View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Â
Citation preview
WHERE WE ARE
CICS AVALON1501 EAST 83RD PLACE
CICS BASIL1816 WEST GARFIELD BLVD.
CICS BUCKTOWN2235 NORTH HAMILTON AVENUE
CICS CHICAGOQUEST1443 N. OGDEN AVENUE
CICS IRVING PARK3820 NORTH SPAULDING DRIVE
CICS LARRY HAWKINS801 EAST 133RD PLACE
CICS LLOYD BOND13300 SOUTH LANGLEY AVENUE
CICS LONGWOOD1309 WEST 95TH STREET
CICS LOOMIS9535 SOUTH LOOMIS STREET
CICS NORTHTOWN ACADEMY3900 WEST PETERSON AVENUE
CICS PRAIRIE11530 SOUTH PRAIRIE AVENUE
CICS RALPH ELLISON1817 WEST 80TH STREET
CICS WASHINGTON PARK6105 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE
CICS WEST BELDEN2245 NORTH MCVICKER AVENUE
CICS WRIGHTWOOD8130 SOUTH CALIFORNIA AVENUE
CICS PATRIOTS615 SOUTH 5TH STREET, ROCKFORD
ACADEMIC STUDENT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
CICS ELEMENTARY
SCHOOLSUMMARY
STATISTICS NWEA GROWTH INDEX
NA
TIO
NA
L A
VE
RA
GE
(55
TH
PE
RC
EN
TIL
E)
50 75 100
2012490 =READING: 1.5 GI
450 =MATH: 2.5 GI
75
74
NA
TIO
NA
L A
VE
RA
GE
(55
TH
PE
RC
EN
TIL
E)
50 75 100
2011810 =READING: 2.2 GI
450 =MATH: 2.5 GI
87
74
NA
TIO
NA
L A
VE
RA
GE
(55
TH
PE
RC
EN
TIL
E)
50 75 100
2010850 =READING: 3.3 GI
790 =MATH: 3.3 GI
96
84
CICS HIGHSCHOOL
GRADUATION RATE
5-YEAR COHORT � ��88%2012
CPS 5-YEAR COHORT GRADUATION RATE: 57% EXCLUDES SELECTIVE ENROLLMENT
60 +720
78%MET OR
EXCEEDED ISAT STANDARDS
CPS COMPOSITE: 72.5%
INCLUDES ELL, EXCLUDES SELECTIVE ENROLLMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2
3
4
5
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
2012 CICS COLLEGE
ENROLLMENT RATE 69%
CICS AVALON421 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/2005
� LOW INCOME � 93%
680 +80 =
550 +10 =550 +110 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 68%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
76%
56%
66%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
0.1
MA
TH
1.8
CICS BASIL730 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/2002
� AFRICAN-AMERICAN & LATINO
LOW INCOME �
100%98%
620 +80 =
540 +10 550 +60 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 62%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
70%
54%
61%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
0.1
MA
TH
1.7
CICS BUCKTOWN667 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/1997
� LOW INCOME �
97%82%
740 +100 =
550 +90 =550 +150 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 74%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
84%
64%
70%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
3.4
MA
TH
4.1
CICS IRVING PARK517 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/2007
� LOW INCOME �
85%70%
790 +130 =
550 +30 =550 +100 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 79%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
92%
58%
65%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
MA
TH
2.5
CICS LLOYD BOND346 STUDENTS K–6 | OPENED 08/2009
� AFRICAN-AMERICAN
LOW INCOME � 100% 99%
580 +50 =
550 +70 =550 +110 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 58%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
63%
62%
66%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
1.1
MA
TH
2.0
CICS LONGWOOD934 STUDENTS 3–8 | OPENED 08/1997
� LOW INCOME � 85%
790 +0=
550 =550 +20 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 79%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
79%
55%
57%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75THR
EA
DIN
G
0.6
MA
TH
0.6
CICS PRAIRIE404 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/1998
� LOW INCOME � 96%
700 +20 =
550 +100 =550 +90 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 70%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
72%
65%
64%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
3.3M
AT
H
2.6
CICS WASHINGTON PARK447 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/2000
� LOW INCOME � 95%
600 +80 =
510 +40 550 +110 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 60%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
68%
51%
64%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
0.4
MA
TH
2.6
CICS WEST BELDEN500 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/2002
� LOW INCOME � 94%
710 +170 =
550 +160 =550 +280 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 71%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
88%
71%
83%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
4.4
MA
TH
6.4
ELEMENTARY ACADEMIC STUDENT PERFORMANCE 2011-2012
AFRICAN-AMERICAN,
LATINO, ASIAN
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
100%
100%
100%
99%
RE
AD
ING
1.6
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
99%
GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EXPERIENCE (GCE)1535 N DAYTON STREET | 9-12COLLABORATION EST. 09/2012GLOBALCITIZENSHIPEXPERIENCE.COM
CICS has collaborated with GCE, a partnership which features a School-within-a-School pilot that serves a cohort of students and their families who were languishing on the CICS waiting list. Today, these students are paving the way for a long-term partnership between GCE and CICS.
This, our fi rst, courageous cohort of students reaps the benefi ts and demonstrates the success of GCE’s innovative and relevant pedagogical models founded on the principles of global citizenship that are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (skills) and UN Millennium Development Goals (values). As our new CICS students are discovering, GCE aims to transform public education by cultivating graduates who are global citizens —demonstrating purpose, autonomy, accountability, gratitude, and through each of these, achievement.
We invite you to learn more about the CICS/GCE students who explore integrated curriculum taught through inquiry and project-based learning. Please schedule your visit to GCE HS, host our students on fi eld experience, or interact with these students on their digital portfolios that they curate on GCEVoices.com.
CICS LARRY HAWKINS426 STUDENTS 7-12OPENED 09/2010
Named by community members to honor the life of Dr. Larry Hawkins, a prominent advocate for Chicago youth. The opening of CICS Lloyd Bond and CICS Larry Hawkins provides a K-12 continuum for residents in and around the Altgeld Gardens neighborhood. CICS Larry Hawkins believes that all children should be provided the same opportunities to learn and that all students, when properly supported, can learn. CICS Larry Hawkins believes in providing a safe, nurturing environment in which students can grow intellectually, socially and emotionally.
19% SC
OR
ED
>
20
ON
AC
T
43% SC
OR
ED
>
20
ON
AC
T
20% SC
OR
ED
>
20
ON
AC
T
17 AV
ER
AG
E
AC
T S
CO
RE
19.3 AV
ER
AG
E
AC
T S
CO
RE
17.1 AV
ER
AG
E
AC
T S
CO
RE
85% 5-Y
R C
OH
OR
T
GR
AD
UA
TIO
N R
AT
E
96% 5-Y
R C
OH
OR
T
GR
AD
UA
TIO
N R
AT
E
83% 5-Y
R C
OH
OR
T
GR
AD
UA
TIO
N R
AT
E
CPS AVERAGE* 16.5 CPS AVERAGE* 16.5 CPS AVERAGE* 16.5CPS AVERAGE 57% CPS AVERAGE 57% CPS AVERAGE 57%
CICS LONGWOOD538 STUDENTS 9–12 | OPENED 08/1997
CICS NORTHTOWN ACAD832 STUDENTS 9–12 | OPENED 08/2003
CICS RALPH ELLISON532 STUDENTS 9–12 | OPENED 08/2006
COLLEGE ACCEPTANCE RATE COLLEGE ACCEPTANCE RATE COLLEGE ACCEPTANCE RATE
95% 85% 93%
� � � AFRICAN-AMERICAN
LOW INCOME
LOW INCOME
LOW INCOME� � � 100% 85% 76% 80%
HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC STUDENT PERFORMANCE 2011-2012
CICS WRIGHTWOOD692 STUDENTS K–8 | OPENED 08/2005
� LOW INCOME � 88%
710 +120 =
490 +60 550 +40 =
ISAT COMPOSITECPS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPOSITE 71%
NATIONAL AVERAGE 55%
82%
49%
59%
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
0.5
MA
TH
1.4
CICS LOOMIS PRIMARY577 STUDENTS K–2 | OPENED 08/2008
� LOW INCOME � 96%
550 =
550 =550 =
ISAT COMPOSITENOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
N/A
N/A
N/A
NWEA READING
NWEA MATH
MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS
MEET TARGET
MEET TARGET
NWEA GROWTH INDEX AS COMPARED WITH NATIONAL PERFORMANCEPERCENTILES
25TH 50TH 75TH
RE
AD
ING
2.2
MA
TH
3.2
CICS ChicagoQuest serves students in grades 6-8 and will open a new grade each subsequent year. CICS Chicago-Quest is a revolutionary charter school where middle- and high-school students are challenged and engaged with a curriculum based on principles of digital learning and game design. CICS ChicagoQuest is designed to prepare its students for college, career, and sophisticated participation in an evolving world.
CICS CHICAGO QUEST220 STUDENTS 6–8OPENED 09/2011
CICS Patriots serves students in grades K-6 and will open a new grade each subsequent year. This is CICS’s fi rst campus outside of Chicago. CICS Patriots focuses on data-informed decision making to best meet the needs of all students. Director Amanda Rychel has been educating students in CICS Schools for the past 8 years, and is focused on providing a high-quality education to prepare students for college and beyond.
CICS PATRIOTS349 STUDENTS K–6OPENED 08/2010
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
93%
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
100%
CICS NEW CAMPUS BACKGROUND
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
& LATINO
100%75%
*THIS FIGURE DOES NOT INCLUDE SELECTIVE ENROLLMENT SCHOOLS
AFRICAN-AMERICAN,
LATINO, ASIAN
YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2012 JUNE 30, 2012 JUNE 30, 2011
REVENUEChicago Public Schools
Per Capita Revenue & Other Funds 71,183,924 67,069,861
Special Services 5,928,918 5,438,054
Grant Commitments & Other Contributions 6,994,282 3,649,409
Investment Income 95,557 225,000
School Lunch Program (Longwood Campus) - 141,553
Other 3,564,305 1,465,451TOTAL REVENUE 87,766,986 77,989,328
EXPENSESOperating Funds to EMOs 66,718,491 62,604,770
Longwood Campus Expenses - -
Administrative Expenses 2,762,982 2,141,091
Facility Maintenance & Capital Expenses 1,094,602 858,871
Rent, Utilities & Property Taxes 3,031,023 1,494,092
Debt Service 2,447,302 2,482,730
Grant Expense 2,292,370 2,420,484
Insurance Expense 199,861 174,404
Direct Campus Expenses - 78,145
Depreciation & Amortization 3,316,732 2,660,191
TOTAL EXPENSES 81,863,362 74,914,778
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 5,903,624 3,074,550
820
+
80 + 40 + 30 + 30 +
0+082% OPERATING FUNDS TO EMOs
8%FACILITIES EXPENSES
4%DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
3%ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
3%GRANT EXPENSE
<1%INSURANCE EXPENSEDIRECT CAMPUS EXPENSES
810
+
80 + 70 + 40
+081% PER CAPITA REVENUE & OTHER FUNDS
8%GRANT COMMITMENTS & OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS
7%SPECIAL SERVICES
4%OTHER
<1% INVESTMENT INCOME
REVENUE FY2012 EXPENSES FY2012
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2012 JUNE 30, 2012 JUNE 30, 2011
ASSETS Cash 7,611,467 3,815,729
Accounts Receivable 5,325,460 2,707,877
Investments 7,734,393 12,561,783
Prepaids 220,117 170,691
Other Current Assets 6,590,943 7,160,032
Fixed Assets 50,169,661 47,031,754
Other Non Current Assets 659,388 645,527TOTAL ASSETS 78,311,430 74,093,392
LIABILITIESAccounts Payable 1,499,674 73,765
Accrued Liabilities 3,359,325 4,989,130
Loans Payable—Current 331,003 331,003
Other Current Liabilities 485,102 560,382
Notes Payable 300,262 540,262
Bond Payable 48,493,758 49,552,447TOTAL LIABILITIES 54,469,123 56,046,989
NET ASSETS Board Designated 309,077 931,953
Operating Surplus/Loss 23,533,230 17,114,451
TOTAL NET ASSETS 23,842,307 18,046,403
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS 78,311,430 74,093,392
Note: 2012 fi gures are based on CICS’s unaudited fi nancial statements for the year ended June 30, 2012. Once the independent audits have been prepared, a complete copy of those statements is available by contacting CICS.
� �� �� � �� ��� �� �� ��� ����� �� ��� ��
64%FIXEDASSETS
10%INVESTMENTS
10%CASH
8%OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
7% ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
1% OTHER NON- CURRENTASSETS
� �� 0% PREPAIDS
ASSETS FY2012
� �� �� ��� ����� �� ��� ����� �� � ��
89%BONDPAYABLE
6%ACCRUEDLIABILITIES
3%ACCOUNTSPAYABLE
1%LOANSPAYABLE: CURRENT
1% OTHER CURRENTLIABILITIES
0% NOTESPAYABLE
LIABILITIES FY2012
BALANCE SHEET
YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2012 JUNE 30, 2012 JUNE 30, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Change in Net Assets 5,903,624 2,758,277
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 3,321,712 2,660,191
Forgiveness of Debt & Bad Debt Expense (240,000) (253,763)
Loss on sale of investments (6,000) 38
Loss on disposition of fi xed assets (98,071) -
Fair Market Value Adjmt. on Investments 82,199 33,071
Change in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts & Grants Receivable (2,617,583) (969,982)
Interest Receivable (124,453) 9,123
Deposits & Prepaid Expenses (35,775) (40,360)
Proceeds from Insurance 111,425
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses (311,617) 2,927,405
Deferred Rent & Deferred Liability (75,281) 39,839CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 5,910,180 7,163,839
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchase of securities (12,538,366.46) (50,996,644.27)
Amortization of investment premium/discount 180,426.00 1,239.40
Proceeds from sale of securities 17,329,851.34 43,676,929.46
Expenditures for assets not in service (13,860.78) 417,996.47
Purchase of Property & Equipment 111,424.55 (603,613)
Capitalized Expenditure (6,576,382.91) (4,871,163.72)CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (1,506,908) (11,771,643)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Bond Interest Income (152,461) (157,941)
Transfer of Cash: Bond Repair & Replacement Reserve 343,520) (400,000)
Proceeds from IFF Loan & Loan Costs (81,470) 218,625
Bond Interest Payments (760,620) (747,079)
Capital Improvement Projects 730,538 270,442CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES (607,533) (815,953)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 3,795,739 (5,423,757)
Anne and Bill Tobey have been invaluable
friends and supporters of Chicago Interna-
tional Charter School with a demonstrated
passion for education equality and the CICS
mission. In addition to his support of CICS,
Bill is also active in his support of the Daniel
Murphy Scholarship Foundation and various
cultural institutions in Chicago. Splitting their
time between Chicago and Colorado, Anne
and Bill are also dedicated to their support
of Aspen Public Radio, The Aspen Commu-
nity Foundation, the Pre-Collegiate Program,
English in Action, and the Aspen Institute.
The Tobeys’ relationship with CICS began
through Bill’s involvement on the board of
directors at The Daniel Murphy Scholarship
Fund (DMSF). At DMSF, Bill met individuals
who were also active with Chicago Inter-
national Charter School and learned about
a CICS initiative to expand access to 21st
Century Technology in the classroom.
He saw that CICS was moving the dial.
“I can’t help but believe that all the things
you’re doing is making things better than
the norm for public education.”
His reasons for deciding to support CICS
were much like those that brought him to
DMSF in the fi rst place. Much like DMSF,
CICS is also providing high-quality education
options for underserved students and fami-
lies. Bill has stated that he, “support(s) edu-
cation because unequal opportunities exist.
When students have a poor start it deprives
us of great minds in the future. We need to
reach for every mind that we can. We can’t
afford to not do something.” Bill also sees
the advantages in the ability of charters to
try new ideas and replicate those which are
found to be successful. “With new ideas it’s
not the same top-down approach. And when
ideas do work, they’ll spread.”
Bill would like to see a day when the norm
for public education is excellence. “When I
joined Daniel Murphy I asked them: Is your
objective to go out of business? You should
be able to reach the point where you don’t
have to provide scholarships anymore,
because public education is doing the job it
should.” Anne and Bill truly personify the be-
lief that providing a quality education for all
students is really an investment in the future
of our city, and for that, everyone at Chicago
International Charter School is truly grateful.
FUNDER PROFILE | ANNE & BILL TOBEY
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW
$100,000 and aboveCharter School Growth Fund
Michael & Susan Dell Foundation
John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
New Schools for Chicago
Walton Family Foundation
$10,000- $99,999The Broad Center
Children’s Inner City Educational Fund
Susan Crown
Patty & Craig Henderson
Illinois Clean Energy Foundation Grant Program
The Mayer & Morris Kaplan Family Foundation
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Keiser Donor Advised Fund at The Chicago Community Trust
Anne & Bill Tobey
$5,000- $9,999Carol Lavin Bernick Family Foundation
Martin & Mary L. Boyer Foundation
Bob & Pamela Delaney
Philip & Regan Friedmann
The Lowe’s Charitable and Educational Foundation
National Center For Philanthropy
Mr. & Mrs. Roger Nelson
$1,000- $4,999Accenture
Lorraine Arvin
Fred Blesi
Chicago Foundation for Education
Debbie & David Chizewer
Tim & Allison Coleman
Gorter Family Foundation
Catherine & Richard Gottfred
Brian Lee
Vivian Lee
Anne Matz
Roger S. McEniry
Mr. Richard J. Metzler
Thomas Nieman
ORBA, Certifi ed Public Accountants and Consultants, Jim Quaid, Director
Pass with Flying Colors
Ms. Rebecca Steffes
Laura Thonn
$500- $999Anonymous (2)
John A. Bollero Jr.
Ben Crist
Phil Dodson
DonorsChoose.org
Nancy Gidwitz & Jeff Grossman
Oppenheimer Family Foundation
Tom Spalding
Janet W. Nieman
The Joseph Valenti Jr. Family Foundation
$250- $499The Adikes Family Foundation
Violet and Anthony Clark
Ms. Pamela J. Flowers-Thomas
Tom Hayden
Deborah Monson
Target Foundation
$100- $249Anonymous
Academy of Our Lady Alumnae Association
Donnet Downer-Thomas
Isabel’s Bowl for Hope
Naomi Maldonado
Homi B. Patel
Ben and Ginevra Ranney
Robert W. Thomas
Patricia & John Zeeman
up to $100Anonymous
Vince Campise
Dunbar Alumni Class of 1980
Mary E. Gleason
Jewell Hamilton
Victor & Beverly Horne
Anne Kerr
Audrey & Michael Lang
Hagai Livni
Richarlena Mary-Taylor
Pamela McCarthy
Nelson Montanez
Tonya K. Myers
Martha Polley
Brooke Proto
Katherine Reing
Henry & Peggy Troast
Myrtle Terrell
Al Wordlaw
In Kind ContributionsAlternative Garden Supply
Education Pioneers
Glencoe PTO
Goldberg Kohn
Craig Henderson & Associates
Pass With Flying Colors & Discovery Clothing
DonorsChoose.org
Illinois Department of Natural Resources
Matching Gift CompaniesThe Boston Consulting Group
Illinois Tool Works Foundation
Nuveen Investments Inc.
PwC
Board of DirectorsLorraine J. Arvin
David J. Chizewer President
Violet M. Clark
Catherine H. Gottfred, PhD
Tom Hayden
Craig W. Henderson Vice President
Gerald L. Jenkins
Alberta Johnson
Thomas J. Nieman Secretary
Laura Thonn Treasurer
BOLD DENOTES FOUNDING BOARD MEMBERS
THANKS TO ALL WHO GAVE GENEROUSLY THIS YEAR