24

CISM Science Seminar Oct. 14, 2004

  • Upload
    carnig

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CISM Science Seminar Oct. 14, 2004. Fluid Dynamics of CME Expansion and Propagation. George Siscoe. 1. Statement of problem: Distinction between CME formation and CME propagation. 2. Why is this problem interesting and important?. 3. Relevance to CISM. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004
Page 2: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004
Page 3: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

In both cases we want something like this:

Page 4: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004
Page 5: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

COSMICAL MAGNETIC FIELDS

THEIR ORIGIN ANDTHEIR ACTIVITY

BY

E. N. PARKER

CLARENDON PRESS . OXFORD1979

“It cannot be emphasized too strongly that the development of a solid understanding of the magnetic activity, occurring in so many forms in so many circumstances in the astronomical universe, can be achieved only by coordinated study of the various forms of activity that are accessible to quantitative observation in the solar system.”

SpaceWeatherSpace

Weather

Page 6: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

• Test of CISM interactive dual line of concept

• New product in the empirical model line

Sun CoronaSolarWind

Mag-Sphere

Iono-Sphere

CISM Physics-Based, Numerical Models Program

Flares SEPsShockArrival

Rad.Ap, Dst

ElectronProfile

CISM Empirical-Based, Forecast Models Program

Need for better1-to-3 day

CMEforecasts achieved

Page 7: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

• Chen: First analytical sun-to-earth expansion-propagation model

• Gopalswamy: Empirical quantification of CME deceleration• Reiner: Constant drag coefficient gives wrong velocity

profile• Cargill: Systematic numerical modeling of drag problem• Owens/Gosling: CME expansion continues to 1 AU and

beyond

Page 8: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

• A CME is a bounded volume of space (i.e., it has a definite position and shape, both of which may change in time)

• The CME volume contains prescribed amounts of magnetic flux and mass, which remain constant in time but vary from one CME to another.

• The forces involved are the sum of magnetic and particle pressures acting on the surface of the CME.

• The volume that defines a CME expands under excess pressure inside compared to outside, and it rises under excess pressure outside below compared to above (generalized buoyancy).

• The life of a CME for our purpose starts as a magnetically over-pressure, prescribed initial volume (e.g., by sudden conversion of a force-free field to non-force free)

• Expansion, buoyancy and drag determine all subsequent dynamics

Page 9: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

CME

PropagationExpansionSun

CME

Page 10: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Sun/Corona• Initial size ~ Initial height ~ 0.05 Rs• Ambient B field = 1.6 Gauss (falls off as 1/r2)• Ambient density =2.5x109 protons/cm3 (falls off hydrostatically with

temperature 7x105 K)• Speed range: sub-ambient to > 2000 km/s• Acceleration: ~ outer corona; 200 m/s2 typical in inner corona (up to

1000 m/s2) (solar gravity = 274 m/s2)• Problem of “slow risers”• Three phases of CME dynamics

Jie Zhang data

Page 11: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Sun

Pre-CMEGrowthPhase

InflationaryPhase

ICME

r(t)

Geometrical Dilation + Radial Expansion Phase

Page 12: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

So

lar

Win

d S

pee

d (

km/s

)

1 A

U

Distance in Rs

Ambient MediumSlow Solar Wind

Hydrodynamic solar wind with Tcorona= 6x105 K, =1.1, density at 1 AU=5/cc

Density matched to hydrostatic value with n=3x108/cc at 1.5x105 km height and T=7x106 K and constant. Densities matched at 25 Rs.

Parker B field with B=5 nT at 1 AU.

Page 13: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Constraints on Interplanetary CME Propagation

Gopalswamy et al., GRL 2000: statistical analysis of CME deceleration between ~15 Rs and 1 AU

Reiner et al. Solar Wind 10 2003: constraint on form of drag term in equation of motion

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

drag Cd ρ (V-Vsw)2 Standard Form

Observed

Page 14: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Constraints on ICME Parameters at 1 AU

Vršnak and Gopalswamy, JGR 2002: velocity range at 1 AU << than at ~ 15 Rs

Owen et al. 2004: expansion speed ICME speed; B field uncorrelated with speed; typical size ~ 40 Rs

Lepping et al, Solar Physics, 2003: Average density ~ 11/cm2; average B ~ 13 nT

Accelerate

Decelerate

350 400 450 500 550 600

20

40

60

80

Vexp = 0.266 Vcme – 71.61

Page 15: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Equation for Expansion:Pressure Inside – Pressure Outside = (Ambient Mass Density) x (Rate of Expansion)2

Equation for Acceleration:(Mass of CME + “Virtual Mass”) x Acceleration = Force of Gravity +

Outside Magnetic Pressure on Lower Surface Area – Same on Upper Surface Area + Ditto for Outside Particle Pressure – Drag Term

Input Parameters: Poloidal Magnetic Field Strength (Bo); Ratio of density inside to outside (η);

Drag Coefficient (Cd); Inflation Expansion Factor (f)

Equations as Expressed in Mathematica

Page 16: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Bo = 6 Gauss, η = 0.7, f = 10, Cd = 2 Tanh(β)

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Gopalswamy Template

drag Cd ρ (V-Vsw)2 Standard Form

Observed

Reiner Template

The Shape Fits

Page 17: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

Baseline Casew/Magnetic Buoyancy

No Magnetic Buoyancy

Magnetic Buoyancy Fits ReinerTemplate Better

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Equations as Expressed in Mathematica

Page 18: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Baseline Casew/Virtual Mass

No Virtual Mass

Virtual Mass Fits Gopalswamy Template Better

Equations as Expressed in Mathematica

Page 19: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

Baseline Case

Cd = 2

50 100 150 200

0.5

1

1.5

2

Cd = 2 fails the Reiner Template

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

and the Gopalswamy Template

Baseline Case

Cd = 2

Page 20: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

Front-to-Back Thickness in AU

Typical Value at 1 AU ~ 0.2

Field and Density at 1 AU

Baseline Observed

Field 9.4 nT ~13 nT

Density 13.7 cm-3 ~11 cm-3

Page 21: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

1.5

2

2.5

3

Model-Predicted Solar Latitude Width Relative to Initial Width

10, not 3, is the desired number

50 100 150 200

20

40

60

80

100

Expansion Velocity km/s

36 km/s at 1 AUComp. 108 km/s by Owen’s Formula

2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20

50

100

150

200

250

300

CME Acceleration m/s2

Jie Zhang data

Acceleration Agrees

Page 22: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

Variation with Bo (in Gauss)

6(Baseline)

8

10

4Reduced Speed Range

As Observed

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Variation with Density Ratio (η)

0.7(Baseline)

0.4

2.0

4.0 Density at 1 AU = 70 cm-3

50 100 150 200

200

400

600

800

1000

Variation with Inflation Factor (f)

10(Baseline)

6

3Density at 1 AU = 45

Tradeoff between density ratio and inflation factor:N/B|1AU = 116 η/(f Bo)

Page 23: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004

50 100 150 200

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Slow RiserSolar Wind

Bo = 6 Gauss as in Baselinef = 7Density Ratio = 4

Accelerate

Decelerate

Cd = 1000 and Constant

Page 24: CISM Science Seminar  Oct. 14, 2004