32
Circular Magnetron Thursday, 17 November 2011

Circular Magnetron - KCMCkcmc.biz/v2/download/GENCOA/Circular_magentron_gencoa.pdf · –Conventional 2 pole magnetic design –Confined plasma ... • Sputter Chimney • Gas injection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Circular Magnetron

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Basic features

• Target Size– 2”, 3”, 4”, 6”, 8”, 10”, 12”, 14” & 16”

Standard 4” circular target dimensions

Targetφ BPφ2” 46 50

3” 71 75

4” 96 100

6” 146 150

8” 192 200

10” 242 250

Standard target canbe mounted by modifying the target clamp

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Basic features

• Target Fixture - clamping on diaphragm

Target Clamp

Target Assembly

SW50-2” balanced magnetron

Magnetron Body

Thursday, 17 November 2011

!"#$%&'()*+,% *"-#%&)./%)0 1,,2'("&'3$

!"#$#%&'&()*+#,#-.'*

//#$#0(%&'&()*+#,#-.'*

12#$#34*)5#3&67&%'*

89#$#57:5#;7*'+

<<=#$#>0''#>&)*#*6.?7.(

@!#$#+.0%'*#A&:(*46.(

,B$CD !4&(+&6+#?.06)*#>.6##:*(*6&'#-6.)*??7(:

,B$CD !4&(+&6+#?.06)*#>.6#7.(#&??7?4*+#+*-.?747.(

,B$ED 1&67*?#7.(#&??7?4#A&:(*47)#?46*(:45

ED$BD =(5&()*+#4&6:*4#0?*#?.06)*

ED$FD G'*&(#4&6:*4#?-044*67(:#*3*(#7(#6*&)473*#A.+*

?**#&%.3* H*&)473*#+7*'*)467)#+*-.?747.(

6” and larger target size

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Magnetic options include the following:

!"#$%&'()*+,% *"-#%&)./%)0 1,,2'("&'3$

!"#$#%&'&()*+#,#-.'*

//#$#0(%&'&()*+#,#-.'*

12#$#34*)5#3&67&%'*

89#$#57:5#;7*'+

<<=#$#>0''#>&)*#*6.?7.(

@!#$#+.0%'*#A&:(*46.(

,B$CD !4&(+&6+#?.06)*#>.6##:*(*6&'#-6.)*??7(:

,B$CD !4&(+&6+#?.06)*#>.6#7.(#&??7?4*+#+*-.?747.(

,B$ED 1&67*?#7.(#&??7?4#A&:(*47)#?46*(:45

ED$BD =(5&()*+#4&6:*4#0?*#?.06)*

ED$FD G'*&(#4&6:*4#?-044*67(:#*3*(#7(#6*&)473*#A.+*

?**#&%.3* H*&)473*#+7*'*)467)#+*-.?747.(

6” and larger target size

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Typical 2 pole magnetic design

Thursday, 17 November 2011

3D Simulation capability to improve products

3D magnetic modeling technique in hand

Plasma simulation and plasma picture (SW300FFE)

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Magnetic optionBalanced (SW) & unbalanced (PP)

• Balanced– Conventional 2 pole magnetic design– Confined plasma

• Unbalanced– 2 pole design– Increase plasma reactivity– Suitable for ion assisted coating process

• hard coating, decorative coating... etc.

Height of zero point represents the difference of degree of balance-unbalance

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Magnetic option - High Yield (HY)

• Multi-pole magnetic design• High target use - more than 40%

6” HY - SW150-HY42% from 6mm thick target

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Flatter field shape= wide erosion

Magnetic Option - HY

Thursday, 17 November 2011

2D magnetic field model for an High Yield type of design

2D magnetic field model for an standard 2 pole type of design

Comparison of standard 2 pole and high yield type magnetics

Flatter field shape= wide erosion

Magnetic Option - HY

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Variable magnets - Vtech (VT)

• Mechanically move magnets to change from balanced to unbalanced

UnbalancedBalanced

Targ

et S

urfa

ce

Zero Point

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Ion current by different unbalance

VT75

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Magnetic Option - Full Face Erosion (FFE)

• Rotating magnet array• Plasma scans all target surface• Available from 3” circular

– 3”-10” conventional FFE– 12”~ uniformity adjustable

• Cleaner target = less arcing

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Target use results SW150FFE

• 54% from the top 6mm thick Cu target

No Re-dep at centre

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Uniformity SW350FFE

75 RPM = ±10.85%

200 RPM = ±3.82%

240 RPM = ±0.66%

300 RPM = ±6.53%

0-50-100-150 50 100 150

SW350FFE - Uniformity v Rotation speed

Rotation speed can tune the uniformity (12” or larger FFE only)

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Magnetic Option - Dual (AS)

Circular magnetron can do dual operation too

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Mechanical options

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Standard Internal and External mount

Thursday, 17 November 2011

SW75 with shutter, tilt & feedthrough

SW75-I

Shutter blade

Tilt Mech.Wall mount feedthrough

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Mechanical Options

• RF high power• Tilt : ±30 degrees• Shutter• Electrical shield (RF)• Sputter Chimney• Gas injection• Anode cooling• etc...

Thursday, 17 November 2011

The options and mounting styles are almost endless – here are a selection of some of them

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Circular sources can also be assembled complete with flange plates and shutters etc

Thursday, 17 November 2011

The optimisation of the target erosion performed by repeating the simulation cycle

No Plasma test required

Repeat of magnetic design & Simulation

Thursday, 17 November 2011

SW50 Uniformity Simulation on Static 300mmOD Substrate

(Guide use only)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Radial Position, mm (half substrate)

Re

leti

ve

De

po

sit

ion

, %

TS=50 Offset= 0 Tilt=0 --> +/-96.37%

TS=150 Offset= 0 Tilt=0 --> +/-64.06%

Substrate (Rotating)

Target

TS (separation)

Off (Offset)

Tilt

SW50-300sub-M749

Thursday, 17 November 2011

SW75 uniformity simulation for 75mm dia. substrate

(Guide use only)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Radial Position, mm (half substrate)

Re

leti

ve

De

po

sit

ion

, %

TS=50 Offset= 0 Tilt= 0 --> +/- 38.24%,

+/-11.1% for 50mm dia. Substrate

TS=100 Offset= 0 Tilt= 0 --> +/-

16.08%, +/-3.99% for 50mm dia.

Substrate

Substrate

Target

TS (separation)

Off (Offset)

Tilt

SW75-803H001-Sub75-TS50&100.xls

Thursday, 17 November 2011

SW100 Uniformity Simulation

for Static substrate(only use for guidance)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 10 20 30 40 50

Radial Position, mm

Rela

tive D

ep

osit

ion

, %

50 mm Separation : +/-45.66%

75 mm Separation : +/-32.71%

100 mm Separation : +/-23.57%

125 mm Separation : +/-17.37%

150 mm Separation : +/-13.16%

175 mm Separation : +/-10.23%

200 mm Separation : +/-8.15%

SW100-100sub-M949-all.xls

Thursday, 17 November 2011

SW150HY Uniformity Real Test

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Distance from centre of target, mm

Relative deposition, %

TS=100, 3.46% on 76mm substrate, 29% on 150mm substrate

TS=50, 2.36% on 76mm substrate, 25% on 150mm substrate

S00590­TestLog.xls

GENCOA

Thursday, 17 November 2011

SW150 Uniformity Simulation

150 dia. substrate(No High Yield option included, only use for guidance)

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Radial Position, mm

Rela

tive D

ep

osit

ion

, %

Sep=50 on axis : +/-59.8%

Sep=100 on axis : +/-37.75%

Sep=150 on axis : +/-23.97%

Sep=200 on axis : +/-15.96%

Sep=250 on axis : +/-11.18%

SW150-150sub-M743-onAxis-all.xls

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Thank you.

Any questions?

Thursday, 17 November 2011