City Indicator Project Sustainable Architecture, Urban and Landscape Plannning Vorhoelzer Forum - 05.02.2020 - 18 h | | | Pathways towards sustainable cities - final presentation Sustainable Architecture, Urban and Landscape Planning Seminar Master WiSe 2019/20 Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang LIMA LAGOS CAIRO MEDELLÍN SEOUL SHANGHAI ACCRA DHAKA MEXICO CITY CURITIBA CAPE TOWN SYDNEY MAPUTO NAIROBI ABU DHABI NEW YORK BARCELONA ZURICH MALMÖ LONDON TOKYO VANCOUVER JAKARTA AMSTERDAM MOSCOW
Vorhoelzer Forum - 05.02.2020 - 18 h
| | | Pathways towards sustainable cities - final
presentation
Sustainable Architecture, Urban and Landscape Planning Seminar
Master WiSe 2019/20
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
LIMA
LAGOS
CAIRO
MEDELLÍN
SEOUL
SHANGHAI
ACCRA
DHAKA
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
25 cities from all around the world. How sustainable are they
really?
What does the sustainable city of the future look like?
With the help of key performance indicators, each team has
researched
the status quo of a city in different sectors: urban planning,
green infrastructure, mobility, energy, water, and waste. Besides
those criteria, they also looked into crucial aspects such as
environmental
quality, climate hazards and disaster risk, health, education,
happiness,
equality, or governance. Their vision: how to achieve sustainable
development that provides both quality of life for all and a
positive
ecological footprint.
The lecture series presents the essential approaches of sustainable
architecture, urban and landscape planning. Each week a new topic
is presented by various expert guest lecturers representing various
TUM departments. Such topics form a holistic view of planning
sustainable environments. Their intersections and interactions are
crucial when investigating complex urban ecosystems. These
interdependencies must be considered if we want to fundamentally
change the way we design architecture, urban spaces, and
landscapes.
During the seminar, this knowledge is applied to the specific case
of each city. Through research and critical evaluation, each team
has assessed the present situation and formulated a vision for
their city. In short, the
course intends to discover what it takes to create the sustainable
city of the future.
The following lecturers have contributed to the lecture
series:
Structure
The course consists in a lecture series and 3 seminars according to
the different master studies:
Lecture series: Sustainable Architecture, Urban and Landscape
Planning
Seminars:
1) Sustainable Architecture, Urban and Landscape Planning – RNB,
AR, IÖ 2) Sustainable Design in an Urban Context – UI 3) System
Effect and Interdependencies of Sustainable Planning in Civil
Engineering – BI
We are grateful for our contributing guest lecturers and their
valuable inputs for the course.
RNB / AR / IÖ
UI
BI
Americas
Vancouver, Canada New York, United States Mexico City, Mexico
Medellín, Colombia Lima, Peru Curitiba, Brazil
Master of: RNB - Resource Efficient and Sustainable Building, AR -
Architecture, IÖ - Engineering Ecology, UI - Environmental
Engineering, BI - Civil Engineering
City Indicator Project
Africa and Middle East
Cairo, Egypt Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Lagos, Nigeria Accra,
Ghana
Nairobi, Kenya Maputo, Mozambique Cape Town, South Africa
Asia and the Pacific
Seoul, South Korea Tokyo, Japan Shanghai, China Dhaka, Bangladesh
Jakarta, Indonesia Sydney, Australia
Europe and Central Asia
Barcelona, Spain
Prof. Wulfhorst Accessibility - A dialogue for more sustainable
urban mobility
Prof. Thierstein Urban Development: A Sustainability Trap
Prof. Winter Building Technology - Energy-efficient Timber
structures. Life Cycle Engineering
Prof. Hamacher Renewable energies: a few observations
Prof. Michaeli Let’s make the Sustainable City
Prof. Lienkamp Status Electromobility - the customer will
decide
Prof. Lang Passive solar energy use in the building sector
Maren Kohaus Resource-efficient constructions - Building with
Timber!
Prof. Ludwig New Directions in Urban Green
Prof. Gehlen Construction materials - the basis for sustainable
building
Prof. Nübel Construction. Real estate. Management.
Sustainability
Prof. Auer Climate Responsive Design
Prof. Petzold Digital Tools in Early Design Stages
Sustainable Architecture, Urban and Landscape Planning Seminar
Master WiSe 2019/20
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
Scan for further literature:
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895;
upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income countries
> 12.055.
Sources: For the literature [1] - [20], scan QR Code Figures: 1- UN
OCHA. 2- UN OCHA. 4- worldometer. (21.01.2020). [Mozambique
Population]. Retrieved from
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/mozambique-population/#population-
pyramid on 16.01.2020. 5- Personal assumptions, based on the
satellite image of Google Maps with Image data from 2020. 6- Eine
Karte für Maputo. (2017). Retrieved from http://kkmosambik.de/
content/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/EineKarteFuerMaputo.pdf on
18.01.2020. 7- Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook –
Mozambique, 2016. [Web page]. Retrieved from https://www.cia.
gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mz.html on
06.01.2020. 8- personal assumptions due to missing data. 9- dos
Muchangos et al. (2017). Application of Material Flow Analysis to
Municipal Solid Waste in Maputo City, Mozambique. doi:
10.1177/0734242X16675685. Aerial image- Google Earth (2020).
Waste Maputo deposits most of its waste in a single open dump site
with minimal compaction and control. This site by far outreaches
its capacity. Furthermore, it assumedly contaminates the
groundwater, landslides threaten the surrounding inhabitants, and
waste pickers suffer from risk of numerous diseases. Problematic is
also the high amount of officially collected waste that is not
deposited officially in the end [18]. • Constructing a new sanitary
landfill with a composting plant & safely closing the
existing ones [19] • Integrating waste pickers into the official
waste management [20] • Informing citizens about the importance of
waste segregation and recycling [20] • Preventing redundant
fossil-based packaging material entering the system
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2017)
2%
58%
4%
36%
Recycling
Composting
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2015)
Water Strong winds, heavy rainfall and rising sea levels regularly
lead to the destruction of water and sewage systems [14]. Currently
less than half of Maputo’s inhabitants have access to drinking
water and only a few households in Maputo are connected to a sewage
system [15]. It is problematic that only a minimum of all fecal
waste actually passes through the treatment plant, while more than
half of the fecal waste contaminate the sewage system and Maputo
Bay [16]. • Realising protective measures against flooding and
storm surges [17] • Extending water networks, wastewater treatment
plants and sewage systems [17] • Repairing and treatment of the
existing pumping and treatment plant [17] • Constructing
underground tanks, pumping stations and water towers[17]
80%
20%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2016)
Energy Mozambique has one of the lowest rates of electricity access
in the world eventhough the country is well-endowed with natural
resources for power generation. Currently the people in Maputo have
to use biomass (wood and coal) as energy sources and have only
sporadic access to electricity [13]. The future development has to
be smart, more efficient and sustainable so that Maputo can achieve
energy sovereignty. • Promoting renewable energy through policy •
Abolishing tariffs for renewable technologies • Promoting
investments in renewable energies by the private sector •
Introducing decentralised renewable energy sources throughout the
city
9%
6%
4%
11%
70%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Others
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2017) Mobility The
demographic explosion in 1975 caused the collapse of Maputo’s
infrastructure [12]. From this point on cars and private buses were
the means of transportation the inhabitants were dependent on [11].
With the introduction of a transport agency infrastructural
concerns, like the reorganization of the road system, could be
addressed [12]. A strong cooperation of the government, operators
and the civil society would set a stable foundation for further
steps. • Prioritizing bus lanes, cycle paths and pavement •
Implementing affordable prices for public transportation •
Introducing visual information about determined bus/train stops and
routes [12]
Green infrastructure Despite parks and other recreational areas
comprising a small percentage, Maputo’s green area overall is much
larger. Space which is not used for living, containing vital soil
and water supply, is primarily agricultural [9]. The intense demand
of land due to population growth, is endangering the wetlands, a
precious natural protector. With the depletion of this natural
system, Maputo will lose significant biodiversity and inevitably be
more vulnerable towards storm surges and floods [10]. •
Transforming the remaining wetlands into a National Park •
Implementing modern water construction and water retention
constructions inland • Applying green roofs to reduce direct runoff
during heavy rainfalls • Introducing a comprehensive hazard
management to withstand extreme weather
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2020)
65%
20%
15%
Built-up areas
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning The capital Maputo is the most densely populated
province in Mozambique with a well- developed city centre [8]. Its
main part consists of rural informal settlements in the north,
where more than 70% of Maputo’s inhabitants live. They are
characterised by poor transport, supply and sewage infrastructure.
As a coastal city, Maputo is particularly vulnerable to extreme
weather scenarios such as floods, cyclones and the rising sea
level. • Developing a decentralised city structure by supporting
the urban growth in the north • Improving situation in informal
settlements within the given boundaries of possibility • Realising
preventive measures regarding the effects of climate change
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2020)
-10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Vision - Fast forward to a sustainable city, south-east Africa We
want the citizens of Maputo to benefit from modern technology and
live their dreams without restrictions but with no dependency on
non-renewable resources. Everyone should have the same
possibilities regardless of age, belief or social background.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Maputo Mozambique
City overview
Country overview
Income classification1 low (460 US$/capita) [1]
Life expectancy 59.3 years [2] Literacy rate 50.6 % [3] Happiness
ranking 123 of 156 countries [4]
Population 1,110,477 (2019) [5] Density 3,202 inhabitants/km (2019)
[5] Climate (Köppen-Geiger) AW [6] CO2 emissions 0.39 tCO2/capita
(2016) [7]
Philipp Eisenlohr, Moritz Kenndoff, Leonie Lang, Tanja Stocker,
Maximilian Wolf
0.5 Earths
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055.
Figures: 1-Network, G. F. (2019). Ecological Footprint (Number of
Earths). Retrieved from Global Footprint Network. 2-Bangladesh:
Floods and Landslides - Jun 2019. (2019, June). 4-[population
pyramid]. The world factbook. 5-Byomkesh, T., Nakagoshi, N., &
Dewan, A. M. (2012). Urbanization and green space dynamics in
Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh. Landscape and Ecological Engineering,
8(1), 45-58. 6-(2012, October). [BRT in Metro Dhaka: Towards
Achieving a Sustainable Urban Public Transport System]. 7-IEA.
(2018). Bangladesh. 8-(2020). Retrieved 28 January 2020, from
http://dwasa.org.bd/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Annual-Report-2017-18.pdf.
9-Pacific Consultants International, Yachiyo Engineering, (2005).
The study on the solid waste management in Dhaka City, Bangladesh:
Japan International Cooperation Agency. / Waste Concern, (2016,
March 16). Compost Plant to Receive Carbon Credits.. Aerial image-
Google Earth (2019).
Waste Dhaka generates 3,200t [17] of waste each day. The actual
volume of generated waste today is unknown. 65% [17] of it is of
domestic source, the rest comes from commercial and industrial
sector. Only 37% [18] of total waste is collected and dumped on an
non- sanitary landfill. The rest clogs the canals or lies in the
street. Recycling is only done informally, but is effective: 83%
[17] of generated plastic waste is recycled. • Open waste banks to
reduce the amount of waste going on a landfill • Formalize the
informal workers to improve their work conditions and income • Pass
an education policy to spread awareness about 3R principles • In
the longterm implement 3R stategies and strive to become a 3R
society
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2005)
14%
2%
38%
46%
Recycling
Composting
Reuse
Incineration
Non-collected
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2018) Water Dhaka WASA
(Water Supply and Sewerage Authority) produced daily 2500 million
liters of water between 2017-2018 [15]. The main problem is that
groundwater level decreases 2.81 m per year [16]. Also, the quality
of house-hold tap water is low. Dhaka WASA supplies water without
proper treatment, with a high level of bacteria. The people are
facing sudden flooding problems during rainy seasons due to poor
drainage system. • Consider alternate source of water • Government
should provide the department with financial help • Import
equipment to build more treatment plants and improve the current
ones • Reconstruct the drainage system to avoid water logging and
mantain it properly
22%
78%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2018)
Energy In Bangladesh carbon emissions per capita are less than 0.5
tons per year [8], but the energy use structure is not sustainable
since the usage rate of renewable energy is less than 1% [8]. Based
on the unhealthy energy use structure, a large amount of people
cannot get access to energy, especially the refugees in the slums.
Therefore, the key thing is to let people living in slums access
energy, especially electricity and natural gas. • Reclassify the
slums based on the addresses so they can legally register their
housing • Give subsidies for energy infrastructure installations,
based on registration certificates • Provide the knowledge on how
to make use of energy policies that benefit the people • In terms
of long-term planning, solar energy should be made full use
of
14%
57%
5%
24%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Others
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2012) Mobility Due to the
absence of efficient public transport system in Dhaka, motorized
vehicles are increasing rapidly. Consequently, the average speed is
7 km/h [12] due to traffic congestion, which eats up to 3.2 working
hours daily. More than 80% [13] of the air pollution is due to
rapid motorization. Besides, conflicts between vehicles and
pedestrians caused 2,720 accidents during 2007-2011 [14]. The
following should be considered: • Develope public awareness to
reduce violation of traffic rules • Build safe, accessible, secure
footpaths and safe pedestrian crossings • Introduce Bus Rapid
Transit as an alternative transport facility • Introduce Mass Rapid
Transit such as Metro to increase accessibility and mobility
Lit. [1] - [4] Lit. [5] - [9] Lit. [10] - [14] Lit. [15] -
[18]
Green infrastructure Dhaka has very little green areas when
compared to it’s high population density. Only 8,5% [9] of the city
is covered with trees whereas ideally it should be at least 20%
[9]. The median of green space per capita in Dhaka is 0,0002 m²
[10]. However, this number changes depending on the wealth and
status of residents living in the communities. The public parks in
Dhaka are sparce and hard to access. The walking time to a park is
ca.20 min [11]. • Consider open green spaces in urban planning to
make them more accessible • Use vertical gardening and greening in
public space to reduce emissions • Encourage rooftop farming, as it
gives food security and reduces energy costs oft he
residents (for building cooling)
50,0%
24,0%
26,0%
Built-up areas
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning Dhaka City has a young population of 20.3 million
with a growth rate of 3.75% [5]. It constitutes for 12.04% [2] of
the nation´s population, but the city’s area is less than 1% of
Bangladesh. Dhaka contains very high density areas that can reach
50,000 person/ km2 [6], especially in the slums. In 2011 there were
3,394 slums housing approximately 1 million people [6]. It’s an
unorganized sprawling city, so the following should take place: •
Spread awareness about the danger of occupying wetlands and
floodplains areas • Construct social houses so people stop relying
on illegal settlements • Decentralize Dhaka City and develop the
rural areas around • Implement the Sponge City concept (raised
floor houses, flood ponds etc.)
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2018)
-10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Vision - Make Dhaka livable again! The vision is to develop Dhaka
in a sustainable way and avoid mistakes of other cities. Firstly
basic needs of residents should be fullfilled. In the longterm
Dhaka should become a healthy place to live in, where people and
the environment are cared for.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Dhaka City Bangladesh
City overview
Country overview
Eile AI Nawwar, Zhuocheng Zou, Dana Khdairat, Zihad Mohammad Aulad,
Magdalena Michalowska, Rawan Gaafar
0,5 Earths
Income classification1 Low middle income (1,750$/cap) [1] Life
expectancy 72.43 (2019) [2] Literacy rate 72.89% (2017) [3]
Happiness ranking 125 of 156 countries [4]
Population 20.3 million (2019) [5] Density 49182 pop/km2 (2014) [6]
Climate (Köppen-Geiger) equatorial desert (Aw) [7] CO2 emissions
0.53 tCO2/capita (2017) [8]
10 km
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055. Sources: QR-Code Figures: 1-
https://data.worldbank.org/country/kenya 2- MauriceOnyangoOyugi,
Victor A. O.Odenyo, Faith N.Karanja:The Implications of Land Use
and Land Cover Dynamics on theEnvironmental Quality of Nairobi
City, Kenya. American Journal of Geographic Information System,
2017 3-too much data. 4-https://
www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ke.html,
last access: 20.01.2020 5-MauriceOnyangoOyugi, Victor A. O.Odenyo,
Faith N.Karanja:The Impl 2017. 6-Deborah Salon, Sumila Gulyani:
Commuting Urban Kenya: Unpacking Travel Demand in Large and Small
Kenyan Cities, July 2019, p. 1, 2, 9; last access: 23.12.2019,
https://www.sciencedi-
rect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966692311002213; UNEP, UN
Habitat, Kenyatta University: City of Nairobi Environmental
Outlook, 2008, p. 43, last access: 28.12.2019,
https://www.foresightfordevelopment.org/sobipro/55/196-city-of-nairobi-environment-outlook
7-[7] . 8- [9]. 9- [10]. Aerial image- Google Earth (2019).
Waste In Nairobi 3000 tons of solid waste are generated daily. With
these waste it gives two big problems. Only 50 % of them is
collected. The rest goes to the environment or will be burned at
the households. The most of the collected waste is brought to open
dumpsites, which often be controlled by illegal cartels. These
cartels make money with selling the raw materials, which are
collected und separated under unsafe working conditions [10]. •
Reducing the waste generation • Rising the collection of solid
waste up to 100 % • Building a safe disposal of solid waste
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2017)
4%
Non-collected
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2017) Water Access to
water services in Nairobi is very unequal. Piped water is available
primarily to upper-income residents, while the poor rely on
untreated wells and surface water or have to buy expensive bottled
water from vendors [9]. This is closely related on the consumption
of water, which is only a fraction of the water cunsumed by
Nairobi’s middle and upper class citziens. A big issue in slum
areas is the pollution of groundwater and the Nairobi River’s
ecosystem [8]. • Provide affordable drinkable water for all
citizens by expanding the water pipe system • Provide improved
sanitation system for all citizens by expanding the sewer system •
Prevent water pollution especially in slum areas
94%
Groundwater
Seawater
Rainwater
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2013)
Energy The energy sector in Kenya is developing rapidly, using more
and more sustainable and renewable energy sources, such as
geothermal energy. In the electricity producing industry more than
75% of the demand is covered by renewable energy sources. Although
facing upcoming challenges, such as the exponential growth of
primary energy demand and the necessity to connect all households
to the power grid, Kenya actively direct its energy sector towards
renewable energy [6, 7]. Important milestones in the future are: •
Improving the power grid • Subventions for electricity connections
for lower income households • Extend the usage of geothermal and
solar energyrchicta pliti sectati illuptia dolorro
18%
65%
1%
Oil
Biofuels
Coal
Renewables
Hydro
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2019) Mobility The major
problems of the city in case of mobility are the poorly developed
roads and throughfares for all traffic participants [3], therefore
Nairobi ist the most motorized city in Kenya. Results from this
initial situation are long traffic jams and commuting times [4],
many traffic accidents and a high level of air pollution in the
city [5]. Nairobi is very unsafe for pedestrians and cyclists
because almost all sidewalks are damaged or not existing and
furthermore there aren’t any cycling lanes. • Increase
pedestrianization and cycling network through safer and seperate
paths • Creation of more clearly and better structured design and
lay-out of the roads • Develop public transport service through
implementation of “bus rapid transit system”
Greeen infrastructure The most significant part of the green spaces
in Nairobi is the National Park. It is a billboard for the city
which protects biodiversity and creates a range of jobs while
promoting tourism. Nevertheless, it is not always accessible and
reachable for locals in everyday life. Green spaces which are
accessible to everybody and with a recreational character are way
too rare [2]. They need to be improved and developed to the
maximum. • Increase the balance about the geographical location of
green areas • Create an inspiring green architecture of existing
buildings • Development of green infrastructure along roads and
pedestrian paths • Create reachable urban green, and recreational
spaces
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2017)
32%
26%
28%
Water Bodies
Urban planning Nairobi is one of the fastest-growing cities in
Africa and quickly became the second- largest city in Africa. The
city is growing at a rate of over 4% annually. This is mainly due
to the high birth rates and immigrants coming to Nairobi in search
of employment opportunities. It is estimated that the city will
continue its upward trend in terms of population, reaching 5 m
people in 2025. Over 60% of the population live in slums [1]. •
Decrease population in slums through building of large residential
complexes • Creation of a solid transport infrastructure with
organized and reliable public transport • Free access to drinkable
water with equal rights for all residents • Implementation of an
overall renewable energy supply
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2009)
-10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Nairobi - a City of Opportunities The future Nairobi is a city, in
which all inhabitants and their subsequent generations have the
same prerequisites and opportunities in terms of primary care,
medical care, education and a range of recreational
opportunities.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Nairobi Kenya
City overview
Country overview
Population 4.734.881 (2020) Density 4.85 inhabitants/km (2020)
Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Subtropical mountain climate CO2 emissions
0.306 mtCO2/capita (2014)
Lukas Tappertz, Eva Zerwes, Nadine Wallner, Katharina Peter,
Matthias Kretzler
0.6 Earths
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055.
Sources: [1] The World Bank Group. [2] The World Bank Group. [3]
countryeconomy.com. [4] LBS. [5] World Resources Institute. [..]
for more information about the literature please scan the QR-Code.
Figures: 1- Global Footprint Network. 2- GFDRR. 3-Global Footprint
Network, T. Agbola and E M.Agunbiade, J. Hammitt and L. Robinson,
GHS, O. A. Ejohwomu, The 2019 Cities Driving Index, World Resources
Institute, IEA, D. Ogunbiyi and A. McMahon, Federal Ministry of
Water Resources and Bureau of Statistics, J. A. Jideonwo, United
Nations, I. R. Aliu et al., LBS, O. Oyelola et al. F. B. Olo-
rungemi. 4-UN Statistics Division. 5-GHS; Lagos State Government.
6- O. A. Ejohwomu. 7- IEA. 8- Federal Ministry of Water Resources
and Bureau of Statistics. 9- I. R. Aliu et al., LBS, O. Oyelola et
al., F. B. Olorunfemi, LAWMA. Aerial image- Google Earth
(2020).
Waste Most of the generated waste is of organic type [23]. Until
recently all of the waste was disposed on the landfills, mostly
open dumps. Recycling happened only informally for many years [24].
Now the government has introduced the “Blue Box Program”, a waste
separation and recycling program [25]. The collection of the waste
is a shared responsibility of the Lagos Waste Management Authority
(LAWMA) and the Private Sector Participation (PSP) [23]. •
Improvement of collection system • Investing in better equipment
for waste collection and treatment • Different treatment for each
type, e.g. anaerobic digestion for organic waste share
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2011)
1%
26%
29%
44%
Recycling
Composting
Reuse
Incineration
Non-collected
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2018) Water More and more
impervious surfaces due to Lagos’ rapid growth and the incomplete
or blocked drainage system lead to annual floods [20].
Consequently, freshwater is contaminated as stormwater enters
damaged water pipes [21]. This further reduces the water supply
which only covers 40% of the demand [22]. Additionally, the
insufficient wastewater treatment system cleans only 5% of the
wastewater [22]. • Harvest roof water by installing gutters on the
roofs and cisterns to prevent flooding
and fill parts of the water supply gap [20] • Start of a cleaning
campaign to motivate city dwellers to clear the drains • Construct
a comprehensive and central wastewater treatment system
7%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2017)
Energy Despite a high power demand, the energy sector in Lagos is
highly underdeveloped. There are three main problems: access to the
electricity grid, grid stability, and grid capacity. In addition to
that, the allegedly high share of renewables in the primary energy
sources originates in the combustion of hardwood fuel [17].
Therefore, forest is destroyed, and carbon stored in the wood is
released into the atmosphere. • Lagos State government is already
launching initiatives towards expanding and
improving the electricity grid and a more sustainable power
generation. • 16 - 27 GW of new generation capacity required by
2030 to maintain productivity [18]. • Exploiting the solar
potential (> 1600 kWh/m2) is crucial [19].
16%
9%
75%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Others
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2015) Mobility The
transport system in Lagos is suffering a lot from massive traffic
congestions due to an immense number of cars and bad road
infrastructure. However, 95% of the daily trips in the city are by
road transport. Other systems of transportation are almost
non-existent [13]. Another problem is the underdeveloped public
transport system that is dominated by poorly maintained semi-formal
minibuses called Danfos [14]. Lagos also has to deal with a high
fatality rate due to traffic accidents (26.2 per 100.000
inhabitants) [15]. • Focus on water transportation (travel time
reduction, less pressure on roads [16]) • Abolition of the Danfos
and replacement by formal bus services • Clear separation of roads
and pedestrian paths as well as more pedestrian bridges
Green infrastructure Around 8.9% of the city area are covered with
healthy vegetation [10]. There are 327 parks for which the Lagos
Parks and Garden Agency is responsible, but the inhabitants have
the chance to take part by adopting a park [11]. The green areas
and trees are very unevenly distributed in the city. There is a
tree planting campaign and day, but monitoring and the attitude of
the Lagosians towards the project pose problems [12]. • More green
areas for cooling purposes and water absorption • Better monitoring
of planted trees and indigenous tree species; rewards for
tree
planting efforts of population • Green roofs and walls: recommended
for private and mandatory for business buildings
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2016)
69%
9%
22%
Built-up areas
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning Lagos has been facing a population explosion which
has for a long time not come along with proper urban planning by
the government. Thus, the high demand for land lead to about
two-thirds of Lagos’ population living in informal settlements
without adequate infrastructure and housing [6]. Recently, Lagos
state government has developed new plans. However, these often
favour high income groups or do not keep their promise [7]. •
Establish a comprehensive cadastral land register for land use
management [8] • Increase community participation in planning
processes so that the citizens’ real
needs are addressed [9] • Provide inclusionary and co-operative
housing concepts for the poor [7]
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2006)
-10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Lagos - Guiding the growth Lagos is one of the fastest-growing
cities in the world. The vision for Lagos is to compensate this
population growth by being a social city with a structured spatial
planning, a sustainable development and a high living quality for
everybody.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Lagos Nigeria
City overview
Country overview
Income classification1 Lower-middle income (1960 US$/ capita)
Life expectancy 53.4 years [1] Literacy rate 62 % [2] Happiness
ranking 85 of 156 countries [3]
Population 22,710,684 (2017) [4] Density 22,710 inhabitants/km2
(2017) Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Equatorial desert climate (AW) CO2
emissions 1.4 mtCO2/capita (2012, Nigeria) [5]
Franziska Dobler, Lena Fuchs, Liliane Raths, Jonas
Schmid-Querg
0.67 Earths
Urban Planning
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055.
Sources: [1] Worldometer (2018) [2] Worldbank (2018) [3] World
happiness report 2019 [4] B. Airlangga and A. Latif, “PROVINSI DKI
JAKARTA DALAM ANGKA 2019 - DKI Jakarta Province in Figures 2019,”,
2019. [5] World Map of Köppen−Geiger Climate Classification (2006)
[6] statista (2017) Figures: 1-
https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/ 2-
[4]. 3- [4], [6], [7], [9], [12], [17], [20], [21], [22], [23],
[26], [28], [29], [30], [31] 4- [4]. 5- Setiowati, R., Hasibuan, H.
S., & Koestoer, R. H. . “Green open space masterplan at Jakarta
Capital City, Indonesia for climate change mitiga- tion”, 2018. .
6- [17], [19] 7- “International Energy Agency,” 2017. [Online].
Available:
https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=INDONESIA&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=Total%20prima-
ry%20energy%20supply%20(TPES)%20by%20source [Zugriff 2020]. 8-
JABODETABEK MPA Strategic plan, C. Ministry and F. E. A. C. o.
Indonesia, 2012. 9- [26] Aerial image- Google Earth (2020).
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2018) Waste Jakarta produces a
lot of solid waste per year, especially in the area of food and
green. [25] More than one-fifth of waste is incinerated in modern
facilities. [26] Particularly some figures suggest that 15 percent
of global plastic waste in oceans comes from Indonesia. Many
problems exist regarding to low quality waste management, limited
final disposal sites and waste management institution. [27] The
goal is to form a developed waste disposal system and to get people
in Jakarta to earn consciousness and scientific understanding about
treatment, recycling and utilization of garbage. • Enact relevant
laws to limit waste generation • Increase the price of plastic. •
Research for highly technical methods for waste disposal.
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2012) Water The city of
Jakarta is facing big issues concerning water. Just one half of the
population is connected to a supply system of drinking water, the
other half has to rely on insecure sources such as rivers and
illegally bored groundwater of a poor water quality.[23] [22]
Jakarta’s biggest challenge is the increasing amount of flooding
events in monsoon periods and the lack of a working drainage system
to lead the huge masses of rainwater out of the city. Also some
parts of the sinking city are endangered not only of the flooding
from rainfalls, but also of the rise of the sealevel due to climate
change, as they are already under sealevel.[24] • Flood security
for whole population by building more drainage channels • Offering
flowing drinking water of a good quality by harvesting rainwater
& recycle wastewater • Good water quality of rivers and
groundwater by implementing a decentralized wastewater
management
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2017)
Energy Indonesia has a ratio of 67% of primary energy produced from
fossil fuels [20]. The electricity sector is even worse: 88% of
produced electricity comes from fossil sources [21]. Other problems
Jakarta faces in electricity supply is stability and consistency.
With only a surplus of 8% according to electricity consumption,
peak periods cannot be overcome without danger of a blackout [22].
This situation brings two conflicting problems together: Change the
energy supply to renewable sources and produce more electricity. •
improve the quality of voltage in the grid • support the
electricity production with decentralised power plants (solar
panels on roofs…) • make the geothermal potentials usable
(investments and science for more efficiency, lower risks and
better maintenance)
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2018) Mobility Jakarta is
a huge city which is facing chronic traffic congestion problems.
The urban area sprawled rapidly in the last 30 years, but the
infrastructure development can’t meet the commuters’ need in city
surrounding areas [17]. Because of unreliable public transport,
motorcycles became the main transport in Jakarta [18], which causes
a lot of air pollution and large greenhouse gas emissions [19]. •
Improve the usage rate by changing the currently existing
motorcycles into Motor-sharing system • Build a reliable public
transport by investing in public transport (better accessibility to
public transport
station, higher frequency of buses and trains, cheaper tickets for
public transport) • Develop alternative fuel technologies for cars
and motorcycles. (such as bio-diesel, bio ethanol, gas
fuel, electricity, etc.)
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2018) Green Infrastructure
(GI) Jakarta has a green area of 5,25% of the total area (3.32
m²/capita) [9]. The extent of an insufficient GI for stormwater
& flooding drainage can be seen in the flooding & sinking
of the city. Furthermore, the low proportion of green areas in the
city leads to poor air quality [10], high air temperatures (UHI)
[11], polluted water & reduced accessibility to green &
public areas [12]. • Increase the total green area to a min. of 50%
by integrating GI in the building stock, e.g. green roofs
&
walls & creating city forests, parks, public spaces [11], [13]
• Ensure the accessibility to green areas by using GIS to optimize
their distribution & connection [14] • Ensure a efficient GI
for flooding drainage & a high water quality by reforestation,
urban wetlands,
renaturalization of rivers, catchment areas, rainwater harvesting,
green roofs, etc. [15], [16]
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2017) Urban Planning
Jakarta is a city with a high population density and growth rate
(1.07 %). [4] A city growing this fast has big problems to keep up
with producing liveable places and the required infrastructure.
Consequently, one quarter of Jakarta is classified as an informal
settlement. Second big problem is the air pollution, which is four
and a half times higher than the WHO recommendation. [7] Another
point is a very high rate of built up land (83,7 %). [8] This stems
the natural drainage system and the ground water storage doesn’t
get refilled from rainfalls, what is the main reason for the
sinking of the city. • Decrease ratio of informal settlements by
giving the possibility to move to social housing • Decrease air
pollution to theWHO recommendation by actions of green
infrastructure and energy supply • Reduce the percentage of
built-up land by developing former slums into green areas
Jakarta - Future for the sinking City We want Jakarta to be a
modern city with a future for educated, relaxed and peaceful living
in a green, healthy and clean environment. Meeting not only
physiological needs, Jakarta will help his inhabitants with a good
urban infrastructure to enjoy social life, gain esteem and find
happiness.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Jakarta Indonesia
1.04 Earth
Timo Schäle, Julia Heichele, Yixuan Li, Guanting Zeng, Felix
Fischer
Flash flood
Income classification1 Lower-middle (3.893,596 US$/capita) Life
expectancy 72.32 years [1] Literacy rate 96 % [2] Happiness ranking
92 of 156 countries [3]
Population 10,467,630 (2017) [4] Density 15,804 inhabitants/km²
(2017) [4] Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Tropical monsoon (Am) [5] CO2
emissions 1,880 mtCO2/capita (2017) [6]
5 km
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
Scan for further literature:
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055.
Sources: [1] The World Bank data. [2] Data by the UNESCO Institute
for Statistics. [3] Data by World Happiness Report (2018). [4] UN
data. [5] City Population Statistics. Link: https://www.citypopula-
tion.de/en/egypt/cities/?cityid=572. [6] World Map of Köppen−Geiger
Climate Classification. [7] Cairo’s bad breath. (2017). UN
environmental programme. Figures: Figures: 1- Global Footprint
Network. 2- Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery,
the natural hazard risk profile ‘ThinkHazard’. 3- Urban Planning:
Global Footprint Network; David Sims (2003) „Case Studies of Cairo,
Egypt“ in UNDERSTANDING SLUMS: Case Studies for the Global Report.;
Green Infrastructure: Kafafy, N. & Betawi, Y. (bez datuma).
Urban Green Space Benefits and the Pivotal Role of Conservation,
Cairo’s Case - Egypt. 4- UN data. 5- Calculated from Google Earth
(2019). 6- Ghonimi I., El ZAmly H. (2017) “Sustainable urban
mobility: Assessing Different Neighbourhood Models in Greater Cairo
Region, Egypt.” 7- IEA World Energy Balances and Statistics. 8-
Fanack Water: Water Resources in Egypt. 9- “Country report on the
solid waste management in EGYPT” (2014) The Regional Solid Waste
Exchange of Information and Expertise network in Mashreq and
Maghreb countries. Aerial image- Google Earth (2019).
Waste In Cairo, the public sector has been unable to provide the
required services effectively, as the existing regulations are
still very limited and the local taxation system is inadequate,
while the illegal disposal of domestic and industrial waste remains
a common practice. Absence of source separation of waste, no policy
and practical focus on reduction and reuse of waste is the main
problem. Our aim is get all waste collected and treated. • Vehicle
productivity(in kg/vehicle/day); • Biological treatment of
biodegradable waste.(Anaerobic digestion); • The “Recycling School”
concept; • Formalization of the traditional garbage
collectors.
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2014)
10%
7%
7%
76%
Recycling
Composting
Sanitary landfill
Open dump
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2018) Water The city of
Cairo is under water stress due to over consumption and dependency
on River Nile for usage. Evaporation and dilapidated network of
pipes create water losses towards the city. The booming population
creates shortage of supply in periods of high demand and illegal
irrigation practices and industrial and sewage discharges have
posed a challenge to put the water into reuse. Our aim is to make
water in Cairo accessible, efficient and carbon neutral. •
Renovation of existing pipe network to minimize losses; • Solar
desalination and rain water harvesting techniques; • Switching the
agriculture sector to less water intensive crops and farming.
69%
12%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2017)
Energy Energy consumption in Egypt exceeds energy production from
oil and natural gas which is turning the country into oil and
natural gas importer although Egypt was the net exporter for both
sources in previous years. A sound energy strategy is crucially
needed, and should be based on two pillars: first, production of
clean energy from various renewable and non-renewable sources, and
second, managing and rationalizing energy demand and decreasing the
consumption, with related reforms. Steps to achieve: • Increasing
the consumption energy from renewable energy sources; • Promoting
to use low energy lights and energy saving devices; • Building
energy efficient buildings.
45%
51%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Renewables
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2017) Mobility The state
of mobility in Cairo faces several issues such as: lack of
standardized roads, high rates of traffic congestion, high rates of
CO2 emissions, lack of metro lines, irregular and overcrowded bus
services, unsafe road infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists.
Our vision is to achieve accessible, affordable and attractive
public and non-motorized transportation for everyone. • Increasing
the efficiency of public transportation (less buses, more metro); •
Insertion of separate cycling and pedestrian lines and easy
connection with other
means of transportation; • Improvement of quality of the roads and
parking facilities.
Greeen infrastructure The problem with overpopulation of the city
starting in 20th century affected the existence of green spaces.
“Almost all of the city’s trees, its most effective dust sponges,
have disappeared under the concrete.” [7] Our goal is to increase
accessibility of green open spaces in Cairo, improve attractiveness
of GI and involve citizens with urban farming. Two main challenges
are discussed in order to solve the problem with green open spaces
in Cairo: dense urban areas and arid climate. The solution offered:
• Urban farming on building roofs; • Interaction between mobility
and GI; • Water sensitive landscape.
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2019)
97%
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning Cairo is one of the world’s most rapidly growing
cities, with nearly two percent annual population growth. Cairo
struggles with many issues, including illegal settlements, traffic
congestion, health issues and severe air pollution. Our aim is to
make Cairo and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and
sustainable. • Renovation of old buildings; • Social Marketing’s to
solve traffic congestion; • Bicycle system for transport; •
Optimization of green energy production.
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2017)
-10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75+
% of Total Population
male female
Vision: Cairo - Better Place for Everyone Cairo is the city with a
great potential. Our goal is to use all its capacity to develop
inclusive and sustainable urbanization, provide affordable housing,
make the transportation sustainable, energy – renewable, water and
air – clean, waste – recycled.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Cairo Egypt
City overview
Country overview
Population 9,539,673 (2018) [4] Density 15,333 inhabitants/km
(2018) [5] Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Hot desert climate (BWh) [6] CO2
emissions 2,233 mtCO2/capita (2014) [1]
Egi Kalaj, Gizem Eryenilmez, Prem Kumar Yadav, Saurav Chauhan,
Sofija Grinevska
1,1 Earths
DroughtFlash flood
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055.
Figures: 1–Ecological footprint (2016). 2-Disaster risks / city
hazards. 3-Sustainability rating. 4-Population by age and gender
(2020). 5- Green and blue infrastructure (2017). 6-Modal split of
transportation (2018). 7-Share of primary energy sources (2018).
8-Share of water supply sources (estimated, 2019). 9-Share of waste
disposal (2016). Aerial image- Google Earth (2020).
Waste
The main issue regarding waste, is the solid waste management. 25%
oft he waste ends up in streets, drains, on the beaches or is
burnt, because it is not collected. The waste collected, is put in
two open dumps which are almost full [28]. The other big concern is
the amount of e-waste coming down at the dumpsite ‚Agbogbloshie‘.
Because people are burning the e-waste to recycle it, there is a
dangerous level of toxic gases [29]. • waste bins and collection
all over the city in streets and private households • fines for
uncontrolled waste disposal • extensions to landfill sites •
controlled recycling of e-waste (improvement for workplaces and
health) • dams and streets built with incinerated waste
product
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2016) [28]
5% 1%
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2019)
[6,22,23,24,25]Water
GAMA (2010) is mainly supplied with treated surface and sea water
through the pipeline system (365,000 m³/day). But the supply volume
is only about 75% of demand and only 51% of the population is
connected to the pipeline system. 67% of the population has access
to improved drinking water. The water consumption is about 71
litres/capita per day. Only 11% of the waste water ends up in the
sewage system. Less than 0.5% of waste water was treated in 2014.
[6, 22] • Reducing pipeline losses (detection system for leaks,
rehabilitation of pipes) • Increase access to water systems without
long distances (e.g. stand pipes) • Increasing the treatment
capacity of existing surface water treatment plants • Construction
of treatment plants for the use of ground and sea water •
Improvement / extension of the pipeline systems (pipe- and
wastewater) • Repair / expansion of wastewater treatment
plants
90%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2018) [14]Energy
The energy supply share in Ghana is dominated by oil and biomass.
Biomass is not counted as a renewable source, because it´s a very
uncontrolled burning of firewood, agriculture residue and waste for
cooking and heating [13]. This residental use makes the biggest
part oft he primary enegry use by 43%. Due to discovery of offshore
oil fields in the westcoast of Ghana, oil has increased in the
electricity generation mix over the last ten years. The access to
electricity in the region of greater Accra is 97% [14]. • increase
solar power: Ghana has ideal conditions, due to its geographical
location • develop waste to energy systems to reduce share of
biomass in energy supply mix • rise awareness: reduce consumption
through energy efficiency
44%
14%
5%
37%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Others
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2018) [18]Mobility
Most of the people are walking (49,6 %) or using their own car
(28,6%), only 0,5% are using the bicycle [18]. Car ownership is a
sign of status which means every year the number of newly
registered vehicles in the Greater Accra Region is raising. 2016 it
was about 70,000 in 2018 it was about 93,135 [19]. Poor roaddesign
for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport (called trotros) are
hindering the traffic, the result is congestion in central area.
Most of the trotros are private and under no control of government.
• Pedestrianfriendly roaddesign (more intersections, street lights,
seperated lines for vehicles, more
parking spots, no more trading on the road) • Better public
transportation access (no more private trotros, just few stations
along the road,
carsharing) • School education about carsharing, public
transportation, NO MORE private cars • Strictly speedlimits at
highway
Green infrastructure
Many different ministries tackling the same issue of sustainable
nature-based solutions not properly. There is a lack of proper
stormwater management causing flood and water logging, especially
in the rainy season, as well as poor maintenance, especially of
organic drains. On top of that these drains must handle grey and
black wastewater in addition to stormwater. The growing
urbanization of the metropolis and rural regions without control
impacts a decreased infiltration and increased surface water
run-off combined with a growing amount of solid waste. Also, there
are only about 7% of green areas in the urbanized region. [20],
[21] • a well-functioning drainage system saving and storm water
management • sustainable solid waste management needs to be
integrated to free the blocked drains • big need of greener housing
spaces to ensure a healthier life (temperature, pollution) and
improve
the quality of the city (tourism, social life)
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2017) [27]
92%
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban Planning
About 8.2% of the population of Ghana lives in Accra [9]. The
population growth rate is estimated at 2.09%. About 56% of the
inhabitants are under 24 years old. [4] The population density with
13,122 inhabitants per km² is 2.8 times higher than in Munich. [7,
8] Accra has a size of 225.7 km² [4]. 92% is built-up area and
about 15.7% (2011) of this is informal settlements [10, 11]. An
estimated 45% of the population lives in these [12]. • Change from
a uni-centric to a well-connected polycentric city • Change from
one-storey to multi-storey houses • Building affordable and
sustainable homes for everyone • Creation of a development plan
with separate areas for industry
“Ambitious - Cultural - Caring - Renewable - Agile” A well educated
young generation strives for being a rolemodel for their whole
country and even western-central Africa. Therefore they will have
acchieved financial independence, solid management of their
economy, infrastructure, resources and culture. Also, social
justice, overall-health and other sustainable nature-based
solutions were implemented in their development.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Accra Ghana
City overview
Country overview
Income classification1 Lower-middle income (2.130 US$/ capita)
[15]
Life expectancy 62/64 years (2016) [1] Literacy rate 76,1 % (2010)
[2] Happiness ranking 98 of 156 countries (2019) [3]
Population 2.514.005 (2020) [4] Density 13.122 inhabitants/km
(2016) [5] Climate (Köppen-Geiger) equatorial, winter dry (Aw) [16]
CO2 emissions 0,97 mtCO2/capita (2016) [17]
Tabea Horn, Martina Gruzlewski, Dominik Eckl, Sabrina
Majewski
1,2 Earths
Flash flood
0
1
2
3
4
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055. 2 IMCV is a Multidimensional Life Conditions
Index developed by the government of Medell ín to quantify each
districts quality of life [9].
Figures: 1- Global Footprint Network, “Ecological Footprint
Explorer,” Footprintnetwork.org, 2019. 2- Departamento
Administrativo de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres Medellín, “Plan
Municipal de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Medellín
2015-2030,” medellin.gov.co, 2015. 4-DANE, “Censo Nacional de
Poblacion y Vivienda,” dane.gov.co, 30-Aug-2019. 5-Área
Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá, “Plan Maestro de Espacios
Públicos Verdes del Área Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá,”
metropol.gov.co, 2006. 6- Área Metropolitana Valle de Aburrá,
“Encuesta origen destino,” Metropol. gov.co, 2018. 7- International
Energy Agency, “IEA - The global energy authority,” Iea.org, 2019.
8- B. Miller and E. Sweigart, “How Countries Manage Water:
Colombia,” Americasquarterly.org, 21- Oct-2019. 9- M. P. Molina
Quintero and J. A. Barrios Barrera, “Plan de Gestión Integral de
Residuos Sólidos,” Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Nov. 2014. Aerial
image- Google Earth (2016).
Scan for further literature:
Waste The total urban solid waste generated is 294.643 [18], which
most of the waste generated is organic and comes from residential
waste. From the total waste, only 18,9% is recycled, 1,8% used as
biomass and 79,2% [19] is disposed on the landfill (3,8km²) which
corresponds to 1% of the city’s total area. • Increase plastic
recycling to 75%. • Reuse organic waste into biomass to 30%. •
Decrease the area needed for the landfill to 60%. • Generate
business through the sustainable reuse and recycle of waste.
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2015)
19%
2%
76%
Others
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2020) Water Medellin has
96% water coverage [14]. The Medellin River represents 75% of the
water supply and 25% comes from groundwater [15]. Medellin’s
average water consumption is 126,67 liters per person per day [16].
The agricultural sector represents 54% of the total water demand in
the city [17]. Medellin has 3 reservoirs, 11 water treatment plants
and 2 different water supply systems, in which 96% of the water is
distributed by the interconnected system and 4% by the independent
system [14]. • Increase water supply and drainage system coverage
to 100%. • Clean 100% of the Medellin River avoiding the use of
harmful chemicals. • Recycle all the wastewater, expand aquifer and
install rainwater tanks.
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2017)
Energy Renewable resources account for one-fourth of Medellín’s
primary energy sources. Electricity is mainly supplied by
hydropower with a percentage of 78%; therefore, the electricity
used in the city is mostly renewable [7]. All inhabitants have
access to electricity. The city has an efficiency score of 2,6 this
is below the global average of 5,27 [7], [13]. • Implement of
photovoltaic solar panels in different sizes such as residential,
commercial
and large-scale. • Construct mini-grid systems using
residential-sized PV applications. • Increase energy efficiency in
new construction projects. • Decrease thermal energy conversion and
carbon emissions.
37%
26%
11%
26%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Others
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2018) Mobility The public
transport system consists of Metro, Tram, Cablecar, and BRT. 45% of
daily trips are completed via public transport, 29% via active
modes but only 1% by bicycle [11]. The city has a high and growing
demand for private transport (e.g. cars and motorbikes). Medellin
is the 25th most congested city in the world (2018) with 138h lost
in traffic [12]. • Develop interconnected electric bicycle stations
and expand system coverage. • Connect all public transport modes
with pedestrian and bicycle systems with extended
hours of operation. • Implement electric-powered cars, motorbikes,
and buses. • Develop new cable car stations and expand public
transport coverage.
cycling 1
Green infrastructure Total green areas account for 18,9% of urban
Medellín (6,6m²/capita), while public- use green areas are only
13,2% of urban Medellín (4,6m²/capita) [10]. The ecological network
is significantly fragmented. The rapidly expanding slums along the
valley walls are the most vulnerable to disasters due to poor
quality housing. • Increase effective green area per capita by
converting private-use areas. • Improve connectivity of the
ecological network through green corridors, green belts,
and library parks, using hedgerows, green roofs, and urban farming.
• Implement green measures against landslides, mudslides, floods
and flash floods,
such as filter strips, detention and infiltration basins, retention
ponds, and rain gardens.
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2006)
87%
9% 4%
Built-up areas
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning Medellín has a young and independent population [5].
The poor and vulnerable classes make up 4,2% and 19,4% of the
population, respectively [8]. These lower classes are only able to
live in specific districts of the city and therefore have limited
access to various services and quality education. The city
qualifies inequality using an IMCV2 [9]. The district with the
highest IMCV has more than double that of the lowest. • Develop
affordable housing programs for the lower classes and the young
population. • Promote the use of sustainable materials and natural
ventilation for all new construction. • Fund interdimensional
programs that benefit communities and the city as a whole,
like the mobility Encicla program, Green Belt, and Library
Parks.
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2018)
-10,00% -5,00% 0,00% 5,00% 10,00%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Vision - The Right to a Sustainable Life A more equal Medellín
where all its inhabitants have the right to adequate housing,
sustainably-sourced public services, and opportunities regardless
of age, gender, education, and economic power.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Medellín Colombia
City overview
Country overview
Population 2.596.625 (2018) [5] Density 6.353,7 inhabitants/km
(2018) [5] Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Tropical monsoon (Am) [6] CO2
emissions 1,66 mtCO2/capita (2017) [7]
Gerda Cones, David Guillen, Andres Grisales, Holman Latorre, Ayberk
Ozyurek
2,05 Earths
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-middle income countries 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055. 2 United Nations. “Peru”. Available:
http://data.un.org/en/iso/pe.html. [November 2019] 3CountryEconomy.
“Literacy rate increase in Peru”. Available:
https://countryeconomy.com/demography/literacy-rate/peru. [November
2019] 4John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs.
(2019). World Happiness Report. [Online]. Available:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/happiness-report/2019/WHR19.pdf.
[Accessed: December 2019] 5 Lima Cómo Vamos. (2019, October). ¿Cómo
vamos en Lima y Callao? Noveno Informe de Indicadores sobre Calidad
de Vida. [Online]. Available:
http://www.limacomovamos.org/informesurbanos/. [Accessed: November
2019]
Waste Organic and dry recyclable materials are the main share of
the total domestic waste generated. The collection services
coverage is 88%[9]. However, no efficient waste segregation at the
source takes place and almost the totality of the collected waste
is disposed in either sanitary landfills or informal open waste
dumps. Informal waste workers face critical health and work safety
risks. • Implement awareness-raising initiatives on consumption and
materials life-cycle. • Reduce packaging and substitute single-use
materials with returnable materials • Proper destination and future
use of the generated waste: segregation at the source,
composting, waste-to-energy, and improved recycling centers and
work conditions.
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2014)
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2017)Water The Peruvian
capital is located at the most critical region of the country in
terms of water avaiability: water is a scarce resource, while the
demand is high. Even though 95% of the population has access to
drinking water[8], this does not ensure the potability of water or
the quality of the drinking water supply system. • Decrease
drinking water demand: more conservation measures, less system
losses • Achieve safe and sustainable water supply: make the
drinking water drinkable. • Invest in descentralized water and
wastewater systems, particularlly non-potable
water reuse, desalination, and fog-water harvesting. • Preserve
surface and groundwater resources.
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2017)Energy Lima relies
mainly on fossil fuels, which are used for cooking, transportation
and transformation to electricity in thermoelectric plants (they
provide 72% of the electricity share, the rest comes from
hydropower plants)[6]. Natural gas has gained a crucial role in
Energy production, displacing almost every other source. Over 99%
of the population has got access to the electric network[7] but
around 50% of electricity is lost during transformation and
distribution processes[3]. • Invest in the local production of
biogas from the city´s organic waste. • Invest in renewables, such
as wind and ocean energy. • Import electricity coming from
renewable energy sources.
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2018)Mobility The majority
of trips is done by public transport[4], which is mainly operated
by old collective buses. These create safety problems, high
particulate matter concentrations and large congestions[5]. There
is a plan for a metro system, one line is already succesfully in
operation. Electromobility does not yet play a role. A lack of
cycling lanes and saftrefy problems hamper the progress in
encouraging cycling as a means of transport. • Invest more into a
cycle network in all districts and advertize it in the city. •
Persecute illegal transport and ensure accessibility for everybody
in public transport. • Electrify taxis as and buses as pilot
projects, set up a smart charging infrastructure. • Integrate the
metro system well into the urban structure (polycentric
development).
cycling 2
motorbike 2
pri ori
tise d
bu s
4
Green infrastructure Lima provides little urban green open spaces
for the citizens with a mean of 2.72 m2 per capita, especially in
the outskirts[3]. Most of the parks are in wealthier districts[3],
some are private. Nonetheless, Lima has got some natural sites[2]
which could be exploited better, e.g. the coast, seasonal hills and
the three rivers. • Renaturate the river and their valleys as they
are possible natural green belts and
make them accessible for walkers and cyclists. • Focus on native
plants that do not use much water. • Use green roofs as a
possibility to green that unused spaces. • Build a terrace
structure in the cliff in Miraflores as a pilot project.
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2014)
Scan for further literature:
Urban planning Due to a lack of housing offer[1] for low income
habitants self-built, poor quality, disaster- prone, informal
settlements have developed[2]. The city’s population distribution
is characterized by massive sprawl of low-density family houses on
the outskirts, overfilled poorly build houses in slums and high
buildings in the central and more wealthy parts of the city[2]. •
Re-location and control of disaster-prone areas. • Self-organized
improvement with state founding to improve the living conditions. •
Private and public market enforcement to create housing offer for
all citizens. • Planning of multi-centered land-use development and
density with a holistic view.
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2017)
LIMA: Juntos, sí se puede! Together, it is posible!
Lima as a healthy living space where people feel invited to
participate, creating a sense of place and responsibility. A city
that respects the natural environment with conscious use of
resources, resulting on equal opportunities and the happiness of
Limeños.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Lima Peru
City overview
Country overview
Population5 10,371,712 (2018) Density5 3,683 inhabitants/km (2018)
Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Arid Desert Cold/Hot Arid(BWk/BWh) CO2
emissions6 1.50 mtCO2/capita (2012)
Alejandro Castillo Nolte, Nicole Valentini Fedrizzi, Sebastian
Schüle, Stefanie Gocht
1.3 Earths
DroughtLandslide/ Mudslide
Earthquake EpidemicFlood
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
Waste Mexico City has one of the highest urban solid waste
generation per capita in the world [17]. Nonetheless the city has a
solid waste infrastructure with a very good collecting rate in the
federal district [18]. For the outer areas is not much reliable
data available. The main part of the waste is organic and stored in
sanitary landfills [19]. Much informal recycling by people called
“pependadores” is happening [17]. Actually, CDMX does not use
waste-to-energy technologies. • Reduce waste generation by banning
single use plastic materials • Increase the sensitivity for waste
separation • Optimize recycling and reuse rates • Exchange old
diesel powered waste trucks by electrical ones
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2018)
15%
11%
6%
65%
Reuse
Incineration
Non-collected
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895;
upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income countries
> 12.055.
Sources: [1] S. d. Salud., «Agenda estadística 2017.,» Mexico
City., 2017. [2] INEGI, «Censo Nacional de Gobiernos Municipales y
Delegacionales 2017,» Sistema Nacional de información estadística y
geográfica., 2017. [3] R. L. a. J. D. S. John F. Helliwell, «World
Happiness Report Mexico,» 2019. [4] S. Z. Arena, « Aspectos
socioeconómicos de la problemática en México.,» Editorial Limusa,
2002. [5] Weatherbase.com, «`Weather Mexico city,» 2020. [6] S. d.
M. A. d. l. C. d. México, Inventario de emisiones de la ciudad de
México., CDMX, 2016. Figures: 1- Global Footprint Network, „Country
Trends,“ 2016. 2- CDMX Resilience Office, „CDMX Resilience
Strategy,“ 100 Resilient Cities, 2016. 4- Secretaria de Salud de la
Ciudad de México. Agenda estadística 2017. CDMX. 5- Own elaboration
based on aerial images of Google Maps (2018). 6- I. N. d. E. y. G.
INEGI, „Encueste origen destino - En hogares de la zona
metropolitana del valle de México,“ México, 2017. 7- Secretaría de
Energía, PRODESEN 2018-2031 Programa de Desarrollo del Sistema
Eléctrico Nacional, CDMX, 2018.. 8- CONAGUA, 2018, Estadísticas del
agua en méxico, edición 2018. Comisión nacional del agua.
Secretaría de medio ambiente y Recursos naturales. México.. 9-
Facultat de Quimica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 2013.
Aerial image- Google Earth (2016).
Scan for further literature:
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2013)
Water The aquifer which provides around 70 % of the water, is
highly overused [15]. Therefore, the groundwater table is sinking
which causes subsidence and damage on the infrastructure, the
ecosystem and poor water quality [16]. Especially poor people
suffer from bad access to water and are vulnerable to floods that
occur recurrently [16]. The rates of wastewater treatment and
groundwater infiltration are too low [16]. • Implement rainwater
harvesting facilities throughout the whole city • Repair damaged
water and wastewater infrastructure and expand it - access to
clean
water for all • Increase groundwater infiltration - implement
infiltration systems • Educate inhabitants to use less water •
Recycle water, e.g. for flushing toilets
25%
68%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2016)
Energy The primary energy is almost 90 % coming from fossil fuels
[14]. For electricity, nuclear energy provides 4 %, hydro 10 %,
wind 4 % and solar 1 % which contrast with the high solar
irradiation potential of 5.3 kWh/m2 annually [14]. Transport sector
is the main source for CO2 and PM2.5 [6]. • Generate electricity
for renewable sources will diversify the energy market making
it
more competitive • Refurbish to the old infrastructure for
transmission and distributionand, implement
Smart-grids • Reduce emissions from internal combustion vehicles
switching to public transport • Develop waste-to-energy facilities
to supply power and build storage systems
62%
22%
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2017)
Mobility Not taking walking into consideration over 95 % of the
trips in Mexico City are made by three means of transport:
motorized private vehicles, metro or a big variety of buses,
microbuses, collective vans and taxis [10]. Whilst the metro system
only covers the city area all other 13 million inhabitants of the
metropolitan region are reliant on road- based ways of travelling.
Mexico City is the fourth most congested city worldwide [11] and
suffers under bad air quality around 250 days a year [12]. The
traffic sector is responsible for 44 % of the cities greenhouse gas
emissions [13]. • Expansion of the metro network • Reduce road
space for cars in favour of bikes, pedestrians • Revaluate the bus
system, bigger buses in a defined network • Expand rail network and
bring unused back in use
Active walking
25
Public
Private
Green infrastructure There are around 6731 ha of green areas in the
urban part (equals to ca. 4.5 % of the total surface) [8] but they
are unevenly distributed. Especially in poor areas, there is often
not enough vegetation (2.23 m2/capita) [8]. The average is at
around 7.54 m2 per person [8] which is not sufficient according to
the WHO [9]. The government and the citizens have started several
programs in the last years to tackle this problem. Therefore, green
areas are becoming more again. • Create green building walls and
roofs – tax benefits for companies • Create a bigger, equally
distributed park structure with water infiltration areas • Increase
urban farming in the city center
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2018)
60%
32%
8%
Built-up areas
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning The city was founded on a lake system surrounded by
volcanoes. It grew without proper planning and by result the lake
was drained and built over. The administrative limits of the city
of Mexico covers 9 million people, while more than the half of the
metropolitan area lives in the neighbor State making complex to
synchronize public policies [7]. • An integral agenda among
municipalities is needed to reorganize better the land use. • The
challenges are to reduce the inequality among social sectors,
improve health
services and provide security. • Create an atlas of risk for
vulnerable buildings for earthquakes and floods.
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2017)
-5% -3% -1% 1% 3% 5%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Vision - „Make Mexico City green again!” Most of the problems arise
from a disrupted relation to nature. The slogan stands for
restoring this “green” relation. The city must be the place where
you feel secure, enjoy being outside everyday while having high and
equal living standards with clean sky and where inhabitants live in
full harmony with nature again.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Mexico City Mexico
City overview
Country overview
Income classification1 Upper-middle (9,180 US$/capita) Life
expectancy 78 years (women) 72 years (men) [1] Literacy rate 98,5 %
[2] Happiness ranking 23 of 156 countries [3]
Population 21.650.668 (2017) [1] Density 16.000 inhabitants/km [4]
Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Ocean Suptropical Highland (Cwb) [5] CO2
emissions 2,87 tCO2/capita (2016) [6]
Sandra Feder, Javier Lopez Garcia, Thomas Merrath, Fabian
Kellner
1,6 Earths
EarthquakeHeavy Rain
Flash flood
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895; upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income
countries > 12.055.
Sources: [1] https://data.worldbank.org [2]
https://happyplanetindex.org [3]
https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/pr/curitiba/panorama [4]
http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/present.htm [5] EcoWood (2011)
http://multimidia.curitiba.pr.gov.br/2012/00118446.pdf [6] Fermino
et al. (2013)
https://bnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-10-35 [7]
Grise et al. (2015) https://
www.researchgate.net/publication/312036103_A_FLORESTA_URBANA_DA_CIDADE_DE_CURITIBA-PR
[8]
https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Clean-Energy-Data-Explorer?language=en_
US [9] https://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/city/curitiba [10]
Mott MacDonald (2015)
https://mid.curitiba.pr.gov.br/2016/00176737.pdf Figures: 1-
https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/images/uploads/Curitiba_report_PT.pdf
2- https://www.c40.org/cities/curitiba#city-climate-risks 4-
https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/pr/curitiba/panorama. 5- Grise
et al. (2015)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312036103_A_FLORESTA_URBANA_DA_CIDADE_DE_CURITIBA-PR
6-
https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Transport-Data-Explorer?language=en_US
7-
https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Clean-Energy-Data-Explorer?language=en_US.
8- https://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/city/curitiba 9- Mott
MacDonald (2015) https://mid.curitiba.pr.gov.br/2016/00176737.pdf
Aerial image- Google Earth (2020).
Scan for further literature:
Waste Curitiba already has a system in place to recycle plastic,
metals, glass and paper, which includes social collection programs.
The system is municipally organized and based on waste pickers.
Even though this unfortunately introduces a lot of redundancy in
waste treatment, changes need to be handled with care as the
livelihood of a few thousand waste pickers depends on it [10].
Possible improvements include: • separate collection of organic
waste for composting and processing in a biogas plant • regulation
for packaging to include recycled material and/or be recyclable •
ban of throwaway plastics • upcycle and repair workshops
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2015)
23%
77%
Recycling
Composting
Reuse
Incineration
Non-collected
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources Water TheMetropolitan
area’s sources of water are mainly rivers. However, processed
drinking water is of 6950 l/s which is smaller than the demand of
7000 l/s [9]. This is a problem for the growing city. Moreover,
Curitiba is located in an area with heavy rainfalls, which brings
the problem of frequent floods. Measures can be taken for
improvement: • Better waste water treatment, goal drinking water •
Dam as flood protection • Desalination of sea water • Increase
awareness of people regarding water • Rainfalls usage as a source
of water
97%
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2018)
Energy The energy sources of the city’s electricity are mainly
renewable, the most important part is here hydropower with around
70 % [8]. On the other side 18 % comes from non- renewable sources
but is responsible for only 6 % of the CO2eq emissions of the
energy sector. The other 94 % come from fuels. So, to really save
CO2eq, there must be a change in the transportation and the
industrial sector [5]. • Generation of more capacity of cleaner
renewable energy such as the wind, solar and
bio-mass • Elimination of CO2 emission • Introduction of smart
technologies
4% 9%
3% 2%
82%
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Renewables
Others
Figure 6: Modal split of transportation (2017-2018) Mobility
Curitiba’s bus system has largely contributed to its development.
Recently, there has been an increase in the use of active transport
& cars, and a decrease in bus ridership. Methods to enhance the
ability of all its inhabitants to move, through highly accessibile,
affordable, environmentally-friendly and high-quality
transportation means are: • Not prioritizing cars - road pricing
& fuel tax, emission control, campaigns • Attractive bus system
- reduce fares, improve quality, higher capacity, electrification •
Encourage modal shift - rental e-scooters & bicycles, better
infrastructure • Use of technology - telecommuting & traffic
signals prioritizing cycling • Future of transport - trams on
existing roads
Green infrastructure • Curitiba is already a very green city.
Nearly the half of the area is covert with green,
which leads to a green area of 64m2 per capita [6], But the problem
with that is, that most of these areas are not public, and the
public ones are not even distributed over the city [7]. Because of
that not all residents have equal and easy access to the public
green space. So, there is still a need for action.
• Achieve equal distribution and access to green spaces, • Make
Curitiba a biophilic city • Community gardening • Vertical Farming
and Gardening
Figure 5: Green and blue infrastructure (2015)
54% 43%
Green areas
Blue areas
Urban planning Curitiba is a fast growing city due to its high
livability, with a growing population of 1.9 million. Some
challenges arise including overcrowding, informal settlements and
slums. Improvements using suitable management of existing land,
targeting the city’s young population, creating attractive social
housing to improve equity and further increase its livability are
to be implemented. • Polycentric city of short distances • Mixed
use development • Energy efficient, attractive social housing •
Shared living to reduce housing shortage
Figure 4: Population by age and gender (2010)
-10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
0-4 5-9
10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95-99 100+
% of Total Population
male female
Vision - A Living City for All A sustainable Curitiba offers equal
opportunity to all inhabitants. An inclusive social infrastructure
enables the citizens to shape their city. The streets, green and
bustling, are for the people. Closed circuits and a regional
economy achieve resilience.
Figure 2: Disaster risks / city hazards
Curitiba Brazil
City overview
Country overview
Life expectancy 75 years [1]
Literacy rate 93 % [1]
Density 4 027.04 inhabitants/km (2010) [3]
Climate (Köppen-Geiger) Moderate maritime climate (Cfb) [4]
CO2 emissions 1.92 mtCO2/capita (2018) [5]
Adejumoke Lanisa, Eman Taha, Adedayo Ajala, Sherief Elmetwally,
Thea Meßmer
1.73 Earths
StormFloodHeavy rain
Violent wind
Technical University of Munich Institute of Energy Efficient and
Sustainable Design and Building Prof. Dr.-Ing. Werner Lang
1 Country income classification from the World Bank Atlas, based on
the Gross National Income (GNI) per capita (current US$):
low-income countries < 996; lower-middle income countries
996-3.895;
upper-midde income countires 3.896-12.055; high-income countries
> 12.055. 2 IOL 2019. 3 Socio Economic Profile // City of Cape
Town 2016. 4 World Happiness Report 2019. 5 World Population
Review 2020. 6 World Population Review 2020. Census 2011. 7 World
Map of Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification 2006. 8 Energy
Consumption and CO2e Emission Database 2018. Sources: [1] dpa
international by K. Palitza 2018. [2] State of the Environment
Report 2018. [3] UAP 2016. [4] Comprehensive integrated transport
plan 2013. The World Air Quality Project. University of Cape Town
2019. WHO 2018. [5] Cape Town State of Energy Report 2015. [6]
Official Guide to South Africa 2018/19 Water and Sanitation. [7]
The South African by Nic Andersen 2018. [8] City of Cape Town -
Water and sanitation services in informal settlements. [9] Green
Cape, Waste - 2018 Market Intelligence Report 2018. [10] E+Z
Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit - Voneinander lernen 2016. [11]
EU-Reycling by H. Stumpf 2019. [12] Lilli Green 2018. Figures: 1-
OCHA. 2- OCHA, Thenounproject by Gan Khoon Lay. 3- various. 4-
State of Cape Town Report 2016. 5- European Comission GHS Urban
Centre Database 2015. Blue areas: self estimation 6- Research Gate
by Marianne Vanderschuren 2015. 7- Cape Town State of Energy Report
2015. 8- University of Cape Town 2019. 9- World Bak 2018, CDP 2018.
Aerial image- Google Earth (2019).
Waste CT produces 3,713,700 t/a of urban solid waste.[9] 64% of the
people in ZA are connected to a waste disposal system. 79% of the
waste is disposed in open dumps. Incineration is prohibited by
law.[10] Informal waste pickers are important for the recycling
system.[11] The measures to achieve the vision “Zero Waste” and
“Cradle to Cradle” are: • The population must be sensitized to this
topic. The current lifestyles must be changed. • Avoid Waste.
Products have to be durable and repairable. Recycling is the last
step. • Replace materials: Packaging made from algae.[12] Local
product and biodegradable. • Organic waste: Generate electricity
and heat in biogas plants. Processed as
biomethane used as fuel for mobility. Fermentation residues used as
fertilizer.
Figure 9: Share of waste disposal (2018)
14%
0%
79%
Reuse
Incineration
Non-collected
Figure 8: Share of water supply sources (2019) Water The supply of
water is a major problem in CT. The city is dependent on rainwater.
Rain is collected in rain season and consumed over year. 99.5% of
the people have access to water with good quality.[6] 2015-2018 was
a water crisis in C.T.. Several years of drought reduced the water
reserves to 16%.[7] The water consumption was limited to 50 LPCD.
Wastewater treatment is insufficient, much water is discharged
untreated into nature. • Permanent reduction of water consumption
in all areas. • Secure independent water supply. Groundwater,
reused water, if needed desalination. • High standards for drinking
water access. Currently:1 tap per 25 houses in townships.[8]
• Connect all houses to the canalisation and improve the wastewater
treatment plants. 95%
5% Surface water
Figure 7: Share of primary energy sources (2015)
Energy CT consumed 5,414,468 TCE final energy in 2012. This
translates into global greenhouse gas emissions of 5.5 tCO2e per
capita. CT’s energy supply profile is dominated by o