 2 3.6
Floodproofing 5 1 5 4 3.5
Floodwall 2 4 3 4 3.1
Building
Relocation1 5 5 1 3.2
Decision based on four criteria Initial cost Lifespan Maintenance Constructability
Levee Design
Obtained soil borings & performed tests
Clay (CH), silt (MH), and sand (SW) present
Suitable for levee
B1
B2 B3
B4
B5
B6
Seepage Analysis
Used SefDam to calculate seepage
Elev. 692’
13’
Elev. 690’
Section Permeability (ft/s) Height (ft) Width (ft) Seepage (ft3/s/ft)
A-A’ 3 x 10-10 5 28 6.494 x 10-11
B-B’ 3 x 10-10 6.5 35.5 1.238 x 10-10
C-C’ 3 x 10-10 13 68 4.578 x 10-10
D-D’ 3 x 10-10 12 63 4.005 x 10-10
E-E’ 3 x 10-10 11.25 59.5 3.639 x 10-10
Total seepage is 0.0244 ft3/day
Slope Stability (cont.)
XSTABL utilized to analyze slope stability Eroding slope improved by Greencastle
Additional load from levee analyzed Additional load does not cause failure
Security
Fencing, lighting, and cameras investigated
Lighting and cameras may be added in future
Initial Cost(30%)
Lifespan(30%)
Maintenance(20%)
Protection(20%)
Overall
Chain LinkFence with
Barbed Wire1 4 5 5 3.8
ColorWeatherproof
Camera5 2 4 1 3.0
Infrared SensorLights
5 1 5 3 3.5
Conclusion
Flood levels warrant need for flood protection Levee chosen as protection option
Seepage and slope stability not a problem Fencing with barbed wire chosen for security
Cameras and lighting may be added Total cost of $95,500
Levee - $71,500 Security - $24,000