30
CII – CMAA Best Practices – Best Practitioners Wayne A. Crew Director, CII CMAA 2010 Owner’s Forum Atlanta, GA • May 4, 2010

CII – CMAA Best Practices – Best Practitioners Wayne A. Crew Director, CII CMAA 2010 Owner’s Forum Atlanta, GA May 4, 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CII – CMAABest Practices – Best Practitioners

Wayne A. CrewDirector, CII

CMAA 2010 Owner’s ForumAtlanta, GA • May 4, 2010

• A consortium of leading owners, contractors & suppliers, and academia working to improve the constructed project and the capital investment process.

• An organized research unit of the Cockrell School of Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin

History

• Established as a recommendation from The BusinessRoundtable Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness (CICE) Project to address:

– construction research

– fragmentation of the industry

• Founded in 1983 by 28 companies; now over 100 members.

• First to bring research to the engineering-construction world.

• First owner-contractor-academic research collaboration for the constructed project.

Mission• Enhance business effectiveness and

sustainability of the capital facility life cycle

• Expand the global competitive advantage of its members through:

– active involvement and participation

– effective use of CII research findings, including CII Best Practices.

PurposeTo measurably improve the delivery of capital facilities.

CII Principles

• Place a premium on safety, ethics, continuousimprovement, and leadership.

• Owner/contractor member balance.

• Promote a high level of knowledge transfer.

• Provide leadership development through member participation.

• High member involvement; small professional staff.

Owner MembersAbbottAir LiquideAir Products and ChemicalsAlcoaAmerenAmerican Transmission Co.Anheuser-Busch InBevAramco ServicesArcher Daniels Midland Barrick GoldBP AmericaBristol-Myers SquibbCargillChevronCITGO PetroleumCodelco-ChileConocoPhillipsConstellation EnergyDFW International AirportDow Chemical

DuPontEastman ChemicalEli LillyExxonMobilGlaxoSmithKlineHovensaInternational PaperKaiser PermanenteMarathon OilNASANaval Facilities Engineering

CommandNOVA ChemicalsOccidental PetroleumOntario Power GenerationPetrobrasPraxairProcter & GambleProgress EnergySaudi Basic Industries Corp

(SABIC)

Sasol TechnologyShell Global Solutions USSmithsonian InstitutionSouthern CompanySunocoTennessee Valley AuthorityTransCanada Corp.U.S. Architect of the CapitolU.S. Army Corps of

EngineersU.S. Dept. of Commerce/

NIST/Building & Fire Research Lab

U.S. Dept. of EnergyU.S. Dept. of Health &

Human ServicesU.S. Dept. of StateU.S. General Services

Administration

Contractor MembersAker SolutionsAlstom PowerAMECAtkins Faithful + GouldAZCO Baker Concrete ConstructionBarton MalowBateman EngineeringBechtel GroupBentley SystemsBIS Frucon Industrial Svcs.Black & VeatchBowen EngineeringBurns & McDonnellCB&ICCC GroupCDI Engineering SolutionsCH2M HILLCSA Group

Day & ZimmermannDresser-Rand CompanyEmerson Process Mgt.eProject ManagementFluorFoster Wheeler USAGrinaker-LTA/E+PCGross Mechanical GS E & CHargrove E & CHiltiJacobsJMJ AssociatesKBRLauren E & ConstructorsM. A. MortensonMcDermott InternationalMustangOmniware

Oracle USAParsonsPathfinderPegasus Global HoldingsR. J. MyckaS&B E & ConstructorsThe Shaw GroupSiemens EnergySNC-LavalinTechnipURS CorporationVictaulic CompanyWalbridgeWanzek ConstructionThe Weitz CompanyWorleyParsonsZachryZurich

University of AlabamaArizona State UniversityAuburn UniversityBucknell UniversityUniversity of California-BerkeleyCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiClemson UniversityUniversity of Colorado-BoulderColorado State University Columbia UniversityEast Carolina UniversityUniversity of FloridaGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of HoustonUniversity of IllinoisIowa State UniversityUniversity of KansasUniversity of KentuckyLehigh UniversityUniversity of MarylandUniversity of MichiganMississippi State University

Universities involved 1983-2009University of New MexicoNorth Carolina State UniversityNorth Dakota State UniversityOklahoma State UniversityOregon State UniversityThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of PittsburghPurdue UniversityPolytechnic UniversitySan Diego State UniversitySan Jose State UniversityStanford UniversityState University of New York-AlbanyVanderbilt UniversityVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Texas A&M UniversityThe University of Texas at Austin

(CII headquarters & founding university)University of WashingtonUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonWorcester Polytechnic Institute

CII Knowledge Processes

Knowledge

Management

Knowledge

AssessmentKnowledge

Dissemination

Knowledge

Creation

Research to define best practices, breakthroughs, and industry norms.

Dissemination through publications, implementation guides, educational materials, workshops, and conferences.

Assessment of the impact of CII practices through benchmarking.

Management, organization, and assessment of the 500-plus CII documents and publications.

A world-class leadership program for senior executive candidates in the engineering and construction industry

Program DescriptionThis intense custom-designed program offers the in-depth knowledge that will allow participants to understand and develop the broad range of leadership skills needed to realize their potential as contenders for the top capital facilities positions in their companies. The program’s innovative curriculum is comprehensive and integrated. It will fine-tune the business acumen of participants, develop executive skills, and enhance their abilities to enrich their organizations’ cultures and drive to profitability.

The curriculum focuses on how to: •Enhance executive leadership capabilities and strategic business skills. •Build collaborative relationships between owners and contractors, and with peers across the industry.•Benchmark on best practices and network with leaders from both owner and contractor companies.

10

2010 CII Annual ConferenceAugust 3-5, 2010

• Over 500 Top Industry Attendees• Presentations on:

– New CII research

– CII product implementation case studies

• New CII Initiatives– Professional Development

– Implementation

– Benchmarking

– Other

• Notable Speakers

Grand Cypress ResortOrlando, Florida

Performance Improvement Workshop Fall 2010

Focused on:• CII Product Implementation• Best Practices• New Practices

• Case Studies• Networking

Houston, TexasNovember 8-10, 2010

Benchmarking Conferences & Workshops

• Essential for implementation of reliable benchmarking process.

• Updates improvements in the online system

• Explains new metrics and interactive reports

• Delivers annual training needed to stay in tune with improvements

• Ensures greatest benefit from this valuable CII resource.

June 2-3, 2010

Abbott Park (Chicago), IL

Hosted by Abbott

High

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

-0.1

-0.24th Quartile 2nd Quartile 1st Quartile

Practice Use

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e

BetterBetter

3rd Quartile

Low

Value of Best Practices

Use of Best Practices

• Company Level VBP

• Project Level VBP

Corporate Strategy

Project Level Use of Best Practices (Tactic)

Project Performance (Bottom Line)

· Improvement culture

· Funding· Incentive· Dedicated team· …

· Front End Planning

· Zero Accident Techniques

· Constructability· ...

· Cost· Schedule· Safety· Quality· Change

Corporate CultureCulture Actively Supports the Implementation of Best Practices?

– Results of Both Owners and Contractors

6.96.2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

YesN = 27

NoN = 16

Plan

ning

11.3%

6.8

4.2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

YesN = 23

NoN = 23

Executi

on 61.9%

Corporate CultureCulture Actively Supports the Implementation of Best Practices?

– Results of Both Owners and Contractors

Owners’ Use of Front End Planning

Owners’ Use of Partnering

Owners’ Use of Change Management

Owners’ Use of Planning for Startup

Contractors’ Use of Constructability

Contractors’ Use of Planning for Startup

Capital Projects Leadership

• McKinsey & Co. (1998)

“The management of capital investment has an

enormous effect on profitability and competitiveness,

yet few companies do it effectively. We believe that

the use of evaluation tools, disciplined processes,

and best practices can help companies trim capital

spending by up to a quarter without reducing capacity

or functionality - and improve their operating costs

and revenues through better investment decisions.”

CII – CMAA

Mission StatementImprove delivery of capital facilities in all settings by

promoting the professional practice of Construction and Program Management in conjunction with the broadest possible application of recognized industry Best Practices.

25

Best Practice – Best Practitioner

CII• Dedicated to organizational transformation.

• Promotes a culture of high-quality execution in contractor (architect/engineer companies, construction companies) and owner organizations.

CMAA• Emphasis on individual

excellence.

• Established Certified Construction Manager credential.

• Solid Standards of Practice. 26

CII – A Legacy of Industry Leadership

Total Recordable Incidence Rate (TRIR)

14.30 14.20

13.00 13.1012.20

11.8010.60

9.909.50 8.80 8.60 8.30 7.90

7.10 6.80 6.40 6.30 5.90 5.40

7.196.12

5.324.31

3.44 3.002.66 2.30

1.60 1.59 1.671.03 1.02

1.23 1.16 0.88 0.72 0.58 0.68 0.53

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

325 413 477 497 527 613 644 770 518 765 995 936 1,117 1,073 1,129 1,195 1,333 1,297 1,766 1,889

To

tal R

ec

ord

ab

le In

cid

en

ce R

ate

(TR

IR)

Industry*

CII

*OSHA Construction Division, NAICS 236-238, SIC 15-17 Reflects OSHA Reporting Change

Year and Work Hours (MM)

44 Companies Reporting as of July 15, 2009

CII – A Legacy of Industry Leadership

Days Away, Restricted, and Transfer (DART) Rate

44 Companies Reporting as of July 15, 2009

6.80 6.79

6.105.80

5.50 5.50

4.904.50

4.404.00

4.20 4.10 4.00 3.803.60 3.40 3.40

3.202.80

1.90 1.551.45 1.14

0.63 0.810.55 0.45 0.31 0.41 0.27 0.26 0.23

0.460.36 0.33 0.25 0.21 0.23 0.18

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

325 413 477 497 527 613 644 888 591 763 1,122 936 1,117 1,073 1,129 1,301 1,419 1,100 1,724 1,775

DA

RT

(LW

CIR

) In

cid

en

ce

Ra

te

Industry*

CII

*OSHA Construction Division, NAICS 236-238, SIC 15-17 Reflects OSHA Reporting Change

Year and Work Hours (MM)

The Legacy Continues

Best Practices – Best Practitioners

Thank you for your attention!

Wayne A. Crew, P.E.Director

Construction Industry Institute3925 W. Braker Lane (R4500)

Austin, TX 78759-5316(512) 232 3003

[email protected]